Prise en charge de la prééclampsie dans un réseau de périnatalité

Identifying predictive factors for admitting patients with severe pre-eclampsia to intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Traditional obstetric units are inadequate for the level of monitoring required in pre-eclamptic patients. It remains to be determined which facility and tools should be implemented. The aim of this work was to identify predictive factors of admission to Intensive Care Unit (ICU) admissions for pregnancy-related hypertensive complications.

METHODS

We conducted an observational, retrospective multicenter study (Toulouse, Nantes). Both have a level III maternity unit and an ICU. The selected patients had one or more of the following diagnoses on admission in the ICU or during hospitalization: pre-eclampsia, eclampsia, HELLP syndrome, Acute Fatty Liver of Pregnancy (AFLP), Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome (HUS). SAPS II, SOFA and APACHE II on admission, and a validated nursing workload assessment score: TISS 28, were collected.

RESULTS

211 parturient women were included. According to the multivariate analysis: APACHE II and SAPS 2 severity scores >15 were significantly higher in the TISS 28 ≥ 20 group. There were also higher rates of uricemia >360 mmol/l.

CONCLUSIONS

To date, there are no reliable and validated predictive factors of severity to guide the transfer of pre-eclamptic patients to an ICU. The combination of an increased APACHE II score and uricemia, as well as a high care workload score that could help with the transfer of high-risk pre-eclamptic patients to a specific care facility. This hypothesis should be tested prospectively. This work could incite reflection on the value of creating obstetric intensive care units, according to the size of the maternity unit.

[Not Available]

The General Practitioner has a role in monitoring women with hypertension during pregnancy, for all women presenting with pre-existing chronic hypertension, a personal history of preeclampsia or with pregnancy-induced hypertension. It may be designated coordinator of monitoring during the first two quarters if he has the skills. Monitoring will then be performed in close coordination with other practitioners with a Personal Pregnancy Care-Plan notebook. Other complications and, in particular, the occurrence of proteinuria, require immediate recourse to the gynaecologist-obstetrician who will become the monitoring coordinator. The coordination of the monitoring will be the responsibility of the gynaecologist-obstetrician from the 3rd trimester.

Second-trimester uterine artery Doppler, PlGF, sFlt-1, sEndoglin, and lipid-related markers for predicting preeclampsia in a high-risk population

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to determine if screening for preeclampsia could be improved between 20 and 24 weeks of gestation by uterine artery Doppler (UAD), biomarkers and lipid-related markers.

METHOD

Women at high risk of preeclampsia according to obstetric and medical characteristics and history were prospectively enrolled. Transabdominal UAD, serum biomarkers (placenta growth factor (PlGF), soluble Fms-like tyrosine kinase-1 and sEndoglin) and lipid-related markers (total and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, triglycerides and leptin) were prospectively collected between 20 and 24 weeks of gestation. The main endpoint was preeclampsia. UAD indices and biomarker levels were compared for the groups with and without preeclampsia. Multivariate analyses took into account the laboratory and ultrasound variables significantly associated with preeclampsia in the univariate analysis and age and nulliparity.

RESULTS

The study at Tours University Hospital took place from March 2003 to February 2008 and included 235 women: 56 (23.8%) developed preeclampsia, 42 were severe (17.8%) and 14 occurred before 34 weeks of gestation (5.9%). The group with preeclampsia had a higher UAD pulsatility index (p = 0.0003), more frequent bilateral notches (p = .0001), lower PlGF levels (239.90 vs 302.00 pg/mL; p = 0.0015), and higher triglyceride (1.95 vs 1.70 mmol/l; p = 0.0068) and leptin levels (37.40 vs 22.55 ng/mL; p = < 0.001). No significant differences were observed for other markers. Screening for preeclampsia using these Doppler and laboratory findings produced an area under the curve of 0.795.

CONCLUSION

Second-trimester UAD findings, and PlGF, triglyceride and leptin levels could help to predict preeclampsia.

[Prehospital management of severe preeclampsia]

Prior to transport, agreement must be reached among all the senior medical staff members involved in the transfer. Tight clinical surveillance is necessary during the transport. The aim of the pharmacological control of a severe hypertension is to allow a moderate reduction of the mean arterial blood pressure as well as dampening the large pressure variations. Boluses of calcium channel inhibitors, eventually combined with labetalol, are to be used as first line treatment. Systematic fluid expansion prior to admission is not recommended. However, it is indicated if obvious signs of hypovolaemia are present, such as a sudden drop in blood pressure, secondary to the initiating of an antihypertensive therapy. It is possible to use i.v. benzodiazepines for the treatment of eclampsia in the prehospital setting. If magnesium sulfate therapy has been initiated in a preeclamptic woman with neurological signs, it may be continued during her transport.