Mesure de l’anxiété et du besoin d’informations préopératoire en six questions

Effects of Preoperative Anxiety on Postoperative Outcomes and Sleep Quality in Patients Undergoing Laparoscopic Gynecological Surgery

OBJECTIVE

Preoperative anxiety is a psychological state that commonly occurs before surgery and may have a negative impact on postoperative outcomes. This study aimed to investigate the effects of preoperative anxiety on postoperative sleep quality and recovery outcomes among patients undergoing laparoscopic gynecological surgery.

METHODS

The study was conducted as a prospective cohort study. A total of 330 patients were enrolled and underwent laparoscopic gynecological surgery. After assessing the patient's preoperative anxiety score on the APAIS scale, 100 patients were classified into the preoperative anxiety (PA) group (preoperative anxiety score > 10) and 230 patients into the non-preoperative-anxiety (NPA) group (preoperative anxiety score ≤ 10). The Athens Insomnia Scale (AIS) was assessed on the night before surgery (Sleep Pre 1), the first night after surgery (Sleep POD 1), the second night after surgery (Sleep POD2), and the third night after surgery (Sleep POD 3). Postoperative pain was evaluated by the Visual Analog Scale (VAS), and the postoperative recovery outcomes and adverse effects were also recorded.

RESULT

The AIS score in the PA group was higher than that of the NPA group at Sleep-pre 1, Sleep POD 1, Sleep POD 2, and Sleep POD 3 (p < 0.05). The VAS score was higher in the PA group than in the NPA group within 48 h postoperatively (p < 0.05). In the PA group, the total dosage of sufentanil was significantly higher, and more rescue analgesics were required. Patients with preoperative anxiety showed a higher incidence of nausea, vomiting, and dizziness than those without preoperative anxiety. However, there was no significant difference in the satisfaction rate between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

The perioperative sleep quality of patients with preoperative anxiety is worse than that of patients without preoperative anxiety. Moreover, high preoperative anxiety is related to more severe postoperative pain and an increased requirement for analgesia.

Arabic Validation of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale

Background

Preoperative anxiety is a frequent and challenging problem that may impact a patient's postoperative pain and satisfaction. The level of a patient's anxiety needs to be assessed through a valid and reliable instrument to prevent and treat preoperative anxiety effectively. One such reliable measurement scale is Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and information scale, which is based on a self-reported questionnaire but is still not validated in Arabic.

Objective

To validate the Arabic Version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) for assessing preoperative anxiety in the Arabic population.

Methods

A cross-sectional study was conducted to translate and evaluate the validity of the APAIS in the Arabic version. The targeted population was Saudi adults undergoing surgery at the King Fahad Hospital in the Qassim region of Saudi Arabia. One hundred hospital patients were recruited and given the APAIS questionnaire to collect the data. The ethical considerations have been appropriately followed to protect the privacy of the patient's history. The collected data was qualitative and quantitative, which were analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS).

Results

The questionnaire showed high internal consistency on the anxiety scale (Cronbach's alpha: 0.851) and a strong correlation between age, chronic diseases, and surgery. While Cronbach's alpha for the information scale is 0.827. The gold standard curve between the worried and afraid two variables showed good efficiency during the configuration. In addition, the Confirmatory Factor Analysis (CFA) model of the Arabic version is a two-factor model to evaluate the validity of the Arabic version.

Conclusion

The Arabic Version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and information scale (APAIS) is a valid and reliable instrument for assessing preoperative anxiety. Using this validated scale for Arabic patients is feasible and shows promising results.

Does increased patient comprehension decrease preoperative anxiety before digestive surgery?

BACKGROUND

There exists a misalignment between the information given by a surgeon and the information retained by the patient. Inability to assimilate relevant information can be a factor of preoperative anxiety. The aim of this study was to assess patients' information retention according to a Fédération de Chirurgie Viscérale et Digestive (FCVD) questionnaire.

MATERIALS

From 29 June 2020 to 2 August 2020, a prospective, comparative multicenter study was conducted among 89 patients who were about to undergo digestive surgery. They were included either in a standard group (management in accordance with the usual French guidelines) or experimental group, which received a second consultation, one week before surgery. The day before being operated, all the patients filled out 3 questionnaires analyzing their percentage of retention according to two scales: the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and information Scale (APAIS) and the visual analogue scale for anxiety (VAS-A).

RESULTS

Patient comprehension of the FCVD information was 94% and 63% in the experimental and the control groups, respectively (P<0.001). The standard group was significantly more anxious than the experimental group, with VAS-A rates of 6.2 and 4.6 (P=0.014), respectively. On the other hand, according to the APAIS scale, they were similarly anxious, with scores of 11.3 versus 11.9, respectively (P=0.200).

CONCLUSION

A second transmission of exhaustive information shortly before digestive surgery was conducive to improved retention. Enhanced comprehension and memorization reduced preoperative anxiety.

Feelings, preoperative anxiety, and need for information in patients undergoing intravitreal injections

PURPOSE

To assess feelings, preoperative anxiety, and need for information in patients undergoing intravitreal injections (IVI).

METHODS

An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in our tertiary university care center between December 2017 and December 2018. Consecutive patients undergoing IVI were included. A paper survey was completed before and after IVI to assess patient experience. Preoperative anxiety and need for information were assessed using the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety Information Scale (APAIS) score.

RESULTS

Hundred patients with a median age of 76.5 years (42-95, SD = 10.1) were included. Median best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) in both eyes was 0.4 logMAR. Main IVI indications were wet age-related macular degeneration (n = 58), diabetic macular edema (n = 19), and venous occlusion (n = 16). The IVI most unpleasant steps were as follows: using an eyelid retractor, needle entry, changing of physician from one IVI to another, the pre-IVI waiting time, and the high number of IVI required for disease control. Preoperative anxiety (APAIS score ≥ 11) was correlated in the multivariate analysis with the need for information (p = 0.004), changing of ophthalmologist between different IVI sessions (p = 0.006), and pain expected before the IVI (p = 0.010). The need for information (APAIS score ≥ 5) was only associated with the preoperative anxiety in the multivariate analysis (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Preoperative anxiety and need for information are common in patients undergoing IVI even after many IVI. Being injected by different practitioners was strongly correlated with preoperative anxiety and should be avoided as much as possible. Better educational and information programs are needed.

Use of pre-operative anxiety score to determine the precise dose of butorphanol for intra-operative sedation under regional anesthesia: A double-blinded randomized trial

A randomized double-blinded controlled trial was performed to explore the association between pre-operative anxiety and intra-operative butorphanol requirement to evaluate the precise sedative requirement and to confirm the sedative effect of butorphanol in patients receiving lower-limb orthopedic surgery. The Amsterdam pre-operative anxiety and information scale and the Ramsay sedation score (RSS) were used to assess the patients' pre-operative anxiety score and sedation state during surgery. Patients were divided into two groups according to their pre-operative anxiety score prior to administration of pre-medication. Patients in each group were randomly divided into a butorphanol group and a 0.9% saline group. A total of 142 patients were enrolled and 131 patients were analyzed. The sedation scores of patients with high pre-operative anxiety in the 0.9% saline group were lower than those in the butorphanol group at each time-point after infusion. An increased pre-operative anxiety score predicted an increased duration to reach an RSS of 4 for an acceptable level of sedation (r²=0.887, P<0.0001). In conclusion, butorphanol had a good sedative effect on patients with pre-operative anxiety. The following formula was proposed: Precise dose of butorphanol (µg/kg)=15.26 + (0.14× pre-operative anxiety score), which may provide an improvement for patients exhibiting a high level of pre-operative anxiety. The trial was registered prior to patient enrollment at clinicaltrials.gov on 20.01.2018 (trial registration no. NCT03429179).

The position of a written document in preoperative information for pediatric surgery: A randomized controlled trial on parental anxiety, knowledge, and satisfaction

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative information is a legal and ethical obligation. Very little studies have evaluated the preoperative information method in pediatrics. Having a child operated on is stressful for the parents. Improving information is a way to lower their anxiety. Our study aims to measure the impact of a leaflet, which supports spoken information on parental anxiety, the comprehension-memorization of the information and their satisfaction.

MATERIALS & METHODS

Prospective study including 178 patients of outpatient surgery, randomized in two groups: spoken information versus spoken information supported by a leaflet, which is then handed out to the parents. The messages were identical: physiopathology, risks without treatment, surgical technique and its possible complications, description of the hospitalization day, and postoperative care. Parental evaluation was made with self-questionnaires after the preoperative consultation, then on the day of surgery. At each moment we evaluated the level of anxiety, satisfaction of information quality and the comprehension-memorization of the data.

RESULTS

Written information significantly improves the scores of comprehension-memorization, parental satisfaction and significantly decreases the level of anxiety.

CONCLUSION

Significant impact of the written document as communication support in pediatric surgery, validating the method and encouraging it to be generalized to other pediatric surgery acts.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

TYPE OF STUDY

Prognosis study.

Validity and Reliability of the Czech Version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS)

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to validate the Czech version of the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale (APAIS) in adult patients undergoing elective surgery.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

METHODS

Data were collected from July 2012 to January 2013. For reliability and validity testing, two instruments measuring preoperative anxiety were administered to the participants on the same occasion, (APAIS and the Spielberg State Anxiety Inventory (STAI-S)). The sample consisted of 344 patients undergoing elective surgery.

FINDINGS

Reliability of APAIS anxiety subscale measured by Cronbach's alpha was 0.91. Reliability of APAIS information subscale measured by Cronbach's alpha was 0.78. The APAIS anxiety subscale correlated significantly with the STAI-S (0.69). Women scored significantly higher on anxiety scales than men.

CONCLUSIONS

APAIS may be a useful tool to measure preoperative anxiety in Czech patients undergoing elective surgery.

[Prevalence and causes of pain after cataract surgery: Comparison of 1st and 2nd eyes]

INTRODUCTION

In our practice, patients undergoing bilateral cataract surgery complain of more significant pain after the 2nd eye surgery. The goal of this study was to compare postoperative pain between the 1st and 2nd eyes with cataract surgery under topical anesthesia and to identify the causes of this pain.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational study between May and September 2015. We included 69 consecutive adults scheduled for bilateral cataract surgery under topical anesthesia within 2 months by the same surgeon. A self-assessment questionnaire of anxiety (the Amsterdam Preoperative Anxiety and Information Scale [APAIS]) was completed before each procedure. Postoperative pain was assessed by the visual analogue scale (VAS) in the recovery room.

RESULTS

Among the 69 included patients (mean age: 70±1.3 years), 13 (19%) experienced more pain after the 2nd eye procedure. The median VAS was 0 (EI: 0-1) after the first eye versus 0 (EI: 0-2) after the second eye (P=0.836). The patients with the most pain after the second eye surgery had a median anxiety score of 5 (EI: 4 to 9.5), which was comparable to those without pain (P=0.589). On bivariate analysis, women had more pain after second eye surgery (27%) than men (4%) (P=0.026). However, this association lost its significance when the analysis was adjusted for the level of anxiety (adjusted OR 7.7, 95% CI [0.91; 64.6]). In fact, women were more anxious [median anxiety score of 6 (EI: 4 to 8.5)] before 2nd eye surgery than men [median score: 4 (EI: 4-6); P=0.013].

DISCUSSION

Pain levels appeared to be very moderate on both sides when measured postoperatively, as opposed to statements often made in the immediate postoperative period. There is a discrepancy with the literature data. However, each study had small sample sizes.

CONCLUSION

We did not find any significant difference in pain between 1st and 2nd eye cataract surgery under topical local anesthesia. While postoperative pain appeared greater among women, we have noted the possible influence of anxiety, which could justify specific preoperative support.

Chronic post-thyroidectomy pain: Incidence, typology, and risk factors

Chronic postoperative pain exists in varying degrees for every type of surgery. An evaluation of the incidence, the typology and predictive factors of chronic pain was carried out at 3 and 6months after thyroidectomy. A prospective observational study, having included each of the patients prior to their thyroidectomy, was carried out over 12months. The patients used an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS), a neuropathic pain screening questionnaire (DN4), an evaluation scale for anxiety and for the need for information related to anaesthesia and surgery (APAIS), a questionnaire describing pain (QDSA) and a questionnaire evaluating neuropathic pain (NPSI) before surgery and at three and six months later. Three hundred and four patients were included. The questionnaires were completed by 251 patients (57 males and 194 females) at 3 and 6months (82%). At 3months, 31 out of 251 (12%) patients mentioned a DN4≥3; at 6months, this rate dropped to 23 out of 251 (9%). The average intensity of chronic postoperative pain remained low to moderate. Levels of anxiety and the need for information were higher in patients with postoperative pain at 3 and 6months. In contrast, the number of intraoperative procedures using a bilateral superficial cervical plexus block (BSCPB) was lower in patients with DN4≥3. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the type of anaesthesia procedure interfered with the risk of delayed pain after thyroidectomy. The presence of a DN4≥3 was nearly three-fold greater in patients without BSCPB (OR 2.647, CI=1.198-5.848).