154P Investigation of PD-L1 expression and tislelizumab efficacy in gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma using a novel tumor and immune cell score with VENTANA PD-L1 (SP263) assay and Combined Positive Score (CPS)

Advances in Immunotherapy in Esophagogastric Cancer

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are rapidly transforming the care of patients with esophagogastric cancer. Particularly, anti-PD-1 therapy has demonstrated promising efficacy in metastatic and resectable disease. In this review, the authors discuss landmark clinical trials, highlight challenges and opportunities in this field, and propose potential directions for future work.

The Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO): Clinical guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of gastric cancer, 2023

The 2023 update of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO) Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer focuses on standardizing cancer diagnosis and treatment in China, reflecting the latest advancements in evidence-based medicine, healthcare resource availability, and precision medicine. These updates address the differences in epidemiological characteristics, clinicopathological features, tumor biology, treatment patterns, and drug selections between Eastern and Western gastric cancer patients. Key revisions include a structured template for imaging diagnosis reports, updated standards for molecular marker testing in pathological diagnosis, and an elevated recommendation for neoadjuvant chemotherapy in stage III gastric cancer. For advanced metastatic gastric cancer, the guidelines introduce new recommendations for immunotherapy, anti-angiogenic therapy and targeted drugs, along with updated management strategies for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive and deficient DNA mismatch repair (dMMR)/microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) patients. Additionally, the guidelines offer detailed screening recommendations for hereditary gastric cancer and an appendix listing drug treatment regimens for various stages of gastric cancer. The 2023 CSCO Clinical Guidelines for Gastric Cancer updates are based on both Chinese and international clinical research and expert consensus to enhance their applicability and relevance in clinical practice, particularly in the heterogeneous healthcare landscape of China, while maintaining a commitment to scientific rigor, impartiality, and timely revisions.

Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (RATIONALE-306): a global, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study

BACKGROUND

The options for first-line treatment of advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma are scarce, and the outcomes remain poor. The anti-PD-1 antibody, tislelizumab, has shown antitumour activity in previously treated patients with advanced oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. We report interim analysis results from the RATIONALE-306 study, which aimed to assess tislelizumab plus chemotherapy versus placebo plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS

This global, randomised, double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled, phase 3 study was conducted at 162 medical centres across Asia, Europe, Oceania, and North America. Patients (aged ≥18 years) with unresectable, locally advanced, recurrent or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma (regardless of PD-L1 expression), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-1, and measurable or evaluable disease per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (version 1.1) were recruited. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1), using permuted block randomisation (block size of four) and stratified by investigator-chosen chemotherapy, region, and previous definitive therapy, to tislelizumab 200 mg or placebo intravenously every 3 weeks on day 1, together with an investigator-chosen chemotherapy doublet, comprising a platinum agent (cisplatin 60-80 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1 or oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1) plus a fluoropyrimidine (fluorouracil [750-800 mg/m2 intravenously on days 1-5] or capecitabine [1000 mg/m2 orally twice daily on days 1-14]) or paclitaxel (175 mg/m2 intravenously on day 1). Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Investigators, patients, and sponsor staff or designees were masked to treatment. The primary endpoint was overall survival. The efficacy analysis was done in the intention-to-treat population (ie, all randomly assigned patients) and safety was assessed in all patients who received at least one dose of study treatment. The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03783442.

FINDINGS

Between Dec 12, 2018, and Nov 24, 2020, 869 patients were screened, of whom 649 were randomly assigned to tislelizumab plus chemotherapy (n=326) or placebo plus chemotherapy (n=323). Median age was 64·0 years (IQR 59·0-69·0), 563 (87%) of 649 participants were male, 86 (13%) were female, 486 (75%) were Asian, and 155 (24%) were White. 324 (99%) of 326 patients in the tislelizumab group and 321 (99%) of 323 in the placebo group received at least one dose of the study drug. As of data cutoff (Feb 28, 2022), median follow-up was 16·3 months (IQR 8·6-21·8) in the tislelizumab group and 9·8 months (IQR 5·8-19·0) in the placebo group, and 196 (60%) of 326 patients in the tislelizumab group versus 226 (70%) of 323 in the placebo group had died. Median overall survival in the tislelizumab group was 17·2 months (95% CI 15·8-20·1) and in the placebo group was 10·6 months (9·3-12·1; stratified hazard ratio 0·66 [95% CI 0·54-0·80]; one-sided p<0·0001). 313 (97%) of 324 patients in the tislelizumab group and 309 (96%) of 321 in the placebo group had treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events. The most common grade 3 or 4 treatment-related treatment-emergent adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (99 [31%] in the tislelizumab group vs 105 [33%] in the placebo group), decreased white blood cell count (35 [11%] vs 50 [16%]), and anaemia (47 [15%] vs 41 [13%]). Six deaths in the tislelizumab group (gastrointestinal and upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage [n=2], myocarditis [n=1], pulmonary tuberculosis [n=1], electrolyte imbalance [n=1], and respiratory failure [n=1]) and four deaths in the placebo group (pneumonia [n=1], septic shock [n=1], and unspecified death [n=2]) were determined to be treatment-related.

INTERPRETATION

Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy as a first-line treatment for advanced or metastatic oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma provided superior overall survival with a manageable safety profile versus placebo plus chemotherapy. Given that the interim analysis met its superiority boundary for the primary endpoint, as confirmed by the independent data monitoring committee, this Article represents the primary study analysis.

FUNDING

BeiGene.

Tislelizumab Versus Chemotherapy as Second-Line Treatment for Advanced or Metastatic Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma (RATIONALE-302): A Randomized Phase III Study

PURPOSE

Patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC) have poor prognosis. For these patients, treatment options are limited after first-line systemic therapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this open-label phase III clinical study, patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, whose tumor progressed after first-line systemic treatment, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous tislelizumab, an anti-programmed cell death protein 1 antibody, 200 mg every 3 weeks or chemotherapy (investigator's choice of paclitaxel, docetaxel, or irinotecan). The primary end point was overall survival (OS) in all patients. The key secondary end point was OS in patients with programmed death-ligand 1 tumor area positivity (TAP) score ≥ 10%.

RESULTS

In total, 512 patients across 11 countries/regions were randomly assigned. At final analysis, conducted after 410 death events occurred, OS was significantly longer with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy in all patients (median, 8.6 v 6.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.70 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.85]; one-sided P = .0001), and in patients with TAP ≥ 10% (median, 10.3 months v 6.8 months; HR, 0.54 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.79]; one-sided P = .0006). Survival benefit was consistently observed across all predefined subgroups, including those defined by baseline TAP score, region, and race. Treatment with tislelizumab was associated with higher objective response rate (20.3% v 9.8%) and a more durable antitumor response (median, 7.1 months v 4.0 months) versus chemotherapy in all patients. Fewer patients experienced ≥ grade 3 treatment-related adverse events (18.8% v 55.8%) with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Tislelizumab significantly improved OS compared with chemotherapy as second-line therapy in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC, with a tolerable safety profile. Patients with programmed death-ligand 1 TAP ≥ 10% also demonstrated statistically significant survival benefit with tislelizumab versus chemotherapy.

The combination of gene hyperamplification and PD-L1 expression as a biomarker for the clinical benefit of tislelizumab in gastric/gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

BACKGROUND

In solid tumor Phase 1/2 trials (NCT02407990; NCT04068519), tislelizumab demonstrated clinical benefit, including in advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma (GEA). However, the majority of patients with GEA did not respond, highlighting the need to understand mechanisms of resistance and identify predictive biomarkers for response.

METHODS

All tislelizumab-treated patients with GEA from the Phase 1/2 trials were included (N = 105). Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression (Tumor Area Positivity [TAP] ≥ 5%), interferon gamma (IFNγ)-related gene signature, gene expression profile, tumor mutational burden (TMB), and gene hyperamplification (HA) were analyzed for correlation with tislelizumab.

RESULTS

A moderate association was observed between PD-L1 TAP ≥ 5%, IFNγ gene signature, TMB-high and efficacy. A potential correlation between hyperamplification (HA +) and worse outcomes with programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibition was identified. Hyperamplified genes were mainly enriched in cancer progression pathways, including cell cycle and RTK-RAS-PI3K pathways. Joint PD-L1 TAP ≥ 5% and lack of hyperamplification showed the most favorable benefit with an objective response rate of 29.4%, and median progression-free survival and overall survival of 4.1 and 14.7 months, respectively. Tumors with TAP ≥ 5% and HA - had inflamed immune signatures with increased immune cell infiltration, enhanced anti-tumor cytotoxic activity and antigen presentation signatures. Findings were validated in two independent gastric and gastrointestinal cancer cohorts treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

In GEA, PD-L1 positivity, IFNγ-related gene signature and TMB-high status were positively associated with tislelizumab clinical benefit, whereas HA was associated with worse clinical outcomes. Combining PD-L1 positivity and HA - may help identify patients more likely to benefit from PD-1 blockade.