1
|
Zattarin E, Taglialatela I, Lobefaro R, Leporati R, Fucà G, Ligorio F, Sposetti C, Provenzano L, Azzollini J, Vingiani A, Ferraris C, Martelli G, Manoukian S, Pruneri G, de Braud F, Vernieri C. Breast cancers arising in subjects with germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations: Different biological and clinical entities with potentially diverse therapeutic opportunities. Crit Rev Oncol Hematol 2023; 190:104109. [PMID: 37643668 DOI: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2023.104109] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/15/2022] [Revised: 08/11/2023] [Accepted: 08/23/2023] [Indexed: 08/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancers (BCs) arising in carriers of germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 pathogenic variants (PVs) have long been considered as indistinguishable biological and clinical entities. However, the loss of function of BRCA1 or BRCA2 proteins has different consequences in terms of tumor cell reliance on estrogen receptor signaling and tumor microenvironment composition. Here, we review accumulating preclinical and clinical data indicating that BRCA1 or BRCA2 inactivation may differentially affect BC sensitivity to standard systemic therapies. Based on a different crosstalk between BRCA1 or BRCA2 and the ER pathway, BRCA2-mutated Hormone Receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced BC may be less sensitive to endocrine therapy (ET) plus CDK 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i), whereas BRCA2-mutated triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) may be especially sensitive to immune checkpoint inhibitors. If validated in future prospective studies, these data may have relevant clinical implications, thus establishing different treatment paths in patients with BRCA1 or BRCA2 PVs.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Emma Zattarin
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Ida Taglialatela
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Riccardo Lobefaro
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Rita Leporati
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Giovanni Fucà
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Francesca Ligorio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; IFOM ETS, the AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy
| | - Caterina Sposetti
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Leonardo Provenzano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Jacopo Azzollini
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Andrea Vingiani
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Pathology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Cristina Ferraris
- Breast Unit, Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Gabriele Martelli
- Breast Unit, Surgery, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Siranoush Manoukian
- Unit of Medical Genetics, Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Giancarlo Pruneri
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy; Pathology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Filippo de Braud
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, University of Milan, Milan, Italy
| | - Claudio Vernieri
- Department of Medical Oncology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy; IFOM ETS, the AIRC Institute of Molecular Oncology, Milan, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Yan S, Imam M. Progress and prospects in research and clinical practice of hormone receptor-positive, HER-2-negative breast cancer with BRCA1/2 mutations. Discov Oncol 2023; 14:110. [PMID: 37351713 PMCID: PMC10290022 DOI: 10.1007/s12672-023-00732-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2023] [Accepted: 06/20/2023] [Indexed: 06/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Breast cancer (BC) is a heterogeneous disease that is the most common cancer in women worldwide. However, precise subtyping and corresponding treatments have improved patient outcomes. Hormone receptor (HR)-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2 (HER2)-negative (HR+/HER2-) BC with BRCA1 and/or BRCA2 mutations (BRCA1/2m) is a unique BC subset with dual drivers: homologous recombination deficiency and hormone receptor signaling. Wild-type BRCA1/2 suppresses estrogen receptor-mediated signaling. Loss-of-function mutations in BRCA1/2 release estrogen receptor suppression, leading to reduced sensitivity to endocrine therapy. Poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP) inhibitors (PARPis) exert antitumor effects against this subtype and can be used in combination with endocrine therapy. Although PARPis have been evaluated in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer, their efficacy against HR+/HER2- BC has not been clearly established. The present review summarizes recent advances and prospects in the progress of the HR+/HER2-/BRCA1/2m subgroup. As such, this article provides theoretical guidance for future research and promotes the use of PARPis for the treatment of HR+/HER2-/BRCA1/2m BC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shunchao Yan
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110022, China.
| | - Murshid Imam
- Department of Oncology, Shengjing Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, 110022, China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Frenel JS, Lusque A, Delaloge S, Ferrero JM, Bachelot T, Desmoulins I, Levy C, Eymard JC, Gonçalves A, Patsouris A, Reynier MAM, Thery MJC, Petit T, Cabel L, Uwer L, Debled M, Chevrot M, Mailliez A, Jacot W, de La Motte Rouge T. Efficacy of front-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive HER2-negative metastatic breast cancer with germline BRCA1/2 mutation. Br J Cancer 2023; 128:2072-2080. [PMID: 37012318 PMCID: PMC10205708 DOI: 10.1038/s41416-023-02248-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/13/2022] [Revised: 03/06/2023] [Accepted: 03/20/2023] [Indexed: 04/05/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Efficacy of endocrine therapy in HR+/HER2- metastatic breast cancer could differ depending on the presence of BRCA1/2 germline mutation. METHODS The ESME metastatic breast cancer platform (NCT03275311) is a French real world database. Multivariable models including a time-varying approach and landmark analyses assessed the association between time-dependent gBRCA status (categorised as gBRCAm, gBRCAwt (wild type), and untested), overall survival (OS), and first-line progression-free survival (PFS1). RESULTS A total of 170 patients were gBRCAm carriers, 676 gBRCAwt, and 12,930 were untested at baseline. In the multivariable analysis, gBRCAm carriers overall had a lower OS compared to gBRCAwt (adjusted HR [95% CI] 1.26 [1.03-1.55]). gBRCAm patients treated with front-line endocrine therapy had lower adjusted OS (adjusted HR [95% CI] = 1.54 [1.03-2.32]) and PFS1 (adjusted HR [95% CI] 1.58 [1.17-2.12]) compared to gBRCAwt patients. However, for patients who received frontline chemotherapy, neither OS nor PFS1 differed between gBRCAm carriers and the other groups (HR versus gBRCAwt for OS: 1.12 [0.88-1.41], p = 0.350; PFS1: 1.09 [0.90-1.31], p = 0.379). CONCLUSION In this large cohort of HR+/HER2- MBC patients treated in a pre-CDK4/6 inhibitors era, gBRCAm status was associated with a lower OS and lower PFS following first-line endocrine therapy, but not following first-line chemotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- J-S Frenel
- Medical Oncology, ICO Institut de Cancerologie de l'Ouest René Gauducheau, Saint-Herblain, France.
| | - A Lusque
- Biostatistics & Health Data Science Unit, Institut Claudius Regaud, IUCT-Oncopole, Toulouse, France
| | - S Delaloge
- Department of Cancer Medicine, Institut Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - J-M Ferrero
- Medical Oncology, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - T Bachelot
- Medical Oncology Department, Centre Léon Bérard, Lyon, France
| | - I Desmoulins
- Medical Oncology, Centre Georges-François Leclerc (Dijon), Dijon, France
| | - C Levy
- Medical Oncology, Centre Francois Baclesse, Caen, France
| | - J-C Eymard
- Medical Oncology, Institut Jean Godinot, Reims, France
| | - A Gonçalves
- Medical Oncology Department, Institute Paoli Calmettes, Marseille, France
| | - A Patsouris
- Medical Oncology Department, ICO - Institut de cancerologie de l'Ouest - Site Paul Papin, Angers, France
| | | | - M J-C Thery
- Medical Oncology, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - T Petit
- Bas-Rhin, Centre Paul Strauss Centre de Lutte contre le Cancer, Strasbourg, France
| | - L Cabel
- Medical Oncology, Hôpital René Huguenin - Institut Curie, Saint-Cloud, France
| | - L Uwer
- Medical Oncology, Institut de Cancerologie de Lorraine - Alexis Vautrin, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
| | - M Debled
- Medical Oncology, Institut Bergonié, Bordeaux, France
| | - M Chevrot
- Department of Real World Data, UNICANCER, Paris, France
| | - A Mailliez
- Medical Oncology, Centre Oscar Lambret, Lille, France
| | - W Jacot
- Medical Oncology Department, ICM Regional Cancer Institute of Montpellier, Montpellier University, INSERM U1194, Montpellier, France
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Albarrán V, Chamorro J, Pozas J, San Román M, Rosero DI, Saavedra C, Gion M, Cortés A, Escalera E, Guerra E, López Miranda E, Fernández Abad M, Martínez Jañez N. Maintained complete response to talazoparib in a BRCA-2 mutated metastatic luminal breast cancer: case report and review of literature. Front Oncol 2023; 13:1158981. [PMID: 37213307 PMCID: PMC10196382 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1158981] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/04/2023] [Accepted: 04/20/2023] [Indexed: 05/23/2023] Open
Abstract
PARP inhibitors are progressively becoming a part of our therapeutic arsenal against BRCA-defective tumors, because of their capacity to induce synthetic lethality in cells with a deficiency in the homologous recombination repair system. Olaparib and talazoparib have been approved for metastatic breast cancer in carriers of germline BRCA mutations, which are found in approximately 6% of patients with breast cancer. We report the case of a patient with metastatic breast cancer, carrier of a germline mutation in BRCA2, with a complete response to first-line treatment with talazoparib, maintained after 6 years. To the best of our knowledge, this is the longest response reported with a PARP inhibitor in a BRCA-mutated tumor. We have made a review of literature, regarding the rationale for PARP inhibitors in carriers of BRCA mutations and their clinical relevance in the management of advanced breast cancer, as well as their emerging role in early stage disease, alone and in combination with other systemic therapies.
Collapse
|
5
|
Predominance of BRCA2 Mutation and Estrogen Receptor Positivity in Unselected Breast Cancer with BRCA1 or BRCA2 Mutation. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14133266. [PMID: 35805038 PMCID: PMC9265086 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14133266] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/18/2022] [Revised: 06/30/2022] [Accepted: 06/30/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary We performed a meataanalysis of BRCA1 or BRCA2 germline pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant (gBRCA) in 108,699 unselected breast cancer patients and in 238,972 unaffected individuals. The metanalysis shows that 3.4% unselected breast cancer patients have a gBRCA. In unselected breast cancer patients with gBRCA, more than half of tumors are estrogen receptor-positive. 0.5% of unaffected individuals of the studied populations are gBRCA carriers. The frequency of gBRCA2 and gBRCA1 heterozygosity is estimated at 1/288 and 1/434, respectively. In unselected breast cancer and in unfafected individuals gBRCA2 is more frequent than gBRCA1. Abstract Background: Poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 inhibitor (PARPi) agents can improve progression-free survival of patients with breast cancer who carry a germline BRCA1 or BRCA2 pathogenic or likely pathogenic variant (gBRCA) in both the metastatic and adjuvant setting. Therefore, we need to reassess the frequency of gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 in order to redefine the criteria for women and tumor phenotype that should be tested. Objective: We studied the relative distribution of gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 in unselected populations of women with breast cancer and in unaffected individuals. We also analyzed the proportion of estrogen receptor (ER)-positive (ER+) tumors in unselected breast cancer patients with gBRCA. Design: We performed a meta-analysis of studies of unselected breast cancer that analyzed the relative contribution of gBRCA1 versus gBRCA2 among unselected breast cancer cases in gBRCA carriers. We then performed a meta-analysis of gBRCA carriage in unaffected individuals from genome-wide population studies, the gnomAD databank, and case–control studies. Results: The BRCA2 gene was involved in 54% of breast cancer cases in unselected patients with gBRCA (n = 108,699) and 60% of unaffected individuals (n = 238,973) as compared with 38% of the largest gBRCA family cohort (n = 29,700). The meta-analysis showed that 1.66% (95% CI 1.08–2.54) and 1.71% (95% CI 1.33–2.2) of unselected breast cancer patients carried gBRCA1 and gBRCA2, respectively. In a population of unaffected individuals, the frequency of heterozygosity for gBRCA1 and gBRCA2 was estimated at 1/434 and 1/288, respectively. Nearly 0.5% of unaffected individuals in the studied populations carried a gBRCA. Carriage of a gBRCA was 2.5% for patients with ER+ tumors (95% CI 1.5–4.1) and 5.7% (95% CI 5.1–6.2) for those with ER- tumors. Overall, 58% of breast tumors occurring in women carrying a gBRCA were ER+ (n = 86,870). Conclusions: This meta-analysis showed that gBRCA2 carriage is predominant in unselected breast cancer patients and unaffected individuals. ER+ tumors among women with gBRCA-related breast cancer are predominant and have been underestimated. Because PARPi agents improve progression-free survival with ER+ gBRCA breast cancer in most clinical trials, breast cancer should be considered, regardless of ER status, for BRCA1/2 screening for therapeutic purposes.
Collapse
|
6
|
Bruno L, Ostinelli A, Waisberg F, Enrico D, Ponce C, Rivero S, Blanco A, Zarba M, Loza M, Fabiano V, Amat M, Pombo MT, Noro L, Chacón M, Coló F, Chacón R, Nadal J, Nervo A, Costanzo V. Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 4/6 Inhibitor Outcomes in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer Carrying Germline Pathogenic Variants in DNA Repair-Related Genes. JCO Precis Oncol 2022; 6:e2100140. [PMID: 35235412 DOI: 10.1200/po.21.00140] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/27/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE In recent years, unprecedented benefits have been observed with the development of cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK) 4 and 6 inhibitors for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative metastatic breast cancer. However, there is scarce evidence of their value in specific populations, such as patients carrying germline pathogenic variants in DNA repair-related genes. PATIENTS AND METHODS We retrospectively studied the efficacy of CDK 4/6 inhibitors plus endocrine therapy in patients with hormone receptor-positive/human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative advanced breast cancer. Three cohorts were compared, including patients harboring germline pathogenic variants in DNA repair-related genes (gBRCA1/2-ATM-CHEK2 mutated), those tested without these mutations (wild type [WT]), and the nontested subgroup. Relevant prognostic factors including age, metastatic site (visceral v nonvisceral), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group, and prior treatment with CDK 4/6 inhibitors were stratified by univariate and multivariate Cox regression models. RESULTS Among the total population (n = 217), 15 (6.9%) patients carried gBRCA1/2 (n = 10)-ATM (n = 4)-CHEK2 (n = 1) pathogenic variants, 45 (20.7%) were WT, and 157 (72.4%) were nontested. Gene pathogenic variant carriers were younger (P < .001). Most patients (164, 75.6%) had not received prior endocrine therapy in the advanced setting. Median progression-free survival was shorter in patients with evaluated germline pathogenic variants (10.2 months [95% CI, 5.7 to 14.7]), compared with WT and nontested patients (15.6 months [95% CI, 7.8 to 23.4], and (17.6 months [95% CI, 12.9 to 22.2]; P = .002). Consistently, a worse median overall survival was observed in the subgroup with germline pathogenic variants than in the WT group (P = .006). Multivariable analysis showed that mutation status was an independent prognostic factor of progression-free survival (P = .020) and overall survival (P = .012). CONCLUSION In this retrospective real-world study, gBRCA1/2-ATM-CHEK2 pathogenic variants were independently associated with poor outcomes in patients with advanced breast cancer treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luisina Bruno
- Genetic Counselling Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Department of Medical Oncology, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Breast Cancer Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Alexis Ostinelli
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Breast Cancer Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Federico Waisberg
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Breast Cancer Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Research Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Diego Enrico
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Research Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Carolina Ponce
- Genetic Counselling Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Breast Cancer Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Department of Breast Surgery, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Sergio Rivero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Breast Cancer Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Albano Blanco
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Martín Zarba
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Martín Loza
- Breast Cancer Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Department of Breast Surgery, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Verónica Fabiano
- Breast Cancer Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Department of Breast Surgery, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Mora Amat
- Breast Cancer Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Department of Pathology, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - María Teresa Pombo
- Department of Pathology, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Laura Noro
- Department of Laboratory Medicine, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Matías Chacón
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Research Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Federico Coló
- Breast Cancer Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Department of Breast Surgery, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Reinaldo Chacón
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Breast Cancer Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Jorge Nadal
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Breast Cancer Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Adrián Nervo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Breast Cancer Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| | - Victoria Costanzo
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina.,Breast Cancer Unit, Alexander Fleming Cancer Institute, Buenos Aires, Argentina
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Collet L, Péron J, Penault-Llorca F, Pujol P, Lopez J, Freyer G, You B. PARP Inhibitors: A Major Therapeutic Option in Endocrine-Receptor Positive Breast Cancers. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14030599. [PMID: 35158866 PMCID: PMC8833594 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14030599] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/15/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 01/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary OlympiAD and EMBRACA trials demonstrated the efficacy of PARPi, compared to chemotherapy, in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancers (mBC) carrying a germline BRCA mutation. Patients with ER+/HER2-BRCA-mutated mBC seemed to have a higher risk of early disease progression while on CDK4/6 inhibitors and benefit from PARPi, especially when prescribed before chemotherapy. Importantly, the frequency of BRCA pathogenic variant (PV) carriers among ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients has been underestimated, and 50% of all BRCA1/2 mutated breast cancers are actually of ER+/HER2- subtype. Recent studies also highlight the benefit of PARPi in BRCA wild type mBC with HRD representing up to 20% of ER+/HER2- breast cancers. The OLYMPIA trial also demonstrated PARPi utility in patients with ER+/HER2- early breast cancers with BRCA PV at high risk of relapse. Consequently, implementation of early genotyping and new strategies for identifying patients with high-risk ER+/HER2- HRD breast cancers likely to benefit from PARPi is of high importance. Abstract Recently, OlympiAD and EMBRACA trials demonstrated the favorable efficacy/toxicity ratio of PARPi, compared to chemotherapy, in patients with HER2-negative metastatic breast cancers (mBC) carrying a germline BRCA mutation. PARPi have been largely adopted in triple-negative metastatic breast cancer, but their place has been less clearly defined in endocrine-receptor positive, HER2 negative (ER+/ HER2-) mBC. The present narrative review aims at addressing this question by identifying the patients that are more likely benefit from PARPi. Frequencies of BRCA pathogenic variant (PV) carriers among ER+/HER2- breast cancer patients have been underestimated, and many experts assume than 50% of all BRCA1/2 mutated breast cancers are of ER+/HER2- subtype. Patients with ER+/HER2- BRCA-mutated mBC seemed to have a higher risk of early disease progression while on CDK4/6 inhibitors and PARPi are effective especially when prescribed before exposure to chemotherapy. The OLYMPIA trial also highlighted the utility of PARPi in patients with early breast cancers at high risk of relapse and carrying PV of BRCA. PARPi might also be effective in patients with HRD diseases, representing up to 20% of ER+/HER2- breast cancers. Consequently, the future implementation of early genotyping strategies for identifying the patients with high-risk ER+/HER2- HRD breast cancers likely to benefit from PARPi is of high importance.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Laetitia Collet
- Oncology Department, CITOHL, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Cancer Institute of Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Lyon, France; (L.C.); (J.P.); (G.F.)
- Lyon-Sud Medicine School, University of Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Julien Péron
- Oncology Department, CITOHL, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Cancer Institute of Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Lyon, France; (L.C.); (J.P.); (G.F.)
- Lyon-Sud Medicine School, University of Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France
- Laboratoire de Biométrie et Biologie Evolutive, Equipe Biostatistique-Santé, CNRS UMR 5558, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69100 Villeurbanne, France
| | - Frédérique Penault-Llorca
- Department of Pathology and Biopathology, Jean Perrin Comprehensive Cancer Center, UMR INSERM 1240, University Clermont Auvergne, 63011 Clermont-Ferrand, France;
| | - Pascal Pujol
- Department of Cancer Genetics, CHU Montpellier, UMR IRD 224-CNRS 5290, Université Montpellier, 34295 Montpellier, France;
- Centre de Recherches Écologiques et Évolutives sur le Cancer (CREEC), UMR 224 CNRS-5290, University of Montpellier, 34394 Montpellier, France
| | - Jonathan Lopez
- Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Department, Hopital Lyon Sud, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France;
| | - Gilles Freyer
- Oncology Department, CITOHL, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Cancer Institute of Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Lyon, France; (L.C.); (J.P.); (G.F.)
- Lyon-Sud Medicine School, University of Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France
| | - Benoît You
- Oncology Department, CITOHL, Lyon-Sud Hospital, Cancer Institute of Hospices Civils de Lyon (IC-HCL), Hospices Civils de Lyon, 69495 Lyon, France; (L.C.); (J.P.); (G.F.)
- Lyon-Sud Medicine School, University of Lyon, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, 69008 Lyon, France
- Correspondence: ; Tel.: +33-(0)4-78-86-43-18; Fax: +33-(0)4-78-86-43-56
| |
Collapse
|