1207O Bevacizumab + erlotinib vs erlotinib alone as first-line treatment of pts with EGFR mutated advanced non squamous NSCLC: Final analysis of the multicenter, randomized, phase III BEVERLY trial

Efficacy and safety of EGFR-TKIs in combination with angiogenesis inhibitors as first-line therapy for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

For patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations, the suggested course of action is epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). Even with a high disease control rate, a majority of patients develop acquired EGFR-TKIs resistance and eventually advance. To increase the benefits of treatment, clinical trials are increasingly exploring the value of EGFR-TKIs combined with angiogenesis inhibitors as a first-line treatment in advanced NSCLC carrying EGFR mutations.

METHOD

Using PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library, to locate published full-text articles in print or online, a thorough literature search was done from the database's inception to February 2021. Additionally, oral presentation RCTs from ESMO and ASCO were obtained. We sifted out RCTs that used EGFR-TKIs along with angiogenesis inhibitors as first-line therapy for advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC. ORR, AEs, OS, and PFS were the endpoints. Review Manager version 5.4.1 was used for data analysis.

RESULTS

One thousand eight hundred twenty-one patients were involved in 9 RCTs. According to the results, combining EGFR-TKIs with angiogenesis inhibitors therapy prolonged PFS of advanced EGFR-mutation NSCLC patients on the whole [HR:0.65 (95%CI: 0.59~0.73, P<0.00001)]. No significant statistical difference was identified between the combination group and single drug group in OS(P=0.20) and ORR (P=0.11). There are more adverse effects when EGFR-TKIs are used in combination with angiogenesis inhibitors than when used alone.

CONCLUSION

The combination of EGFR-TKIs and angiogenesis inhibitors prolonged PFS in patients with EGFR-mutant advanced NSCLC, but the OS and ORR benefit was not significant, and the risk of adverse events was higher, more pronounced with hypertension and proteinuria; PFS in subgroups suggested that the combination was associated with better PFS in the smoking, liver metastasis, and no brain metastasis groups, and the included studies suggested that the smoking group , liver metastasis group, and brain metastasis group may have a potential OS benefit.

RELAY, Ramucirumab plus Erlotinib (RAM+ERL) in Untreated Metastatic EGFR-Mutant NSCLC (EGFR+ NSCLC): Association between TP53 Status and Clinical Outcome

BACKGROUND

Ramucirumab plus erlotinib (RAM+ERL) demonstrated superior progression-free survival (PFS) in RELAY, a randomised Phase III trial in patients with untreated, metastatic, EGFR-mutated, non-small-cell lung cancer (EGFR+ NSCLC). Here, we present the relationship between TP53 status and outcomes in RELAY.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients received oral ERL plus intravenous RAM (10 mg/kg IV) or placebo (PBO+ERL) every 2 weeks. Plasma was assessed by Guardant 360 next-generation sequencing and patients with any gene alteration detected at baseline were included in this exploratory analysis. Endpoints included PFS, overall response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), DoR, overall survival (OS), safety, and biomarker analysis. The association between TP53 status and outcomes was evaluated.

RESULTS

Mutated TP53 was detected in 165 (42.7%; 74 RAM+ERL, 91 PBO+ERL) patients, wild-type TP53 in 221 (57.3%; 118 RAM+ERL, 103 PBO+ERL) patients. Patient and disease characteristics and concurrent gene alterations were comparable between those with mutant and wildtype TP53. Independent of treatment, TP53 mutations, most notably on exon 8, were associated with worse clinical outcomes. In all patients, RAM+ERL improved PFS. While ORR and DCR were comparable across all patients, DoR was superior with RAM+ERL. There were no clinically meaningful differences in the safety profiles between those with baseline TP53 mutation and wild-type.

CONCLUSION

This analysis indicates that while TP53 mutations are a negative prognostic marker in EGFR+ NSCLC, the addition of a VEGF inhibitor improves outcomes in those with mutant TP53. RAM+ERL is an efficacious first-line treatment option for patients with EGFR+ NSCLC, independent of TP53 status.

First-line therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer with Leu858Arg epidermal growth factor receptor mutations: a Bayesian network meta-analysis

Aim

The objective of this network meta-analysis was to determine the most useful first-line therapeutic strategy for patients with advanced (IIIB/IV or relapsed) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) Leu858Arg or EGFR 19del mutations.

Methods

PubMed, the Web of Science, Medline, and reports of the top three world cancer conferences (WCLC, ESMO, and ASCO) were searched for appropriated randomized controlled studies (RCTs) discussing the use of various generations of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs; gefitinib, erlotinib, icotinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, osimertinib, aumolertinib), chemotherapy [pemetrexed-based chemotherapy (PC), non-pemetrexed-based chemotherapy (NPC)], and different combined therapies (osimertinib plus bevacizumab, afatinib plus cetuximab, erlotinib plus bevacizumab, erlotinib plus ramucirumab, gefitinib plus apatinib, gefitinib plus PC, and gefitinib plus pemetrexed) to treat patients with advanced NSCLC with EGFR Leu858Arg or 19del mutations. OpenBugs and Stata software were used to analyze the data.

Results

We included 21 studies with 16 arms (including 2479 cases with EGFR Leu858Arg mutations and 3325 cases with EGFR 19del mutations). Among patients with NSCLC with EGFR Leu858Arg mutations, compared with the first-generation TKIs (such as gefitinib), the second- or third-generation TKIs [dacomitinib: hazard ratio (HR) = 0.63; 95% confidence index (CI) = (0.45, 0.89); osimertinib: HR = 0.63; 95% CI = (0.42, 0.97)] showed significant benefits in improving progression-free survival (PFS), as did afatinib plus cetuximab [HR = 1.98; 95% CI = (1.01, 3.95)], erlotinib plus bevacizumab [HR = 1.79; 95% CI = (1.22, 2.62)], and erlotinib plus ramucirumab [HR = 1.62; 95% CI = (1.07, 2.48)]. In terms of overall survival (OS), these 16 arms showed no significant differences between each other (p > 0.05). Among patients with NSCLC with EGFR 19del mutations, compared with the first- or second-generation TKIs (such as gefitinib and afatinib), aumolertinib [versus gefitinib: HR = 0.39; 95% CI = (0.28, 0.55) versus afatinib: HR = 0.53; 95% CI = (0.35, 0.84)] and osimertinib [versus gefitinib: HR = 0.40; 95% CI = (0.32, 0.51) versus afatinib: HR = 0.53, 95% CI = (0.38, 0.79)] showed significantly beneficial effects. Among these first-line therapeutic strategies for patients with EGFR Leu858Arg mutations, the combination of afatinib and cetuximab ranked as the best to prolong PFS (33.0%). For NSCLC patients with 19del mutations, however, osimertinib plus bevacizumab was the best at prolonging PFS (84.3%).

Conclusion

For NSCLC patients with EGFR Leu858Arg mutations, the second-generation TKIs, the third-generation TKIs, and the combined treatments showed better efficacy than the first-generation TKIs for PFS. There were, however, no significant differences between each group for OS.

Clinical, Pathologic, and Molecular Prognostic Factors in Patients with Early-Stage EGFR-Mutant NSCLC

PURPOSE

In early-stage, EGFR mutation-positive (EGFR-M+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), surgery remains the primary treatment, without personalized adjuvant treatments. We aimed to identify risk factors for recurrence-free survival (RFS) to suggest personalized adjuvant strategies in resected early-stage EGFR-M+ NSCLC.

EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN

From January 2008 to August 2020, a total of 2,340 patients with pathologic stage (pStage) IB-IIIA, non-squamous NSCLC underwent curative surgery. To identify clinicopathologic risk factors, 1,181 patients with pStage IB-IIIA, common EGFR-M+ NSCLC who underwent surgical resection were analyzed. To identify molecular risk factors, comprehensive genomic analysis was conducted in 56 patients with matched case-controls (pStage II and IIIA and type of EGFR mutation).

RESULTS

Median follow-up duration was 38.8 months (0.5-156.2). Among 1,181 patients, pStage IB, II, and IIIA comprised 577 (48.9%), 331 (28.0%), and 273 (23.1%) subjects, respectively. Median RFS was 73.5 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 62.1-84.9], 48.7 months (95% CI, 41.2-56.3), and 22.7 months (95% CI, 19.4-26.0) for pStage IB, II, and IIIA, respectively (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis of clinicopathologic risk factors, pStage, micropapillary subtype, vascular invasion, and pleural invasion, and pathologic classification by cell of origin (type II pneumocyte-like tumor cell vs. bronchial surface epithelial cell-like tumor cell) were associated with RFS. As molecular risk factors, the non-terminal respiratory unit (non-TRU) of the RNA subtype (HR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.72-7.09; P < 0.01) and TP53 mutation (HR, 2.50; 95% CI, 1.24-5.04; P = 0.01) were associated with poor RFS independent of pStage II or IIIA. Among the patients with recurrence, progression-free survival of EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) in those with the Apolipoprotein B mRNA Editing Catalytic Polypeptide-like (APOBEC) mutation signature was inferior compared with that of patients without this signature (8.6 vs. 28.8 months; HR, 4.16; 95% CI, 1.28-13.46; P = 0.02).

CONCLUSIONS

The low-risk group with TRU subtype and TP53 wild-type without clinicopathologic risk factors might not need adjuvant EGFR-TKIs. In the high-risk group, with non-TRU subtype and/or TP 53 mutation, or clinicopathologic risk factors, a novel adjuvant strategy of EGFR-TKI with others, e.g., chemotherapy or antiangiogenic agents needs to be investigated. Given the poor outcome to EGFR-TKIs after recurrence in patients with the APOBEC mutation signature, an alternative adjuvant strategy might be needed.

Genomic Landscape, Clinical Features and Outcomes of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Harboring BRAF Alterations of Distinct Functional Classes

Simple Summary

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring BRAF non-V600 alterations constitute a heterogeneous and poorly studied population orphan of targeted therapies. We conducted a systematic review to detect all BRAF alterations of defined functional class across different cancer types. Then, we searched for NSCLC patients harboring these alterations in the cancer bioportal and in POPLAR and OAK trials using patient-level data, to investigate clinical and genomic differences associated with each BRAF functional class and the prognostic impact of BRAF non-V600 mutations. We found that NSCLC patients harboring distinct classes of BRAF alterations have different clinical characteristics, clinical features and genomic landscape. Moreover, BRAF non-V600 alterations were associated with a poor prognostic impact, apparently regardless of the treatment received. These peculiar features may suggest the use of tailored treatments according to each class of BRAF alteration.

Abstract

Background: In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), BRAF class 1 alterations are effectively targeted by BRAF inhibitors. Conversely, targeted therapies have very low or absent activity in patients carrying class 2 and 3 alterations. The spectrum of BRAF alterations in NSCLC patients, and their accompanying clinical features, genomic landscape and treatment outcomes have been poorly reported. Patients and methods: We identified BRAF alterations of defined functional class across different tumors through a systematic review. Then, we selected NSCLC patients carrying BRAF alterations, according to the systematic review, in the cBioPortal (cBioPortal cohort) to collect and analyze clinical, biomolecular and survival data. Finally, we identified NSCLC patients carrying BRAF non-V600 mutations enrolled in POPLAR and OAK trials (POPLAR/OAK cohort), extracting clinical and survival data for survival analyses. Results: 100 different BRAF non-V600 alterations were identified through the systematic review. In the cBioPortal cohort (n = 139), patients harboring class 2 and 3 alterations were more frequently smokers and had higher tumor mutational burden compared to those carrying class 1 alterations. The spectrum of most frequently co-altered genes was significantly different between BRAF alterations classes, including SETD2, STK11, POM121L12, MUC16, KEAP1, TERT, TP53 and other genes. In the POPLAR/OAK cohort, patients carrying non-V600 BRAF alterations were characterized by poor prognosis compared to BRAF wild-type patients. Conclusions: Different classes of BRAF alterations confer distinctive clinical features, biomolecular signature and disease behavior to NSCLC patients. Non-V600 alterations are characterized by poor prognosis, but key gene co-alterations involved in cancer cell survival and immune pathways may suggest their potential sensitivity to tailored treatments.

Impact of Smoking Status in Combination Treatment with EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and Anti-Angiogenic Agents in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Harboring Susceptible EGFR Mutations: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who harbor susceptible epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations and are treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) show longer progression-free survival (PFS) than those treated with chemotherapy. However, developed EGFR-TKI resistance limits PFS improvements. Currently, combination treatment with EGFR-TKIs and anti-angiogenic agents is considered a beneficial regimen for advanced-stage NSCLC harboring susceptible EGFR mutations. However, several trials reported osimertinib plus bevacizumab failed to show superior efficacy over osimertinib alone. However, subgroup analysis showed significantly longer PFS among patients with a history of smoking over those who never smoked. We performed a comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the smoking status impact. At the end of the process, a total of 2068 patients from 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were included in our meta-analysis. Overall, combination EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agent treatment showed significantly better PFS among patients with a smoking history (Hazard Ratio (HR) = 0.59, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.48-0.73). Erlotinib-based combination therapy showed positive PFS benefits regardless of smoking status (HR = 0.54, 95%CI = 0.41-0.71 for ever smoker, HR = 0.69, 95%CI = 0.54-0.87 for never smoker). Combination therapy prolonged PFS significantly regardless of ethnicity (HR: 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44-0.93 for Asian RCTs, HR: 0.55, 95% CI: 0.41-0.74 for global and non-Asian RCTs). PROSPERO registration number is CRD42022304198).

Effect of smoking habits on the efficacy of EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agent in advanced EGFR-mutant NSCLC

BACKGROUND

The types of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutant non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients who could obtain significant clinical benefit from the dual inhibition of EGFR/vascular EGFR (VEGFR) pathways remain unclear. No consensus has been reached on the significance of smoking habits in clinical benefit obtained from EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agents.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases for all phase II/III randomized clinical trials (RCTs) investigating the efficacy of EGFR-TKI combined with anti-angiogenic agents stratified by smoking habits (updated October 2021) were searched systematically. The primary outcomes were the pooled HRs for PFS/OS in smokers and non-smokers, and differences in efficacy of EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic treatment between smokers and non-smokers, measured by difference in PFS and OS.

RESULTS

Seven phase II/III RCTs involving 1452 patients were identified. The pooled analysis demonstrated that EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agent could decrease the risk of progression by 40% (HR, 0.60; 95%CI 0.48-0.75) in smokers when compared with EGFR-TKI alone, but not in non-smokers (HR, 0.92; 95%CI 0.68-1.25). The comparison analysis further demonstrated that EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who smoked obtained greater progression-free survival (PFS) benefit from treatment with EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agents (HR, 0.68; 95%CI 0.51-0.91). Consistent with the results for PFS, smokers receiving EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agents appeared to exhibit better overall survival (OS) than non-smokers but not to a statistically significant degree (HR, 0.60; 95%CI 0.23-1.52). Meta-regression analysis revealed no significant effect of the line of treatment (P = 0.52), trial phase (P = 0.52), EGFR-TKI type (P = 0.13), or anti-angiogenic agent type (P = 0.50) on PFS effect sizes under multivariate models.

CONCLUSION

Comprehensive analysis suggested that EGFR-TKI plus anti-angiogenic agents led to favorable PFS among smoking EGFR-mutant patients, comparable to nonsmokers, which might provide a useful guide for clinicians.

Afatinib Treatment Alone or with Bevacizumab in a Real-World Cohort of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Mutation

BACKGROUND

Treatment outcome between afatinib alone or with bevacizumab in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patient with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation remains insufficiently reported.

METHODS

A total of 405 advanced NSCLC patients with sensitizing-EGFR mutation receiving first-line single-agent afatinib or with bevacizumab were grouped and propensity score-matched. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and secondary T790M mutation were analyzed.

RESULTS

In the original cohort, 367 (90.6%) patients received afatinib treatment alone and 38 (9.4%) patients received afatinib plus bevacizumab. Patients who received bevacizumab combination were significantly younger (54.6 ± 10.9 vs. 63.9 ± 11.5; p < 0.001) compared to the afatinib alone group. After propensity score matching, the afatinib alone and afatinib plus bevacizumab groups contained 118 and 34 patients, respectively. A non-significantly higher objective response was noted in the afatinib plus bevacizumab group (82.4% vs. 67.8%; p = 0.133). In the propensity score-matched cohort, a bevacizumab add-on offered no increased PFS (16.1 vs. 15.0 months; p = 0.500), risk reduction of progression (HR 0.85 [95% CI, 0.52-1.40]; p = 0.528), OS benefit (32.1 vs. 42.0 months; p = 0.700), nor risk reduction of death (HR 0.85 [95% CI, 0.42-1.74] p = 0.660) compared to the single-agent afatinib. The secondary T790M rate in afatinib plus bevacizumab and afatinib alone groups was similar (56.3% vs. 49.4%, p = 0.794). Multivariate analysis demonstrated that EGFR L858R (OR 0.51 [95% CI, 0.26-0.97]; p = 0.044), EGFR uncommon mutation (OR 0.14 [95% CI, 0.02-0.64]; p = 0.021), and PFS longer than 12 months (OR 2.71 [95% CI, 1.39-5.41]; p = 0.004) were independent predictors of secondary T790M positivity.

CONCLUSION

Bevacizumab treatment showed moderate efficacy in real-world, afatinib-treated NSCLC patients with EGFR-sensitizing mutation.