Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab versus the EXTREME regimen as first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: KESTREL, a randomized, open-label, phase III study

The predictive role of PD-L1 in head and neck cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis

This systematic review and meta-analysis investigates the predictive and prognostic role of PD-L1 expression in treating head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Recognizing the importance of PD-L1 in patient response to treatment, the main objective was to assess its impact on overall survival and progression-free survival in HNSCC patients. A thorough search of databases such as PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science from 2010 to 2022, along with relevant articles and references, yielded 120 studies. Of these, 7 met the criteria focusing on HNSCC patients, PD-L1 expression evaluation, and treatment with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors. Data extraction followed PRISMA guidelines and involved independent review and consensus for discrepancies. The primary outcomes analyzed were overall survival and progression-free survival in relation to PD-L1 expression levels in patients undergoing immunotherapy.Theseven randomized controlled trials selected had a total of 4,477 participants. Results showed that patients with positive PD-L1 expression experienced improved overall survival when treated with PD-1 or PD-L1 inhibitors, particularly those with high PD-L1 expression. However, PD-L1 expression did not significantly affect progression-free survival. These findings suggest that PD-L1 expression can be a predictive marker for better overall survival in HNSCC patients treated with immunotherapy. However, its influence on progression-free survival remains unclear, indicating the need for further research.

A Phase II Open-Label Randomized Clinical Trial of Preoperative Durvalumab or Durvalumab plus Tremelimumab in Resectable Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Clinical implications of neoadjuvant immunotherapy in patients with locally advanced but resectable head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) remain largely unexplored.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with resectable HNSCC were randomized to receive a single dose of preoperative durvalumab (D) with or without tremelimumab (T) before resection, followed by postoperative (chemo)radiotherapy based on multidisciplinary discretion and 1-year D treatment. Artificial intelligence (AI)-powered spatial distribution analysis of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes and high-dimensional profiling of circulating immune cells tracked dynamic intratumoral and systemic immune responses.

RESULTS

Of the 48 patients enrolled (D, 24 patients; D+T, 24 patients), 45 underwent surgical resection per protocol (D, 21 patients; D+T, 24 patients). D±T had a favorable safety profile and did not delay surgery. Distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS) was significantly better in patients treated with D+T than in those treated with D monotherapy. AI-powered whole-slide image analysis demonstrated that D+T significantly reshaped the tumor microenvironment toward immune-inflamed phenotypes, in contrast with the D monotherapy or cytotoxic chemotherapy. High-dimensional profiling of circulating immune cells revealed a significant expansion of T-cell subsets characterized by proliferation and activation in response to D+T therapy, which was rare following D monotherapy. Importantly, expansion of specific clusters in CD8+ T cells and non-regulatory CD4+ T cells with activation and exhaustion programs was associated with prolonged DRFS in patients treated with D+T.

CONCLUSIONS

Preoperative D±T is feasible and may benefit patients with resectable HNSCC. Distinct changes in the tumor microenvironment and circulating immune cells were induced by each treatment regimen, warranting further investigation.

Immunotherapy for head and neck cancer: Fundamentals and therapeutic development

Squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) has been treated by multidisciplinary therapy consisting of surgery, radiotherapy, and cancer chemotherapy, but the recent advent of immunotherapy has produced significant changes in treatment systems and the results of these therapies. Immunotherapy has greatly improved the outcome of recurrent metastatic SCCHN, and the development of new treatment methods based on immunotherapy is now being applied not only to recurrent metastatic cases but also to locally advanced cases. To understand and practice cancer immunotherapy, it is important to understand the immune environment surrounding cancer, and the changes to which it is subject. Currently, the anti-PD-1 antibody drugs nivolumab and pembrolizumab are the only immunotherapies with proven efficacy in head and neck cancer. However, anti-PD-L1 and anti-CTLA-4 antibody drugs have also been shown to be useful in other types of cancer and are being incorporated into clinical practice. In head and neck cancer, numerous clinical trials have aimed to improve efficacy and safety by combining immunotherapy with other drug therapies and treatment modalities. Combinations of immunotherapy with cancer drugs with different mechanisms of action (cytotoxic agents, molecular-targeted agents, immune checkpoint inhibitors), as well as with radiation therapy and surgery are being investigated, and have the potential to significantly change medical care for these patients. The application of cancer immunotherapy not only to daily clinical practice but also to further therapeutic development requires a clear and complete understanding of the fundamentals of cancer immunotherapy, and knowledge of the numerous clinical studies conducted, both past and present. The results of these trials are numerous, both positive and negative, and a comprehensive understanding of this wide range of completed and ongoing clinical trials is critical to a systematic and comprehensive understanding of their scope and lessons learnt. In this article, after outlining the concepts of ``cancer immune cycle,'' ``cancer immune editing,'' and ``tumor microenvironment'' to provide an understanding of the basics of cancer immunity, we summarize the basics and clinical trial data on representative immune checkpoint inhibitors used in various cancer types, as well as recent therapeutic developments in cancer immunotherapy and the current status of these new treatments.

Pembrolizumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy versus placebo plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (KEYNOTE-412): a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial

BACKGROUND

Despite multimodal therapy, 5-year overall survival for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is about 50%. We assessed the addition of pembrolizumab to concurrent chemoradiotherapy for locally advanced HNSCC.

METHODS

In the randomised, double-blind, phase 3 KEYNOTE-412 trial, participants with newly diagnosed, high-risk, unresected locally advanced HNSCC from 130 medical centres globally were randomly assigned (1:1) to pembrolizumab (200 mg) plus chemoradiotherapy or placebo plus chemoradiotherapy. Randomisation was done using an interactive response technology system and was stratified by investigator's choice of radiotherapy regimen, tumour site and p16 status, and disease stage, with participants randomly assigned in blocks of four per stratum. Participants, investigators, and sponsor personnel were masked to treatment assignments. Local pharmacists were aware of assignments to support treatment preparation. Pembrolizumab and placebo were administered intravenously once every 3 weeks for up to 17 doses (one before chemoradiotherapy, two during chemoradiotherapy, 14 as maintenance therapy). Chemoradiotherapy included cisplatin (100 mg/m2) administered intravenously once every 3 weeks for two or three doses and accelerated or standard fractionation radiotherapy (70 Gy delivered in 35 fractions). The primary endpoint was event-free survival analysed in all randomly assigned participants. Safety was analysed in all participants who received at least one dose of study treatment. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03040999, and is active but not recruiting.

FINDINGS

Between April 19, 2017, and May 2, 2019, 804 participants were randomly assigned to the pembrolizumab group (n=402) or the placebo group (n=402). 660 (82%) of 804 participants were male, 144 (18%) were female, and 622 (77%) were White. Median study follow-up was 47·7 months (IQR 42·1-52·3). Median event-free survival was not reached (95% CI 44·7 months-not reached) in the pembrolizumab group and 46·6 months (27·5-not reached) in the placebo group (hazard ratio 0·83 [95% CI 0·68-1·03]; log-rank p=0·043 [significance threshold, p≤0·024]). 367 (92%) of 398 participants treated in the pembrolizumab group and 352 (88%) of 398 participants treated in the placebo group had grade 3 or worse adverse events. The most common grade 3 or worse adverse events were decreased neutrophil count (108 [27%] of 398 participants in the pembrolizumab group vs 100 [25%] of 398 participants in the placebo group), stomatitis (80 [20%] vs 69 [17%]), anaemia (80 [20%] vs 61 [15%]), dysphagia (76 [19%] vs 62 [16%]), and decreased lymphocyte count (76 [19%] vs 81 [20%]). Serious adverse events occurred in 245 (62%) participants in the pembrolizumab group versus 197 (49%) participants in the placebo group, most commonly pneumonia (43 [11%] vs 25 [6%]), acute kidney injury (33 [8%] vs 30 [8%]), and febrile neutropenia (24 [6%] vs seven [2%]). Treatment-related adverse events led to death in four (1%) participants in the pembrolizumab group (one participant each from aspiration pneumonia, end-stage renal disease, pneumonia, and sclerosing cholangitis) and six (2%) participants in the placebo group (three participants from pharyngeal haemorrhage and one participant each from mouth haemorrhage, post-procedural haemorrhage, and sepsis).

INTERPRETATION

Pembrolizumab plus chemoradiotherapy did not significantly improve event-free survival compared with chemoradiotherapy alone in a molecularly unselected, locally advanced HNSCC population. No new safety signals were seen. Locally advanced HNSCC remains a challenging disease that requires better treatment approaches.

FUNDING

Merck Sharp & Dohme, a subsidiary of Merck & Co, Rahway, NJ, USA.

Emerging monoclonal antibody therapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The incidence of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is increasing, particularly among younger populations. It is projected that the number of new cases will increase by almost 50% by 2040, with market revenues expected to triple in the same period. Despite the recent introduction of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) into the therapeutic armamentarium, the vast majority of patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC fail to derive durable benefits from systemic therapy.

AREAS COVERED

This article aims to review the multiple monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) regimens currently under development, targeting various growth factors, immune checkpoints, immune costimulatory receptors, and more.

EXPERT OPINION

So far, the combination of anti-EGFR and ICI appears to be the most promising, especially in HPV-negative patients. It will be interesting to confirm whether the arrival of antibody-drug conjugates and bispecific mAb can surpass the efficacy of anti-EGFR, as they are also being tested in combination with ICI. Furthermore, we believe that immune costimulatory agonists and various ICIs combination are worth monitoring, despite some initial setbacks.

Plasma IL-1 and IL-6 Family Cytokines with Soluble Receptor Levels at Diagnosis in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: High Levels Predict Decreased Five-Year Disease-Specific and Overall Survival

Activation of the acute-phase cascade (APC) has been correlated with outcomes in various cancers, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Primary drivers of the APC are the cytokines within the interleukin-6 (IL-6) and IL-1 families. Plasma levels of IL-6 family cytokines/soluble receptors (IL-6, IL-27, IL-31, OSM, CNTF, soluble (s-)gp130, s-IL-6Rα) and IL-1 family members (IL-1RA, s-IL-33Rα) were determined at diagnosis for 87 human papillomavirus (HPV)-negative (-) HNSCC patients. We then studied the 5-year Disease-Specific Survival (DSS) and Overall Survival (OS). Increased plasma levels of IL-6 (p < 0.001/p < 0.001) (DSS/OS), IL-31 (p = 0.044/p = 0.07), IL-1RA (p = 0.004/p = 0.035), soluble (s)-IL-6Rα p = 0.022/p = 0.035), and s-gp130 (p = 0.007/p = 0.003) at diagnosis were predictors of both OS and DSS from HPV(-) HNSCC patients. The cytokine DSS/OS predictions were associated with TNM stage and smoking history, whereas the soluble receptors IL-6Rα, gp130, and IL33Rα more uniquely predicted DSS/OS. Clinically, IL-6 levels above 2.5 pg/mL yielded 75% specificity and 70% sensitivity for DSS. In conclusion, high plasma levels of IL-6, IL-31, and IL-1RA, as well as the soluble receptors IL-6Rα, gp130, and IL33Rα, predicted clinical outcome. This shows their potential as candidates for both general therapy and immune therapy stratification, as well as being future platforms for the development of new immunotherapy.

Pembrolizumab-based first-line treatment for PD-L1-positive, recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a retrospective analysis

BACKGROUND

The KEYNOTE-048 trial showed that pembrolizumab-based first-line treatment for R/M HNSCC led to improved OS in the PD-L1 CPS ≥ 1 population when compared to the EXTREME regimen. However, the R/M HNSCC real-world population is generally frailer, often presenting with multiple comorbidities, worse performance status and older age than the population included in phase III clinical trials.

METHODS

This is a retrospective, single-centre analysis of patients with R/M HNSCC treated with pembrolizumab-based first-line treatment.

RESULTS

From February 2021 to March 2023, 92 patients were treated with pembrolizumab-based first-line treatment. Patients treated with pembrolizumab-based chemoimmunotherapy had better ECOG PS and younger age than those treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy. Median PFS and OS were 4 months and 8 months, respectively. PFS was similar among patients treated with pembrolizumab-based chemoimmunotherapy and pembrolizumab monotherapy, while patients treated with pembrolizumab monotherapy had worse OS (log-rank p =.001, HR 2.7). PFS and OS were improved in patients with PD-L1 CPS > = 20 (PFS: log-rank p =.005, HR 0.50; OS: log-rank p =.04, HR 0.57). Patients with higher ECOG PS scores had worse PFS and OS (PFS, log-rank p =.004; OS, log-rank p = 6e-04). In multivariable analysis, ECOG PS2 was associated with worse PFS and OS.

CONCLUSIONS

PFS in our real-world cohort was similar to the KEYNOTE-048 reference while OS was numerically inferior. A deeper understanding of clinical variables that might affect survival outcomes of patients with R/M HNSCC beyond ECOG PS and PD-L1 CPS is urgently needed.

Toxicity profiles of immune checkpoint inhibitors for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are widely used in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC); however, the toxicity profiles are inconclusive.

METHODS

Clinical trials evaluating ICIs for R/M HNSCC were searched from online databases. The characteristics of the studies and the results of incidences of any grade treatment-related adverse events (trAEs), grade three or more trAEs, treatment-related deaths, trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment, and specific trAEs were extracted.

RESULTS

Twenty studies with 3756 patients were included. The pooled incidences of any grade trAEs, grade three or more trAEs, treatment-related deaths, trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment for overall population were 62.07% (95% CI, 59.07%-65.02%), 13.82% (95% CI, 11.23%-16.62%), 0.39% (95% CI, 0.15%-0.71%), 3.99% (95% CI, 2.36%-5.95%), respectively. Programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) inhibitors monotherapy and ICIs combination therapy had significantly higher incidences of any grade trAEs (odds ratio [OR], 1.25, 95% CI, 1.05-1.49 and 1.36, 95% CI, 1.15-1.60, respectively), grade three or more trAEs (OR, 1.41, 95% CI, 1.08-1.84 and 1.79, 95% CI, 1.39-2.30, respectively), trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment (OR, 3.98, 95% CI, 2.06-7.70 and 10.14, 95% CI, 5.49-18.70, respectively) compared with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors monotherapy. ICIs combination therapy had a significantly higher incidence of grade three or more trAEs compared with PD-1 inhibitors monotherapy (OR, 1.27, 95% CI, 1.03-1.55); however, the incidences of any grade trAEs and trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment were not significant different.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggests that the incidences of grade three or more trAEs, treatment-related deaths, and trAEs leading to discontinuation of treatment are low in R/M HNSCC patients treated with ICIs. PD-L1 inhibitors monotherapy may be safer compared with PD-1 inhibitors monotherapy and ICIs combination therapy.

Association between sex and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Aim: To explore the association between sex and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Materials & methods: We assessed the difference in survival outcomes from ICIs between sexes using an interaction test. Results: 108 studies representing 70,243 patients were included. In the first-line setting, the pooled interaction HR was 0.97 (95% CI: 0.91-1.04). In the subsequent-line setting, the pooled interaction HR was 0.85 (95% CI: 0.77-0.95). When ICIs were given as perioperative therapy or as systemic therapy in patients with positive PD-L1 expression, both men and women obtained equal survival benefits. Conclusion: Both sex, line of therapy, cancer (sub)type and PD-L1 status should be taken into account in the assessment of risk versus benefit when deciding to offer ICIs to patients.

Colorectal medullary carcinoma: a pathological subtype with intense immune response and potential to benefit from immune checkpoint inhibitors

INTRODUCTION

Different pathological types of colorectal cancer have distinguished immune landscape, and the efficacy of immunotherapy will be completely different. Colorectal medullary carcinoma, accounting for 2.2-3.2%, is characterized by massive lymphocyte infiltration. However, the attention to the immune characteristics of colorectal medullary carcinoma is insufficient.

AREA COVERED

We searched the literature about colorectal medullary carcinoma on PubMed through November 2023to investigate the hallmarks of colorectal medullary carcinoma's immune landscape, compare medullary carcinoma originating from different organs and provide theoretical evidence for precise treatment, including applying immunotherapy and BRAF inhibitors.

EXPERT OPINION

Colorectal medullary carcinoma is a pathological subtype with intense immune response, with six immune characteristics and has the potential to benefit from immunotherapy. Mismatch repair deficiency, ARID1A missing and BRAF V600E mutation often occurs. IFN-γ pathway is activated and PD-L1 expression is increased. Abundant lymphocyte infiltration performs tumor killing function. In addition, BRAF mutation plays an important role in the occurrence and development, and we can consider the combination of BRAF inhibitors and immunotherapy in patients with BRAF mutant. The exploration of colorectal medullary carcinoma will arouse researchers' attention to the correlation between pathological subtypes and immune response, and promote the process of precise immunotherapy.

Outcomes in biomarker-selected subgroups from the KESTREL study of durvalumab and tremelimumab in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Selective biomarkers may improve outcomes in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) treated with immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy. We investigated three independent biomarkers for association with efficacy in the randomized, phase III KESTREL study (NCT02551159) of first-line durvalumab monotherapy or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus the EXTREME regimen: programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) immunohistochemistry, blood tumor mutational burden (bTMB) via circulating tumor DNA, and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR).

METHODS

Tumor or blood samples from patients enrolled in the KESTREL study were analyzed for PD-L1, bTMB, and NLR. Associations with overall survival (OS) or objective response rates (ORRs) were evaluated based on prespecified cut-offs for PD-L1 (tumor cell [TC] ≥ 50%/immune cell ≥ 25% or TC ≥ 25%), bTMB (≥ 16 mutations [mut] per megabase [Mb]), and NLR (≤ 7). Ad hoc analyses of exploratory cut-offs were performed.

RESULTS

Prespecified or exploratory cut-offs for PD-L1 did not enrich for ORR or OS for durvalumab monotherapy or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus EXTREME. In the bTMB ≥ 16 mut/Mb subgroup, OS hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for durvalumab monotherapy and durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus EXTREME were 0.90 (0.48-1.72) and 0.69 (0.39-1.25), respectively. Complete response rates were 8.6% with durvalumab plus tremelimumab and 4.3% with EXTREME (≥ 16 mut/Mb subgroup). No improvement in OS was observed for durvalumab monotherapy or durvalumab plus tremelimumab versus EXTREME at prespecified or exploratory NLR cut-offs.

CONCLUSIONS

bTMB demonstrated potential utility for selecting patients with R/M HNSCC who benefited from durvalumab with or without tremelimumab versus EXTREME. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT02551159.

Survival Benefit from Cancer-Directed Surgery for Metastatic Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to gather evidence for the survival benefit of cancer-directed surgery (CDS) in metastatic head and neck cancer (M1 HNC) and identify which patients will benefit most from CDS.

METHODS

Patients with M1 HNC were identified within the SEER database. According to whether received CDS, patients were divided into the CDS and non-CDS groups. The bias between the two groups was minimized using Propensity Score Matching (PSM), and the prognostic role of CDS was investigated using Kaplan-Meier analysis, log-rank test, and Cox proportional hazard models. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS), and the secondary endpoint was cancer-specific survival (CSS).

RESULTS

A total of 3215 patients with M1 HNC were extracted, including 566 patients who received CDS that were 1:1 propensity score-matched with patients who did not receive CDS. In the matched dataset, the median OS and CSS in CDS groups were significantly higher than in non-CDS groups (OS: 19.0 vs. 9.0 months, p < 0.001; CSS: 21.0 vs. 9.0 months, p < 0.001). Meanwhile, multivariable Cox regression analysis also revealed that CDS was a favorable prognostic factor for both OS and CSS. Furthermore, subgroups of patients with M1 HNC (younger age, being married, grade I-II, oropharynx site, earlier T/N stage, radiotherapy) were inclined to benefit from CDS, while those patients who received chemotherapy failed to benefit from CDS.

CONCLUSIONS

This study indicated that CDS was associated with improved survival in M1 HNC, especially for those subpopulations that benefit more from CDS treatment.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 134:1288-1298, 2024.

Major and durable responses to photon and electron-beam palliative radiotherapies after immune-checkpoint inhibitors in head and neck cancer

BACKGROUND

The immuno-modulatory effects of ionizing radiation are well-known and preclinical studies suggest a synergistic effect of combining radiotherapy (RT) and IO. However, data regarding the clinical activity and safety of this approach are limited.

METHODS

We present the cases of two patients with SCCHN primary progressing to PDL1-based IO within a clinical trial (NCT03383094), that received subsequent but not concurrent palliative RT using two different modalities (electron beam and photon beam therapies).

RESULTS

Both patients achieved major and durable responses at 4 irradiated sites, with excellent tolerance and no grade ≥ 3 toxicities. Complete response occurred in 3 of the disease areas (all locoregional) and partial response in 1 metastatic lesion.

CONCLUSION

Palliative radiotherapy after progression to IO was safe and demonstrated profound and durable responses in the cases presented.

Comparative safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

To indirectly compare the safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in the treatment of recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC) by network meta-analysis (NMA).

METHODS

Through August 1, 2023, we searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) of ICI-based treatment for R/M HNSCC. Outcomes of interest included overall and organ-specific immune-related adverse events (irAEs). Addis 16.5 software was used to perform NMA. Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) was used to assess confidence in the evidence.

RESULTS

Nine RCTs were included in this NMA, involving a total of 4016 patients. The general safety of ICI-based treatments in descending order was as follows: Durvalumab + Tremelimumab, Camrelizumab + Chemotherapy, Durvalumab, Toripalimab + Chemotherapy, Pembrolizumab, Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy, Nivolumab, Tremelimumab. There were differences in the toxicity profile among Toripalimab + Chemotherapy (dermatologic irAEs), Camrelizumab + Chemotherapy (hypothyroidism), Nivolumab + Ipilimumab (hyperthyroidism, pneumonitis), Pembrolizumab (nephrotoxicity), Pembrolizumab + Chemotherapy (colitis). ICI-based treatment increased the incidence of endocrine irAEs (hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism) and pneumonitis compared to conventional therapy. Besides, the combination of dual ICIs resulted in a greater occurrence of irAEs compared to the use of a single ICI.

CONCLUSIONS

The safety ranking of treatments based on ICIs is significantly influenced by specific irAEs. These irAEs, which vary in type and severity, play a crucial role in determining the overall safety profile of each ICI regimen.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

PROSPERO CRD42023460267.

Mechanisms of Resistance and Therapeutic Perspectives in Immunotherapy for Advanced Head and Neck Cancers

Immunotherapy is emerging as an effective treatment for advanced head and neck cancers and interest in this treatment modality has led to rapid expansion of this research. Pembrolizumab and nivolumab, monoclonal antibodies directed against the programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) receptor, are US Food and Drug Administration (FDA)- and European Medical Agency (EMA)-approved immunotherapies for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Resistance to immunotherapy is common, with about 60% of patients with recurrent or metastatic HNSCC not responding to immunotherapy and only 20-30% of patients without disease progression in the long term. Overcoming resistance to immunotherapy is therefore essential for augmenting the effectiveness of immunotherapy in HNSCC. This review details the innate and adaptive mechanisms by which head and neck cancers can become resistant to immunotherapeutic agents, biomarkers that can be used for immunotherapy patient selection, as well as other factors of the tumor microenvironment correlated with therapeutic response and prognosis. Numerous combinations and novel immunotherapies are currently being trialed, based on better understood immune evasion mechanisms. These potential treatments hold the promise of overcoming resistance to immunotherapy in head and neck cancers.

The dynamic role of immune checkpoint molecules in diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of head and neck cancers

Head and neck cancer (HNC) is the sixth most common cancer type, accounting for approximately 277,597 deaths worldwide. Recently, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has approved immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) agents targeting programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) as a treatment regimen for head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). Studies have reported the role of immune checkpoint inhibitors as targeted therapeutic regimens that unleash the immune response against HNSCC tumors. However, the overall response rates to immunotherapy vary between 14-32% in recurrent or metastatic HNSCC, with clinical response and treatment success being unpredictable. Keeping this perspective in mind, it is imperative to understand the role of T cells, natural killer cells, and antigen-presenting cells in modulating the immune response to immunotherapy. In lieu of this, these immune molecules could serve as prognostic and predictive biomarkers to facilitate longitudinal monitoring and understanding of treatment dynamics. These immune biomarkers could pave the path for personalized monitoring and management of HNSCC. In this review, we aim to provide updated immunological insight on the mechanism of action, expression, and the clinical application of immune cells' stimulatory and inhibitory molecules as prognostic and predictive biomarkers in HNC. The review is focused mainly on CD27 and CD137 (members of the TNF-receptor superfamily), natural killer group 2 member D (NKG2D), tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member 4 (TNFRSF4 or OX40), S100 proteins, PD-1, PD-L1, PD-L2, T cell immunoglobulin and mucin domain 3 (TIM-3), cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen 4 (CTLA-4), lymphocyte-activation gene 3 (LAG-3), indoleamine-pyrrole 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), B and T lymphocyte attenuator (BTLA). It also highlights the importance of T, natural killer, and antigen-presenting cells as robust biomarker tools for understanding immune checkpoint inhibitor-based treatment dynamics. Though a comprehensive review, all aspects of the immune molecules could not be covered as they were beyond the scope of the review; Further review articles can cover other aspects to bridge the knowledge gap.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors Serve as the First-Line Treatment for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

OBJECTIVES

Immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) therapy has demonstrated substantial benefits for certain patients. We try to evaluate the merits and demerits of each immunotherapy to aid clinical treatment.

METHODS

We conducted a comprehensive search of the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases for randomized clinical trials published as of June 10, 2023. Our study included published clinical trials of ICI monotherapy or combination therapy, along with data on treatment-related adverse events (TRAE). Data regarding survival efficacy and adverse events of each randomized controlled trial (RCT) were collected. The Bayesian random effects model was utilized for the network meta-analysis (NMA).

RESULTS

This study incorporated 19 RCTs, involving 5900 patients. Among 14 treatment regimens, Pembrolizumab combined with chemotherapy emerged as the most promising primary treatment for overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR). Toripalimab combined with chemotherapy exhibited the highest likelihood of becoming the primary treatment for extending progression-free survival (PFS). Durvalumab showed the lowest probability of adverse events, suggesting a safer profile compared with other drugs. Camrelizumab combined with chemotherapy demonstrated a heightened risk of adverse events. Dual ICI Nivolumab/Ipilimumab surpassed Durvalumab/Tremelimumab in terms of ORR and adverse events. The standard of care (SOC) regimen did not exhibit strong performance across the four outcome indicators.

CONCLUSION

Our analysis suggests that the integration of chemotherapy agents with ICIs enhances its efficacy as a first-line treatment for patients with advanced head and neck cancer (HNC).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

1 Laryngoscope, 134:749-761, 2024.

Immunotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: current status and perspectives

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the treatment of several solid cancers, including head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). First approved for second-line settings, ICIs are now used for the first-line treatment of HNSCCs, mainly in combination with standard chemotherapy. This review focuses on the results of the main phase III studies evaluating ICIs in recurrent or metastatic HNSCCs. The efficacy and indications according to the PD-L1 status, the main predictive biomarker, are discussed. The results of trials assessing ICI efficacy for locally advanced disease, including the neoadjuvant setting are also discussed. Finally, therapeutic combinations that are potential treatments for HNSCCs, including ICIs and targeted therapies such as anti-EGFR agents, are presented.

Early recurrence, time-to-recurrence, and recurrence patterns: Assessing their impact on survival outcomes in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M-HNSCC) patients treated with first line platinum-based chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

R/M-HNSCC patients typically receive 1L platinum-based chemotherapy with pembrolizumab or cetuximab. However, the outcomes for patients with early recurrence (<6 months) remain unclear due to their exclusion from most 1L studies. This study aimed to assess the impact of time-to-recurrence intervals (TTRI) and recurrence patterns on the survival of R/M-HNSCC patients.

METHODS

We identified non-curable R/M-HNSCC patients at our institution from 1/2008 through 6/2020. We analyzed the outcomes of early recurrent patients who received 1L systemic treatment, with different TTRIs and recurrence patterns.

RESULTS

Our study included 234 eligible patients. The majority (47%) experienced early recurrence (<6 months), while 22%, 20%, and 11% had recurrences at 6-12 months, >12 months, and de novo metastasis, respectively. The platinum-based regimen was the most commonly used chemotherapy (86%), with cetuximab and immunotherapy utilized in 3% and 5% of cases, respectively. Significant differences in PFS and OS were observed among TTRI groups. For patients with early recurrence, both platinum-doublet and monotherapy treatments significantly improved OS. Locoregional recurrence (47%) was the most common, followed by distant metastasis (22%) and both (20%). Recurrence patterns were significantly associated with OS but not with PFS. In multivariate analysis, TTRI ≥12 months significantly correlated with improved PFS (HR 0.51; p = 0.004) and OS (HR 0.58; p = 0.009), whereas recurrent pattern did not.

CONCLUSION

TTRI significantly influenced the survival, while recurrence patterns did not. In our study, the retrospective design limited our ability to definitively establish whether early recurrent R/M-HNSCC patients would benefit more from platinum-doublet. Despite poor prognosis, early recurrent patients benefited from 1L systemic treatments. Given the variation in prognoses, TTRI should be considered a stratification factor in future clinical trials.

Discontinuation risk from adverse events: immunotherapy alone vs. combined with chemotherapy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

While immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy (Chemo-IO) is generally recognized for providing superior outcomes compared to monotherapy (mono-IO), it is associated with a higher incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs), which may lead to treatment discontinuation. In this study, we compared the rates of treatment discontinuation between mono-IO and Chemo-IO as first-line treatments for various solid tumors.

METHODS

We systematically reviewed clinical trials from databases (PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and an additional source) published from January 1, 2018, to July 10, 2023. We included phase III randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that utilized immunotherapy agents in at least one arm as first-line treatments for a variety of solid tumors. Data extraction followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews (PRISMA) extension statement for network meta-analysis. A random effects model was used for the network meta-analysis, with the risk of bias assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool II. The primary outcomes encompassed treatment discontinuation rates due to TRAEs among patients who underwent immunotherapy, either alone or combined with chemotherapy, for various solid tumors. Pooled relative risks (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated to compare between treatment groups.

RESULTS

From 29 RCTs, a total of 21,677 patients and 5 types of treatment were analyzed. Compared to mono-IO, Chemo-IO showed a significantly higher rate of discontinuation due to TRAEs (RR 2.68, 95% CI 1.98-3.63). Subgroup analysis for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients also exhibited a greater risk of discontinuation due to TRAEs with Chemo-IO compared to mono-IO (RR 2.93, 95% CI 1.67-5.14). Additional analyses evaluating discontinuation rates due to either treatment emergent adverse events (TEAEs) or AEs regardless of causality (any AEs) consistently revealed an elevated risk associated with Chemo-IO.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemo-IO was associated with an elevated risk of treatment discontinuation not only due to TRAEs but also any AEs or TEAEs. Given that the treatment duration can impact clinical outcomes, a subset of patients might benefit more from mono-IO than combination therapy. Further research is imperative to identify and characterize this subset.

Durvalumab with or without tremelimumab for patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) ranks as the sixth most prevalent cancer worldwide, significantly impacting patients' quality of life. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have been employed in the treatment of recurrent/metastatic (R/M)-HNSCC patients. This meta-analysis aims to assess the efficacy and safety of durvalumab monotherapy compared to the combination of durvalumab and tremelimumab in R/M-HNSCC patients.

Methods

Relevant studies were systematically searched in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. All articles comparing durvalumab monotherapy with the combination with durvalumab and tremelimumab in R/M-HNSCC treatment were included. Additionally, the references of identified studies were screened if necessary.

Result

A total of 1298 patients from three studies comparing durvalumab with durvalumab and tremelimumab in treating R/M-HNSCC were include in this meta-analysis. Our findings revealed no significant difference in objective response rate (ORR) [odds ratio (OR): 1.15, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.85 to 1.56, P = 0.36] and disease control rate (DCR) (OR=1.08, 95%CI: 0.86 to 1.37, P = 0.51). Similar outcomes were observed in overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and duration of response (DoR). Regarding safety, there was no significant difference in the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (trAEs) between the two groups (OR=1.26, 95%CI: 0.81 to 1.94, P = 0.30). However, patients treated with the combination therapy exhibited a higher incidence of grade 3-4 trAEs (OR=1.93, 95%CI: 1.36 to 2.73, P = 0.0002) and a greater likelihood of discontinuing treatment due to trAEs (OR=2.07, 95%CI: 1.12 to 3.85, P = 0.02). There was no significant difference in the occurrence of severe trAEs leading to death (OR=1.36, 95%CI: 0.47 to 3.96, P = 0.57).

Conclusion

This meta-analysis suggests that R/M-HNSCC patients receiving the combination of durvalumab and tremelimumab may achieve comparable outcomes in terms of ORR, DCR, OS, PFS, and DoR, without significant differences. However, the combination therapy is associated with a higher incidence of grade 3-4 trAEs and an increased likelihood of treatment discontinuation due to trAEs. These findings highlight the need for cautious consideration of the combination of durvalumab and tremelimumab in R/M-HNSCC patients, which should be further evaluated in high-quality studies.

Are immune checkpoint inhibitors ineffective in treating patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma aged 75 years or Older? A Meta-Analysis

OBJECTIVES

The efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) is unclear in patients aged ≥ 75 years with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials that compared ICIs with standard-of-care (SOC) therapy for recurrent/metastatic HNSCC.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and ClinicalTrials.gov were searched for eligible trials. We evaluated the overall survival (OS) benefit of ICIs versus SOC according to patient age (<75 versus ≥ 75 years). The OS benefit was evaluated and compared between the age subgroups using hazard ratios (HRs). Data were pooled using a random-effects model.

RESULTS

Five phase 3 trials involving 3437 patients were included. In patients aged ≥ 75 years (n = 207), ICIs did not improve OS compared to SOC (HR = 1.30, 95 % confidence interval [CI]: 0.93-1.81, P = 0.127). However, an improvement in OS was observed in patients aged < 75 years (n = 3230, HR = 0.90, 95 % CI: 0.83-0.99, P = 0.025). There is a significant difference in OS benefit between patients aged < 75 and ≥ 75 years (ratio of HR = 0.69, 95 % CI: 0.49-0.98, P = 0.036). Subgroup, meta-regression, and sensitivity analyses supported the reliability of the results.

CONCLUSIONS

Given the small sample size, our findings showing no improvement in OS suggest a lack of evidence to support the use of ICIs in patients with recurrent/metastatic HNSCC aged ≥ 75 years. Therefore, prospective studies are needed to clarify their efficacy among this age group.

Evaluation of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with PD-1 inhibitors in patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma: a comparative study of antitumor activity

PURPOSE

To assess the antitumor activity of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in conjunction with PD-1 inhibitors (neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy) among patients with oropharyngeal and hypopharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPHSCC) and compare its efficacy with neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective analysis using data from patients diagnosed with OPHSCC and treated at the Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center between September 2012 and August 2022. We included patients who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone or combined with PD-1 inhibitors. We assessed the clinical response using the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and evaluated progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Preliminary results demonstrate that neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy exhibited robust antitumor activity in OPHSCC, with an impressive overall response rate (ORR) of 81.0%. Complete response and partial response rates were 14.9% and 65.9%, respectively. Notably, neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy demonstrated superior PFS and OS to neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone. The 1-year PFS rate was 80.7%, and the 2-year rate was 61.1%. Additionally, the 1-year OS rate reached 92.3%. Finally, a multivariate analysis identified the American Joint Committee on Cancer stage reduction post-treatment as a favorable predictor of PFS.

CONCLUSION

Our results underscore the promising potential of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in enhancing antitumor activity in patients with OPHSCC. The robust ORR, along with improved PFS and OS, supports the utility of this combined approach. These results pave the way for further investigations to validate and refine the application of neoadjuvant chemoimmunotherapy in this challenging clinical context.

PER2 binding to HSP90 enhances immune response against oral squamous cell carcinoma by inhibiting IKK/NF-κB pathway and PD-L1 expression

BACKGROUND

Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) contributes to the immune escape of tumor cells and is a critical target for antitumor immunotherapy. However, the molecular mechanisms regulating PD-L1 expression remain unclear, hindering the development of effective therapies. Here we investigate the role and molecular mechanism of the core clock gene Period2 (PER2) in regulating PD-L1 expression and its role in the combination therapy of oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC).

METHODS

Quantitative real-time PCR, western blotting or immunohistochemistry to detect expression of PER2 and PD-L1 in OSCC tissues and cells. Overexpression and knockdown of PER2 detects the function of PER2. Bioinformatics, immunoprecipitation, GST pull-down, CHX chase assay and western blot and strip to detect the mechanism of PER2 regulation for PD-L1. A humanized immune reconstitution subcutaneous xenograft mouse model was established to investigate the combination therapy efficacy.

RESULTS

In OSCC tissues and cells, PER2 expression was reduced and PD-L1 expression was increased, the expression of PER2 was significantly negatively correlated with PD-L1. In vitro and in vivo experiments demonstrated that PER2 inhibited PD-L1 expression and enhanced T-cell-mediated OSCC cell killing by suppressing the IKK/NF-κB pathway. Mechanistically, PER2 binds to heat shock protein 90 (HSP90) through the PAS1 domain and reduces the interaction of HSP90 with inhibitors of kappa B kinase (IKKs), promoting the ubiquitination of IKKα/β and p65 nuclear translocation to inhibit IKK/NF-κB pathway, thereby suppressing PD-L1 expression. In humanized immune reconstitution subcutaneous xenograft mouse model, it was demonstrated that PER2 targeting combined with anti-PD-L1 treatment improved the inhibition of OSCC growth by promoting CD8+ T-cell infiltration into the tumor.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings reveal the role and mechanism of PD-L1 regulation by PER2 and support the potential clinical application of PER2 targeting in combination with anti-PD-L1 in OSCC immunotherapy.

A single photodynamic priming protocol augments delivery of ⍺-PD-L1 mAbs and induces immunogenic cell death in head and neck tumors

Photodynamic priming (PDP) leverages the photobiological effects of subtherapeutic photodynamic therapy (PDT) regimens to modulate the tumor vasculature and stroma. PDP also sensitizes tumors to secondary therapies, such as immunotherapy by inducing a cascade of molecular events, including immunogenic cell death (ICD). We and others have shown that PDP improves the delivery of antibodies, among other theranostic agents. However, it is not known whether a single PDP protocol is capable of both inducing ICD in vivo and augmenting the delivery of immune checkpoint inhibitors. In this rapid communication, we show for the first time that a single PDP protocol using liposomal benzoporphyrin derivative (Lipo-BPD, 0.25 mg/kg) with 690 nm light (75 J/cm2 , 100 mW/cm2 ) simultaneously doubles the delivery of ⍺-PD-L1 antibodies in murine AT-84 head and neck tumors and induces ICD in vivo. ICD was observed as a 3-11 fold increase in tumor cell exposure of damage-associated molecular patterns (Calreticulin, HMGB1, and HSP70). These findings suggest that this single, highly translatable PDP protocol using clinically relevant Lipo-BPD holds potential for improving immunotherapy outcomes in head and neck cancer. It can do so by simultaneously overcoming physical barriers to the delivery of immune checkpoint inhibitors, and biochemical barriers that contribute to immunosuppression.

Efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors in recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials

BACKGROUND

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) showed antitumor activity for recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (R/M HNSCC). However, the results from different studies were controversial.

METHODS

Online databases were searched for randomized clinical trials (RCTs) evaluating ICIs for R/M HNSCC. The characteristics of the studies and the results of overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were extracted.

RESULTS

A total of 4936 patients from eight studies were included. Anti-PD1/PDL1 monotherapy significantly improved OS in total population (hazard ratio, HR, 0.87, 95% CI, 0.79-0.95, p = 0.003) and PD-L1 high expression patients (HR, 0.71, 95% CI, 0.55-0.90, p = 0.006) with significant lower incidence of any grade TRAEs (odds ratio, OR, 0.16, 95% CI, 0.07-0.37, p < 0.00001) and Grades 3-5 TRAEs (OR, 0.18, 95% CI, 0.10-0.33, p < 0.0001) compared with standard of care (SOC); however, the pooled results of PFS and ORR were not significant different. PD1/PDL1 inhibitors plus CTLA4 inhibitors did not improve OS, PFS, ORR compared with SOC or ICIs monotherapy; however, the incidence of Grades 3-5 TRAEs was significant higher compared with ICIs monotherapy (OR, 1.80, 95% CI, 1.34-2.41, p = 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Anti-PD1/PDL1 monotherapy could improve OS for R/M HNSCC with significant lower incidence of TRAEs compared with SOC. PD1/PDL1 inhibitors plus CTLA4 inhibitors showed no more benefit compared with both SOC and ICIs monotherapy, but the incidence of Grades 3-5 TRAEs was significant higher compared with ICIs monotherapy.

Intermediate endpoints as surrogates for outcomes in cancer immunotherapy: a systematic review and meta-analysis of phase 3 trials

Background

Cancer immunotherapy shows unique efficacy kinetics that differs from conventional treatment. These characteristics may lead to the prolongation of trial duration, hence reliable surrogate endpoints are urgently needed. We aimed to systematically evaluate the study-level performance of commonly reported intermediate clinical endpoints for surrogacy in cancer immunotherapy.

Methods

We searched the Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane databases, between database inception and October 18, 2022, for phase 3 randomised trials investigating the efficacy of immunotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumours. An updated search was done on July, 15, 2023. No language restrictions were used. Eligible trials had to set overall survival (OS) as the primary or co-primary endpoint and report at least one intermediate clinical endpoint including objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), progression-free survival (PFS), and 1-year overall survival. Other key inclusion and exclusion criteria included: (1) adult patients (>18 years old) with advanced solid tumour; (2) no immunotherapy conducted in the control arms; (3) follow-up is long enough to achieve OS; (4) data should be public available. A two-stage meta-analytic approach was conducted to evaluate the magnitude of the association between these intermediate endpoints and OS. A surrogate was identified if the coefficient of determination (R2) was 0.7 or greater. Leave-one-out cross-validation and pre-defined subgroup analysis were conducted to examine the heterogeneity. Potential publication bias was evaluated using the Egger's and Begg's tests. This trial was registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42022381648.

Findings

52,342 patients with 15 types of tumours from 77 phase 3 studies were included. ORR (R2 = 0.11; 95% CI, 0.00-0.24), DCR (R2 = 0.01; 95% CI, 0.00-0.01), and PFS (R2 = 0.40; 95% CI, 0.23-0.56) showed weak associations with OS. However, a strong correlation was observed between 1-year survival and clinical outcome (R2 = 0.74; 95% CI, 0.64-0.83). These associations remained relatively consistent across pre-defined subgroups stratified based on tumour types, masking methods, line of treatments, drug targets, treatment strategies, and follow-up durations. No significant heterogeneities or publication bias were identified.

Interpretation

1-year milestone survival was the only identified surrogacy endpoint for outcomes in cancer immunotherapy. Ongoing investigations and development of new endpoints and incorporation of biomarkers are needed to identify potential surrogate markers that can be more robust than 1-year survival. This work may provide important references in assisting the design and interpretation of future clinical trials, and constitute complementary information in drafting clinical practice guidelines.

Funding

None.

Identification of a distinct tumor endothelial cell-related gene expression signature associated with patient prognosis and immunotherapy response in multiple cancers

BACKGROUND

Tumor endothelial cells (TECs) play a significant role in regulating the tumor microenvironment, drug response, and immune cell activities in various cancers. However, the association between TEC gene expression signature and patient prognosis or therapeutic response remains poorly understood.

METHODS

We analyzed transcriptomics data of normal and tumor endothelial cells obtained from the GEO database to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) associated with TECs. We then compared these DEGs with those commonly found across five different tumor types from the TCGA database to determine their prognostic relevance. Using these genes, we constructed a prognostic risk model integrated with clinical features to develop a nomogram model, which we validated through biological experiments.

RESULTS

We identified 12 TEC-related prognostic genes across multiple tumor types, of which five genes were sufficient to construct a prognostic risk model with an AUC of 0.682. The risk scores effectively predicted patient prognosis and immunotherapeutic response. Our newly developed nomogram model provided more accurate prognostic estimates of cancer patients than the TNM staging method (AUC = 0.735) and was validated using external patient cohorts. Finally, RT-PCR and immunohistochemical analyses indicated that the expression of these 5 TEC-related prognostic genes was up-regulated in both patient-derived tumors and cancer cell lines, while depletion of the hub genes reduced cancer cell growth, migration and invasion, and enhanced their sensitivity to gemcitabine or cytarabine.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study discovered the first TEC-related gene expression signature that can be used to construct a prognostic risk model for guiding treatment options in multiple cancers.

Combination Therapy as a Promising Way to Fight Oral Cancer

Oral cancer is a highly aggressive tumor with invasive properties that can lead to metastasis and high mortality rates. Conventional treatment strategies, such as surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation therapy, alone or in combination, are associated with significant side effects. Currently, combination therapy has become the standard practice for the treatment of locally advanced oral cancer, emerging as an effective approach in improving outcomes. In this review, we present an in-depth analysis of the current advancements in combination therapies for oral cancer. The review explores the current therapeutic options and highlights the limitations of monotherapy approaches. It then focuses on combinatorial approaches that target microtubules, as well as various signaling pathway components implicated in oral cancer progression, namely, DNA repair players, the epidermal growth factor receptor, cyclin-dependent kinases, epigenetic readers, and immune checkpoint proteins. The review discusses the rationale behind combining different agents and examines the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the effectiveness of these combinations, emphasizing their ability to enhance treatment response and overcome drug resistance. Challenges and limitations associated with combination therapy are discussed, including potential toxicity and the need for personalized treatment approaches. A future perspective is also provided to highlight the existing challenges and possible resolutions toward the clinical translation of current oral cancer therapies.

Enhancement of Immunotherapies in Head and Neck Cancers Using Biomaterial-Based Treatment Strategies

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is a challenging disease to treat because of typically late-stage diagnoses and tumor formation in difficult-to-treat areas, sensitive to aggressive or invasive treatments. To date, HNSCC treatments have been limited to surgery, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy, which may have significant morbidity and often lead to long-lasting side effects. The development of immunotherapies has revolutionized cancer treatment by providing a promising alternative to standard-of-care therapies. However, single-agent immunotherapy has been only modestly effective in the treatment of various cancers, including HNSCC, with most patients receiving no overall benefit or increased survival. In addition, single-agent immunotherapy's limitations, namely immune-related side effects and the necessity of multidose treatments, must be addressed to further improve treatment efficacy. Biocompatible biomaterials, in combination with cancer immunotherapies, offer numerous advantages in the concentration, localization, and controlled release of drugs, cancer antigens, and immune cells. Biomaterial structures are diverse, and their design can generally be customized to enhance immunotherapy response. In preclinical settings, the use of biomaterials has shown great promise in improving the efficacy of single-agent immunotherapy. Herein, we provide an overview of current immunotherapy treatments for HNSCC and their limitations, as well as the potential applications of biomaterials in enhancing cancer immunotherapies. Impact Statement Advances in anticancer immunotherapies for the past 30 years have yielded exciting clinical results and provided alternatives to long-standing standard-of-care treatments, which are associated with significant toxicities and long-term morbidity. However, patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) have not benefited from immunotherapies as much as patients with other cancers. Immunotherapy limitations include systemic side effects, therapeutic resistance, poor delivery kinetics, and limited patient responses. Biomaterial-enhanced immunotherapies, as explored in this review, are a potentially powerful means of achieving localized drug delivery, sustained and controlled drug release, and immunomodulation. They may overcome current treatment limitations and improve patient outcomes and care.

Clinical efficacy and biomarker analysis of dual PD-1/CTLA-4 blockade in recurrent/metastatic EBV-associated nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Single-agent checkpoint inhibitor (CPI) activity in Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) related nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is limited. Dual CPI shows increased activity in solid cancers. In this single-arm phase II trial (NCT03097939), 40 patients with recurrent/metastatic EBV-positive NPC who failed prior chemotherapy receive nivolumab 3 mg/kg every 2 weeks and ipilimumab 1 mg/kg every 6 weeks. Primary outcome of best overall response rate (BOR) and secondary outcomes (progression-free survival [PFS], clinical benefit rate, adverse events, duration of response, time to progression, overall survival [OS]) are reported. The BOR is 38% with median PFS and OS of 5.3 and 19.5 months, respectively. This regimen is well-tolerated and treatment-related adverse events requiring discontinuation are low. Biomarker analysis shows no correlation of outcomes to PD-L1 expression or tumor mutation burden. While the BOR does not meet pre-planned estimates, patients with low plasma EBV-DNA titre (<7800 IU/ml) trend to better response and PFS. Deep immunophenotyping of pre- and on-treatment tumor biopsies demonstrate early activation of the adaptive immune response, with T-cell cytotoxicity seen in responders prior to any clinically evident response. Immune-subpopulation profiling also identifies specific PD-1 and CTLA-4 expressing CD8 subpopulations that predict for response to combined immune checkpoint blockade in NPC.

Current State and Future Directions of EGFR-Directed Therapy in Head and Neck Cancer

OPINION STATEMENT

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) is commonly overexpressed in many head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCC). With the success of EGFR inhibition in other cancer types, there was optimism for efficacy in HNSCC. Unfortunately, the clinical outcomes of EGFR-directed therapy have not provided overwhelming benefit. In the curative-intent setting, cisplatin has proven superior over cetuximab, an EGFR monoclonal antibody, in multiple large trials, and cisplatin should continue to be the treatment of choice when administered with definitive or adjuvant radiation. For cisplatin-ineligible patients, we prefer carboplatin-based treatment over cetuximab. We reserve cetuximab for a small group of patients who are eligible for radiation and systemic treatment but have contraindications to any platinum therapy. The role of EGFR inhibitors in the recurrent/metastatic setting is more robust. Although supplanted by immunotherapy as front-line treatment, cetuximab remains a meaningful second-line option for patients who have progressed on immune checkpoint inhibitors. Overall, EGFR-directed therapies have been of modest value in the treatment of both locally advanced and metastatic HNSCC. The future of EGFR-directed therapies will likely develop from exploring combination therapies, especially with immunotherapy. Early evidence suggests synergistic effects allowing for a more robust immune response, which holds promise for novel regimens in the treatment of HNSCC.

The Role of Different Immunocompetent Cell Populations in the Pathogenesis of Head and Neck Cancer-Regulatory Mechanisms of Pro- and Anti-Cancer Activity and Their Impact on Immunotherapy

Head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is one of the most aggressive and heterogeneous groups of human neoplasms. HNSCC is characterized by high morbidity, accounting for 3% of all cancers, and high mortality with ~1.5% of all cancer deaths. It was the most common cancer worldwide in 2020, according to the latest GLOBOCAN data, representing the seventh most prevalent human malignancy. Despite great advances in surgical techniques and the application of modern combinations and cytotoxic therapies, HNSCC remains a leading cause of death worldwide with a low overall survival rate not exceeding 40-60% of the patient population. The most common causes of death in patients are its frequent nodal metastases and local neoplastic recurrences, as well as the relatively low response to treatment and severe drug resistance. Much evidence suggests that the tumour microenvironment (TME), tumour infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and circulating various subpopulations of immunocompetent cells, such regulatory T cells (CD4+CD25+Foxp3+Tregs), cytotoxic CD3+CD8+ T cells (CTLs) and CD3+CD4+ T helper type 1/2/9/17 (Th1/Th2/Th9/Th17) lymphocytes, T follicular helper cells (Tfh) and CD56dim/CD16bright activated natural killer cells (NK), carcinoma-associated fibroblasts (CAFs), myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs), tumour-associated neutrophils (N1/N2 TANs), as well as tumour-associated macrophages (M1/M2 phenotype TAMs) can affect initiation, progression and spread of HNSCC and determine the response to immunotherapy. Rapid advances in the field of immuno-oncology and the constantly growing knowledge of the immunosuppressive mechanisms and effects of tumour cancer have allowed for the use of effective and personalized immunotherapy as a first-line therapeutic procedure or an essential component of a combination therapy for primary, relapsed and metastatic HNSCC. This review presents the latest reports and molecular studies regarding the anti-tumour role of selected subpopulations of immunocompetent cells in the pathogenesis of HNSCC, including HPV+ve (HPV+) and HPV-ve (HPV-) tumours. The article focuses on the crucial regulatory mechanisms of pro- and anti-tumour activity, key genetic or epigenetic changes that favour tumour immune escape, and the strategies that the tumour employs to avoid recognition by immunocompetent cells, as well as resistance mechanisms to T and NK cell-based immunotherapy in HNSCC. The present review also provides an overview of the pre- and clinical early trials (I/II phase) and phase-III clinical trials published in this arena, which highlight the unprecedented effectiveness and limitations of immunotherapy in HNSCC, and the emerging issues facing the field of HNSCC immuno-oncology.