Evaluation of the performance of ultrasonography and 99mTc-sestamibi scintigraphy for primary hyperparathyroidism surgery

Positive predictive values of ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration with parathyroid hormone assay and Tc-99m sestamibi scintigraphy in sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism

OBJECTIVES

Ultrasonography (US) and Tc-99m sestamibi scintigraphy (SS) are usually performed as preoperative imaging modalities for patients with sporadic primary hyperparathyroidism (SPHP). Fine-needle aspiration (FNA) under US guidance for parathyroid hormone (PH) assay can enhance the diagnostic accuracy of US. The main aim of the present study was to compare positive predictive values between US-FNA and SS. The secondary aim was to draw up a decision-tree for FNA and SS.

METHODS

The single-center retrospective study included patients with previously non-operated SPHP. They underwent US-guided FNA, PET-CT SS, and 18 F-choline scintigraphy if the first two methods were inconclusive. PH washout level was considered pathological when greater than the serum PH level. Postoperative histology data were correlated to imaging data.

RESULTS

In total, 117 patients were included, with a mean age of 64 years (range, 26-89 years). A single adenoma was identified on pathology in 101 patients (89%). FNA findings were pathologic for 64 patients (55%), with a mean PH level of 2,604ng/L [range, 585-9,074ng/L], higher than the serum level of 179ng/L [range, 60-1,000ng/L]. US-guided FNA showed sensitivity, specificity, and positive and negative predictive values (PPV, NPV) of respectively 72%, 92%, 99% and 28%, compared to 89%, 42%, 93% and 32% for SS. The rate of error in locating the parathyroid gland was 8% for US-guided FNA versus 12% for SS. Comparison of the two methods showed better sensitivity for SS (P=0.0052) and better specificity for FNA (P=0.0143), with no significant difference in PPV or NPV. 18 F-choline scintigraphy detected the hyperfunctioning parathyroid in 11 out of the 15 patients.

CONCLUSION

PPV did not significantly differ between FNA and SS. US-guided FNA performed by an experienced operator could be a simple first-line method for more than 50% of patients with non-operated SPHP, with 99% PPV. In case of negative or doubtful FNA findings, SS can be performed in second line.

A mini-invasive approach is feasible in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism and discordant or negative localisation studies

Preoperative localisation of pathological glands in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHP) is the mainstay for mini-invasive parathyroidectomy. Nevertheless, a not negligible number of patients presents discordant or negative neck ultrasound (US) and ^99mTc-Sestamibi (MIBI) scan. The aim of this study was to assess if a mini-invasive approach is feasible in this kind of patients. In this retrospective study were included patients that underwent parathyroidectomy for PHP. Patients were divided into two groups according to concordance of US and MIBI scan results. 242 patients were included: 183 had concordant preoperative studies, and 59 had discordant or negative studies. A mini-invasive approach was possible in 42 (72.9%) patients with unclear preoperative studies, whereas 12 (20.3%) additional patients required conversion to BNE. The incidence of persistent PHP was higher in patients with unclear preoperative studies (8.5% vs 2.7%), but this difference did not reach a statistical significance (p = 0.121). In patients with unclear preoperative studies, a negative result of intraoperative PTH allowed to avoid a persistent disease in 12 patients, while in 3 cases led to an unnecessary additional exploration. In patients with discordant preoperative studies a mini-invasive approach is feasible; in this setting, the use of intraoperative PTH is mandatory to reduce the incidence of persistent PHP.

Surgical management of MILD hyperparathyroidism

INTRODUCTION

There is no consensus for management of Mild primary hyperparathyroidism (MILD-pHP). Specific management has been suggested by some authors. We have compared the surgical management of the patients with MILD-pHP to those with Classic primary hyperparathyroidism (C-pHP) treated by surgery according to The Fourth International Workshop on pHP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data of 173 patients who underwent a parathyroidectomy were reviewed and retrospectively analysed. Management of 32 patients with MILD-pHPT (18.5%) patients were compared to that of 141 (81.5%) patients with C-pHPT.

RESULTS

MILD-pHP group was more often discovered after non-fractured osteoporosis (21.9% vs 7.1%, p = 0.02) and surgery for chondrocalcinosis was more often carried out (6.3% vs 0%, p = 0.03) in the MILD-pHP group. A Mini-Invasive Parathyroidectomy (MIP) was carried out in 81.3% of cases, and 87.5% of patients had a single adenoma. The rate of multiglandular pathology was not different. Same day discharge was significantly higher in MILD-pHP group (37.5% vs 17.7%, p = 0.01). Success was obtained in 87.5% in the MILD-pHP group, there was no significant difference with the C-pHP group (92.9%, p = 0.48). There was no significant difference in the imaging performances. Imaging discordance was observed in 18.8% of cases in MILD-pHP and 33.6% in C-pHP (p = 0.38) without correlation with surgical failure.

CONCLUSION

This study suggests that, by selecting patients on the basis of concordant imaging and international recommendations, there is no difference in outcome between MILD-pHP and C-pHP treated surgically.