Atrofia muscular espinal: revisión de nuestra casuística en los últimos 25 años

Prognostic Factors and Treatment-Effect Modifiers in Spinal Muscular Atrophy

Spinal muscular atrophy (SMA) is a rare, progressive neuromuscular disease characterized by loss of motor neurons and muscle atrophy. Untreated infants with type 1 SMA do not achieve major motor milestones, and death from respiratory failure typically occurs before 2 years of age. Individuals with types 2 and 3 SMA exhibit milder phenotypes and have better functional and survival outcomes. Herein, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify factors that influence the prognosis of types 1, 2, and 3 SMA. In untreated infants with type 1 SMA, absence of symptoms at birth, a later symptom onset, and a higher survival of motor neuron 2 (SMN2) copy number are all associated with increased survival. Disease duration, age at treatment initiation, and, to a lesser extent, baseline function were identified as potential treatment‐modifying factors for survival, emphasizing that early treatment with disease‐modifying therapies (DMT) is essential in type 1 SMA. In patients with types 2 and 3 SMA, factors considered prognostic of changes in motor function were SMN2 copy number, age, and ambulatory status. Individuals aged 6–15 years were particularly vulnerable to developing complications (scoliosis and progressive joint contractures) which negatively influence functional outcomes and may also affect the therapeutic response in patients. Age at the time of treatment initiation emerged as a treatment‐effect modifier on the outcome of DMTs. Factors identified in this review should be considered prior to designing or analyzing studies in an SMA population, conducting population matching, or summarizing results from different studies on the treatments for SMA.

Population-based analysis of survival in spinal muscular atrophy

OBJECTIVE

To investigate probabilities of survival and its surrogate, that is, mechanical ventilation, in patients with spinal muscular atrophy (SMA).

METHODS

We studied survival in a population-based cohort on clinical prevalence of genetically confirmed, treatment-naive patients with SMA, stratified for best acquired motor milestone (i.e., none: type 1a/b; head control in supine position or rolling: type 1c; sitting independently: type 2a; standing: type 2b; walking: type 3a/b; adult onset: type 4). We also assessed the need for mechanical ventilation as a surrogate endpoint for survival.

RESULTS

We included 307 patients with a total follow-up of 7,141 person-years. Median survival was 9 days in SMA type 1a, 7.7 months in type 1b, and 17.0 years in type 1c. Patients with type 2a had endpoint-free survival probabilities of 74.2% and 61.5% at ages 40 and 60 years, respectively. Endpoint-free survival of SMA types 2b, 3, and 4 was relatively normal, at least within the first 60 years of life. Patients with SMA types 1c and 2a required mechanical ventilation more frequently and from younger ages compared to patients with milder SMA types. In our cohort, patients ventilated up to 12 h/d progressed not gradually, but abruptly, to ≥16 h/d.

CONCLUSIONS

Shortened endpoint-free survival is an important characteristic of SMA types 1 and 2a, but not types 2b, 3, and 4. For SMA types 1c and 2a, the age at which initiation of mechanical ventilation is necessary may be a more suitable endpoint than the arbitrarily set 16 h/d.

[Ethical attitudes of intensive care paediatricians as regards patients with spinal muscular atrophy type 1]

INTRODUCTION

Spinal muscular atrophy type 1 (SMA-1) is a progressive and fatal disease that leads to ethical problems for Paediatric professionals. Our objective was to determine the ethical options of Paediatric Intensive Care Unit (PICU) paediatricians as regards a child with SMA-1 and respiratory failure.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A cross-sectional descriptive study was conducted using an anonymous questionnaire sent to PICUs in Spain (which can be accessed through the Spanish Society of Paediatric Critical Care web page).

RESULTS

Of the 124 responses analysed, 70% were from women, 51% younger than 40 years, 54% from a PICU with more than 10 beds, 69% with prior experience in such cases, and 53% with religious beliefs. In the last patient cared for, most paediatricians opted for non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) and limitation of therapeutic effort (LET) in case of NIV failure. Confronted with a future hypothetical case, half of paediatricians would opt for the same plan (NIV+LET), and 74% would support the family's decision, even in case of disagreement. Age, prior experience and sex were not related to the preferred options. Paediatricians with religious beliefs were less in favour of initial LET. Less than two-thirds (63%) scored the quality of life of a child with SMA-1 and invasive mechanical ventilation as very poor.

CONCLUSIONS

Faced with child with SMA-1 and respiratory failure, most paediatricians are in favour of initiating NIV and LET when such support is insufficient, but they would accept the family's decision, even in case of disagreement.