La recherche du ganglion sentinelle dans le mélanome malin cutané de bas stade est-elle réellement peu invasive ?

[Sentinel node procedure in head and neck cutaneous melanoma]

INTRODUCTION

Sentinel lymph node (SLN) biopsy is frequently discussed in the management of cutaneous melanoma, especially in head and neck localizations where SLN biopsy is much more demanding. The benefits of SLN protocol are not proved yet. The aim of our study was to present our experience of SLN biopsy in head and neck cutaneous melanoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included all patients managed for head and neck malignant melanoma from 2002 to 2006. We reviewed the technique, implementation and difficulties of the procedure, postoperative outcome, and complications.

RESULTS

Nineteen patients were included. An average of 2.2 lymph nodes were localized per patient using lymphoscintigraphy. Biopsy was impossible for one patient because the deep spinal node was not found. An average of 1.2 nodes was biopsied per patient. One patient presented with micrometastases. Another presented with lymphorrhea.

DISCUSSION

Sentinel node biopsy is widely performed in the management of cutaneous melanoma but remains an option for these indications in the last update of the French Society of Dermatology. SLN biopsy is difficult to implement because of the complexity of head and neck lymphatic system.

Complications liées à l’exérèse du ganglion sentinelle dans le mélanome

INTRODUCTION

Side-effects occurring after sentinel lymph node excision in malignant melanoma patients have been poorly evaluated to date. The aim of the present study was to assess the side-effects of sentinel lymph node excision in this population.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

All consecutive malignant melanoma patients undergoing sentinel lymph node excision between March 2000 and December 2002 were included in this retrospective study. Patients with a metastatic sentinel node subsequently undergoing lymph node dissection were excluded. Median follow-up of patients was 12.6 +/- 8.8 months. Complications were classified as "early" (i.e. occurring the month following surgery), or "late" (after this time).

RESULTS

Forty malignant melanoma patients (17 males, 23 females) with a normal histologic examination of their sentinel lymph node were included. They belonged to a series of sixty-one melanoma patients undergoing lymph node excision. Fourteen complications were observed in ten patients. Two early complications were seen: hematoma (n=1) and deep venous thrombosis with pulmonary embolism (n=1). Twelve late complications were observed: mild lymphoedema (n=5), hypertrophic scars (n=2), painful scars (n=4), and one chronic seroma (n=1). Many complications (33%) were observed after excision in the inguinal area.

DISCUSSION

The complications of sentinel lymph node excision must be considered in determining the benefit/risk ratio of this technique.

Influence de la taille et de la localisation des métastases dans les ganglions sentinelles de mélanome sur le résultat du curage, à propos de 35 cas

AIM

Thirty-five cases of lymphadenectomy carried out in the context of positive sentinel lymph node for malignant melanoma have been reviewed to assess the prognostic value of certain metastatic charachteristics. We have checked wether the type (macro or micrometastasis) and localisation (subcapsular or intraparenchymal) in the sentinel lymph node had predictive value for the lymphadenectomy outcome and evolution of the case.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The retrospective study relates to 35 cases (with an average 2 years history) taken from a total of 87 sentinel lymph node protocols; average age 46.5 years, Breslow 2.5 mm with an history of 25 months.

RESULTS

Among the 35 positive sentinel lymph nodes we have 19 cases (54.2%) of micrometastasis. Among the 35 lymphadenectomy 5 cases (14.28%) turned out positive, 3 of which concerned micrometastatic sentinel lymph nodes. In our cohort the micrometastatic nature of sentinel lymph nodes did not have statistically significant impact upon the lymphadenectomy result but showed more favourable short-term evolution with 68.42% metastatic free evolution as against 43.75% in case of initial macrometastasis. The subcapsular localisation of micrometastasis equally represents a factor of improved prognosis (69.2% of metastatic free evolution against of 30.8% in the case of intraparenchymal localistion).

CONCLUSION

Unfortunately, none of the studied criteria justifies a modification of our present clinical attitude whereby a systematic lymphadenectomy in cases of positive sentinel lymph nodes is performed, whatever the type or localisation of the relevant metastases.