Prothèses mammaires rondes ou anatomiques. Avantages et inconvénients respectifs

[Optimization of primary aesthetic breast augmentation using implants: an evidence-based level approach]

The primary aesthetic breast augmentation has been the most performed cosmetic surgery procedure in the world for over 40 years. The current literature focuses on the new concept of "process of breast augmentation" and the importance of non-surgical part (patient selection, preoperative planning and personalized management of postoperative care) in potentiating the cosmetic results and reducing the rate of complications and reoperations. This review of literature discusses, through an analysis of scientific evidence levels, every step of the whole process of breast augmentation in order to determine the current best practices tailored to each patient to optimize satisfactory and durable cosmetic outcomes.

Review of 1,447 breast augmentation patients using PERTHESE silicone implants

Introduction

A survey of surgeons in Brazil on their experience with PERTHESE silicone breast implants was performed.

Materials and methods

Surgeons that used PERTHESE implants between 2002 and 2008 were surveyed on the shape and volume of the implants used, surgical incision site, surgical plane of insertion, key postoperative complications, and surgeon and patient satisfaction.

Results

The survey had a response rate of 20%, with ten surgeons reporting data on 1447 patients. The majority of the implants used were 200–300 cc, round, and high profile. Preference for the traditional inframammary incision site (47% of patients) was favored over transaxillary (33%) and periareolar (19%), and both subglandular (55%) and submuscular (44%) planes of insertion were used. Over 97% of surgeons and patients were satisfied with the results and surgeons indicated that the implants were easy to use.

Conclusions

This review demonstrates that these implants are safe, maybe easier to introduce than other implants, and result in a high level of surgeon and patient satisfaction.

Expansion tissulaire et seins tubéreux: à propos de dix cas

INTRODUCTION

Tuberous breast is a deficiency of mammary development, principally in the lower lateral and medial quadrants. In types II and III of the Grolleau classification, we perform a two-stage correction by tissue expansion associated with an implant in order to avoid the double bubble deformity and the difficulty of medial infra-mammary fold reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between February 2003 and February 2006, ten patients have been treated by implantation of an anatomical expander associated with a vertical and horizontal Puckett plasty. The second operation consisted in the replacement of the expander by an anatomical prosthesis associated, if necessary, with a second Puckett plasty and lipofilling.

RESULTS

There was no double bubble deformity. Three patients required a complementary lipofilling to improve the result of the lower medial fold. One prosthesis had to be repositioned and one expander infection was responsible of a three-month delay in the reconstruction procedure.

CONCLUSION

Tuberous breast correction is a therapeutic challenge in quite psychologically distressed patients. In types II and III, tissue expansion associated with a Puckett plasty increase the volume of the lower pole and reduces the risk of the double bubble deformity. The implantation of an anatomical prosthesis gives more natural effect to the contour of the glandular lower pole. This therapeutic attitude gives the chance of achieving a completely satisfactory result.

Prothèses mammaires : réflexions sur une chorégraphie de l'acte opératoire

Breast augmentation offers a high rate of satisfaction but the local complications remain frequent. These are mainly capsular contracture, malpositions of implant, acute or infraclinical infections. The causes of these complications are multifactorials. The goal of this chapter is to determine the effect of the surgical technique on the result. We think that if no routine procedure can be proposed, a reflexion on the objectives of the breast augmentation and the adaptation of the surgical technique is necessary for each surgeon. We identify twelve aims and discuss them: rigorous preoperative planning, determination of the position of the implant, creation of an adapted implant pocket, as much atraumatic as possible dissection, no bacterial contamination, no foreign particles, respect of the implant, drainage or not, efficient suture, pain and discomfort control, need for contension and clear postoperative advices. These objectives being precised, we integrate them in a chronological surgical process under the form of questions. Each surgeon can then choose his answers by evaluating the arguments, which led to his choices.