Chirurgie oncoplastique pour le traitement des tumeurs mammaires centrales

Breast-Conserving Surgery is Oncologically Safe for Well-Selected, Centrally Located Breast Cancer

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate the long-term survival outcomes of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in centrally located breast cancer (CLBC) compared with mastectomy in CLBC and BCS in non-CLBC, based on the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database.

METHODS

Female patients aged < 80 years with unilateral T1-T2 invasive ductal or lobular breast cancer undergoing BCS or mastectomy were enrolled. The differences in clinical-pathological characteristics were evaluated using Chi square tests. Multivariate logistic regression was used to measure the relationship between predictive variables and performing BCS in CLBC. Survival outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using Cox proportional hazards models. To overcome the effects of baseline differences on survival outcome in patients treated with BCS in the central and upper-outer locations, a 1:1 ratio propensity score matching method was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, among 16,522 CLBC patients, 7982 cases (48.3%) underwent BCS between 1998 and 2015. Factors such as older age, Black race, invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC), grade I, small tumor size, none or limited lymph node metastasis, positive progesterone receptor status, and receiving chemotherapy were independently correlated with BCS. BCS was an independent favorable prognostic factor among CLBC patients, based on multivariate Cox analysis. It was also shown that CLBC had similar survival outcomes compared with tumors in the upper-outer quadrant, and had a better breast cancer-specific survival compared with tumors in the lower quadrants, based on multivariate Cox analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

BCS should be an acceptable and preferable alternative to mastectomy for well-selected, early-stage T1 or T2 CLBC.

[Anatomical study of men's nipple areola complex]

The surgical approach of gynecomastia, sexual reassignment surgery in female-to-male transsexuals and the increase of number of obese wishing to turn to plastic surgery led us to deepen the anatomical knowledge of the nipple areola complex (NAC) in men, poorly retailed in the literature. By inspiring us of the methodology of a Japanese study, we studied 50 healthy volunteers male, from 18 to 55 years old, from July till August 2015. We measured various distances relative to the NAC to define its vertical and horizontal position, as well as the internipple distance according to the size, to the weight and to the body mass index (BMI). At the end of the analysis, we were able to underline a lower vertical thoracic position of the NAC in the tall category of person, a more side horizontal position to the subject presenting a high BMI and a linear relation between the BMI and the internipple (Em) defined by (Em)=8.96×BMI. The surgeon's judgment and the desires of the patient are essentials basis of therapeutics decisions that could be lean on this anatomical study, which allowed to establish an idea of the cartography of the NAC in man. It will be interesting and necessary to confront it with other studies with larger scale.

[Conservative treatment of breast cancer: experience of a Tunisian team]

En Tunisie, le cancer du sein touche des femmes jeunes avec une taille moyenne au moment du diagnostic à 5 cm. Ces particularités font que la chirurgie radicale reste prédominante. Nous présentons dans ce travail l'expérience de notre équipe en matière de chirurgie conservatrice du cancer du sein. Le but de ce travail est d’évaluer les résultats de ce traitement. Etude rétrospective longitudinale, sur une période de 75 mois. Nous avons inclus toutes les patientes ayant bénéficié d'un traitement conservateur pour une tumeur maligne du sein. Ont été analysés: les caractéristiques épidémiologiques, les aspects radiologiques et histologiques. Le suivi des malades s'est basé sur la détection des récidives. Nous avons évalué le résultat esthétique à la fin de la radiothérapie. Le traitement conservateur a été réalisé dans 23.8% des cas. Le taux de récidives locales était de 6.8% avec une corrélation significative pour une taille tumorale > 30 mm (p= 0.009), l'association d'une composante intracanalaire (p= 0.035), le statut triple négatif (p= 0.003) et des marges d'exérèse < 5mm sans recoupes per-opératoires (p = 0.045). Les facteurs suivants étaient significativement liés au risque de survenue de métastases à distance: le statut triple négatif (p= 0.003), taille tumorale > 30mm (p = 0.006) et l'atteinte ganglionnaire (p = 0.001). Le résultat esthétique était satisfaisant dans 90% des cas. L'augmentation du nombre de patientes pouvant bénéficier d'une chirurgie conservatrice, doit passer impérativement par le développement et la promotion du diagnostic précoce et du dépistage par la mammographie.

[Surgery for invasive breast cancer]

As most solid tumors, surgery is often the first step of the multidisciplinary management for breast cancers. Although mastectomy and axillar lymphadenectomy still have indications, conservative treatment and sentinel node detection are commonly used. Thanks to induction chemotherapy and oncoplastic techniques, surgery is conservative in most cases, even for important tumors without overall survival prejudice. There is no consensus about resection margins status but a limit of 2 to 3 mm seems to be reasonable while oncoplastic surgery allows large resection and good cosmetic outcomes. In this overview, we present the state of the art for breast cancer surgery including conservative and radical treatments, axillar lymphadenectomy and sentinel lymph node detection, margins status, oncoplastic techniques.