Hyperhidrose axillaire, traitement par injection de toxine botulique de type A : revue de la littérature

The Initial Exploration of Polidocanol Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Axillary Osmidrosis: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

Axillary osmidrosis (AO) is a strong, unpleasant odor that originates from the apocrine axillary glands. Treatments of AO include surgical treatment and nonsurgical treatment. The surgical procedure yields effective results with a low recurrence rate but requires a longer recovery time and has more postoperative complications. Nonsurgical treatments are minimally invasive and safe, but short-term recurrence may occur in some cases.

OBJECTIVE

Polidocanol sclerotherapy was first described for management of AO. This retrospective study explored the clinical efficacy in relieving symptom of AO assessed by AO severity using the axillary osmidrosis grading system and safety of polidocanol sclerotherapy in treating AO.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This retrospective study included 25 patients with AO single-site study, with 12 patients receiving polidocanol (1%) sclerotherapy (the polidocanol group) and 13 receiving botulinum toxin A (BTX-A) injection (the BTX-A group). The short-term efficacy (7 days after injection), the long-term efficacy (6 months after injection), the recurrence rate, and complications were compared between the 2 groups. A p-value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.

RESULTS

The short-term efficacies of polidocanol sclerotherapy and BTX-A injection were 100% and 69.2%, which was not clinically significant (p > .05), whereas their long-term efficacies were 100% and 46.2%, respectively (p < .05). The recurrence rates in the polidocanol and BTX-A groups were 25.0% and 84.6%, respectively (p < .05). The complications did not differ significantly between the 2 groups (p > .05). Although the short-term efficacy and complications were comparable between the 2 groups, the long-term efficacy of polidocanol sclerotherapy was superior to BTX-A injection. The polidocanol group has a lower recurrence rate than the BTX-A group.

CONCLUSION

Polidocanol sclerotherapy may provide an effective and safe treatment with longer efficacy compared to toxin, which is an effective and safe option for AO treatment.

Interventions for hyperhidrosis in secondary care: a systematic review and value-of-information analysis

BACKGROUND

Hyperhidrosis is uncontrollable excessive sweating that occurs at rest, regardless of temperature. The symptoms of hyperhidrosis can significantly affect quality of life. The management of hyperhidrosis is uncertain and variable.

OBJECTIVE

To establish the expected value of undertaking additional research to determine the most effective interventions for the management of refractory primary hyperhidrosis in secondary care.

METHODS

A systematic review and economic model, including a value-of-information (VOI) analysis. Treatments to be prescribed by dermatologists and minor surgical treatments for hyperhidrosis of the hands, feet and axillae were reviewed; as endoscopic thoracic sympathectomy (ETS) is incontestably an end-of-line treatment, it was not reviewed further. Fifteen databases (e.g. CENTRAL, PubMed and PsycINFO), conference proceedings and trial registers were searched from inception to July 2016. Systematic review methods were followed. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted for comparisons between botulinum toxin (BTX) injections and placebo for axillary hyperhidrosis, but otherwise, owing to evidence limitations, data were synthesised narratively. A decision-analytic model assessed the cost-effectiveness and VOI of five treatments (iontophoresis, medication, BTX, curettage, ETS) in 64 different sequences for axillary hyperhidrosis only.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

Fifty studies were included in the effectiveness review: 32 randomised controlled trials (RCTs), 17 non-RCTs and one large prospective case series. Most studies were small, rated as having a high risk of bias and poorly reported. The interventions assessed in the review were iontophoresis, BTX, anticholinergic medications, curettage and newer energy-based technologies that damage the sweat gland (e.g. laser, microwave). There is moderate-quality evidence of a large statistically significant effect of BTX on axillary hyperhidrosis symptoms, compared with placebo. There was weak but consistent evidence for iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis. Evidence for other interventions was of low or very low quality. For axillary hyperhidrosis cost-effectiveness results indicated that iontophoresis, BTX, medication, curettage and ETS was the most cost-effective sequence (probability 0.8), with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of £9304 per quality-adjusted life-year. Uncertainty associated with study bias was not reflected in the economic results. Patients and clinicians attending an end-of-project workshop were satisfied with the sequence of treatments for axillary hyperhidrosis identified as being cost-effective. All patient advisors considered that the Hyperhidrosis Quality of Life Index was superior to other tools commonly used in hyperhidrosis research for assessing quality of life.

LIMITATIONS

The evidence for the clinical effectiveness and safety of second-line treatments for primary hyperhidrosis is limited. This meant that there was insufficient evidence to draw conclusions for most interventions assessed and the cost-effectiveness analysis was restricted to hyperhidrosis of the axilla.

FUTURE WORK

Based on anecdotal evidence and inference from evidence for the axillae, participants agreed that a trial of BTX (with anaesthesia) compared with iontophoresis for palmar hyperhidrosis would be most useful. The VOI analysis indicates that further research into the effectiveness of existing medications might be worthwhile, but it is unclear that such trials are of clinical importance. Research that established a robust estimate of the annual incidence of axillary hyperhidrosis in the UK population would reduce the uncertainty in future VOI analyses.

STUDY REGISTRATION

This study is registered as PROSPERO CRD42015027803.

FUNDING

The National Institute for Health Research Health Technology Assessment programme.