Abdominoplasty with simultaneous laparoscopic umbilical hernia repair: A practical approach to preserve the umbilical vascularization

Periumbilical Fascioplasty Improves Postabdominoplasty Umbilical Perfusion: An Approach to Reducing Umbilical Necrosis

Abdominoplasty represents one of the most recognized operations performed by plastic surgeons. Despite its long history and ubiquity, the procedure retains a largely individualistic component, affected by a surgeon's artistry as much as by known clinical approaches. Consequently, complication incidence reporting has been variable, particularly that of umbilical dehiscence. This study aims to demonstrate the incorporation of periumbilical fascioplasty to reliably limit umbilical necrosis, particularly in cases where maximal rectus plication is desired. We present a series of 30 patients who underwent abdominoplasty at a single center under 1 surgeon between 2021 and 2024. Abdominoplasties were performed in standard fashion. Following extensive midline abdominal wall plication, the umbilicus is identified deep within the plication. Periumbilical fascioplasty is then performed by incising the anterior rectus fascia circumferential to the position of the umbilicus, releasing any adherences to the underlying rectus muscle, and suturing the imbricated anterior rectus fascial segment onto the anteriorly exposed fascia, thereby anteriorly transposing the base of the umbilicus. This further eliminates the compression caused by the vertical vector of traditional midline plication while simultaneously displacing the umbilical base anteriorly. Abdominal skin is then transposed, and the umbilicus is externalized in the desired fashion. This approach resulted in 0 cases of umbilical skin necrosis and dehiscence. Although approximately 15 additional minutes are required in this process, the reduced need for follow-up corrective surgery should be considered. In applying this protocol, a surgeon may be more confident that they may achieve maximum midline plication while improving umbilical survivability metrics.

The Preservation of Umbilical Blood Supply in Combined Ventral Hernia Repair and Abdominoplasty: A Narrative Review

INTRODUCTION

Combined ventral hernia repair and abdominoplasty treat risk factors such as high body mass index and weak abdominal musculature, providing excellent intraoperative exposure and improved patient outcomes. Unfortunately, a combination of traditional procedures is unfeasible as the umbilical blood supply would be compromised, leading to increased umbilical necrosis risk. This narrative review aimed to identify new techniques and solidify evidence in preserving umbilical blood supply and associated level of evidence.

METHODS

Two authors conducted a thorough literature search on PubMed, Scopus and Cochrane CENTRAL databases from January 1901 to July 2023, adhering to the methodologies of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Studies were reviewed for their surgical technique and quality of evidence. The primary outcomes of interest consisted of umbilical complications of this combined procedure.

RESULTS

Six techniques were identified that included laparoscopic, pre-rectus, unilateral, distal bilateral, proximal bilateral, and inferior midline approaches. All techniques demonstrated as viable options in preserving umbilical blood supply as reported complications were few, minor, and compounded by risk factors. However, all included techniques were limited to low-to-moderate-quality evidence.

CONCLUSION

Despite the lack of high-quality evidence, all techniques remain viable options for combined ventral hernia repair and abdominoplasty. Large-scale high-quality RCTs are required to compare the effectiveness of various approaches with additional outcomes of hernia recurrence rates, intraoperative time, and patient- and surgeon-reported satisfaction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE IV

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Umbilicus Necrosis During Mesh Repair of Rectus Diastasis for Abdominoplasty: Practical Tips for Prevention and Treatment

Rectus muscles widened by pregnancy are handled in dramatically different ways in standard abdominoplasty and mesh abdominoplasty. Patients with significant abdominal wall laxity and/or umbilical hernia repair are treated with the use of retrorectus mesh placement. In these conditions the risk of damaging the blood supply to the umbilicus might be greater. Despite the fact that it is of no functional significance in adults, the umbilicus is a key esthetic landmark of the anterior abdominal wall. For both patients and surgeons alike, its absence, distortion, or misplacement after surgery can be distressing and can be a source of frequent patient complaint. Umbilical stalk necrosis represents an underreported yet important complication for patients following mesh abdominoplasty. We advance some recommendations for patients undergoing abdominoplasty with mesh repair of rectus diastasis and/or concomitant umbilical hernia mesh repair via the open approach. This information should help influence intraoperative decision-making to prevent the development of this undesirable complication.Level of Evidence V: This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Closing the gap: evidence-based surgical treatment of rectus diastasis associated with abdominal wall hernias

PURPOSE

Rectus diastasis (RD) associated with abdominal hernias present a surgical challenge associated with a paucity in treatment guidelines. The objective of this systematic review is to review surgical techniques and assess complication and recurrence rates of RD in patients with concurrent abdominal hernias.

METHODS

PubMed and EMBASE databases were systematically searched, and data extraction was performed on articles which met the inclusion criteria. Pooled analyses of complication and recurrence rates were performed to compare open vs. minimally invasive surgery. Student t tests were performed to compare differences in continuous outcomes.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight studies were included in this review. RD can be surgically repaired by both open and laparoscopic approaches using both non-absorbable and absorbable sutures. The majority of the techniques reported included mesh insertion either above the aponeurosis, retromuscular, preperitoneal, or intraperitoneal. Open techniques, compared to laparoscopic approaches, were associated with a significantly higher rate of skin dehiscence (6.79% vs. 2.86%; p = 0.003) and hematoma formation (4.73% vs. 1.09%; p < 0.001) and a significantly lower rate of post-operative seroma formation (2.47% vs. 8.29%; p < 0.001). No significant difference in RD recurrence rates were observed between open and laparoscopic repair (0.22 vs. 0.63%, p = 0.17).

CONCLUSION

Both open and laparoscopic surgery are safe and effective methods that can be used to repair RD in patients with RD and concurrent abdominal hernias as evident by the low recurrence and complication rates and almost negligible major complications post repair.

Comparison of outcomes in rectus abdominis diastasis repair-which data do we need in a hernia registry?

INTRODUCTION

Rectus abdominis diastasis (RAD) ± concomitant hernia is a complex hernia entity of growing significance in everyday clinical practice. Due to a multitude of described surgical techniques, a so far missing universally accepted classification and hardly existing comparative studies, there are no clear recommendations in guidelines. Therefore, "RAD ± concomitant hernia" will be documented as a separate hernia entity in the Herniamed Registry in the future. For this purpose, an appropriate case report form will be developed on the basis of the existing literature.

METHODS

A systematic search of the available literature was performed in March 2021 using Medline, PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, Embase, Springer Link, and the Cochrane Library. 93 publications were identified as relevant for this topic.

RESULTS

In total 45 different surgical techniques for the repair of RAD ± concomitant hernia were identified in the surgical literature. RAD ± concomitant hernia is predominantly repaired by plastic but also by general surgeons. Classification of RAD ± concomitant hernia is based on a proposal of the German Hernia Society and the International Endohernia Society. Surgical techniques are summarized as groups subject to certain aspects: Techniques with abdominoplasty, open techniques, mini-less-open and endoscopic sublay techniques, mini-less-open and endoscopic subcutaneous/preaponeurotic techniques and laparoscopic techniques. Additional data impacting the outcome are also recorded as is the case for other hernia entities. Despite the complexity of this topic, documentation of RAD ± concomitant hernia has not proved to be any more cumbersome than for any of the other hernia entities when using this classification.

CONCLUSION

Using the case report form described here, the complex hernia entity RAD ± concomitant hernia can be recorded in a registry for proper analysis of comparative treatment options.

Techniques of Concomitant Abdominoplasty and Umbilical Hernia Repair: A Review

BACKGROUND

Different methods of performing full abdominoplasty and umbilical hernia (UH) repair simultaneously have been proposed.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to review and compare UH repair outcomes and umbilical stalk survival.

METHODS

A literature research was performed through 28 December 2019. Other hernia repairs and mini-abdominoplasty (without umbilical transposition) were excluded. The primary outcomes analyzed were rates of UH recurrence, mesh infection, and umbilical necrosis.

RESULTS

Six studies were included (5 retrospectives series, 1 case report). Hernia was repaired by an open approach (3 studies, 28 patients) or a laparoscopic approach (3 studies, 67 patients). UH repair consisted of mesh placement in the intraperitoneal or retromuscular/preperitoneal plane, or suture technique in the intraperitoneal plane. No hernia recurrence, mesh infection, or umbilical necrosis was described.

CONCLUSIONS

Both open and laparoscopic approaches to simultaneous abdominoplasty and UH repair seem to be safe based on the rates of umbilical stalk vascularization, hernia recurrence, and mesh infection. However, more well-designed studies are needed to prove this hypothesis.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Laparoscopic-Assisted Relocation of the Umbilicus With Umbilicoplasty in Complex Abdominal Wall Reconstruction

Patients with complex abdominal wall pathology often present with significant distortion of their umbilicus. Ventral and umbilical hernias often create widening or protrusion of the umbilicus, while obesity and laxity of the skin and subcutaneous tissue of the abdominal wall further exacerbates the deformity. The primary goal of hernia repair is always reduction of the hernia with a tension-free repair; however, an important secondary goal is esthetic improvement of the abdominal wall. Often, in patients with complex hernia defects involving the umbilicus, there is discussion of not salvaging the umbilicus altogether. Although this certainly remains an option for many patients, we present a technique that would not only allow for hernia reduction under direct laparoscopic visualization but also an improved esthetic to the umbilicus.