Thermal hydraulic analysis of Syrian MNSR research reactor using RELAP5/Mod3.2 code

Study of cooling strategy for pressure vessel in pool research reactor at accident situation

Pressure vessel in pool layout is usually used in high power and middle pressure research reactor, Flow inversion and residual heat removal is important problem. The heat removal strategy at accident situation for a pressure vessel in pool layout research reactor was studied in the paper, many cases was researched for the ability of heat removal and safety of core.

Steady state and transient analyses of MNSR reactor using RELAP5 code

Developing a reliable thermal-hydraulic model of a nuclear reactor is an essential process in the steady state and transient analyses. This paper provides the results of best estimate calculation carried out with reference to Iranian Miniature Neutron Source Reactor (MNSR) using the RELAP5 code. Applying the qualified nodalization and the cross-flow effects are some of the advantages in the present model. Here, various transients including step and ramp reactivity insertions were inspected for safety analysis. The obtained results from the code showed a reasonable agreement with the MNSR Safety Analysis Report (SAR) and existing experimental and reference data.

Thermal hydraulic analysis of reactivity accidents in MTR research reactors using RELAP5

The present paper comes in the line with the international approach which use the best estimate codes, instead of conservative codes, to get more realistic prediction of system behavior under off-normal reactor conditions. The aim of the current work is to apply this approach using the thermal-hydraulic system code RELAP5/Mod3.3 in a reassessment of safety of the IAEA benchmark 10 MW Research Reactor. The assessment is performed for both slow and fast reactivity insertion transients at initial power of 1.0 W. The reactor power is calculated using the RELA5 point kinetic model. The reactivity feedback terms are considered in two steps. In the first step the feedback from changes in water density and fuel temperature (Doppler effects) are considered. In the second step the feedback from the water temperature changes is added. The results from the first step are compared with that published in IAEA-TECDOC-643 benchmarks. The comparison shows that RELAP5 over predicts the peak power and consequently the fuel, clad and coolant temperatures in case of fast reactivity insertion. The results from the second step show unjustified values for reactor power. Therefore, the model of reactivity feedback from water temperature changes in the RELAP5 code may have to be reviewed.