Clinical efficacy and safety of external radiotherapy combined with sorafenib in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Treatment of intermediate-to-advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma is shifting toward a multidisciplinary strategy that includes multiple modalities as needed

In the recent issue of the World Journal of Gastroenterology, Han et al compared the efficacy of and adverse reactions to bevacizumab versus lenvatinib as molecularly targeted agents in combination with interventional therapy and immunotherapy (IMT) to treat intermediate-to-advanced unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma. No significant differences in efficacy or adverse reactions were observed between bevacizumab and lenvatinib. This study is highly promising because in some regions, e.g., Japan, the combination of molecularly targeted therapy with IMT is fixed because of insurance restrictions, and some molecularly targeted agents cannot be combined with IMT. Further studies using these three modalities are expected to be conducted in the future. Additionally, because advanced radiotherapy modalities have recently been established, the number of combinations continues to increase, and further evidence regarding combination therapy, which is the cornerstone of personalized medicine, needs to be accumulated.

Clinical outcomes and safety of external beam radiotherapy with extensive intrahepatic targets for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: A single institutional clinical experience

BACKGROUND

This study observed the clinical outcome of radiotherapy to extensive intrahepatic targets for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in a single institution.

METHODS

From September 2009 to July 2021, patients who underwent fractionated radiotherapy to a planning target volume (PTV) of over 100 ml with biological effective dose >30 Gy 10 for advanced HCC were enrolled. Overall survival (OS) and radiation-induced liver toxicity (RILD) were evaluated. RILD was defined as an increase in Child-Pugh (CP) score ≥2 or liver function tests ≥2.5 times at 3 months after the end of radiotherapy.

RESULTS

A total of 136 patients were evaluated. Eighty-nine patients had portal vein tumor thrombus (PVTT), 37 patients were in CP B stage, and the median radiation dose to PTV was 48.8 Gy 10 . The median OS was 12.3 months. The factors most affecting OS were PVTT ( P = 0.001), PTV (>500 ml, P = 0.001), incomplete coverage of the intrahepatic tumor ( P = 0.004), and CP B ( P = 0.006) in Cox regression. RILD occurred in 22.4% of the patients and was affected by PVTT ( P = 0.003), PTV ( P = 0.010), pretreatment bilirubin levels (>1.5 mg/ml, P = 0.016), and the mean normal liver dose (MNLD) (≥ EQD 2 18 Gy 3 , P = 0.021) in binary logistic regression. As the PTV was in excess of >500 ml, RILD developed in 30.2% of patients and the prognostic importance of pretreatment bilirubin levels ( P = 0.006) and the MNLD ( P = 0.014) increased.

CONCLUSIONS

As PTV is more extensive, the bilirubin level and the MNLD have to be taken into consideration for safe radiotherapy, in addition to the traditional prognostic factors.

Radiation Therapy With Combination Therapy of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors and Antiangiogenic Therapy for Hepatocellular Carcinoma

PURPOSE

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) combined with antiangiogenic therapy have limited efficacy in treating advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The synergistic effect of systemic therapy and radiation therapy (RT) might resolve this problem. We aimed to investigate the effect of RT on the treatment outcomes of ICIs and antiangiogenic combination therapy in patients with advanced-stage HCC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This retrospective observational study analyzed the medical records of 194 patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C HCC who were admitted to our center from August 2018 to June 2022 and received ICIs combined with antiangiogenic therapy as the first-line treatment. Patients who were administered RT for tumor thrombus or symptomatic metastases within 8 weeks of the commencement of combination therapy were allocated to the RT group, whereas those who did not receive RT were assigned to the non-radiation therapy (NRT) group. Propensity score matching was used to mitigate selection bias. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The secondary endpoints included objective response rate, disease control rate (DCR), local PFS, out-of-field PFS, and treatment-related adverse events.

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients diagnosed with advanced-stage HCC and treated with ICIs and antiangiogenic therapy were included in the study, with 33 patients in the RT group and 43 patients in the non-RT group. After propensity score matching, 29 matched patient pairs were generated. The median follow-up was 15.5 months, and the RT sites were mainly located on the tumor thrombus (55.2%) and extrahepatic metastatic lesions (48.3%). The median PFS was 8.3 months (95% CI, 5.4-11.3) in the RT group and 4.2 months (95% CI, 3.4-5.0) in the NRT group (P < .001). The median OS was not reached in the RT group and was 9.7 months (95% CI, 4.1-15.3) in the NRT group (P = .002). The objective response rate was 75.9% (95% CI, 56.5-89.7) in the RT group and 24.1% (95% CI, 10.3-43.5) in the NRT group (P < .001). The DCR was 100% in the RT group and 75.9% (95% CI, 56.5-89.7) in the NRT group (P = .005). The median local PFS and out-of-field PFS were 13.2 months (95% CI, 6.3-20.1) and 10.8 months (95% CI, 7.0-14.7), respectively. RT was an independent prognostic factor for PFS (hazard ratio = 0.33; 95% CI, 0.17-0.64; P < .001) and OS (hazard ratio = 0.28; 95% CI, 0.11-0.68; P = .005), respectively. The rates of any grade treatment-related adverse events were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In comparison to the combination of ICIs and antiangiogenic therapy, the inclusion of RT has been observed to improve the DCR and survival outcomes in patients with advanced-stage HCC. The safety profile of this triple therapy was satisfactory.

Tyrosine-kinase inhibitor combined with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy for hepatocellular carcinoma refractory to transarterial chemoembolization: a propensity-matched study

PURPOSE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI) combined with iodine-125 seed brachytherapy (TKI-I) versus TKI alone for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) refractory to transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).

METHODS

Data of patients with TACE-refractory HCC who received TKI (sorafenib or lenvatinib) or TKI-I from September 2018 to December 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. A propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to diminish potential bias. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and time to progression (TTP). Tumor responses and treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) were also compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were included in this study. Under PSM, 48 paired patients were selected for comparison. The median OS was 23.2 (95% CI 20.9-25.1) months in the TKI-I group versus 13.9 (95% CI 11.1-16.7) months in the TKI group (P < 0.001). The median TTP was 12.8 (95% CI 10.1-15.5) months in the TKI-I group versus 5.8 (95% CI 5.0-6.6) months in the TKI group (P < 0.001). Patients in the TKI-I group had higher objective response rate (68.8% vs. 33.3%, P = 0.001) and disease control rate (89.6% vs. 66.7%, P = 0.007) than those in the TKI group. The incidence and severity of TRAEs in the TKI-I group were comparable to those in the TKI group (any grade, 89.7% vs. 92.2%, P = 0.620; ≥grade 3, 33.8% vs. 32.8%, P = 0.902).

CONCLUSIONS

TKI-I was safe and significantly improved survival over TKI alone in HCC patients with TACE refractoriness.

External radiotherapy combined with sorafenib has better efficacy in unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) has a very low resectable rate. This meta-analysis aimed to compare efficacy of three combination strategies in treatment of advanced unresectable HCC with a view of guiding future selection of the best combination therapy for sorafenib and local therapy. A search was conducted to identify relevant literature published between April 2013 and May 2022, and then compared efficacy of sorafenib combined with external radiotherapy (SOF + RT), sorafenib with transarterial chemoembolization (SOF + TACE), sorafenib with hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (SOF + HAIC), sorafenib (SOF), external radiotherapy (RT), transarterial chemoembolization (TACE), and hepatic artery infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) were studied and analyzed. Finally, the results were statistically analyzed using R 3.5.3 software and Stata/SE 15.0 software. A total of 46 studies, involving 7595 patients, were included in the meta-analysis. Analysis of overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) of seven related treatment interventions revealed that the combination therapy had significantly higher efficacy than monotherapies. Among the combination therapies, SOF + RT was associated with the best OS and PFS rates, and the least adverse events compared to the other treatment modalities. The efficacy of combination therapy was better than monotherapy. In combination therapy, the overall survival time and progression-free survival time of SOF + RT were longer, and the adverse reactions were less. Therefore, SOF + RT may be the best choice for sorafenib combined with local therapy.

Comparison of stereotactic body radiotherapy with and without lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: a propensity score analysis

PURPOSE

Lack of evidence on the benefit of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) in combination with lenvatinib for advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our research compared the efficacy and safety of SBRT plus lenvatinib versus SBRT alone in clinical practice for the treatment of advanced HCC.

METHODS

Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce selection bias. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), intrahepatic PFS (IHPFS), and objective response rate (ORR) were compared between the two groups. Additionally, safety profiles were also evaluated in the two groups.

RESULTS

After PSM, 35 patients from each group were selected and the date was compared. Compared with the SBRT alone group, the median OS, PFS, and IHPFS were significantly prolonged in SBRT plus lenvatinib group (median OS 16.8 vs. 11.0 months, pOS = 0.043; median PFS 9.1 vs. 3.7 months, pPFS < 0.001; median IHPFS 9.5 vs. 4.2 months, pIHPFS = 0.004). The 6- and 12-month OS rates were 91.4% and 68.6% in the combined therapy group and 82.9% and 48.6% in the monotherapy group, respectively. The 6- and 12-month PFS rates were 68.6% and 34.3% in the combined therapy group and 31.4% and 8.6% in the monotherapy group, respectively. Furthermore, a higher ORR was observed in SBRT plus lenvatinib group (54.29% vs. 22.86%, p = 0.007). Subgroup analysis of patients with macroscopic vascular invasion (MVI) also had similar results. Moreover, most adverse events (AEs) were mild-to-moderate and manageable in the SBRT plus lenvatinib group.

CONCLUSION

SBRT plus lenvatinib is expected to significantly improve OS, PFS, IHPFS, and ORR for patients with advanced HCC when compared to SBRT alone, with manageable adverse effects.

Immunogenic landscape and risk score prediction based on unfolded protein response (UPR)-related molecular subtypes in hepatocellular carcinoma

Background

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most common type of cancer and causes a significant number of cancer-related deaths worldwide. The molecular mechanisms underlying the development of HCC are complex, and the heterogeneity of HCC has led to a lack of effective prognostic indicators and drug targets for clinical treatment of HCC. Previous studies have indicated that the unfolded protein response (UPR), a fundamental pathway for maintaining endoplasmic reticulum homeostasis, is involved in the formation of malignant characteristics such as tumor cell invasiveness and treatment resistance. The aims of our study are to identify new prognostic indicators and provide drug treatment targets for HCC in clinical treatment based on UPR-related genes (URGs).

Methods

Gene expression profiles and clinical information were downloaded from the TCGA, ICGC and GEO databases. Consensus cluster analysis was performed to classify the molecular subtypes of URGs in HCC patients. Univariate Cox regression and machine learning LASSO algorithm were used to establish a risk prognosis model. Kaplan-Meier and ROC analyses were used to evaluate the clinical prognosis of URGs. TIMER and XCell algorithms were applied to analyze the relationships between URGs and immune cell infiltration. Real time-PCR was performed to analyze the effect of sorafenib on the expression levels of four URGs.

Results

Most URGs were upregulated in HCC samples. According to the expression pattern of URGs, HCC patients were divided into two independent clusters. Cluster 1 had a higher expression level, worse prognosis, and higher expression of immunosuppressive factors than cluster 2. Patients in cluster 1 were more prone to immune escape during immunotherapy, and were more sensitive to chemotherapeutic drugs. Four key UPR genes (ATF4, GOSR2, PDIA6 and SRPRB) were established in the prognostic model and HCC patients with high risk score had a worse clinical prognosis. Additionally, patients with high expression of four URGs are more sensitive to sorafenib. Moreover, ATF4 was upregulated, while GOSR2, PDIA6 and SRPRB were downregulated in sorafenib-treated HCC cells.

Conclusion

The UPR-related prognostic signature containing four URGs exhibits high potential application value and performs well in the evaluation of effects of chemotherapy/immunotherapy and clinical prognosis.