The timing and importance of motor skills course in knee arthroscopy training

Arthroscopic Shoulder Simulation May Improve Short-Term Speed, Accuracy, and Efficiency of Surgical Movements in Orthopaedic Residents and Fellows: A Systematic Review

PURPOSE

To systematically review the effectiveness and validity of orthopaedic surgery training using simulation technologies including augmented reality, virtual reality, and/or mixed reality within arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

METHODS

A literature search was conducted of the EMBASE and PubMed databases from inception to January 2024 per the 2020 Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis guidelines. Included studies described arthroscopic shoulder surgery simulation training among orthopaedic surgery trainees. Exclusion criteria included studies assessing nonarthroscopic and nonshoulder simulations, non-English-language studies, case reports, animal studies, studies with overlapping cohorts, and review articles. Simulation characteristics, performance measurements, and validity assessed were extracted. The Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and Newcastle-Ottawa Scale assessed study quality. Simulation type, validation type, and simulation outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

A total of 15 included articles, published from 2011 to 2021, evaluated 421 residents or fellows and 17 medical students. Virtual reality was used in 40% of studies and mixed reality in 60%. The most common outcomes assessed were time to completion (80%), visualizing and probing task performance (60%), and the Arthroscopic Surgery Skill Evaluation Tool (33.3%). Construct validity was assessed in 46.7% of studies, transfer validity in 26.7%, face validity in 20%, and content validity in 6.7%. Three studies demonstrated improved performance in those undergoing simulation training compared with nonsimulation groups. Two studies (13.3%) demonstrated improved time-to-task completion and decreased camera distance traveled when using simulation training. One study demonstrated that postgraduate year 1 and postgraduate year 5 residents derived the greatest benefit from simulation training.

CONCLUSIONS

Arthroscopic shoulder simulation training may benefit the surgical skills of orthopaedic residents of all levels of experience as measured by time-to-completion, accuracy, and efficiency of surgical movements. Simulation training exhibits differences in operative time between more- and less-experienced orthopaedic surgeons and trainees. Virtual reality simulation training may result in more-efficient orthopaedic surgical techniques.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, systematic review of level I-III studies.

Failure of Orthopaedic Residents to Voluntarily Participate in a Laboratory Skills Training

INTRODUCTION

Arthroscopy simulation is increasingly used in orthopaedic residency training. The implementation of a curriculum to accommodate these new training tools is a point of interest. We assessed the use of a high-fidelity arthroscopy simulator in a strictly voluntary curriculum to gauge resident interest and educational return.

METHODS

Fifty-eight months of simulator use data were collected from a single institution to analyze trends in resident use. Comparable data from two additional residency programs were analyzed as well, for comparison. Orthopaedic residents were surveyed to gauge interest in continued simulation training.

RESULTS

Average annual simulator use at the study institution was 27.7 hours (standard deviation = 26.8 hours). Orthopaedic residents spent an average of 1.7 hours practicing on the simulation trainer during the observation period. A total of 21% of residents met or exceeded a minimum of 3 hours of simulation time required for skill improvement defined by literature. Most (86%) of the residents agreed that the simulator in use should become a mandated component of a junior resident training.

CONCLUSION

Although surgical simulation has a role in orthopaedic training, voluntary simulator use is sporadic, resulting in many residents not receiving the full educational benefits of such training. Implementation of a mandated simulation training curriculum is desired by residents and could improve the educational return of surgical simulators in residency training.

Analysis of Tools Used in Assessing Technical Skills and Operative Competence in Trauma and Orthopaedic Surgical Training: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Robust assessment of skills acquisition and surgical performance during training is vital to ensuring operative competence among orthopaedic surgeons. A move to competency-based surgical training requires the use of tools that can assess surgical skills objectively and systematically. The aim of this systematic review was to describe the evidence for the utility of assessment tools used in evaluating operative performance in trauma and orthopaedic surgical training.

METHODS

We performed a comprehensive literature search of MEDLINE, Embase, and Google Scholar databases to June 2019. From eligible studies we abstracted data on study aim, assessment format (live theater or simulated setting), skills assessed, and tools or metrics used to assess surgical performance. The strengths, limitations, and psychometric properties of the assessment tools are reported on the basis of previously defined utility criteria.

RESULTS

One hundred and five studies published between 1990 and 2019 were included. Forty-two studies involved open orthopaedic surgical procedures, and 63 involved arthroscopy. The majority (85%) were used in the simulated environment. There was wide variation in the type of assessment tools in used, the strengths and weaknesses of which are assessor and setting-dependent.

CONCLUSIONS

Current technical skills-assessment tools in trauma and orthopaedic surgery are largely procedure-specific and limited to research use in the simulated environment. An objective technical skills-assessment tool that is suitable for use in the live operative theater requires development and validation, to ensure proper competency-based assessment of surgical performance and readiness for unsupervised clinical practice.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

Trainers and trainees can gain further insight into the technical skills assessment tools that they use in practice through the utility evidence provided.

Teaching hip surgery to orthopaedic residents: what's new?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to provide an overview of the published literature on the existing educational methods used to teach surgical skills, with a specific focus on hip surgery, to orthopaedic residents.

METHODS

A total of 31 articles were selected from a PubMed literature search on the topic of teaching surgical skills to orthopaedic residents, and 9 articles on hip surgery are included in this review.

RESULTS

Although several methods are included in the published literature to teach orthopaedic residents, only arthroscopy of the knee and shoulder joint is well described. Hip arthroscopy has a steeper learning curve and thus the use of simulation training as a complementary teaching method is even more important.

CONCLUSIONS

Currently, open surgery skills for joint arthroplasty are largely acquired by apprenticeship learning. Simulation training in the form of virtual reality could contribute to better performance of residents, decreasing operation time and improving patient safety.

Cognitive and skill performance of individuals at sitting versus standing workstations: a quasi-experimental study

Objectives. This study aimed to assess cognitive and skill performance at sitting and standing workstations among students from Shiraz University of Medical Sciences. Methods. Forty students (20 females and 20 males) participated in this quasi-experimental study. Tests were performed among randomly selected participants over two consecutive days: day 1, the Beck depression inventory and Beck anxiety inventory were used to assess the severity of depression and anxiety in the study participants, respectively, and Raven's general intelligence test was used to measure intelligence quotient; day 2, five performance assessment tests (cognitive performance assessment tests 'n-back', 'Stroop' and 'advanced reaction time'; skill performance assessment tests 'two-arm coordination' and 'Purdue pegboard') were randomly selected and presented to individuals at each workstation (sitting and standing workstations). At the end of each sitting and standing position, the comfort of the workstation was measured using a visual analog scale. Results. No statistically significant difference was shown between sitting and standing positions in terms of 'n-back', 'Stroop', 'advanced reaction time', 'two-arm coordination' and 'Purdue pegboard'. Participants were more comfortable in sitting positions and more easily distracted in standing positions. Conclusions. Sitting and standing positions had no significant effects on participants' cognitive and skill performance.

Impact of industry 4.0 to create advancements in orthopaedics

Scientists and health professional are focusing on improving the medical sciences for the betterment of patients. The fourth industrial revolution, which is commonly known as Industry 4.0, is a significant advancement in the field of engineering. Industry 4.0 is opening a new opportunity for digital manufacturing with greater flexibility and operational performance. This development is also going to have a positive impact in the field of orthopaedics. The purpose of this paper is to present various advancements in orthopaedics by the implementation of Industry 4.0. To undertake this study, we have studied the available literature extensively on Industry 4.0, technologies of Industry 4.0 and their role in orthopaedics. Paper briefly explains about Industry 4.0, identifies and discusses the major technologies of Industry 4.0, which will support development in orthopaedics. Finally, from the available literature, the paper identifies twelve significant advancements of Industry 4.0 in orthopaedics. Industry 4.0 uses various types of digital manufacturing and information technologies to create orthopaedics implants, patient-specific tools, devices and innovative way of treatment. This revolution is to be useful to perform better spinal surgery, knee and hip replacement, and invasive surgeries.