Increasing movement during office work at sit-stand workstations: A novel seating device to facilitate transitions

Do lumbar spine kinematics contribute to individual low back pain development in habitual sitting?

This study explored differences in activities and spine kinematics by transient low back pain status throughout a week of their usual office work. Using a 100-mm visual-analogue scale, twenty participants were classified as non-pain (NPD) and pain developers (PD; ≥10 mm). Tri-axial accelerometers measured sitting time and thorax, pelvis, and lumbar spine angles. Amplitude probability distribution functions were constructed for postures and movements. PD (n = 6) exhibited increases in pain daily, with partial or complete recovery overnight and full recovery over the weekend, hence pain did not accumulate. PD sat more than NPD (n = 14), exhibited decreased peak posterior pelvic tilt (10°) and thorax inclination (8°), and tended to demonstrate less frequent spine movements. To decrease the risk of pain with sitting, reducing seated time, reclining on the seatback, and promoting seated movements should be recommended. With habitual exposures, small differences between pain groups could suggest a pathway to sitting-related back pain over time.Practitioner Summary: The biomechanical link between habitual sitting and low back pain remains unclear. Activity, spine kinematics, and pain ratings were collected throughout a week of individuals' seated work at their own workstation. Small differences between those with and without transient low back pain could suggest a pathway to sitting-related back pain.

A week-long field study of seated pelvis and lumbar spine kinematics during office work

The study objective was to quantify "natural" seated pelvis and lumbar spine kinematics over multiple days of work at individuals' workstations. Twenty participants completed five days of their usual office work while seated time was characterized from a thigh-worn activity monitor. Seated pelvic tilt and lumbar spine flexion-extension were measured from tri-axial accelerometers. Seated time accounted for approximately 90% of participants' workdays. Sitting was characterized by posterior pelvic tilt and lumbar flexion (43-79% of maximum flexion) with an average of 9 shifts and 13 fidgets every 15 min. No significant differences emerged by sex or between days indicating that a single representative day can capture baseline sitting responses in the field. Average field kinematics tended to agree with the laboratory-collected kinematics, but postural variability was larger in the field. These kinematic values could be useful for designing interventions aimed at reducing spine flexion and increasing spine movement in occupational sitting.

Implementing an accelerometer-based pelvis segment for low back kinetic analyses during dynamic movement tasks

An accelerometer-based pelvis has been employed to study segment and joint kinematics during scenarios involving close human-object interface and/or line-of-sight obstructions. However, its accuracy for examining low back kinetic outcomes is unknown. This study compared reaction moments and contact forces of the L5S1 joint calculated with an accelerometer-based and optically tracked pelvis segment. An approach to correct the global pelvis position as a function of thigh angle was developed. One participant performed four dynamic tasks: forward bend, squat, sit-to-stand-to-sit, and forward lunge. A standard bottom-up inverse dynamics approach was used and the root mean square error (RMSE) and coefficient of determination (R2) were calculated to examine kinetic differences between the optical and accelerometer approaches. The RMSE observed for L5S1 reaction flexion-extension moments ranged from 1.32 Nm to 2.20 Nm (R2 ≥ 0.98). The RMSE for net shear and compression reaction forces ranged from 2.13 to 10.45 N and 0.63 - 4.96 N, respectively. Similarly, the RMSE for L5S1 joint contact shear and compression ranged from 13.45 N to 19.51 N (R2 ≥ 0.85) and 31.18 N - 55.97 N (R2 ≥ 0.97), respectively. In conclusion, the accelerometer-based pelvis together with the approach to correct the global pelvis position is a feasible approach for computing low back kinetics with a single equivalent muscle model. The observed error in joint contact forces represents less than 5 % of the NIOSH recommended action limits and is unlikely to alter the interpretation of low back injury risk.

Effect of different loads on facet joint motion during lumbar lateral bending in sitting position

OBJECTIVE

To study the effect of weight-bearing on lumbar facet joint during lateral bending in sitting position.

METHODS

Ten normal healthy people (5 males and 5 females) aged 25-39 years (mean 32 ± 4.29 years) were recruited. CT scanning was used to reconstruct the lumbar spine model, and then dual fluoroscopic image system (DFIS) was used to restore the lumbar facet joint movement in sitting position. Finally, the lumbar facet joint translation distance and rotation angle were measured.

RESULTS

In L3-4 level, the displacement of right facet joint in Y-axis was the smallest at 0.05 ± 0.40 mm, the displacement of 0 kg left facet joint in X-axis was the largest at 1.68 ± 0.85 mm, and the rotation angle was - 0.57 ± 1.43° to 5.66 ± 2.70° at 10 kg; in L4-5 level, the displacement of right facet joint in Y-axis was the smallest at 10 kg, - 0.13 ± 0.91 mm, and the displacement of left facet joint in Z-axis was the largest at - 2.11 ± 0.88 mm, and the rotation angle was 0.21 ± 2.14° to 7.89 ± 2.59° at 10 kg; in L5-S1 level, the displacement of right facet joint in Y-axis was the smallest at 10 kg, - 0.17 ± 1.10 mm, and the displacement of 0 kg left facet joint in X-axis was the largest at 2.19 ± 2.28 mm, and the rotation angle was 0.03 ± 2.02° to 3.98 ± 0.37°.

CONCLUSION

In sitting position, weight-bearing has certain influence on the displacement of facet joints during lumbar lateral bending movement, and this influence occurs simultaneously in translation and rotation; the left and right facet joints are not symmetrical during lumbar lateral bending movement.