The dyadic relationship of supportive care needs with quality of life in lung cancer survivor and spousal caregiver couples

Development of a dyadic mindfulness self-compassion intervention for patients with lung cancer and their family caregivers: A multi-method study

Objective

Lung cancer and its prolonged treatment are profoundly unsettling for patients and their family caregivers, and developing dyadic measures to alleviate their negative affectivity is pivotal. This study aimed to develop a complex intervention to alleviate dyadic psychological stress among patients with lung cancer and their family caregivers.

Methods

A stepwise multi-method study was conducted following the Medical Research Council framework. Three phases were adopted, namely: (1) a preparation phase, a systematic review was conducted to identify the evidence base, (2) a development phase, empirical data from a quantitative study and a qualitative study were integrated to identify effective components, and (3) a modification phase, an online Delphi survey was carried out to refine the intervention.

Results

The dyadic Mindfulness Self-Compassion intervention developed in this study consists of six weekly sessions. The key components of the intervention include: (1) getting along with cancer (introductory session targets illness perception), (2) practising mindful awareness (core session for mindfulness), (3) defining dyadic relationships and introducing self-compassion (core session for self-compassion), (4) promoting dyadic communication (maintenance session targets communication skills), (5) promoting dyadic coping (maintenance session targets coping skills), and (6) a summary session reviewing the rewards and challenges of dyadic adaptation named embracing the future.

Conclusions

An evidence-based, theory-driven, and culturally appropriate dyadic Mindfulness Self-Compassion intervention was developed for patients with lung cancer and their family caregivers. Future studies are warranted to pilot and evaluate the usability, feasibility, acceptability, satisfaction, and effectiveness of this complex intervention.

Trial registration

ClinicalTrial.gov NCT04795700.

Caregiver Distress: An Interdisciplinary Approach to Patient Care

BACKGROUND

Advanced cancer severely impacts the lives of patients as well as their caregivers and loved ones. The burden of the caregiver role often results in significant distress, especially near the end of life. Identifying ways to support patients and caregivers is an important focus of palliative care.

OBJECTIVES

To report two cases depicting the negative impact of caregiver distress on patient care and end-of-life decision-making, requiring the collaboration of an interdisciplinary team. The cases outline interdisciplinary approaches to patient and caregiver support during this transition.

CONCLUSIONS

Medical facilities providing cancer care should have structures and processes capable of assessing and managing caregiver distress. Interdisciplinary teams are needed to identify a process of supporting caregivers to minimize negative impacts of emotional dysregulation on patients, their caregivers, and staff.

Symptom management interventions influence unscheduled health services use among cancer survivors and caregivers

PURPOSE

Three sequences of telephone symptom management interventions were tested on use of unscheduled health services among cancer survivors with depressive or anxiety symptoms during treatment (N = 334) and their informal caregivers (N = 333).

METHODS

The three 12-week intervention sequences were as follows: (1) Symptom Management and Survivorship Handbook (SMSH), (2) a combined 8-week SMSH + Telephone Interpersonal Counseling (TIPC) followed by SMSH for 4 weeks, and (3) SMSH for 4 weeks followed by a combined SMSH + TIPC if no response to SMSH alone. Survivor-caregiver dyads were first randomized to SMSH or a combined SMSH + TIPC. If the survivor's depressive or anxiety symptoms persisted after 4 weeks of SMSH alone, the dyad was randomized the second time to continue with SMSH alone or TIPC was added to SMSH. All participants were assessed at baseline and 13 and 17 weeks. Health service use was compared between randomized groups and among the three sequences.

RESULTS

Survivors were 60.2 years of age, 79% were female, and 41% were Hispanic. Caregivers were 54.8 years of age; 67% were female. The significantly lower rate of emergency department (ED) or urgent care visits for survivors was found in the SMSH + TIPC intervention sequence compared to the SMSH alone in the second randomization and for the third intervention sequence compared to the first.

CONCLUSIONS

Adding TIPC to SMSH after week 4 when survivors experienced persisting depressive or anxiety symptoms reduced ED/urgent care visits compared to SMSH alone.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Managing depression and anxiety symptoms may help prevent ED/urgent care visits and worsening of other symptoms.

The Experience of Social Alienation in Elderly Lung Cancer Patients: A Qualitative Study

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to understand the experience of social alienation in elderly lung cancer patients, to explore its causes, and to propose targeted intervention strategies.

METHODS

From July to August 2023, 16 elderly lung cancer patients attending the respiratory department of a tertiary hospital in Changsha City, Hunan Province, were selected for semi-structured interviews using a purposive sampling method. The Colaizzi 7-step method was used to analyze the data.

RESULTS

A total of four themes were distilled: the experience of social alienation in elderly lung cancer patients (pessimistic feelings, inferiority complex, and heavy psychological burden), subjective causes (disease-included shame, avoidant social behavior, and stigmatized labels), objective causes (isolated social states, and reduced amount of socialization), and rehabilitation support.

CONCLUSION

The causes of social alienation in elderly lung cancer patients include multiple aspects of personal, family, and social support, and symptom management and psychological guidance should be strengthened for this population to construct a hospital-society-family triple-linkage care program to help patients recover.

Cancer Survivors' and Care Partners' Audio Diaries on Stress and Social Support Resources During the COVID-19 Pandemic

OBJECTIVES

To describe cancer survivors' and care partners' perceived stress and social support during the COVID-19 pandemic and assess the feasibility of audio diaries for assessing role-related needs and resources.

METHODS

Participants (N = 51; n = 28 survivors, n = 23 care partners) recorded three monthly audio diaries reporting stress and support experiences. Diaries were transcribed and content-analyzed using a hybrid approach. Stress-related content was inductively coded, and social support content was deductively coded by type (instrumental, information, emotional, companionship, appraisal; κ = 0.75) then inductively coded. Descriptive statistics summarized sociodemographic data and compared coding frequencies by role. We developed narrative summaries of stress and support categories and selected quotes for contextual detail.

RESULTS

Cancer-related stressors were most prevalent (28.8%), followed by work (26.8%), family (23.1%), social isolation (13.4%), and finances (8.0%). While no significant difference in reporting frequency was observed between roles, cancer-related stress was more prevalent for survivors while work-related stress was mentioned more by care partners. Emotional support was the most prevalent support type (32.1%), followed by companionship (25.3%), appraisal (17.9%), instrumental (16.67%), and informational support (8%). Survivors reported more appraisal support than care partners (χ2 = 6.48, df = 1, P = .011) and more support for self-care, while care partners expressed more other-oriented concerns and focused more on managing responsibilities and interactions outside the household.

CONCLUSIONS

The pandemic complicated and intensified role-based stressors already present in the survivorship context. Our findings highlight the importance of informal social support networks, particularly when access to formal services is limited, and suggest that audio diaries can be an effective tool for assessing support needs and resources.

IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE

Nurses and healthcare providers should tailor social support assessments to address the distinct support needs and individual resources of cancer survivors and their care partners. This is especially critical in contexts that limit access to care and formal services.