Upper-limb joint power and its distribution in spinal cord injured wheelchair users: steady-state self-selected speed versus maximal acceleration trials

Predictors of shoulder pain in manual wheelchair users

BACKGROUND

Manual wheelchair users rely on their upper limbs to provide independent mobility, which leads to high muscular demand on their upper extremities and often results in shoulder pain and injury. However, the specific causes of shoulder pain are unknown. Previous work has shown that decreased shoulder muscle strength is predictive of shoulder pain onset, and others have analyzed joint kinematics and kinetics, propulsion technique and intra-individual variability for their relation to shoulder pathology. The purpose of this study was to determine in a longitudinal setting whether there are specific biomechanical measures that predict shoulder pain development in manual wheelchair users.

METHODS

All participants were asymptomatic for shoulder pain and categorized into pain and no pain groups based on assessments at 18 and 36 months later. Shoulder strength, handrim and joint kinetics, kinematics, spatiotemporal measures, intra-individual standard deviations and coefficients of variation were evaluated as predictors of shoulder pain.

FINDINGS

Individuals who developed shoulder pain had weaker shoulder adductor muscles, higher positive shoulder joint work during recovery, and less trunk flexion than those who did not develop pain. In addition, relative intra-individual variability was a better predictor of shoulder pain than absolute variability, however future work is needed to determine when increased versus decreased variability is more favorable for preventing shoulder pain.

INTERPRETATION

These predictors may provide insight into how to improve rehabilitation training and outcomes for manual wheelchair users and ultimately decrease their likelihood of developing shoulder pain and injuries.

Effects of Seated Postural Stability and Trunk and Upper Extremity Strength on Performance during Manual Wheelchair Propulsion Tests in Individuals with Spinal Cord Injury: An Exploratory Study

Objectives. To quantify the association between performance-based manual wheelchair propulsion tests (20 m propulsion test, slalom test, and 6 min propulsion test), trunk and upper extremity (U/E) strength, and seated reaching capability and to establish which ones of these variables best predict performance at these tests. Methods. 15 individuals with a spinal cord injury (SCI) performed the three wheelchair propulsion tests prior to discharge from inpatient SCI rehabilitation. Trunk and U/E strength and seated reaching capability with unilateral hand support were also measured. Bivariate correlation and multiple linear regression analyses allowed determining the best determinants and predictors, respectively. Results. The performance at the three tests was moderately or strongly correlated with anterior and lateral flexion trunk strength, anterior seated reaching distance, and the shoulder, elbow, and handgrip strength measures. Shoulder adductor strength-weakest side explained 53% of the variance on the 20-meter propulsion test-maximum velocity. Shoulder adductor strength-strongest side and forward seated reaching distance explained 71% of the variance on the slalom test. Handgrip strength explained 52% of the variance on the 6-minute propulsion test. Conclusion. Performance at the manual wheelchair propulsion tests is explained by a combination of factors that should be considered in rehabilitation.

Shoulder pain and cycle to cycle kinematic spatial variability during recovery phase in manual wheelchair users: a pilot investigation

Wheelchair propulsion plays a significant role in the development of shoulder pain in manual wheelchair users (MWU). However wheelchair propulsion metrics related to shoulder pain are not clearly understood. This investigation examined intra-individual kinematic spatial variability during semi-circular wheelchair propulsion as a function of shoulder pain in MWU. Data from 10 experienced adult MWU with spinal cord injury (5 with shoulder pain; 5 without shoulder pain) were analyzed in this study. Participants propelled their own wheelchairs on a dynamometer at 3 distinct speeds (self-selected, 0.7 m/s, 1.1 m/s) for 3 minutes at each speed. Motion capture data of the upper limbs were recorded. Intra-individual kinematic spatial variability of the steady state wrist motion during the recovery phase was determined using principal component analysis (PCA). The kinematic spatial variability was calculated at every 10% intervals (i.e at 11 interval points, from 0% to 100%) along the wrist recovery path.

RESULTS

Overall, spatial variability was found to be highest at the start and end of the recovery phase and lowest during the middle of the recovery path. Individuals with shoulder pain displayed significantly higher kinematic spatial variability than individuals without shoulder pain at the start (at 10% interval) of the recovery phase (p<.004).

CONCLUSIONS

Analysis of intra-individual kinematic spatial variability during the recovery phase of manual wheelchair propulsion distinguished between those with and without shoulder pain. Variability analysis of wheelchair propulsion may offer a new approach to monitor the development and rehabilitation of shoulder pain.

Measurement of shoulder joint loads during wheelchair propulsion measured in vivo

BACKGROUND

Recent in vivo measurements show that the loads acting in the glenohumeral joint are high even during activities of daily living. Wheelchair users are frequently affected by shoulder problems. With previous musculoskeletal shoulder models, shoulder joint loading was mostly calculated during well-defined activities like forward flexion or abduction. For complex movements of everyday living or wheelchair propulsion, the reported loads vary considerably.

METHODS

Shoulder joint forces and moments were measured with telemeterized implants in 6 subjects. Data were captured on a treadmill at defined speeds and inclinations. Additional measurements were taken in 1 subject when lifting the body from the wheelchair, using his arms only, and in 2 subjects when rapidly accelerating and stopping the wheelchair. The influence of the floor material on shoulder joint loading was accessed in 2 subjects. In general, the maximum shoulder loads did not exceed those during daily living but the time courses and magnitudes of the loads intra-individually varied much.

FINDINGS

The highest forces acted during maximum acceleration and lifting from the wheelchair (128% and 188% of body weight). Grass was the only surface which led to a general load increase, compared to a smooth floor.

INTERPRETATION

The increased incidence of overuse injuries in wheelchair users are probably not caused by excessive load magnitudes during regular propulsion. The high number of repetitions is assumed to be more decisive.

Individual muscle contributions to push and recovery subtasks during wheelchair propulsion

Manual wheelchair propulsion places considerable physical demand on the upper extremity and is one of the primary activities associated with the high prevalence of upper extremity overuse injuries and pain among wheelchair users. As a result, recent effort has focused on determining how various propulsion techniques influence upper extremity demand during wheelchair propulsion. However, an important prerequisite for identifying the relationships between propulsion techniques and upper extremity demand is to understand how individual muscles contribute to the mechanical energetics of wheelchair propulsion. The purpose of this study was to use a forward dynamics simulation of wheelchair propulsion to quantify how individual muscles deliver, absorb and/or transfer mechanical power during propulsion. The analysis showed that muscles contribute to either push (i.e., deliver mechanical power to the handrim) or recovery (i.e., reposition the arm) subtasks, with the shoulder flexors being the primary contributors to the push and the shoulder extensors being the primary contributors to the recovery. In addition, significant activity from the shoulder muscles was required during the transition between push and recovery, which resulted in increased co-contraction and upper extremity demand. Thus, strengthening the shoulder flexors and promoting propulsion techniques that improve transition mechanics have much potential to reduce upper extremity demand and improve rehabilitation outcomes.

The influence of altering push force effectiveness on upper extremity demand during wheelchair propulsion

Manual wheelchair propulsion has been linked to a high incidence of overuse injury and pain in the upper extremity, which may be caused by the high load requirements and low mechanical efficiency of the task. Previous studies have suggested that poor mechanical efficiency may be due to a low effective handrim force (i.e. applied force that is not directed tangential to the handrim). As a result, studies attempting to reduce upper extremity demand have used various measures of force effectiveness (e.g., fraction effective force, FEF) as a guide for modifying propulsion technique, developing rehabilitation programs and configuring wheelchairs. However, the relationship between FEF and upper extremity demand is not well understood. The purpose of this study was to use forward dynamics simulations of wheelchair propulsion to determine the influence of FEF on upper extremity demand by quantifying individual muscle stress, work and handrim force contributions at different values of FEF. Simulations maximizing and minimizing FEF resulted in higher average muscle stresses (23% and 112%) and total muscle work (28% and 71%) compared to a nominal FEF simulation. The maximal FEF simulation also shifted muscle use from muscles crossing the elbow to those at the shoulder (e.g., rotator cuff muscles), placing greater demand on shoulder muscles during propulsion. The optimal FEF value appears to represent a balance between increasing push force effectiveness to increase mechanical efficiency and minimize upper extremity demand. Thus, care should be taken in using force effectiveness as a metric to reduce upper extremity demand.

Redefining the manual wheelchair stroke cycle: identification and impact of nonpropulsive pushrim contact

OBJECTIVES

To create a comprehensive definition of the manual wheelchair stroke cycle, which includes multiple periods of pushrim contact, and to show its improved clinical benefit to wheelchair propulsion analyses.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional biomechanics study.

SETTING

Three motion analysis laboratories.

PARTICIPANTS

Persons (N=54) with paraplegia who use a manual wheelchair.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pushrim forces, axle moments, and contact angles measured during wheelchair propulsion.

RESULTS

Total force on the pushrim was used to define pushrim contact and positive axle moment was used to identify the included period of propulsive contact. During most strokes, periods of nonpropulsive contact existed before and after propulsive contact. Within these periods, braking moments were applied to the pushrim, resulting in negative power output, or power loss. Including nonpropulsive data decreased mean stroke moment and power. The magnitude and the angle over which braking moments and power loss occurred increased with wheel speed. Mean braking moment and power loss within the initial contact period were significantly (P<.001) related to stroke pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

The proposed definition of the stroke cycle provides a thorough and practical description of wheelchair propulsion. Researchers and clinicians should use this definition to understand and minimize the impact of nonpropulsive contact throughout the stroke.