1
|
Leland NE, Lekovitch C, Martínez J, Rouch S, Harding P, Wong C. Optimizing Post-Acute Care Patient Safety: A Scoping Review of Multifactorial Fall Prevention Interventions for Older Adults. J Appl Gerontol 2022; 41:2187-2196. [PMID: 35618304 DOI: 10.1177/07334648221104375] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Accidental falls are preventable adverse events for older post-acute care (PAC) patients. Yet, due to the functional and medical care needs of this population, there is little guidance to inform multidisciplinary prevention efforts. This scoping review aims to characterize the evidence for multifactorial PAC fall prevention interventions. Of the 33 included studies, common PAC intervention domains included implementing facility-based strategies (e.g., staff education), evaluating patient-specific fall risk factors (e.g., function), and developing an individualized risk profile and treatment plan that targets the patient's constellation of fall risk factors. However, there was variability across studies in how and to what extent the domains were addressed. While further research is warranted, health system efforts to prevent accidental falls in PAC should consider a patient-centered multifactorial approach that fosters a culture of safety, addresses individuals' fall risk, and champions a multidisciplinary team.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie E Leland
- Department of Occupational Therapy, 6614University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Cara Lekovitch
- Department of Occupational Therapy, 6614University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Jenny Martínez
- Department of Occupational Therapy, 6559Jefferson College of Rehabilitation Sciences, Philadelphia, PA, USA
| | - Stephanie Rouch
- Department of Occupational Therapy, 6614University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA
| | - Patrick Harding
- Chan Division of Occupational Science and Occupational Therapy, 5116University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| | - Carin Wong
- Department of Sociology, 14669California State University Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prommik P, Maiväli Ü, Kolk H, Märtson A. Causal variation modelling identifies large inter- and intra-regional disparities in physical therapy offered to hip fracture patients in Estonia. Disabil Rehabil 2021; 44:4729-4737. [PMID: 33929920 DOI: 10.1080/09638288.2021.1918772] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/21/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE An essential measure of hip fracture (HF) rehabilitation, the amount of physical therapy (PT) used per patient, has been severely understudied. This study (1) evaluates post-acute PT use after HF in Estonia, (2) presents causal variation modelling for examining inter- and intra-regional disparities, and (3) analyses its temporal trends. MATERIALS AND METHODS This retrospective cohort study used validated population-wide health data, including patients aged ≥50 years, with an index HF diagnosed between January 2009 and September 2017. Patients' 6-month PT use was analysed and reported separately for acute and post-acute phases. RESULTS While most of the included 11,461 patients received acute rehabilitation, only 40% of them received post-acute PT by a median of 6 h. Analyses based on measures of central tendency revealed 2.5 to 2.6-fold inter-regional differences in HF post-acute rehabilitation. Variation modelling additionally detected intra-regional disparities, showing imbalances in the fairness of allocating local rehabilitation resources between a county's patients. CONCLUSIONS This study demonstrates the advantages of causal variation modelling for identifying inter- and intra-regional disparities in rehabilitation. The analyses revealed persisting large multi-level disparities and accompanying overall inaccessibility of PT in HF rehabilitation in Estonia, showing an urgent need for system-wide improvements.Implications for rehabilitationThis study demonstrates the advantages of causal variation modelling for identifying inter- and intra-regional disparities in rehabilitation, using an essential outcome measure - used physical therapy hours.The study revealed large multi-level disparities and overall inaccessibility of physical therapy in hip fracture rehabilitation in Estonia, showing an urgent need for system-wide improvements.This study expands our knowledge on unstudied topics - hip fracture post-acute care and long-term physical therapy use.This regional analysis provides the first evidence-based regional-level basis for improving the rehabilitation system in Estonia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Pärt Prommik
- Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.,Traumatology and Orthopaedics Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia.,Institute of Sport Sciences and Physiotherapy, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Ülo Maiväli
- Institute of Technology, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Helgi Kolk
- Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.,Traumatology and Orthopaedics Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| | - Aare Märtson
- Department of Traumatology and Orthopaedics, University of Tartu, Tartu, Estonia.,Traumatology and Orthopaedics Clinic, Tartu University Hospital, Tartu, Estonia
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Mayo NE, Kaur N, Barbic SP, Fiore J, Barclay R, Finch L, Kuspinar A, Asano M, Figueiredo S, Aburub AS, Alzoubi F, Arafah A, Askari S, Bakhshi B, Bouchard V, Higgins J, Hum S, Inceer M, Letellier ME, Lourenco C, Mate K, Salbach NM, Moriello C. How have research questions and methods used in clinical trials published in Clinical Rehabilitation changed over the last 30 years? Clin Rehabil 2016; 30:847-64. [PMID: 27496695 PMCID: PMC4976657 DOI: 10.1177/0269215516658939] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2016] [Accepted: 06/20/2016] [Indexed: 12/19/2022]
Abstract
Research in rehabilitation has grown from a rare phenomenon to a mature science and clinical trials are now common. The purpose of this study is to estimate the extent to which questions posed and methods applied in clinical trials published in Clinical Rehabilitation have evolved over three decades with respect to accepted standards of scientific rigour. Studies were identified by journal, database, and hand searching for the years 1986 to 2016.A total of 390 articles whose titles suggested a clinical trial of an intervention, with or without randomization to form groups, were reviewed. Questions often still focused on methods to be used (57%) rather than what knowledge was to be gained. Less than half (43%) of the studies delineated between primary and secondary outcomes; multiple outcomes were common; and sample sizes were relatively small (mean 83, range 5 to 3312). Blinding of assessors was common (72%); blinding of study subjects was rare (19%). In less than one-third of studies was intention-to-treat analysis done correctly; power was reported in 43%. There is evidence of publication bias as 83% of studies reported either a between-group or a within-group effect. Over time, there was an increase in the use of parameter estimation rather than hypothesis testing and there was evidence that methodological rigour improved.Rehabilitation trialists are answering important questions about their interventions. Outcomes need to be more patient-centred and a measurement framework needs to be explicit. More advanced statistical methods are needed as interventions are complex. Suggestions for moving forward over the next decades are given.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nancy E Mayo
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Navaldeep Kaur
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Skye P Barbic
- Department of Occupational Science & Occupational Therapy, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
| | - Julio Fiore
- Department of Surgery, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ruth Barclay
- Department of Physical Therapy, College of Rehabilitation Sciences, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada
| | - Lois Finch
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ayse Kuspinar
- School of Physical Therapy, University of Saskatchewan, Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada
| | - Miho Asano
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sabrina Figueiredo
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Ala' Sami Aburub
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Fadi Alzoubi
- Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Alaa Arafah
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Sorayya Askari
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Behtash Bakhshi
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Vanessa Bouchard
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Johanne Higgins
- École de réadaptation, Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Stanley Hum
- Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital, Multiple Sclerosis Clinic, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Mehmet Inceer
- School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Marie Eve Letellier
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Christiane Lourenco
- Departamento de Educação Integrada em Saúde, Universidade Federal do Espírito Santo, Brazil Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Kedar Mate
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| | - Nancy M Salbach
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario
| | - Carolina Moriello
- Division of Clinical Epidemiology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada Center for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Research Institute, McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada School of Physical and Occupational Therapy, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Paci M, Landi N, Briganti G, Lombardi B. Factors associated with citation rate of randomised controlled trials in physiotherapy. Arch Physiother 2015; 5:9. [PMID: 29340178 PMCID: PMC5759914 DOI: 10.1186/s40945-015-0009-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/22/2015] [Accepted: 08/05/2015] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Despite the use of citation rate as a measure of quality of research is strongly criticized and debated, it remain a widely used method to evaluate performances of researchers, articles and journals. The aim of this study was to test which factors are associated with citation rate of Randomised Controlled Trials (RCTs) published on the physiotherapy field. Methods All RCTs abstracted in the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), indexed in Scopus database and published in 2008 were included. PEDro score, language of publication, indexing in PubMed database, type of access to articles, subdiscipline, the number of authors, the country where the study was performed, the type of institution where the study was conducted and the number of centres involved in the study (multicentric vs single-centre). and the 2013 5-year impact factor of the publishing journals were considered as independent variables. Citation rate until December 2013 was extracted from Scopus database and used as dependent variable. Results Six hundred and nineteen RCTs, published in 283 journals, were included and analysed. The 5-year impact factor was the strongest variable associated with the citation rate and explained approximately 50 % of the variance, and the number of authors explained an additional small part (about 1 %) of variability. The other variables were excluded from the model. Conclusions The study highlights that 5-year Impact Factor, not accessibility (language of publication, indexing in PubMed database or the type of access to articles) or reported quality (PEDro score), is a strong predictor of the number of citations for RCTs in the physiotherapy field. Our findings support the increasingly widespread idea that citation analysis does not reflect the scientific merit of the cited work, at least in terms of reported quality. The results of this study need to be confirmed with a publication window larger than one year.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Matteo Paci
- Unit of Functional Rehabilitation, Department of Continuing Care, Azienda USL 4, Prato, Italy
| | | | | | - Bruna Lombardi
- Unit of Functional Rehabilitation, Department of Continuing Care, Azienda USL 4, Prato, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Snell K, Hassan A, Sutherland L, Chau L, Senior T, Janaudis-Ferreira T, Brooks D. Types and quality of physical therapy research publications: has there been a change in the past decade? Physiother Can 2015; 66:382-91. [PMID: 25922560 DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2013-67] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE To describe and compare the type and quality of evidence published in physical therapy (PT) journals during two time periods (2000-2002 vs. 2010-2012) and to explore scientific editors' opinions on changes in the types and quality of articles. METHODS A quantitative, longitudinal, retrospective journal review was used to categorize and assess the methodological rigour of items published in four PT journals using the Hedges Project. A quantitative, descriptive, cross-sectional survey explored the opinions of scientific editors. Percentages and frequencies of article types (as defined by the Hedges Project criteria), items passing rigour, and editor responses were calculated. Statistical significance of differences in article type and rigour between the two time periods was determined using Fisher's Exact Test. RESULTS There was a significant increase in original studies and review articles from 2000-2002 to 2010-2012 (p<0.001, p=0.002, respectively). The overall pass rate for rigour was 33.3% in 2000-2002 and 42.5% in 2010-2012, showing a significant increase (p=0.019). The majority of editors reported an increase in systematic reviews, qualitative designs, and randomized controlled trials and believed that quality had improved by 2010-2012. CONCLUSION From 2000-2002 to 2010-2012, the quality of articles published in PT journals improved and the proportion of original studies and review articles increased.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kaitlyn Snell
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto
| | - Ali Hassan
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto
| | | | - Leo Chau
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto
| | | | - Tania Janaudis-Ferreira
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto ; Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre ; West Park Healthcare Centre, Toronto, ON
| | - Dina Brooks
- Department of Physical Therapy, University of Toronto ; West Park Healthcare Centre, Toronto, ON
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Saragiotto BT, Costa LCM, Oliveira RF, Lopes AD, Moseley AM, Costa LOP. Description of research design of articles published in four Brazilian physical therapy journals. Braz J Phys Ther 2014; 18:56-62. [PMID: 24675913 PMCID: PMC4183239 DOI: 10.1590/s1413-35552012005000136] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/20/2013] [Accepted: 07/31/2013] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Background While the research design of articles published in medical journals and in
some physical therapy journals has already been evaluated, this has not been
investigated in Brazilian physical therapy journals. Objective To describe the research design used in all articles published in Brazilian
scientific journals that are freely available, have high Qualis rankings,
and are relevant to physical therapy over a 7-year period. Method We extracted the bibliometric data, research design, research type (human or
animal), and clinical area for all articles published. The articles were
grouped into their level of evidence, and descriptive analyses were
performed. We calculated the frequency, proportions of articles, and 95%
confidence interval of these proportions with each research design in each
journal. We cross-tabulated the clinical areas with research designs
(expressed as number and percentages). Results A total of 1,458 articles from four Brazilian journals were found:
Revista Brasileira de Fisioterapia, Revista
Fisioterapia em Movimento, Revista Fisioterapia e
Pesquisa, and Revista Acta Fisiátrica.
The majority of articles were classified as level II of evidence (60%),
followed by level III (29%) and level I (10%). The most prevalent research
designs were cross-sectional studies (38%), single-case or case-series
studies, and narrative reviews. Most articles reported human research and
were in the musculoskeletal, neurologic, and cardiothoracic areas. Conclusions Most of the research published in Brazilian physical therapy journals used
levels II and III of evidence. Increasing the publication rate of systematic
reviews and randomized controlled trials would provide more high-quality
evidence to guide evidence-based physical therapy practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Bruno T Saragiotto
- Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Lucíola C M Costa
- Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Ronaldo F Oliveira
- Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Alexandre D Lopes
- Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| | - Anne M Moseley
- Musculoskeletal Division, The George Institute for Global Health, Sydney, NSW, Australia
| | - Leonardo O P Costa
- Doctoral Programs in Physical Therapy, Universidade Cidade de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil
| |
Collapse
|