1
|
Onan D, Ulger O, Martelletti P. Effects of spinal stabilization exercises delivered using telerehabilitation on outcomes in patients with chronic neck pain: a randomized controlled trial. Expert Rev Neurother 2023; 23:269-280. [PMID: 36927237 DOI: 10.1080/14737175.2023.2192870] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/18/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND When spinal stabilization exercises (SSE) are performed regularly, may provide benefits on outcome measures in chronic nonspecific neck pain (CNNP) patients. The pandemic has made it difficult for CNNP patients to access regular physiotherapy-exercise services. This study aims to compare telerehabilitation (TR) with face-to-face rehabilitation in CNNP. METHODS Neck Functional Capacity Evaluation Test (NFCET) results were the primary outcomes. Pain intensity (PI), disability, awareness, neck muscles architecture, andexercise satisfaction were the secondary outcomes. Patients were randomized into the TR group (TRG) (n = 15) and the control group (CG) (n = 16). Patients performed SSE 3 days a week, for 8 weeks. The TRG was instructed remotely while the CG was instructed in the clinic. RESULTS After 8 weeks in both groups, NFCET values and neck awareness increased (p < 0.05), PI and disability decreased (p < 0.05). Muscle architecture improved in both groups (p < 0.05), except for the Right Sternocleidomastoideus in both groups and the Right Upper-Trapezius in TRG (p > 0.05). There was no difference between the groups for all variables and exercise satisfaction(p > 0.05). CONCLUSION SSE for CNNP, whether supervised by therapists in the clinic or by telerehabilitation, was equally effective. THE CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER NCT04691024.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilara Onan
- Spine Health Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Ozlem Ulger
- Spine Health Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
- Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
McGee S, Sipos T, Allin T, Chen C, Greco A, Bobos P, MacDermid J. Systematic review of the measurement properties of performance-based functional tests in patients with neck disorders. BMJ Open 2019; 9:e031242. [PMID: 31767589 PMCID: PMC6886974 DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-031242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
OBJECTIVES The purpose of this systematic review is to identify and synthesise studies evaluating performance-based functional outcome measures designed to evaluate the functional abilities of patients with neck pain. DESIGN Systematic review. DATA SOURCES A literature search using PubMed, Scopus, CINAHL, EMBASE, COCHRANE, Google Scholar and a citation mapping strategy was conducted until July 2019. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA More than half of the study's patient population had neck pain or a musculoskeletal neck disorder and completed a functional-based test. Clinimetric properties of at least one performance-based functional tests were reported. Both traumatic and non-traumatic origins of neck pain were considered. DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS Relevant data were then extracted from selected articles using an extraction guide. Selected articles were appraised using the Quality Appraisal for Clinical Measurement Research Reports Evaluation Form (QACMRR). RESULTS The search obtained 12 articles which reported on four outcome measures (functional capacity evaluations (FCE), Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment Work Simulator II (BTEWS II), Functional Impairment Test-Hand and Neck/Shoulder/Arm (FIT-HaNSA)) and a physiotherapy test package, to assess the functional abilities in patients with mechanical neck pain. Of the selected papers: one reports content validity, five construct validity, four reliability, one sensitivity to change and one both reliability and construct validity. QACMRR scores ranged from 68% to 95%. CONCLUSIONS This review found very good quality evidence that the FIT-HaNSA has excellent inter and intra-rater reliability and very weak to weak convergent validity. Excellent quality evidence of fair test-retest reliability, weak convergent validity and very weak known groups validity for the BTEWS II test was found. Good to excellent quality evidence exists that an FCE battery has poor to excellent reliability and very weak to strong validity. Good to excellent quality of weak to strong validity and trivial to strong effect sizes were found for a physiotherapy test package. PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER CRD42018112358.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Steven McGee
- School of Physical Therapy, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Taylor Sipos
- School of Physical Therapy, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Thomas Allin
- School of Physical Therapy, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Celia Chen
- School of Physical Therapy, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Alexandra Greco
- School of Physical Therapy, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
| | - Pavlos Bobos
- School of Physical Therapy, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Western's Bone and Joint Intitute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Dalla Lana School of Public Health, Institute of Health Policy Management and Evaluation, Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Health Care Research, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Joy MacDermid
- School of Physical Therapy, Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- Western's Bone and Joint Intitute, Western University, London, Ontario, Canada
- School of Rehabilitation Science, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
De Baets S, Calders P, Schalley N, Vermeulen K, Vertriest S, Van Peteghem L, Coussens M, Malfait F, Vanderstraeten G, Van Hove G, Van de Velde D. Updating the Evidence on Functional Capacity Evaluation Methods: A Systematic Review. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2018; 28:418-428. [PMID: 28988355 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-017-9734-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
Objectives To synthesize the evidence on the psychometrics functional capacity evaluation (FCE) methods. Methods A systematic literature search in nine databases. The resulting articles were screened based on predefined in- and exclusion criteria. Two reviewers independently performed this screening. Included studies were appraised based on their methodological quality. Results The search resulted in 20 eligible studies about nine different FCE methods. The Baltimore Therapeutic Equipment work simulator showed a moderate predictive validity. The Ergo-Kit (EK) showed moderate variability and high inter- and intra-rater reliability. Low discriminative abilities and high convergent validity were found for the EK. Concurrent validity of the EK and the ERGOS Work Simulator was low to moderate. Moderate to high test-retest, inter- and intra-reliability was found in the Isernhagen Work-Systems (IWS) FCE. The predictive validity of the IWS was low. The physical work performance evaluation (PWPE) showed moderate test-retest reliability and moderate to high inter-rater reliability. Low internal and external responsiveness were found for the PWPE, predictive validity was high. The predictive validity of the short-form FCE was also high but need to be further examined on several psychometric properties. Low discriminative and convergent validity were found for the work disability functional assessment battery. The WorkHab showed moderate to high test-retest, inter- and intra-rater reliability. Conclusion Well-known FCE methods have been rigorously studied, but some of the research indicates weaknesses in their reliability and validity. Future research should address how these weaknesses can be overcome.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stijn De Baets
- Occupational Therapy Program, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium.
| | - Patrick Calders
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Noortje Schalley
- Occupational Therapy Program, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Katrien Vermeulen
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Sofie Vertriest
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Lien Van Peteghem
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Marieke Coussens
- Occupational Therapy Program, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Fransiska Malfait
- Centre for Medical Genetics, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Guy Vanderstraeten
- Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
- Department of Physical and Rehabilitation Medicine, Ghent University Hospital, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Geert Van Hove
- Department of Special Needs Education, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, Ghent University, Ghent, Belgium
| | - Dominique Van de Velde
- Occupational Therapy Program, Department of Rehabilitation Sciences and Physiotherapy, Faculty of Medicine and Health Sciences, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, 9000, Ghent, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Plomb-Holmes C, Lüthi F, Vuistiner P, Leger B, Hilfiker R. A Return-to-Work Prognostic Model for Orthopaedic Trauma Patients (WORRK) Updated for Use at 3, 12 and 24 Months. JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL REHABILITATION 2017; 27:568-575. [PMID: 28012065 PMCID: PMC5709449 DOI: 10.1007/s10926-016-9688-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/01/2023]
Abstract
Purpose Updating the Wallis Occupational Rehabilitation Risk (WORRK) model formula, predicting non-return to work (nRTW) at different time points (3 and 12 months) than in the validation study (2 years). Methods Secondary analysis of two samples was carried out (following orthopaedic trauma), including work status, the first at 3 months (428 patients) and the second at 12 months (431 patients) after discharge from rehabilitation. We used calibration (agreement between predicted probabilities and observed frequencies) and discrimination (area under the receiver operating characteristics curve) to assess performance of the model after fitting it in the new sample, then calculated the probabilities of nRTW based on the coefficients from the 2-year prediction. Finally, the intercepts were updated for both 3- and 12-month prediction models (re-calibration was necessary for the adjustment of these probabilities) and performance re-evaluated. Results Patient characteristics were similar in all samples (mean age 43 in both groups; 86% male at 3 months, 84% male at 12 months). The proportion of nRTW at 3 months was 63.8% and 53.4% at 12 months (50.36% at 2 years). Performance of the original WORRK for both 3- and 12-month prediction showed an AUC of 0.73, while statistically significant miscalibration was found for both time points (p < 0.001). After the updating of the intercept, calibration was improved and did not show significant miscalibration (p = 0.458 and 0.341). The AUC stayed at 0.73. Conclusion The WORRK model was successfully adapted by changing the intercept for 3- and 12-month prediction of nRTW, now available for use in clinical practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chantal Plomb-Holmes
- Department for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Clinique romande de réadaptation suvacare, Sion, Switzerland.
- Institut de Recherche en Réadaptation, Clinique romande de réadaptation suvacare, Sion, Switzerland.
| | - François Lüthi
- Department for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Clinique romande de réadaptation suvacare, Sion, Switzerland
- Institut de Recherche en Réadaptation, Clinique romande de réadaptation suvacare, Sion, Switzerland
- Département de l'Appareil Locomoteur, Hôpital Orthopédique, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Philippe Vuistiner
- Department for Musculoskeletal Rehabilitation, Clinique romande de réadaptation suvacare, Sion, Switzerland
- Institute of Social and Preventive Medicine, Lausanne University Hospital, Lausanne, Switzerland
| | - Bertrand Leger
- Institut de Recherche en Réadaptation, Clinique romande de réadaptation suvacare, Sion, Switzerland
| | - Roger Hilfiker
- Institut de Recherche en Réadaptation, Clinique romande de réadaptation suvacare, Sion, Switzerland
- School of Health Sciences, University of Applied Sciences and Arts Western Switzerland Valais (HES-SO Valais-Wallis), Sion, Switzerland
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Reneman M, Roelofs M, Schiphorst Preuper H. Reliability and Agreement of Neck Functional Capacity Evaluation Tests in Patients With Chronic Multifactorial Neck Pain. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 2017; 98:1476-1479. [DOI: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.12.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2016] [Revised: 12/06/2016] [Accepted: 12/15/2016] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
|
6
|
Abstract
Physicians who treat injured workers with painful conditions face complex challenges that require skills beyond those of a clinician. To address these challenges effectively, physicians need to understand the logic of workers' compensation systems and the interests of the various participants in the systems. They must be prepared to interface constructively between their patients and the workers' compensation carrier and attend to a multitude of administrative issues. In the present article, the authors provide an extended case history with commentary to illustrate the challenges that physicians face and the ways they can respond to these challenges.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James P Robinson
- Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
| | - Lee S Glass
- Department of Labor and Industries, Olympia, WA, USA
| |
Collapse
|