Current Research Outcomes From the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems

Effects of Combined Intrathecal Mesenchymal Stem Cells and Schwann Cells Transplantation on Neuropathic Pain in Complete Spinal Cord Injury: A Phase II Randomized Active-Controlled Trial

Neuropathic pain is a debilitating complication following spinal cord injury (SCI). Currently, effective treatments for SCI-induced neuropathic pain are highly lacking. This clinical trial aimed to investigate the efficacy of combined intrathecal injection of Schwann cells (SCs) and bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs) in improving SCI-induced neuropathic pain. This study was a parallel-group, randomized, open-label, active-controlled phase II trial with two arms, including treatment and control groups. Patients with complete SCI-induced neuropathic pain in the treatment group received a single combined intrathecal injection of BMSCs and SCs. Study outcome measures were International SCI Pain Basic Data Set (ISCIPBDS) and World Health Organization (WHO) Quality of Life Assessment Instrument (WHOQOL-BREF). A total of 37 (55.2%) and 30 (44.8%) patients in the treatment and control groups were followed up for 6 months, respectively. Significant reductions in mean scores of interference items in the treatment group, including daily activities (P < 0.001), mood (P < 0.001), and sleep (P < 0.001), were found at 6 months after the injection compared with the control one. Similarly, pain frequency (P = 0.002), mean (P = 0.001), and worst (P = 0.001) numeric rating scale (NRS) pain intensity scores showed significant reductions in the treatment group after 6 months compared with the control one. Based on multiple regression analysis controlled for potential confounders, significant associations between changes in all outcome measures over the study period and the treatment group were found. This clinical trial indicated the efficacy of combined cell therapy in improving the neuropathic pain and quality of life in complete SCI patients. Future investigations should evaluate the effects of combination of this strategy with other existing therapies for SCI-induced neuropathic pain. This clinical trial was also registered prospectively at the Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT20200502047277N8).

Do improvements in upper extremity motor function affect changes in bladder management after cervical spinal cord injury?

INTRODUCTION

One of the most important predictors of clean intermittent catheterization (CIC) adoption after spinal cord injury (SCI) is upper extremity (UE) motor function at discharge from rehabilitation. It is not clear however if post-discharge improvements in UE motor function affect future bladder management decisions.

METHODS

We assessed persons with cervical SCI in the National Spinal Cord Injury Dataset for the years 2000-2016 who underwent motor examination at discharge from rehabilitation and again at 1-year follow-up. Individuals were stratified based on a previously described algorithm which categorizes the ability to independently perform CIC based upon UE motor scores. Improvements in the predicted ability to self-catheterize over the first year after rehabilitation discharge were evaluated in relation to bladder management.

RESULTS

Despite 15% of our SCI cohort improving from "less than able to independently catheterize" to "able to independently catheterize", more patients in the overall cohort dropped out of CIC (175/643 = 27.2%) than adopted CIC (68/548 = 12.4%) (P < .001). We found that in those initially categorized as "less than able to independently catheterize" at the time of rehabilitation discharge, CIC adoption was not significantly different at 1-year follow-up whether or not there was motor improvement to "able to independently catheterize" (12.7% vs 9.2% respectively, P = 0.665). Between these two groups, CIC dropout was also equivalent (34.3% vs 30.0% respectively, P = 0.559).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first year after rehabilitation, more overall SCI patients transition away from CIC than convert to CIC. Significant improvements in UE motor function during the first year after rehabilitation discharge do not appear to affect bladder management decisions.

Bladder Management With Chronic Indwelling Catheter is Associated with Elevated Mortality in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of bladder management method, specifically chronic indwelling catheter (IndC), on survival in patients with spinal cord injury (SCI) in Spinal Cord Injury Model System database.

METHODS

Spinal Cord Injury Model System is a multicenter longitudinal database since 1970 with >40,000 patients with SCI. Adult patients (>18 at the time of injury) were screened. Patients who died within 1 year of injury and had 2 or more changes in method of bladder management, or reported normal volitional void were excluded. Outcome of interest was death from nonpulmonary, nonwound related sepsis (NPNWS). Left truncation cox regression method using age as the time-scale was used to calculate hazard ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 13,616 patients were included. Comparison was performed between "IndC" group (n = 4872; 36.1%) vs "Other" (n = 8744; 63.9%). After adjusting for age and change in bladder management method, "IndC" is associated with elevated NPNWS mortality (2.10; 95% confidence interval 1.72-2.56, P < .001). Multivariable analysis, adjusting for age at injury, gender, race, education, insurance status, etiology of SCI, injury level, neurologic impairment level, and change in bladder management method, showed IndC was associated with significantly higher risk of death from NPNWS compared to other methods of bladder management.

CONCLUSION

In a large cohort of SCI patients, bladder management with IndC is predictive of significantly propagated NPNWS related mortality compared to other methods of bladder management. While identifying IndC is an independent mortality risk factor, a better understanding of the underlying mechanisms could inform strategies to improve neurourological care and survival after SCI.

A pragmatic randomized controlled trial testing the effects of the international scientific SCI exercise guidelines on SCI chronic pain: protocol for the EPIC-SCI trial

STUDY DESIGN

Protocol for a pragmatic randomized controlled trial (the Exercise guideline Promotion and Implementation in Chronic SCI [EPIC-SCI] Trial).

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES

To test if home-/community-based exercise, prescribed according to the international SCI exercise guidelines, significantly reduces chronic bodily pain in adults with SCI.

SECONDARY OBJECTIVES

To investigate: (1) the effects of exercise on musculoskeletal and neuropathic chronic pain; (2) if reduced inflammation and increased descending inhibitory control are viable pathways by which exercise reduces pain; (3) the effects of chronic pain reductions on subjective well-being; and (4) efficiency of a home-/community-based exercise intervention.

SETTING

Exercise in home-/community-based settings; assessments in university-based laboratories in British Columbia, Canada.

METHOD

Eighty-four adults with chronic SCI, reporting chronic musculoskeletal or neuropathic pain, and not meeting the current SCI exercise guidelines, will be recruited and randomized to a 6-month Exercise or Wait-List Control condition. Exercise will occur in home/community settings and will be supported through behavioral counseling. All measures will be taken at baseline, 3-months and 6-months. Analyses will consist of linear mixed effect models, multiple regression analyses and a cost-utility analysis. The economic evaluation will examine the incremental costs and health benefits generated by the intervention compared with usual care.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

The University of British Columbia Clinical Research Ethics Board approved the protocol (#H19-01650). Using an integrated knowledge translation approach, stakeholders will be engaged throughout the trial and will co-create and disseminate evidence-based recommendations and messages regarding the use of exercise to manage SCI chronic pain.

Representativeness of the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems National Database

STUDY DESIGN

Secondary analysis of prospectively collected observational data.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the representativeness of the Spinal Cord Injury Model Systems National Database (SCIMS-NDB) of all adults aged 18 years or older receiving inpatient rehabilitation in the United States (US) for new onset traumatic spinal cord injury (TSCI).

SETTING

Inpatient rehabilitation centers in the US.

METHODS

We compared demographic, functional status, and injury characteristics (nine categorical variables comprising of 46 categories and two continuous variables) between the SCIMS-NDB (N = 5969) and UDS-PRO/eRehabData (N = 99,142) cases discharged from inpatient rehabilitation in 2000-2010.

RESULTS

There are negligible differences (<5%) between SCIMS-NDB patients and the population for 31 of the 48 comparisons. Minor differences (5-10%) exist for age categories, sex, race/ethnicity, marital status, FIM Motor score, and time from injury to rehabilitation admission. Important differences (>10%) exist in mean age and preinjury occupational status; the SCIMS-NDB sample was younger and included a higher percentage of individuals who were employed (62.7 vs. 41.7%) and fewer who were retired (10.2 vs. 36.1%).

CONCLUSIONS

Adults in the SCIMS-NDB are largely representative of the population of adults receiving inpatient rehabilitation for new onset TSCI in the US. However, users of the SCIMS-NDB may need to adjust statistically for differences in age and preinjury occupational status to improve generalizability of findings.