Comparative Effectiveness of Injection Therapies in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review, Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Specific modes of exercise to improve rotator cuff-related shoulder pain: systematic review and meta-analysis

Objective

To investigate the effect of specific modes of exercise on rotator cuff-related shoulder pain (RCRSP) patients, aiming to provide a theoretical reference for conservative treatment and exercise prescription.

Methods

Data sources included PubMed/MEDLINE, Web of Science, ScienceDirect, and CNKI, covering studies from database inception to June 2024. Study selection followed pre-set inclusion/exclusion criteria. Cochrane methods guided quality assessment and data extraction. Outcome measures included VAS, CMS, and DASH scores. Publication bias assessed via funnel plots; forest plots created using RevMan 5.4.

Results

13 studies (n = 690) met inclusion criteria for RCRSP exercise interventions. It is indicated that: (1) specific exercises led to modest improvements in performance of pain (SMD = -0.31, 95% CI: 0.46 to -0.16, P < 0.0001) and function, with enhancements in CMS (SMD = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.44 to 0.74, P < 0.00001) and DASH (SMD = -0.60, 95% CI: 0.80 to -0.39, P < 0.00001). (2) Interventions lasting less than 2 months were slightly more effective than those lasting 2 months or longer, observed in VAS (SMD = -0.35, 95% CI: 0.56 to -0.15, P = 0.0007), CMS (SMD = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.47 to 0.96, P < 0.00001), and DASH (SMD = -0.71, 95% CI: 0.99 to -0.43, P < 0.00001). (3) Subgroup analyses revealed that handgrip strength exercises enhanced shoulder pain relief, shoulder mobilization/stretching improved both function and pain levels over 2 months, scapular stabilization exercise improved pain and DASH performance over 2 months, eccentric exercises boosted CMS and DASH performance over 2 months, while proprioceptive exercises showed no significant improvement in pain or CMS performance.

Conclusion

Compared to non-specific exercises, specific exercise programs moderately alleviate RCRSP symptoms, with shorter interventions (<2 months) demonstrating marginally superior outcomes. Efficacy varies by exercise type, emphasizing the need for individualized prescriptions.

Systematic Review Registration

PROSPERO (CRD42024550602).

Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy Diagnosis, Nonsurgical Medical Care, and Rehabilitation: A Clinical Practice Guideline

This evidence-based clinical practice guideline (CPG) aims to guide clinicians with recommendations covering the assessment, treatment, and prognosis of adults with shoulder pain with suspected rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy, the nonsurgical medical care and rehabilitation of adults with RC tendinopathy, as well as the return to function and sport for elite and recreational athletes. This CPG includes recommendations for managing RC tendinopathy with or without calcifications and partial-thickness RC tears. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 2025;55(4):235-274. Epub 30 January 2025. doi:10.2519/jospt.2025.13182.

Current evidence on hyaluronic acid injections for rotator cuff tendinopathy: A scoping review

Introduction

There is growing evidence that hyaluronic acid (HA) injections can significantly improve pain and function in rotator cuff tendinopathy. However, there is no consensus regarding the optimal parameters for HA injections. This narrative review explores the procedural considerations for HA injections in rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Methods

A literature search using Pubmed and Cochrane was conducted to assess procedural considerations for HA injections in rotator cuff tendinopathy including the type of HA (linear vs. cross-linked), the molecular weight (low, moderate, and high), the combination of HA with other products, the number and frequency of injections, the injection guidance, and the adverse effects.

Results

Nine randomized-controlled trials and two prospective non-randomized studies assessed the efficacy of HA injections for rotator cuff tendinopathy, and their characteristics were thoroughly analyzed. Two studies compared the efficacy of different molecular weight HA. One study assessed the efficacy of HA combined with extracorporeal shockwave therapy.

Conclusion

Highlights of the findings include the clinical benefits of HA injections for rotator cuff tendinopathy, the better tolerability of low molecular weight HA compared to high molecular weight, the safer adverse effect profile of HA compared to glucocorticoid injections, and the synergistic effect of HA and extracorporeal shockwave therapy.

Effectiveness of Additional or Standalone Corticosteroid Injections Compared to Physical Therapist Interventions in Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

IMPORTANCE

Rotator cuff tendinopathy represents the most prevalent cause of shoulder pain, the third most common musculoskeletal disorder after low back pain and knee pain.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to determine the effectiveness of corticosteroid injection(s), alone or in combination with anesthetic injection or any other physical therapist interventions, compared to physical therapist interventions alone in adults with rotator cuff tendinopathy.

DESIGN

This study was a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. PubMed, EMBASE, Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Scopus, Web of Science, and Physiotherapy Evidence Database were searched from inception to March 2023. Meta-analysis using a random-effects model was performed. Risk of bias and certainty of the evidence for the primary outcomes were assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach, respectively. The protocol was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (CRD42021240882).

PARTICIPANTS

Participants were adults with rotator cuff tendinopathy.

INTERVENTIONS

Corticosteroid injection(s), alone or in combination with anesthetic injection or with any other physical therapist interventions, was compared to physical therapist interventions alone.

MAIN OUTCOMES

Pain, function, quality of life, patient-rated overall improvement, and adverse events were the main outcomes.

RESULTS

Fifteen randomized controlled trials (1785 participants) met the inclusion criteria. At short term, corticosteroid injection coupled with physical therapist interventions and compared to the same interventions alone might have resulted in some small to moderate improvements in pain and function. Conversely, corticosteroid injection alone seemed not to be more effective than physical therapist interventions in improving pain and function in most of the studies included. At mid- and long-term follow-up assessments corticosteroid injection seemed not to be more effective than any physical therapist interventions.

CONCLUSIONS

This study highlights the potential effectiveness of corticosteroid injection(s) in rotator cuff tendinopathy for pain and function at short term at best, especially in combination with physical therapist interventions. However, the evidence is of moderate to mostly very low certainty. Additional high-quality research considering core outcomes, therefore, is needed.

RELEVANCE

Corticosteroid injection(s) seems not to be superior to physical therapist interventions, other than resulting in some transient improvements at short term if provided together with other physical therapist interventions, in adults with rotator cuff tendinopathy. Furthermore, considering the potential adverse events associated with the injections, physical therapist interventions may be an important stand-alone treatment option.

Effectiveness of sub-acromial injections in rotator cuff injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Sub-acromial injections are a therapeutic option for rotator cuff injuries; however, evidence regarding the most effective drug in this context is unclear, which needs to be investigated.

AIM

To evaluate the effectiveness of various sub-acromial injections for rotator cuff injuries.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review and pair-wise and network meta-analyses of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) comparing sub-acromial injections for rotator cuff injuries. The interventions evaluated were hyaluronic acid (HA), platelet-rich plasma (PRP), prolotherapy, and corticosteroids. The outcomes of interest were pain and functional improvement, which were evaluated with standardized scores. The Risk of Bias 2 tool and the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation methodology were used to assess data quality.

RESULTS

Twenty RCTs, comprising 1479 participants, were included. In the short term, HA achieved the best outcomes [pain mean difference (MD) = -1.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) -2.37 to -0.59; function MD = 10.18, 95%CI: 4.96-15.41]. In the medium term, HA, PRP, HA + PRP, and corticosteroids were not superior to placebo in improving pain. Based on function, HA + PRP was superior to placebo, corticosteroids, and PRP (MD = 26.72; 95%CI: 8.02-45.41). In the long term, HA, PRP, and corticosteroids were not superior to placebo in reducing pain. However, based on function, HA + PRP, PRP, and HA were superior to placebo, and HA + PRP had the best result (MD = 36.64; 95%CI: 31.66-33.62).

CONCLUSION

HA provides satisfactory short-term results, while HA with PRP demonstrates functional improvement in the medium and long terms. However, no intervention maintained the pain-relief effect on > 3-month follow-up.

Comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-invasive neuromodulation technologies and botulinum toxin injections for post-stroke spasticity and motor function: a network meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

Background

Non-invasive neuromodulation is a promising approach for improving spasticity and motor function after stroke. However, it is still unclear which type of non-invasive neuromodulation is effective and evidence of important differences between them and botulinum toxin (BoNT) injection is limited. We aimed to assess the comparative efficacy and acceptability of non-invasive neuromodulation technologies and BoNT for post-stroke spasticity and motor function.

Methods

In this network meta-analysis, Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Scopus, CNKI, and Wan Fang Data were searched from the earliest records to 8 October 2024. Randomised controlled trials that compared any type of non-invasive neuromodulation therapies, BoNT, and control treatments (including sham or no stimulation/injection) for post-stroke spasticity measured by modified Ashworth scale (MAS) were included. MAS, motor function, and acceptability were pooled using random-effects model with summary weighted mean difference (WMD) or risk ratios (RR) alongside 95% confidence interval (CI). Ranking probabilities of the treatments were estimated. Clinical importance was categorized as definite, probable, possible, or definitely not, considering the relationship between effect measures (95% CI) and minimal clinically important difference (1, 6, and 1.5 points for MAS, motor function, and acceptability, respectively). The quality of evidence was assessed using CINeMA online web. PROSPERO registration CRD42024543494.

Findings

6260 studies were identified and 185 trials (11,185 participants; 12 interventions) were included. Compared with control treatments, BoNT, high- and low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (HFrTMS and LFrTMS), and anodal, cathodal, and dual transcranial direct current stimulation (atDCS, ctDCS, and dtDCS) significantly improved spasticity at short-term follow-up (WMD range -0.81 to -0.31), but did not achieve clinical importance. At mid-term, ctDCS (WMD = -2.00; 95% CI: -3.03, -0.97) and dtDCS (WMD = -1.62; 95% CI: -3.22, -0.02) were more efficacious than control treatments in reducing post-stroke spasticity with probable clinical importance. For motor function, atDCS, ctDCS, and dtDCS were more efficacious than control treatments (WMD range 6.29-13.00), with probable clinical importance, while BoNT, HFrTMS, and LFrTMS with possible clinical importance (WMD range 3.42-5.28). Various modalities have comparable acceptability to control treatments (RR range 0.48-1.46). Confidence in accordance with CINeMA ranged from high to low. Sensitivity and meta-regression analyses on limb measured, cointervention, and stroke stage confirmed the main findings of this study.

Interpretation

Taken together with clinical importance, evidence available supports three forms of tDCS as effective treatments for post-stroke spasticity and/or motor impairments, whereas BoNT, HFrTMS, and LFrTMS for motor impairments. These modalities could be considered alongside rehabilitation interventions as core treatments for post-stroke spasticity and motor impairments.

Funding

China Postdoctoral Science Foundation (2024M752230).

Autologous Peripheral Blood-Derived Orthobiologics for the Management of Shoulder Disorders: A Review of Current Clinical Evidence

INTRODUCTION

A multidisciplinary approach is recommended to manage shoulder pain, the third most common musculoskeletal disorder, but traditional modalities have limitations, providing only temporary symptomatic pain relief instead of targeting the underlying pathophysiology. Recently, autologous peripheral blood-derived orthobiologics (APBOs) have become popular for the management of shoulder disorders. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is the most frequently used APBO, but its efficacy remains disputable. Thus, the possibility of using other APBOs, such as platelet lysate (PL), autologous conditioned serum (ACS), gold-induced cytokine (GOLDIC), plasma rich in growth factors (PRGF), growth factor concentrate (GFC), autologous protein solution (APS), and hyperacute serum (HS), for the management of shoulder disorders have been considered. This review summarizes the outcomes of clinical studies involving APBOs to manage shoulder disorders.

METHODS

Multiple databases (PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, and Scopus) were searched employing terms for APBOs and various shoulder disorders for articles published in the English language to September 11, 2024, adhering to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines.

RESULTS

Only six clinical studies fulfilled our pre-defined search and inclusion criteria. Specifically, one, two, two, and one studies involving the use of PL, ACS, PRGF, and APS, respectively, were included in this review. No clinical studies were identified involving the use of GOLDIC, GFC, and HS.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of PL, ACS, PRGF, and APS is safe and can reduce pain and improve function in patients with shoulder disorders, including rotator cuff tendinopathy, subacromial impingement syndrome, glenohumeral osteoarthritis and delayed union fracture of the clavicle. Given the dearth of relevant literature and limitations of the available studies, more prospective clinical studies, and ideally, randomized controlled trials, with extended follow-up are necessary to establish the efficacy of APBOs and to select the ideal APBO for the management of shoulder disorders.

Collagen Injections for Rotator Cuff Diseases: A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Because of its anatomy and function, the rotator cuff (RC) is vulnerable to considerable morbidity. The prevalence of RC diseases (RCDs) among the general population is 5-39%, reaching over 30% in patients older than 60. The aim of the present systematic review is to investigate the effects of the use of collagen injections in the treatment of RCDs.

METHODS

A systematic search of scientific electronic databases (such as PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science) was performed up to November 2024, following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Two independent authors conducted the search and assessed the articles. The inter-rater reliability for the quality assessment was measured using Cohen's kappa coefficient, while the Modified Coleman Methodology Score (CMS) was applied to evaluate the methodological quality of the articles included in this systematic review.

RESULTS

A total of eight articles were included, with the overall quality of the included articles being evaluated as fair. Despite the use of different types of collagen and injection protocols, as well as the different scores applied, each included study showed clinically relevant improvements. However, given the high degree of heterogeneity of the included studies, we cannot draw conclusions regarding which type of collagen and injection protocol are best for RCD treatment.

DISCUSSION

Collagen administration for RCDs seems to be effective at reducing pain and improving function, as well as the tendon structure, especially in partial tears and RC tendinopathy. High-quality, prospective studies with long-term follow-up are necessary to validate the findings of the articles included in this systematic review.

Platelet-Rich Plasma Versus Corticosteroid Injections for Chronic Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Chronic tendinopathy is a degenerative condition characterized by persistent pain, functional limitations, and tendon thickening, often resulting from repetitive overuse or failed tendon healing. Left untreated, it can progress to tendon rupture, prolonged disability, and impaired quality of life. Management typically includes conservative therapies, such as physical therapy, corticosteroid (CS) injections for short-term relief, and platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a regenerative therapy with potential long-term benefits. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluates and compares the effectiveness of PRP and CS injections for chronic tendinopathies regarding pain reduction, functional improvement, and long-term outcomes. A structured search of PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and comparative studies. Primary outcomes included pain reduction and functional improvement while secondary outcomes assessed heterogeneity and publication bias. PRP and CS injections demonstrated no significant difference in short-term pain reduction. Functional outcomes were comparable in the short term but showed a trend favoring PRP at longer follow-up periods. PRP exhibited a slight advantage in long-term functional recovery, though the results were not statistically significant. Substantial heterogeneity across studies highlights the need for standardized protocols and larger trials to confirm these findings and optimize treatment strategies.

Subacromial injection of platelet-rich plasma provides greater improvement in pain and functional outcomes compared to corticosteroids at 1-year follow-up: a double-blinded randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Studies evaluating the results of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy have demonstrated conflicting results and have been confounded by small patient samples, the absence of a control group, the combined analysis of isolated tendinopathies and rotator cuff tears, and insufficient reporting of PRP preparations. The purpose of this study was to perform a randomized controlled trial (RCT) comparing PRP with standard corticosteroid injections in providing pain relief and improved function in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy.

METHODS

This was a double-blind RCT at a single center. We evaluated patients between 18 and 50 years old who had both a clinical and magnetic resonance imaging diagnosis of supraspinatus tendinopathy refractory to conservative treatment. A total of 50 patients received PRP treatment, whereas 50 patients received a corticosteroid, as a control group. Patients completed patient-reported outcome assessments at baseline and at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months after injection. The primary outcome was improvement in the visual analog scale (VAS) score for pain. Secondary outcomes included changes in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Standardized Shoulder Assessment Form (ASES) score, Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE) score, and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). Treatment failure was defined as persistent pain at 3 months that required a subsequent injection.

RESULTS

The mean age was 27.7 years (±7.4). All the patients completed 12 months of clinical follow-up. At 12 months, patients in the PRP group showed a significantly greater improvement in the VAS score than patients in the corticosteroid group: 1.68 (0.6) vs. 2.3 (1.0) (P < .001). As well, at the 12-month follow-up, the 3 scores evaluated were significantly higher in patients treated with PRP than in patients treated with corticosteroid: ASES, 89.8 (6.3) vs. 78.0 (8.6) (P < .001); SANE, 89.2 (6.3) vs. 80.5 (9.6) (P < .001); and PSQI, 2.72 (0.6) vs. 4.02 (1.7) (P < .001). The overall failure rate was significantly higher in the corticosteroid group (30%) than in the PRP group (12%) (P < .01).

CONCLUSION

One subacromial PRP injection in patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy showed significantly superior and sustained pain-relieving and functional improvements compared with one corticosteroid subacromial injection assessed by 4 patient-reported outcome scales at the 12-month follow-up. Moreover, the overall failure rate was significantly higher in the corticosteroid group than in the PRP group.

Small Intestinal Submucosa Hydrogel Loaded With Gastrodin for the Repair of Achilles Tendinopathy

Achilles tendinopathy (AT) is an injury caused by overuse of the Achilles tendon or sudden force on the Achilles tendon, with a considerable inflammatory infiltrate. As Achilles tendinopathy progresses, inflammation and inflammatory factors affect the remodeling of the extracellular matrix (ECM) of the tendon. Gastrodin(Gas), the main active ingredient of Astrodia has anti-inflammatory, antioxidant, and anti-apoptotic properties. The small intestinal submucosa (SIS) is a naturally decellularized extracellular matrix(dECM)material and has a high content of growth factors as well as good biocompatibility. However, the reparative effects of SIS and Gas on Achilles tendinopathy and their underlying mechanisms remain unknown. Here, it is found that SIS hydrogel loaded with gastrodin restored the mechanical strength of the Achilles tendon, facilitated ECM remodeling, and restored ordered collagen arrangement by promoting the translocation of protein synthesis. It also decreases the expression of inflammatory factors and reduces the infiltration of inflammatory cells by inhibiting the NF-κB signaling pathway. It is believed that through further research, Gas + SIS may be used in the future for the treatment of Achilles tendinopathy and other Achilles tendon injury disorders.

Classification of distinct tendinopathy subtypes for precision therapeutics

Rotator cuff tendinopathy is the most common tendinopathy type with the worst prognosis. Conventional treatments often elicit heterogeneous drug responses due to the diversity of tendinopathy. Hence, this study attempted a classification of 126 diseased tendons into three distinct subtypes with opposite pathogenic mechanisms based on transcriptomic and clinical features. The hypoxic atrophic subtype with white appearance (Hw) exhibits downregulated neovascularization pathways. The inflammatory proliferative subtype with white appearance (Iw) shows a moderate upregulation of inflammatory characteristics. The inflammatory proliferative subtype with red appearance (Ir) exhibits the highest levels of upregulated neovascularization and inflammatory pathways, along with severe joint dysfunction. We then established research models, including subtype-specific simulations in animal models and clinical data analysis. These revealed that glucocorticoid, a controversial commonly used drug, was only effective in treating the Ir subtype. Hence, the tendinopathy subtypes elucidated in this study have significant implications for developing precision treatment of tendinopathy.

A Practical Guide to Injection Therapy in Hand Tendinopathies: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials

Hand tendinopathies represent a pathological condition associated with significant disability. However, due to this high heterogeneity of the treatments and their efficacy, there is still a lack of consensus on the infiltrative therapy of the hand. This systematic review aimed to investigate the efficacy of injection techniques in the treatment of pain related to the main hand tendinopathies. We searched online medical databases (PubMed, Pedro, Cochrane Library, Scopus, and WoS). Only RCTs published in the last 10 years (up to 5 August 2024), written in English, and related to infiltrative treatment in wrist and hand tendinopathies were evaluated. The risk of bias in RCTs was assessed with Version 2 of the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool for randomized trials (RoB 2). Out of 641 articles identified, 23 were included in the final synthesis: 14 RCTs on trigger finger, and 9 RCTs on de Quervain's tenosynovitis. The present systematic review showed that infiltrative therapy of trigger finger and de Quervain's tenosynovitis constitutes a fundamental element in the treatment of these pathological conditions, in terms of pain reduction and improvement in the functionality of the hand.

Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma in partial-thickness rotator cuff tears: a systematic review

IMPORTANCE

Partial-thickness rotator cuff tears (PTRCTs) commonly affect overhead athletes, leading to a decline in sports performance. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is being explored as an alternative treatment modality for individuals with PTRCTs to reduce discomfort and enhance functional recovery. We conducted a systematic review study of randomized controlled clinical trials to determine the effectiveness of PRP in treating PTRCTs.

AIM

To determine the effectiveness of PRP in treating PTRCTs.

EVIDENCE REVIEW

We conducted a comprehensive literature search for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that compared the effectiveness of PRP with eccentric exercise and placebo injections as treatments for PTRCTs. We searched databases such as the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, PubMed, and EMBASE. The visual analog scale (VAS) score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeon (ASES) score, and Constant-Murley Score (CMS) was utilized as an outcome measure. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.3 software.

FINDINGS

Our meta-analysis included 12 studies involving 762 patients. At six weeks post-treatment, the PRP group had significantly higher VAS scores compared to the control group, indicating improvement (standard mean difference (SMD): -2.04 [95% confidence interval (CI): -4.00 to -0.08], I2 ​= ​97%, P-value ​= ​0.04). Patients who received PRP showed statistically significant improvements in VAS scores at 3 months and 6 months follow-up (SMD, -1.78 [95% CI: -3.03 to -0.52], I2 ​= ​96%, P-value ​= ​0.005) (SMD: -2.26 [95% CI: -3.77 to -0.76], I2 ​= ​97%, P-value ​= ​0.003). A statistically significant difference was also observed in VAS scores at the long-term 1-year follow-up (SMD: -2.27 [95% CI: -4.07 to -0.47]; I2 ​= ​98%; P-value ​= ​0.031). There were statistically significant differences in ASES scores and CMS scores in the short-term (SMD: 1.21 [95% CI: 0.19 to 2.24], I2 ​= ​96%, P-value ​= ​0.02) (SMD, 2.01 [95% CI: 0.14 to 3.88], I2 ​= ​97%, P-value ​= ​0.04). However, in the long-term ASES and CMS scores did not show any statistical significance (SMD: 2.06 [95% CI: -0.54 to 4.65], I2 ​= ​99%, P-value ​= ​0.12) (SMD: 4.36 [95% CI: -5.48 to 14.21], I2 ​= ​99%, P-value ​= ​0.39).

CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE

Our findings suggest that PRP treatment is effective in reducing pain for individuals with PTRCTs, providing benefits in the short and long term. However, its impact on functional recovery appears somewhat constrained and doesn't endure over time. Additionally, significant heterogeneity exists among studies, encompassing variations in PRP composition and control group treatments. Consequently, we conclude that compelling evidence for symptom improvement in PTRCT patients following PRP treatment remains elusive.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I.

Equine Musculoskeletal Pathologies: Clinical Approaches and Therapeutical Perspectives-A Review

Musculoskeletal injuries such as equine osteoarthritis, osteoarticular defects, tendonitis/desmitis, and muscular disorders are prevalent among sport horses, with a fair prognosis for returning to exercise or previous performance levels. The field of equine medicine has witnessed rapid and fruitful development, resulting in a diverse range of therapeutic options for musculoskeletal problems. Staying abreast of these advancements can be challenging, prompting the need for a comprehensive review of commonly used and recent treatments. The aim is to compile current therapeutic options for managing these injuries, spanning from simple to complex physiotherapy techniques, conservative treatments including steroidal and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, hyaluronic acid, polysulfated glycosaminoglycans, pentosan polysulfate, and polyacrylamides, to promising regenerative therapies such as hemoderivatives and stem cell-based therapies. Each therapeutic modality is scrutinized for its benefits, limitations, and potential synergistic actions to facilitate their most effective application for the intended healing/regeneration of the injured tissue/organ and subsequent patient recovery. While stem cell-based therapies have emerged as particularly promising for equine musculoskeletal injuries, a multidisciplinary approach is underscored throughout the discussion, emphasizing the importance of considering various therapeutic modalities in tandem.

A scoping review and best evidence synthesis for treatment of partial-thickness rotator cuff tears

BACKGROUND

Rotator cuff disorders include a broad spectrum of pathological conditions including partial-thickness and full-thickness tears. Studies have shown partial-thickness rotator cuff tear (PTRCT) prevalence to be twice that of full-thickness tears. In the working population, PTRCTs are one of the most common causes of shoulder pain and often result in occupational disability due to pain, stiffness, and loss of shoulder function. Treatment of PTRCTs remains controversial. The purpose of this study was to consolidate the existing high-quality evidence on best management approaches in treating PTRCTs using both nonoperative and operative approaches.

METHODS

A scoping review with best evidence synthesis was performed as per the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses extension for Scoping Reviews. MEDLINE (OVID), EMBASE (OVID), Cochrane Library (Wiley), SCOPUS, Web of Science Core Collection, CINAHL Plus with Full Text (EBSCOhost), PubMed Central, and Science Direct were searched from 2000 to March 3, 2023. Level 1 studies, and systematic reviews and meta-analyses that included level 1 and 2 studies, were included.

RESULTS

The search yielded 8276 articles. A total of 3930 articles were screened after removing 4346 duplicates. Application of inclusion criteria resulted in 662 articles that were selected for full-text review. Twenty-eight level 1 studies, 1 systematic review, 4 meta-analyses, and 1 network meta-analyses were included in the best evidence synthesis. Nonoperative strategies included injections (ie, platelet-rich plasma, corticosteroid, prolotherapy, sodium hyaluronate, anesthetic, and atelocollagen), exercise therapy, and physical agents. Operative interventions consisted of débridement, shaving of the tendon and footprint, transtendon repair, and traditional suture anchor repair techniques with and without tear completion. Both nonoperative and operative strategies demonstrated effectiveness at managing pain and functional outcome for PTRCTs. The evidence supports the effectiveness of surgical intervention in treating PTRCTs regardless of arthroscopic technique.

CONCLUSION

The results of this scoping review do not support superiority of operative over nonoperative management and suggest that both strategies can be effective at managing pain and functional outcome for PTRCTs. Surgery, however, is the most invasive and costly approach, with the highest risk of complications such as infection. Other variables such as patient expectation, treating practitioner bias, or preference may change which modalities are offered and in what sequence.

Trends in utilization, demographics, and costs of platelet-rich plasma injections: a ten-year nationwide investigation

INTRODUCTION

Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) has become one of the most popular biologic treatments in orthopedic surgery. Despite this, its utilization over the last decade has not been investigated.

METHODS

We conducted a search using Current Procedural Terminology codes to identify patients who received PRP injections between 2010 and 2019 using the PearlDiver database. The purpose was to 1) determine annual trends of PRP injections of the ankle, hip, knee, shoulder, and elbow for cartilaginous, tendinous, ligamentous, meniscal/labral, and miscellaneous pathologies; 2) compare baseline demographics of patients receiving these injections; and 3) analyze costs.

RESULTS

A total of 23,716 patients who received PRP injections were identified; 54.4% were female. The incidence of PRP injections was between 1.6 and 4.3 per 100,000 orthopedic patients. The most common anatomic locations targeted for PRP therapy was the knee (36.7%), followed by the shoulder/elbow (30.5%), then the ankle (19.6%) and hip (13.6%). Subgroup analysis revealed that most common use of PRP was for knee cartilaginous pathologies, followed by shoulder/elbow tendinous pathologies. The number of injections used in the knee significantly increased between 2010 and 2019 (p< 0.001), and trended toward significantly increasing in the shoulder/elbow (p = 0.055). Average annual costs for PRP injections ranged from $711.65 for ankles and $1,711.63 for hips; costs significantly changed for 3 of the 4 anatomic locations. By 2019, average PRP injection costs for each area clustered around $1000.

CONCLUSION

Between 2010 and 2019, there was an increase in usage of PRP injections in the knee (cartilaginous pathologies) and the shoulder/elbow (tendinous pathologies). PRP costs demonstrated early variability but clustered around $1000 by 2019. Further studies into drivers of prices and cost-effectiveness of PRP are needed to provide clarity into the true costs to patients and healthcare providers.

Efficacy of ozone injections for reducing musculoskeletal pain in comparison with corticosteroid injections: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Corticosteroid injections are frequently used in the short-term treatment of musculoskeletal pain, but their use is controversial as repeated exposures to corticosteroids can lead to deleterious effects on musculoskeletal tissue. Ozone injections have been proposed as a possible treatment for musculoskeletal pain; however, their effectiveness has not been compared with corticosteroids.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effectiveness of ozone injections for reducing pain in individuals with musculoskeletal pain in comparison with corticosteroid injections through a meta-analysis.

METHODS

An online systematic search was performed using electronic databases up to September 2023. We searched for studies that compared corticosteroid injections with ozone injections in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain of diverse origins.

RESULTS

Eleven studies were included comprising a total of 534 individuals. In the overall pooled analysis, a pain reduction in favor of corticosteroid injections was found in the short term (d= 0.31, 95% CI 0.01 to 0.60, p (z) 0.04, I2 = 32%). In the medium term, no significant differences were found in reducing pain between groups (d=-0.17, 95% CI -0.42 to 0.07, p (z) 0.15, I2 = 0%).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results suggest that corticosteroids injections are more effective in reducing musculoskeletal pain in the short term, but equally effective in the medium term when compared with ozone injections. Nonetheless, better-quality clinical trials are necessary to corroborate these results.

One-shot platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection is non-inferior to extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the management of supraspinatus tendinosis

PURPOSE

Supraspinatus tendinosis (ST) refers to the intratendinous degeneration of the supraspinatus tendon. Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) is one of the possible conservative treatments for supraspinatus tendinosis. This prospective observational study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a single ultrasound-guided PRP injection in the treatment of supraspinatus tendinosis and to assess its non-inferiority to the widely used shockwave therapy.

METHODS

Seventy-two amateur athletes (35 male, mean age: 43.75 ± 10.82, range 21-58 years old) with ST were finally included in the study. All the patients underwent clinical evaluation at baseline, (T0) and at 1-month (T1), 3-month (T2) and 6-month (T3) follow-up using the following clinical scales: the Visual Analogue Scale for pain (VAS), Constant Score and the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand Score (DASH). A T0 and T3 ultrasound examination was also performed. The findings observed in the recruited patients were compared to the clinical results observed in a retrospective control group made up of 70 patients (32 male, mean age = 41.29 ± 13.85, range 20-65 years old) treated by extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT).

RESULTS

VAS, DASH and Constant scores significantly improved from T0 to T1; the improvement in clinical scores was kept until T3. No local nor systemic adverse events were observed. An improvement in the tendon structure was observed on ultrasound examination. PRP showed a non-statistical inferiority, in terms of efficacy and safety, compared to ESWT.

CONCLUSION

The PRP one-shot injection is a valid conservative treatment to reduce pain, and improve both quality of life and functional scores in patients with supraspinatus tendinosis. Furthermore, the PRP intratendinous one-shot injection showed a non-inferiority in terms of efficacy at the 6-month follow-up, compared to ESWT.

Comparing the effect of physiotherapy and physiotherapy plus corticosteroid injection on pain intensity, disability, quality of life, and treatment effectiveness in patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome: a randomized controlled trial

PURPOSE

To compare the short and medium-term effects of physiotherapy plus corticosteroid injection (combined) with physiotherapy alone on pain intensity, disability, Quality of Life (QoL), and treatment effectiveness in patients with Subacromial Pain Syndrome (SAPS).

METHODS

In this double-blind, parallel Randomized Controlled Trial (RCT), 50 patients with SAPS were randomly assigned into combined (N = 25, a single injection 3-6 days before physiotherapy) and physiotherapy alone group (N = 25). Pain, disability, QoL, and treatment-effectiveness were measured at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and 3 and 6-month follow-up with Visual Analog Scale (VAS), Shortened Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Quick-DASH), Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (SPADI) (primary outcome measure), Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC), and Global Rating of Change (GRC) respectively. A 2 × 4 (group × time) mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) was applied for analysis.

RESULTS

The ANOVA revealed statistically significant group-in-time interaction for all outcome measures (p-value < 0.05). The independent t-test showed more effectiveness in the combined group at medium-term, as the mean scores of almost all outcome measures were substantially lesser (p < 0.01). Moreover, in short-time, despite a greater number of patients stating "completely recovered" in the combined group, there was no statistically significant difference between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Effects of physiotherapy plus corticosteroid injection could be more long-lasting than physiotherapy alone in improving pain intensity, disability, QoL, and treatment effectiveness in patients with SAPS.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

IRCT20201010048980N1.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONShoulder pain is common, persistent, and predominantly results from subacromial pain syndrome (SAPS).Physiotherapy and corticosteroid injections are effective interventions for this condition.Comprehensive physiotherapy alone can be as effective as corticosteroid injection combined with physiotherapy in the short term.A combined approach versus physiotherapy alone may have more medium-term effects on SAPS patients' pain, disability, quality of life, and treatment effectiveness.

Comparative Efficacy of Neuromodulation Technologies for Overactive Bladder in Adults: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to investigate the comparative efficacy of neuromodulation technologies for overactive bladder (OAB) syndrome in adults.

DATA SOURCES

A computerized search was conducted of Cochrane Library, EMBASE, MEDLINE (via PubMed), Web of Science, CNKI, Wan Fang Data, and ClinicalTrials.gov up to April 21, 2022.

STUDY SELECTION

The search selected clinical trials with random allocation to percutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (PTNS), transcutaneous tibial nerve stimulation (TTNS), vaginal electrical stimulation (VES), sacral neuromodulation (SNM), parasacral stimulation (PS), pudendal neuromodulation, or placebo.

DATA EXTRACTION

The main outcomes were the voiding diary, OAB-related quality of life, and positive response rate. The Cochrane Risk of Bias tool (RoB 2.0) was used to assess the risk of bias of each included study, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool was used to evaluate the overall evidence quality of key outcomes.

DATA SYNTHESIS

The study included 21 randomized controlled trials involving 1433 participants, and all trials were used for the meta-analysis. In the network meta-analyses, five of six neuromodulation technologies, including PTNS, TTNS, VES, SNM, and PS, were related to higher efficacy than the placebo. Ranking probability showed that SNM was the most efficacious therapy for improving OAB-related quality of life, urinary episodes, and urinary frequency. For urgency incontinence episodes and the number of pads, PTNS and TTNS were the most efficacious modalities, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Neuromodulation technologies, including PTNS, TTNS, VES, SNM, and PS, may be effective and safe solutions for OAB syndrome in adults. Moreover, SNM is the most efficacious regimen for OAB-related quality of life, urinary episodes, and urinary frequency. PTNS and TTNS are the most efficacious modalities for reducing urgency incontinence episodes and the number of pads, respectively. Future studies should pay more attention to the quality of study design and report, patients who may benefit the most from neuromodulation, and the long-term effect, cost-effectiveness, and satisfaction of neuromodulation.

Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection on Range of Motion, Pain, and Disability in Patients With Adhesive Capsulitis: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the therapeutic effects of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection on range of motion, pain, and disability in patients with adhesive capsulitis (AC).

DATA SOURCES

The authors performed the literature search in the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases in February 2023.

STUDY SELECTION

Prospective studies comparing the outcomes of PRP with other intervention in patients with AC.

DATA EXTRACTION

The quality of included randomized trials was assessed using the revised Cochrane Risk of Bias (RoB 2.0) tool. The Risk of Bias in Non-Randomized Studies of Interventions tool was applied to assess the quality of nonrandomized trials. The mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) was determined as the effect size for continuous outcomes, and outcome accuracy was determined using 95% confidence intervals (CIs).

DATA SYNTHESIS

Fourteen studies involving 1139 patients were included. Our meta-analysis revealed that PRP injection can significantly improve passive abduction (MD=3.91; 95% CI, 0.84-6.98), passive flexion (MD=3.90; 95% CI, 0.15-7.84), and disability (SMD=-0.50; 95% CI, -1.29 to -0.74) within 1 month after intervention. Moreover, PRP injection can significantly improve passive abduction (MD=17.19; 95% CI, 12.38-22.01), passive flexion (MD=17.74; 95% CI, 9.89-25.59), passive external rotation (MD=12.95; 95% CI, 10.04-15.87), pain (MD=-8.40; 95% CI, -16.73 to -0.06), and disability (SMD=-1.02; 95% CI, -1.29 to -0.74) 3 months after intervention. PRP injection can also significantly improve pain (MD=-18.98; 95% CI, -24.71 to -13.26), and disability (SMD=-2.01; 95% CI, -3.02 to -1.00) 6 months after intervention. In addition, no adverse effects of PRP injection were reported.

CONCLUSIONS

PRP injection may serve as an effective and safe treatment for patients with AC.

Comparison Clinical Effects of Hypertonic Dextrose and Steroid Injections on Chronic Subacromial Bursitis: A Double-Blind Randomized Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the study is to determine and compare the treatment efficacy of subacromial steroid injections and dextrose prolotherapy for chronic subacromial bursitis patients.

DESIGN

Fifty-four patients with chronic subacromial bursitis were enrolled in this double-blind randomized controlled trial. Shoulder Pain and Disability Index and visual analog scale were the primary outcomes.

RESULTS

The steroid group ( n = 26) exhibited significant visual analog scale score improvements comparing with baseline at weeks 2, 6, and 12; the dextrose prolotherapy group ( n = 28) exhibited visual analog scale score improvements at weeks 6 and 12. The steroid group displayed significant Shoulder Pain and Disability Index score improvements compared with baseline at weeks 2, 6, and 12; the dextrose prolotherapy group exhibited significant score decreases at weeks 2 and 6. Compared with the dextrose prolotherapy group, the steroid group demonstrated significantly greater decreases in visual analog scale scores at weeks 2 and 6; the steroid group showed significantly greater decreases in Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores at weeks 2, 6, and 12.

CONCLUSIONS

Both hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy and steroid injections can provide short-term improvements of pain and disability among chronic subacromial bursitis patients. Moreover, steroid injections showed better effectiveness than hypertonic dextrose prolotherapy in ameliorating pain and improving function.

Exploration of the Usual Care Pathway for Rotator Cuff Related Shoulder Pain in the Western Australian Workers' Compensation System

PURPOSE

Investigate components of care for rotator cuff related shoulder pain in workers' compensation in relation to claim outcomes (claim duration, total medical spend, total claim cost, return to work outcome).

METHODS

Engagement with (had care, time to care) four components of care (prescribed exercise, imaging, injections, surgery) were obtained from auditing 189 closed workers' compensation files. Associations were analysed between components of care and claim outcomes.

RESULTS

80% received prescribed exercise, 81% imaging, 42% injection and 35% surgery. Median time to imaging (11 days) was shorter than the prescribed exercise (27 days), with injection at 38 days and surgery 118.5 days. With univariable regression analysis higher age, the involvement of legal representation and the presence of rotator cuff pathology from diagnostic imaging (partial thickness tear or full thickness tear) were all associated with increased claim duration, total medical spend, total claim cost and less successful return to work outcomes. After adjusting for these three associations, having an injection or surgery were both positively associated with longer claim duration and greater medical spend, and surgery with greater total claim costs. In general, longer time to receiving components of care was associated with increased claim duration and reduced odds of returning to full duties at work.

CONCLUSION

Early management was not consistent with clinical guidelines for managing workers' compensation rotator cuff related shoulder pain. This may negatively affect claims outcomes.

Enthesitis in Spondyloarthritis Including Psoriatic Arthritis-To Inject or Not To Inject?: A Narrative Review

PURPOSE

Enthesitis is a key manifestation of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and spondyloarthritis (SpA) and is considered to be the tissue where the disease initiates. Enthesitis leads to pain and substantial limitations in patients with PsA. Treatment is key in achieving remission or minimal disease activity. Whether it is safe to apply injections to entheseal tissue is unknown. This narrative review aimed to summarize the literature on the efficacy and tolerability of entheseal corticosteroid (CS) injections.

METHODS

The published literature was searched through PubMed as well as identifying relevant articles from their citations,  for articles on the anatomic location of the injection, tissue characteristics (eg, whether there is a tendon sheath), blind versus imaging-guided and entheseal versus perientheseal injections, and related studies in animals. Given that articles on SpA are limited, those on mechanical enthesopathies were also included.

FINDINGS

The literature on the efficacy and tolerability of entheseal CS injection in SpA and PsA are limited. In most articles on entheseal injection, the entheseal tissue has not actually been targeted. The decision of entheseal injection should be made on an individual basis, with consideration of the use of CS injection as the last treatment option following more conservative measures such as NSAIDs, physiotherapy, rest, and lifestyle modifications. Entheseal injection should be avoided in high-risk patients, such as those who have rupture at the enthesis. Diagnostic ultrasound is advised to ensure the presence of inflammation that can potentially benefit from corticosteroid injection, as well as the absence of rupture. In the authors' perspective, perientheseal injections should be tried before intraentheseal injections. Finally, ultrasound guidance for needle placement is strongly encouraged.

IMPLICATIONS

The literature on the efficacy and tolerability of entheseal CS injection in SpA and PsA is limited. With the lack of quality data, recommendations on entheseal corticosteroid injection remain expert opinion.

Subacromial injection of hydrolyzed collagen in the symptomatic treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy: an observational multicentric prospective study on 71 patients

Background

The purpose of the present observational multicentric prospective study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a new infiltration device (CHondroGrid, Bioteck S.p.A, Arcugnano, Italy) based on hydrolyzed collagen in the treatment of rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Methods

Seventy-one patients (53.3 ± 11.6 years old) affected by rotator cuff tendinopathy were treated in 2021 with two subacromial injections of CHondroGrid at 13 ± 2.9 days apart. The outcomes measured were the visual analog scale (VAS) score (in movement, during the night, and at rest), the Constant Score, the Simple Shoulder Test, and patient satisfaction. The outcome variables were measured before each injection, at 1 month and at 6 months after the last injection.

Results

The treatment was significantly effective from the first injection and up to the six-month follow-up. At the last follow-up, the VAS score on movement had improved by 71% (P < .001), while the VAS score at rest and during the night had ameliorated by 91% and 87%, respectively (P < .001). The Constant Score and Simple Shoulder Test improved by 32% and 61%, respectively (P < .001). No adverse events were reported.

Conclusions

CHondroGrid resulted in a safe and effective treatment in pain relief and for the functional recovery of rotator cuff tendinopathy.

Local injection therapy in the complex treatment of musculoskeletal disorders: principles of application, evidence base, safety

Local injection therapy (LIT)  is an important component of the complex treatment of musculoskeletal disorders (MSD), which is widely used in real clinical practice. Glucocorticoids, hyaluronic acid drugs (HA), autologous cell drugs, botulinum toxin type A, radioactive isotopes, etc. are used for LIT.  LIT makes it possible to achieve a pronounced symptomatic effect, while in some cases, for example, repeated HA treatments in patients with osteoarthritis, the possibility of slowing the progression of the disease and reducing the need for surgical treatment is discussed.

The performance of LIT requires special skills and abilities of the physician, careful compliance with the rules of asepsis and antisepsis, and instrumental visualization. LIT can be associated with serious complications and therefore must be performed according to strict indications.

The Expert Council was devoted to defining the basic principles of LIT. The indications for the use of certain types of this therapies, the evidence base for its efficacy and safety, the order of application of different drugs, and the need to combine LIT with other drug and non-drug treatments of MSD were reviewed.

Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of Achilles tendon disease

BACKGROUND

The effectiveness of Platelet-Rich Plasma (PRP) in the treatment of patients with Achilles tendon rupture (ATR) and Achilles tendinopathy (AT) has been controversial.

AIM

To assess PRP injections' effectiveness in treating ATR and AT.

METHODS

A comprehensive review of relevant literature was conducted utilizing multiple databases such as Cochrane Library, PubMed, Web of Science, Chinese Science and Technology Journal, EMBASE, and China Biomedical CD-ROM. The present investigation integrated randomized controlled trials that assessed the effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma injections in managing individuals with Achilles tendon rupture and tendinopathy. The eligibility criteria for the trials encompassed publications that were published within the timeframe of January 1, 1966 to December 2022. The statistical analysis was performed utilizing the Review Manager 5.4.1, the visual analogue scale (VAS), Victorian Institute Ankle Function Scale (VISA-A), and Achilles Tendon Thickness were used to assess outcomes.

RESULTS

This meta-analysis included 13 randomized controlled trials, 8 of which were randomized controlled trials of PRP for AT and 5 of which were randomized controlled trials of PRP for ATR. PRP for AT at 6 wk [weighted mean difference (WMD) = 1.92, 95%CI: -0.54 to 4.38, I2 = 34%], at 3 mo [WMD = 0.20, 95%CI: -2.65 to 3.05, I2 = 60%], and 6 mo [WMD = 2.75, 95%CI: -2.76 to 8.26, I2 = 87%) after which there was no significant difference in VISA-A scores between the PRP and control groups. There was no significant difference in VAS scores between the PRP group and the control group after 6 wk [WMD = 6.75, 95%CI: -6.12 to 19.62, I2 = 69%] and 6 mo [WMD = 10.46, 95%CI: -2.44 to 23.37, I2 = 69%] of treatment, and at mid-treatment at 3 mo [WMD = 11.30, 95%CI: 7.33 to 15.27, I2 = 0%] after mid-treatment, the PRP group demonstrated better outcomes than the control group. Post-treatment patient satisfaction [WMD = 1.07, 95%CI: 0.84 to 1.35, I2 = 0%], Achilles tendon thickness [WMD = 0.34, 95%CI: -0.04 to 0.71, I2 = 61%] and return to sport [WMD = 1.11, 95%CI: 0.87 to 1.42, I2 = 0%] were not significantly different between the PRP and control groups. The study did not find any statistically significant distinction between the groups that received PRP treatment and those that did not, regarding the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment - Achilles scores at 3 mo [WMD = -1.49, 95%CI: -5.24 to 2.25, I2 = 0%], 6 mo [WMD = -0.24, 95%CI: -3.80 to 3.32, I2 = 0%], and 12 mo [WMD = -2.02, 95%CI: -5.34 to 1.29, I2 = 87%] for ATR patients. Additionally, no significant difference was observed between the PRP and the control groups in improving Heel lift height respectively at 6 mo [WMD = -3.96, 95%CI: -8.61 to 0.69, I2 = 0%] and 12 mo [WMD = -1.66, 95%CI: -11.15 to 7.83, I2 = 0%] for ATR patients. There was no significant difference in calf circumference between the PRP group and the control group after 6 mo [WMD = 1.01, 95%CI: -0.78 to 2.80, I2 = 54%] and 12 mo [WMD = -0.55, 95%CI: -2.2 to 1.09, I2 = 0%] of treatment. There was no significant difference in ankle mobility between the PRP and control groups at 6 mo of treatment [WMD = -0.38, 95%CI: -2.34 to 1.58, I2 = 82%] and after 12 mo of treatment [WMD = -0.98, 95%CI: -1.41 to -0.56, I2 = 10%] there was a significant improvement in ankle mobility between the PRP and control groups. There was no significant difference in the rate of return to exercise after treatment [WMD = 1.20, 95%CI: 0.77 to 1.87, I2 = 0%] and the rate of adverse events [WMD = 0.85, 95%CI: 0.50 to 1.45, I2 = 0%] between the PRP group and the control group.

CONCLUSION

The use of PRP for AT improved the patient's immediate VAS scores but not VISA-A scores, changes in Achilles tendon thickness, patient satisfaction, or return to sport. Treatment of ATR with PRP injections alone improved long-term ankle mobility but had no significant effect on VISA-A scores, single heel lift height, calf circumference or return to sport. Additional research employing more extensive sampling sizes, more strict experimental methods, and standard methodologies may be necessary to yield more dependable and precise findings.

Nonoperative Treatment of Rotator Cuff Tears

Rotator cuff tears are common with prevalence increasing with age. Diagnosis by physical examination may require a cluster of tests. Although radiographs can be helpful, MRI, MRI arthrography, and ultrasound represent the most used imaging technique to identify rotator cuff tears. Although surgery is sometimes necessary, a large portion of patients may respond to conservative treatment including physical therapy and injections. Physical therapy should include restoring the range of motion, addressing any pectoralis minor or posterior capsule stiffness, and restoring motor control/strength to the scapula and rotator cuff. Other conservative treatments may include nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, corticosteroid injects, and platelet-rich plasma.

Comparison of three common shoulder injections for rotator cuff tears: a systematic review and network meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical effectiveness of three common shoulder injections mentioned in the guidelines [corticosteroid, sodium hyaluronate (SH) and platelet-rich plasma (PRP)] on rotator cuff tears.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The PubMed, Embase and Cochrane Library databases were systematically searched up to June 1, 2022, for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and prospective studies on the three injection therapies for rotator cuff tears. The main results were pain relief and functional improvement at 1-5 months and over 6 months, pooled using a network meta-analysis and ranked by SUCRA score. The risk of bias of the included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Collaboration tool.

RESULTS

Twelve RCTs and 4 prospective studies comprising a total of 1115 patients were included in the review. Three prospective studies were judged to be at high risk of selection bias and performance bias, and one was considered as having a high risk of detection bias. SH injection ranked first in the short term in pain relief (MD: - 2.80; 95%CI - 3.91, - 1.68) and functional improvement (MD:19.17; 95%CI 12.29, 26.05), while PRP injection obtained better results in the long term in both pain relief (MD: - 4.50; 95%CI - 4.97, - 4.03) and functional improvement (MD:11.11; 95%CI 0.53,21.68).

CONCLUSIONS

PRP injection has the potential to successfully treat rotator cuff tears as an alternative to corticosteroids in the long term, in terms of either therapeutic efficiency or adverse effects, followed by SH injection. More research is needed to make high-quality recommendations on treatment options for injection treatments of rotator cuff tears.

Effects of Platelet-Rich Plasma in Tear Size Reduction in Partial-Thickness Tear of the Supraspinatus Tendon Compared to Corticosteroids Injection

OBJECTIVES

Corticosteroid (CS) injection is commonly used in partial-thickness rotator cuff tears to decrease pain. However, this could result in unwanted side effects, such as tendon rupture. Alternatively, platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection is frequently used to treat tendinopathies because it enhances healing. This study aimed to compare the differences in tear size and functional scores between intralesional PRP and subacromial CS injections.

METHODS

Patients with symptomatic partial-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon who underwent conservative treatment for ≥ 3 months were enrolled. All patients underwent magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) to confirm the diagnosis. Fourteen and 15 patients were randomized to receive intralesional PRP and subacromial CS injections, respectively. Tears were measured in the coronal and sagittal planes. The patients underwent another MRI 6 months after the injection. Tear size was compared between the two MRI results. The American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons Shoulder score (ASES) and Constant-Murley score (CMS) were also obtained.

RESULTS

The baseline data were similar between the groups. In the coronal plane, PRP and CS showed tear size reductions of 3.39 mm (P = 0.003) and 1.10 mm (P = 0.18), respectively. In the sagittal plane, PRP and CS showed tear size reductions of 2.97 mm (P = 0.001) and 0.76 mm (P = 0.29), respectively. Functional scores improved 6 months after injection in both groups, but PRP showed better functional scores than CS (P = 0.002 for ASES, P = 0.02 for CS).

CONCLUSION

Intralesional PRP injection can reduce the tear size in partial-thickness tears of the supraspinatus tendon. Subacromial steroid injection did not significantly affect the tear size. While CS improved functional scores compared with baseline, PRP resulted in better improvement 6 months post-injection. Trial registration Thai Clinical Trials Registry, TCTR20210428004. Registered 28 April 2021-retrospectively registered, TCTR20210428004 .

Platelet-Rich Plasma Injection Can Be a Viable Alternative to Corticosteroid Injection for Conservative Treatment of Rotator Cuff Disease: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

PURPOSE

To explore whether platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injection can be a viable alternative to corticosteroid (CS) injection for conservative treatment of rotator cuff disease.

METHODS

This study was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PubMed, EMBASE, The Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched from January 1, 1990, to March 20, 2022, for English-language randomized controlled trials that compared PRP and CS injections for patients with rotator cuff disease. Two evaluators independently screened the literature, extracted data, and assessed the level of evidence and methodologic quality of the enrolled studies. The meta-analysis was conducted using RevMan software (version 5.3.3).

RESULTS

Thirteen nonsurgical randomized controlled trials with 725 patients were included. Compared with CS, PRP provided statistically worse short-term (<2 months) changes in American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons (ASES) assessment scores, Simple Shoulder Test scores, and Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand questionnaire scores but provided better medium-term (2-6 months) changes in Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand scores, as well as long-term (≥6 months) changes in Constant-Murley scores, ASES scores, and Simple Shoulder Test scores. No statistically significant differences regarding pain reduction were found between the 2 groups. PRP injections led to worse short-term changes in forward flexion and internal rotation but better medium-term changes in forward flexion and external rotation. PRP showed significantly lower rates of post-injection failure (requests for subsequent injections or surgical intervention prior to 12 months) than CS. No outcome reached the minimal clinically important difference. After sensitivity analyses excluding studies with substantial clinical and/or methodologic heterogeneity, PRP showed better medium-term changes in ASES scores and visual analog scale scores and long-term changes in visual analog scale scores that reached the minimal clinically important difference.

CONCLUSIONS

Without the drawbacks of CS injection, PRP injection is not worse than CS injection in terms of pain relief and function recovery at any time point during follow-up. PRP injection may reduce rates of subsequent injection or surgery, and it might provide better improvements in pain and function in the medium to long term. PRP injection can be a viable alternative to CS injection for conservative treatment of rotator cuff disease.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Meta-analysis of Level I and II studies.

Novel Orthobiologic Preparation and Regenerative Rehabilitation of a Complex Shoulder Injury in a Competitive Adolescent Female Athlete

Background

Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and prolotherapy have resulted in promising outcomes in patients with various types of shoulder injuries. However, there is a lack of preliminary evidence supporting preparation of PRP production, timely application of these therapies and regenerative rehabilitation protocols. The purpose of this case report is to describe the distinct method including orthobiologic preparation, tissue-specific treatment and regenerative rehabilitation of an athlete with a complex shoulder injury.

Case Presentation

A 15y/o competitive female wrestler with a complex shoulder injury presented to the clinic after unsuccessful conservative rehabilitation. Unique methods were incorporated to optimize PRP production, specific tissue healing and regenerative rehabilitation. Multiple injuries required different orthobiologic interventions at different time frames, in order to promote optimal healing and stability of the shoulder.

Outcomes

The described interventions resulted in successful outcomes including pain, disability, full return to sport, and regenerative tissue healing confirmed with diagnostic imaging.

Level of Evidence

5.

Comparison of ultrasound-guided subacromial corticosteroid and ozone (O2-O3) injections in the treatment of chronic rotator cuff tendinopathy: a randomized clinical trial

Background

: The authors aimed to compare the effects of a one-time ultrasound (US)-guided subacromial corticosteroid injection and three-time ozone (O₂-O₃) injection in patients with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy.

Methods

: Participants were randomly assigned to the corticosteroid group (n = 22) or ozone group (n = 22). Injections in both groups were administered into subacromial bursa with an US-guided in-plane posterolateral approach. Primary outcome measure was the change in the Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) score between baseline and 12-weeks post-injection. Secondary outcome measures included visual analog scale and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores. Assessments were recorded at baseline, and 4-weeks and 12-weeks post-injection.

Results

: Forty participants completed this study. Based on repeated measurement analysis of variance, a significant effect of time was found for all outcome measures in both groups. Both the groups showed clinically significant improvements in shoulder pain, quality of life, and function. Baseline, 4-week post-injection, and 12-week post-injection WORC scores (mean ± standard deviation) were 57.91 ± 18.97, 39.10 ± 20.50 and 37.22 ± 27.31 in the corticosteroid group, respectively and 69.03 ± 15.89, 39.11 ± 24.36, and 32.26 ± 24.58 in the ozone group, respectively. However, no significant group × time interaction was identified regarding all outcome measures.

Conclusions

: Three-time ozone injection was not superior to a one-time corticosteroid injection in patients with chronic supraspinatus tendinopathy. It might be as effective as corticosteroid injection at 4-weeks and 12-weeks post-injection in terms of relieving pain and improving quality of life and function.

Comparison of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy and Ultrasound-Guided Shoulder Injection Therapy in Patients with Supraspinatus Tendinitis

BACKGROUND

The present study compared the clinical effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) with that of ultrasound (US)-guided shoulder steroid injection therapy in patients with supraspinatus tendinitis. We hypothesized that the two treatments would show comparable results.

METHODS

The inclusion criteria were age over 20 years and diagnosis of supraspinatus tendinitis using US. Ultimately, 26 patients were assigned using blocked randomization: 13 in the US-guided shoulder injection group and 13 in the ESWT group. Treatment outcomes were evaluated using the pain visual analog scale (pVAS), the American Shoulder and Elbow Society (ASES) score, and the Constant score at baseline and at 1 and 3 months after the procedure.

RESULTS

At 1 month after the intervention, pVAS, ASES, and constant score were significantly higher in the US-guided shoulder injection group than in the ESWT group, but not at 3 months after the intervention. Both groups showed clinically significant treatment effects at 3 months after the intervention compared to baseline. No significance was shown using equivalence testing.

CONCLUSIONS

US-guided shoulder injection therapy was not superior to ESWT therapy. Considering the complications and rebound phenomenon of steroid injections, interventions using ESWT may be a good alternative to treat patients with supraspinatus tendinitis.

Effectiveness of subacromial injections in rotator cuff lesions: systematic review and meta-analysis protocol

INTRODUCTION

Subacromial injections are therapeutic options for rotator cuff injuries, with consistent results not well established yet for each drug applied. The objective of this systematic review and meta-analysis is to analyse the effectiveness of the substances used in subacromial injections for the treatment of rotator cuff injuries and shoulder impingement syndrome, considering the functional gain and pain improvement of the shoulder.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

Beginning in November 2022, we will perform a detailed search using the MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and LILACS databases. Relevant grey literature (reference lists, conference abstracts and academic papers) will also be included.Two reviewers will independently screen and extract the information from the literature. Bias and quality of the included studies will be evaluated using the risk of bias assessment tool provided by the Cochrane Collaboration. Statistical analyses will be performed using Review Manager V.5.4 software.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

Approval and patient informed consent are not required because we will only include published literature. The results of this research will be disseminated in a peer-reviewed journal and likely through other scientific events.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020199292.

Platelet lysate and tendon healing: comparative analysis of autologous frozen-thawed PRP and ketorolac tromethamine in the treatment of patients with rotator cuff tendinopathy

Platelet-rich blood derivatives are being nowadays increasingly used in the treatment of tendon-related pathologies as a rich source of growth factors. We sought to ascertain if local application of platelet lysate (PL) to augment rotator cuff repair ameliorates patient outcomes compared to ketorolac tromethamine treated group. A total of forty patients, with clinical diagnosis of Rotator Cuff Tendinopathy were randomized to receive sub acromial injections of PL every week for a total of 3 injections and two injection of ketorolac tromethamine once every two weeks. Subjective assessments included VAS, SPADI and shoulder range of motion were assessed at baseline and at 1 and 6 months after injection. Taking both control and PL groups, it was vividly seen that the outcomes were identical at the initial state, as well as the short-term one; whereas, when considering the 6-month period, there is a seemingly remarkable superiority in PL group in all parameters.

Subacromial Injections of Low- or High-Molecular-Weight Hyaluronate Versus Physical Therapy for Shoulder Tendinopathy: A Randomized Triple-Blind Controlled Trial

OBJECTIVE

Shoulder tendinopathy is a prevalent and debilitating problem. We compared the effects of subacromial high- or low-molecular-weight hyaluronate injection with physical therapy (PT) in shoulder tendinopathy.

DESIGN

A triple-blinded randomized controlled trial.

SETTING

We conducted the trial in an outpatient clinic at a teaching hospital.

PARTICIPANTS

In total, 79 patients with shoulder tendinopathy were randomly allocated to high- (n = 27) or low-molecular-weight (n = 28) hyaluronate or PT (n = 24) groups.

INTERVENTIONS

We administered a 20-mg injection of high- or low-molecular-weight hyaluronate. For PT, we prescribed 10 sessions of physiotherapy and exercise.

OUTCOME MEASURES

The primary outcome was shoulder pain and the secondary outcomes included Disability of the Arm Shoulder and Hand score, shoulder range of movement and QoL. We measured the outcomes at baseline, 1, and 3 months of treatment, and assessed shoulder pain at the sixth month postintervention.

RESULTS

The interventions were all clinically beneficial in the management of tendinopathy for high- (n = 25) and low-molecular-weight (n = 24) hyaluronate and PT (n = 19) groups (all P < 0.05). However, between-group analyses indicated that hyaluronate preparations were more effective in controlling pain, decreasing disability, increasing range of motion, and improving the quality of life (all P < 0.05). The pain and subjective feeling of rigidity at the injection area ( P = 0.012) were less prominent for low-molecular-weight hyaluronate.

CONCLUSION

High- or low-molecular-weight hyaluronate is more effective than PT in the treatment of shoulder tendinopathy. The clinical benefits of hyaluronate last for at least 3 months, and the pain alleviation sustains partially for 6 months. Shoulder injection of low-molecular-weight hyaluronate is more tolerable to the patient than high-molecular-weight hyaluronate.

Cross-Linked Hyaluronate and Corticosteroid Combination Ameliorate the Rat Experimental Tendinopathy through Anti-Senescent and -Apoptotic Effects

The combination of cross-linked hyaluronate (cHA) and corticosteroid showed more rapid pain or functional improvement in knee osteoarthritis and adhesive capsulitis. However, rare evidence of this combination in treating tendinopathy has been reported. We hypothesized that the specific formulations of cHA and dexamethasone (DEX) conferred amelioration of tendinopathy via anti-apoptosis and anti-senescence. In this controlled laboratory study, primary tenocytes from the human tendinopathic long head of biceps were treated with three cHA formulations (cHA:linealized HA = 80:20, 50:50, and 20:80) + DEX with or without IL-1β stimulation. Cell viability, inflammatory cytokines, tendon-related proliferation markers, matrix metalloproteinases (MMPs), senescent markers, and apoptosis were examined. The in vivo therapeutic effects of the selected cHA + DEX combinations were evaluated in a collagenase-induced rat patellar tendinopathy model. The expression levels of inflammatory mediators, including IL-1β, IL-6, COX-2, MMP-1, and MMP-3 were significantly reduced in all cHA + DEX-treated tenocytes (p < 0.05, all). The cHA (50:50) + DEX and cHA (20:80) + DEX combinations protected tenocytes from cytotoxicity, senescence, and apoptosis induced by DEX in either IL-1β stimulation or none. Furthermore, the two combinations significantly improved the rat experimental tendinopathy by reducing ultrasound feature scores and histological scores as well as the levels of apoptosis, senescence, and senescence-associated secretory phenotypes (p < 0.05, all). We identified two specific cHA formulations (cHA (50:50) and cHA (20:80)) + DEX that could ameliorate tendinopathy through anti-senescence and -apoptosis without cytotoxicity. This study provides a possible approach to treating tendinopathy using the combination of two well-known agents.

The use of platelet-rich plasma in management of musculoskeletal pain: a narrative review

Musculoskeletal pain is the most common pain reported by patients. Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is widely used to treat musculoskeletal pain. However, the efficacy of PRP to treat this pain remains controversial. This review highlights the application of PRP in the treatment of musculoskeletal pain. PRP treatment appears to reduce pain and improve function in patients with musculoskeletal pain. However, there are limitations to the currently published studies. These limitations include the PRP preparation methods, type of activators, types of pathology to be treated, methods and times of administration, and association of PRP with other treatments.

Comparative Efficacy of Nonoperative Treatments for Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

OBJECTIVE

An evolved understanding of the pathophysiology of greater trochanteric pain syndrome has led to a number of proposed nonoperative management strategies. The objective of this review was to compare the efficacy of the various nonoperative treatments for greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS).

DESIGN

Systematic review and network meta-analysis.

SETTING

PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, SCOPUS, and Web of Science were searched to January 2020.

PATIENTS

Patients undergoing nonoperative treatment for GTPS.

INTERVENTIONS

Nonoperative treatment strategies for GTPS including injections of corticosteroids, platelet-rich plasma, hyaluronic acid, dry needling, and structured exercise programs and extracorporeal shockwave therapy.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Pain and functional outcomes. Bayesian random-effects model was performed to assess the direct and indirect comparison of all treatment options.

RESULTS

Thirteen randomized controlled trials and 1034 patients were included. For pain scores at 1 to 3 months follow-up, both platelet-rich plasma (PRP) and shockwave therapy demonstrated significantly better pain scores compared with the no treatment control group with PRP having the highest probability of being the best treatment at both 1 to 3 months and 6 to 12 months. No proposed therapies significantly outperformed the no treatment control group for pain scores at 6 to 12 months. Structured exercise had the highest probability of being the best treatment for improvements in functional outcomes and was the only treatment that significantly improved functional outcome scores compared with the no treatment arm at 1 to 3 months.

CONCLUSION

Current evidence suggests that PRP and shockwave therapy may provide short-term (1-3 months) pain relief, and structured exercise leads to short-term (1-3 months) improvements in functional outcomes.

Effectiveness of Ultrasound-Guided Corticosteroid Injections, Prolotherapy, and Exercise Therapy on Partial-Thickness Supraspinatus Tears

CONTEXT

To investigate the effects of steroid injection (STE), prolotherapy (PRO), and exercise therapy in the treatment of partial tears of the supraspinatus.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

A total of 64 patients with clinically and radiologically diagnosed partial-thickness supraspinatus tear who received either a cortisone injection (STE), dextrose PRO, or physical therapy combined with home-based exercise therapy were included. Main outcome measures were patients' visual analog scale scores, Western Ontario Rotator Cuff (WORC) Index scores, and the Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores at the baseline, 3 weeks, and 3 months.

RESULTS

The effect of group, time, and group-time interaction on visual analog scale, WORC, and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores was statistically significant (P < .001). Visual analog scale and Shoulder Pain and Disability Index scores were the lowest in the STE group at week 3, and the lowest in the PRO group at month 3 (P < .001). WORC scores of the STE group were the highest at week 3 (P < .001). At month 3, WORC scores of STE and PRO groups were similar (P = .089), but significantly higher than exercise therapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Corticosteroids provide a fast pain-relieving effect and improvement in function in partial-thickness rotator cuff tears, but these effects diminish over time, whereas PRO provides a long-lasting effect.

Corticosteroid Injections After Rotator Cuff Repair Improve Function, Reduce Pain, and Are Safe: A Systematic Review

Purpose

To review the literature on postoperative corticosteroid injections (CSIs) following primary rotator cuff repair (RCR) to evaluate efficacy and adverse effects.

Methods

A systematic review of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane databases were performed to identify all studies published within the last 15 years, which reported on outcomes of postoperative CSIs following RCR. Studies including patients who received only preoperative CSIs and revision RCRs were excluded. Included studies were evaluated for study methodology, patient demographics, outcome measures, physical examination parameters, results of imaging studies, and adverse effects or clinical complications.

Results

Seven studies comprising 5,528 patients satisfied inclusion criteria. Among included patients, 54.8% were female and mean age range from 52.3 ± 13.0 to 62.7 ± 6.6 years. Only 1 included investigation was a Level I study. Overall, 4 of 5 studies reported significant improvements in pain and outcome scores (Constant score, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score) compared with controls. Across all studies, the majority of these effects were statistically significant at 3 months postoperatively but not beyond this time point. Five of the 6 included investigations reported no increased rate of retears after postoperative CSIs. One study did find an increase in retear in patients receiving postoperative CSIs but was unable to determine whether these retears were present before the patient received the CSI. Another investigation reported an increased rate of infection only if the CSI was administered in the first postoperative month.

Conclusions

Postoperative CSIs may improve pain and function for up to 3 months following primary RCR but not at later follow-up time points. CSIs should be administered only after the first postoperative month to minimize the potential risk for adverse events.

Level of Evidence

Systematic review of level I-IV studies.

The Efficacy of Platelet-Rich Plasma for Ligament Injuries: A Systematic Review of Basic Science Literature With Protocol Quality Assessment

Background:

Despite the existence of many clinical studies on platelet-rich plasma (PRP) interventions for ligamentous pathology, basic science consensus regarding the indications, mechanisms, and optimal composition of PRP for treating ligament injuries is lacking.

Purpose:

To (1) compare the efficacy of PRP in animal models of ligament injury with placebo and (2) describe the potential variability in PRP preparation using accepted classification systems.

Study Design:

Systematic review.

Methods:

The Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PubMed, Embase, and Ovid MEDLINE were queried in April 2020 for in vivo and in vitro basic science studies regarding PRP use for ligament injury. Study design, results, PRP composition, and analyzed cellular and molecular markers were extracted, and outcomes relative to control models were documented. Bias was assessed using the SYRCLE risk-of-bias tool.

Results:

Included were 43 articles (31 in vivo and 12 in vitro studies) investigating the anterior cruciate ligament/cranial cruciate ligament (n = 32), medial collateral ligament (n = 6), suspensory ligament (n = 3), patellar ligament (n = 1), and Hock ligament (n = 1). Platelet concentration was reported in 34 studies (77.3%); leukocyte composition, in 12 (27.3%); and red blood cell counts, in 7 (15.9%). With PRP treatment, 5 of 12 in vitro studies demonstrated significant increases in cell viability, 6 of 12 in gene expression, 14 of 32 in vivo studies reported superior ligament repair via histological evaluation, and 13 in vivo studies reported superior mechanical properties. Variability in PRP preparation methods was observed across all articles, and only 1 study reported all necessary information to be classified by the 4 schemes we used to evaluate reporting. Among the in vivo studies, detection and performance bias were consistently high, whereas selection, attrition, reporting, and other biases were consistently low.

Conclusion:

Conflicting data on the cellular and molecular effects of PRP for ligament injuries were observed secondary to the finding that included studies were heterogeneous, limiting interpretation across studies and the ability to draw meaningful conclusions. Clinical trials and any causal relationship between PRP use in ligament injuries and its potential for regeneration and healing should be pursued with caution if based solely on basic science data.

Platelet-rich plasma versus corticosteroid injections for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a comparative study with up to 18 months follow-up

Background

Given the complications involved in corticosteroid (CS) injections, subacromial platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections may provide a valid alternative to CS in the treatment of rotator cuff (RC) tendinopathy.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a total of 98 patients affected by RC tendinopathy who were treated with either subacromial injection of PRP or CS. The PRP group received three injections of autologous PRP at 2 weeks interval, and the CS group received one injection of CS. The Western Ontario Rotator Cuff Index (WORC) was the primary outcome measure, while the secondary outcome measures were the visual analog scale (VAS), range of motion (ROM), and need for cuff repair surgery, which were analyzed at intervals of 6, 12, and 18 months.

Results

A total of 75 patients were included in the analysis (PRP, n=35; CS, n=40). The mean follow-up for PRP was 21.1±8.7 months and for CS was 33.6±16.3 months (p<0.001). Both groups showed improvement in WORC, VAS, and ROM. No significant differences were detected between the two groups in any of the primary (WORC) or secondary outcomes over 6, 12, and 18 months (all p>0.05). No adverse events were detected.

Conclusions

Both treatments improved patient symptoms, but neither resulted in a significantly better outcome in this series of patients. PRP can be a safe and feasible alternative to CS, even at long-term follow-up, to reduce local and systemic effects involved with CS injections.

The effectiveness of dextrose prolotherapy in plantar fasciitis: A systemic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Dextrose prolotherapy (DPT) is considered to be a type of regenerative therapy and is widely used in various musculoskeletal disorders. Plantar fasciitis is a common cause of heel pain that affects the quality of life of many people. We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of DPT for plantar fasciitis.

METHODS

PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from their respective inception dates to June 2021. Only randomized controlled trials comparing DPT and other interventions for plantar fasciitis were included in this review. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated for comparison. The outcome measurements included visual analog score, numeric rating scale, Foot Function index, Revised Foot Function index, American Orthopedic Foot and Ankle Score, and plantar fascia thickness. Post-treatment duration was classified as short-term (1-2 months), medium-term (3 months), or long-term (6 months).

RESULTS

Six studies with 388 adult patients diagnosed with plantar fasciitis were included for the meta-analysis. In terms of pain scores improvement, DPT was superior to placebo or exercise in the short-term (SMD: -1.163, 95%CI: -2.17 to -0.156) and the medium-term (SMD: -1.394, 95%CI: -2.702 to -0.085). DPT was inferior to corticosteroid injection in the short-term (SMD: 0.781, 95%CI: 0.41 to 1.152). For functional improvement, DPT was superior to placebo or exercise in the short-term (SMD: -1.51, 95%CI: -2.96 to -0.059), but inferior to corticosteroid injection (SMD: 0.526, 95%CI: 0.161 to 0.89) and extracorporeal shock wave therapy in the short-term (SMD: 0.484, 95%CI: 0.145 to 0.822). Randomized controlled trials showed a better pain improvement in the long-term for patients treated with DPT compared to corticosteroid (P = .002) and exercise control (P < .05). No significant differences were found between patients treated with DPT and patients treated with platelet-rich plasma.

CONCLUSION

Dextrose prolotherapy was a safe and effective treatment option for plantar fasciitis that may have long-term benefits for patients. The effects were comparable to extracorporeal shock wave therapy or platelet-rich plasma injection. Further studies with standardized protocols and long-term follow-up are needed to address potential biases.

Can platelet-rich plasma injections provide better pain relief and functional outcomes in persons with common shoulder diseases: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

Background

To evaluate the efficacy of autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) injections in the treatment of common shoulder diseases.

Methods

The PubMed, Medline, and Central databases and trial registries were searched from their inception to October 2020 for randomized controlled trials of autologous PRP injections for shoulder diseases versus placebo or any control intervention. Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were followed in the selection, analysis, and reporting of findings. The primary outcome was pain intensity (visual analog scale), and secondary outcomes were changes in function and quality of life (QoL).

Results

A total of 17 randomized controlled trials of PRP versus control were analyzed. From 8–12 weeks to ≥1 year, PRP injections were associated with better pain relief and functional outcomes than control interventions. PRP injections were also associated with greater QoL, with an effect size of 2.61 (95% confidence interval, 2.01–14.17) at medium-term follow-up. Compared with placebo and corticosteroid injections, PRP injections provided better pain relief and functional improvement. In subgroup analyses, trials in which PRP was prepared by the double centrifugation technique, the platelet concentration in the PRP was enriched ≥5 times, leucocyte-rich PRP was used, or an activating agent was used before application reported the most effective pain relief at 6–7 months.

Conclusions

PRP injections could provide better pain relief and functional outcomes than other treatments for persons presenting with common shoulder diseases. PRP injections have a greater capacity to improve shoulder-related QoL than other interventions.

American Medical Society for Sports Medicine Position Statement: Principles for the Responsible Use of Regenerative Medicine in Sports Medicine

ABSTRACT

Many sports medicine physicians are currently considering introducing regenerative medicine into their practice. Regenerative medicine and the subclassification of orthobiologics are a complicated topic and have produced widely varying opinions. Although there is concern by government regulators, clinicians, scientists, patient advocacy organizations, and the media regarding the use of regenerative medicine products, there is also excitement about the potential benefits with growing evidence that certain regenerative medicine products are safe and potentially efficacious in treating musculoskeletal conditions. Sports medicine physicians would benefit from decision-making guidance about whether to introduce orthobiologics into their practice and how to do it responsibly. The purpose of this position statement is to provide sports medicine physicians with information regarding regenerative medicine terminology, a brief review of basic science and clinical studies within the subclassification of orthobiologics, regulatory considerations, and best practices for introducing regenerative medicine into clinical practice. This information will help sports medicine physicians make informed and responsible decisions about the role of regenerative medicine and orthobiologics in their practice.

Effectiveness of platelet-rich plasma injections for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The effect of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) on patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture is still controversial. The purpose of this systematic review is to assess the efficacy of PRP injections treating acute Achilles tendon rupture.

METHODS

A comprehensive electronic literature search was performed in the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases to identify relevant studies that were published prior to April 29, 2021. Randomized controlled trials evaluating the efficacy of PRP injections in treating patients with acute Achilles tendon rupture were included. Statistical analyses were conducted using RevMan software.

RESULTS

Five randomized controlled trials were included in this systematic review. The results of the meta-analysis showed that PRP has positive effects on ankle dorsiflexion angle, dorsal extension strength of the ankle, and calf circumference compared with that in controls. However, the current evidence failed to show that PRP effectively improves ankle plantar flexion angle, plantar flexion strength of the ankle, and pain.

CONCLUSIONS

PRP injections for the treatment of acute Achilles tendon rupture significantly improved ankle dorsiflexion angle, dorsal extension strength of the ankle, and calf circumference compared with that in controls. Additional studies with larger sample sizes, more rigorous designs and standardized protocols are needed to draw more reliable and accurate conclusions.