Predictors of Outpatient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Uptake, Adherence, Completion, and Treatment Response Among Male U.S. Veterans With Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Impact of pulmonary rehabilitation on exercise capacity, health-related quality of life, and cardiopulmonary function in lung surgery patients: a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis

Background

Pulmonary rehabilitation is considered beneficial for patients undergoing lung surgery, yet its specific impacts on exercise capacity, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and cardiopulmonary function require further elucidation. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of PR on these outcomes in patients undergoing lung surgery using a retrospective propensity score-matched analysis.

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed 420 patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who underwent lung surgery from January 2022 to May 2024. Among these, 84 patients received PR while 336 did not (control group). Propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:1 ratio yielded 46 patients in each group. Baseline characteristics, spirometry, cardiopulmonary exercise testing, respiratory muscle strength, HRQL, and muscle measurements were assessed pre-and post-surgery.

Results

Before PSM, significant differences existed between groups, with the PR group being older and having different pulmonary function baselines. After PSM, groups were well-balanced. Postoperatively, the PR group showed significant improvements in FEV1/FVC (64.17% vs. 50.87%, p < 0.001), FEV1 (2.31 L/min vs. 1.75 L/min, p < 0.001), and predicted FVC percentage (88.75% vs. 68.30%, p < 0.001). Cardiovascular responses showed a lower CI during exercise in the PR group post-PSM (6.24 L/min/m2 vs. 7.87 L/min/m2, p < 0.001). In terms of exercise capacity, the PR group had higher maximal WR percentage (104.76% vs. 90.00%, p = 0.017) and peak VO2 (1150.70 mL/min vs. 1004.74 mL/min, p = 0.009). PR also resulted in less leg soreness and lower total CAT scores postoperatively. Muscle measurements indicated significantly smaller reductions in ΔHUESMCSA and percentage change in the PR group.

Conclusion

Pulmonary rehabilitation significantly enhances exercise capacity, HRQL, and cardiopulmonary function in patients undergoing lung surgery. It also mitigates postoperative muscle loss, underscoring its importance in the postoperative management of lung surgery patients.

Maintenance Pulmonary Rehabilitation: An Update and Future Directions

The Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease guidelines recommend pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) for individuals with COPD to improve exercise capacity and health-related quality of life (HRQOL) and reduce symptoms of dyspnea. For cost-effectiveness in COPD care, PR is second only to smoking cessation. However, PR programs typically last 9-12 weeks. The benefits of PR in terms of exercise capacity and HRQOL often decrease toward pre-PR levels as early as 3-6 months after completing PR if patients do not continue to engage in exercise. This review will (1) briefly summarize the efficacy data that informed the 2023 American Thoracic Society (ATS) clinical practice guidelines for maintenance PR, (2) discuss exercise components of maintenance PR studied since 2020 when the last papers were included in the ATS guidelines, (3) explore future directions for delivery of maintenance PR using technology-mediated models, and (4) examine the need for behavior change techniques informed by theoretical models that underpin long-term behavior change. This review will focus on persons with COPD who have completed an out-patient core initial PR program as most of the data on maintenance PR have been published in this patient population. Core PR typically implies a facility-based initial intensive structured program. All patients who complete a core initial PR program should be counseled by PR staff at the discharge visit to engage in ongoing exercise. This usual care is equally as important as referral to a formal PR maintenance program. It is critical to emphasize that usual care after core initial PR means all patients should be supported to participate in regular ongoing exercise, regardless of whether supervised maintenance PR is available. Currently, the optimal frequency, exercise and/or physical activity content, and delivery mode for maintenance PR in persons with COPD and other chronic respiratory diseases remain unknown. Patient safety and degree of in-person supervision required due to the severity of the underlying lung disease need to be considered. Future research of maintenance PR should be underpinned by behavior change techniques. Finally, in the setting of finite resources, balancing the competing priorities of core initial programs with those of maintenance PR programs needs to be achieved.

Efficacy and safety of a music-therapy facilitated pulmonary telerehabilitation program in COPD patients: the COPDMELODY study protocol

Despite considerable evidence for the benefit in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), the implementation of pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is insufficient. However, music therapy may help address this gap due to its unique benefits. Therefore, we aimed to develop a music-therapy facilitated pulmonary telerehabilitation program based on rhythm-guided walking, singing, and objective telemonitoring. A supervised, parallel-group, single-blinded, randomized controlled clinical trial will be conducted, including 75 patients with COPD anticipated to be randomized in a 1:1:1 ratio into three groups. The intervention groups will receive a 12-week remotely monitored rehabilitation program, while the usual care group will not receive any rehabilitation interventions. Of the two intervention groups, the multi-module music therapy group will contain rhythm-guided walking and singing training, while the rhythm-guided walking group will only include music tempo-guided walking. The primary outcome is the distance of the incremental shuttle walking test. Secondary outcomes include respiratory muscle function, spirometry, lower extremity function, symptoms, quality of life, anxiety and depression levels, physical activity level, training adherence, and safety measurements. The results of this study can contribute to develop and evaluate a home-based music-facilitated rehabilitation program, which has the potential to act as a supplement and/or substitute (according to the needs) for traditional center-based PR in patients with stable COPD. Clinical trial registration: https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/, NCT05832814.

The acceptability, practicality, implementation and efficacy of a physical and social activity intervention 'BreatheHappy' for people with long-term respiratory conditions: A feasibility study

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to determine the feasibility of a group-based pilot programme of low-to-moderate physical activity training, education and social activities, by investigating acceptability, practicality, implementation and efficacy testing. We offer suggestions on programme adaptions for future study.

METHODS

People with a range of chronic respiratory diseases were invited to participate in a pilot 12 week group activity programme. Activities included outdoor walking, tai-chi, education and a range of social activities. Acceptability was determined by participant experiences determined during interviews. Practicality was determined by programme and outcome measure completion, cost and adverse events. Implementation was determined according to whether the programme ran as planned. Efficacy was determined by statistical analyses of outcomes including hand grip strength, timed up and go test, COPD Helplessness Index, COPD Assessment Test, and measures of physical activity via accelerometry.

RESULTS

Thematic analysis indicated that the "BreatheHappy" programme was acceptable. Seven of nine participants completed eight out of 10 sessions and the majority completed all outcome measures. "BreatheHappy" was therefore considered practical. The programme was not implemented as planned, with only 10 sessions running rather than the 12 intended. There was a significant increase in daily step counts (MD: 1284 95% CI: 240-2329 p: 0.024 effect size: 0.988), stepping time (MD: 16 min 95% CI: 5-27 min p: 0.011 effect size: 1.36) and daily minutes completing light physical activity (MD: 23 95% CI: 6-38 p: 0.006 effect size: 1.6). However, time spent sitting for ≥30 min but ≤60 min significantly increased (MD: 26 95% CI: 0.2-52 min p: 0.049 effect size: 0.931), showing signs of efficacy and changing physical activity behaviour patterns.

DISCUSSION

A 10-week programme of low-moderate physical activity training, education and social activities shows signs of feasibility for future research. Suggested adaptions for future study include using physical activity measures such as daily step count or light physical activity for a primary outcome, and mental health and social health related outcome measures relatable to participant's beneficial experiences of the programme. Recruitment in future studies will try and reach both those less socially active and possibly those who have completed pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Venues should be close to efficient transport links whilst different frequencies and durations of programme delivery should be trialled. Adequate funding should be provided for both staff running the programme and blinded research staff for outcome measurement.

Pulmonary Rehabilitation in Persons With COPD

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a high-value intervention for persons with COPD and other chronic lung diseases. It is associated with improvement in exercise capacity, dyspnea, health-related quality of life, and depression as well as a reduction in hospitalization and improved survival when PR follows COPD-related hospitalizations. PR is underused in the United States and other countries despite strong evidence of both clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness. Additional challenges include a lack of equitable reimbursement and poor access, particularly in rural settings. Models, for example, virtual PR, may be an option for improving access but coverage in the United States by Medicare is tenuous. In addition, virtual PR models have considerable heterogeneity, which challenges uniform efficacy and selection of optimal candidates.

Improving Physiological, Physical, and Psychological Health Outcomes: A Narrative Review in US Veterans with COPD

The Veterans Health Administration (VHA) is the largest integrated healthcare system in the United States (US) providing healthcare to an increasing number of middle-aged and older adults who remain at greater risk for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) compared to their civilian counterparts. The VHA has obligated research funds, drafted clinical guidelines, and built programmatic infrastructure to support the diagnosis, treatment, and care management of Veterans with COPD. Despite these efforts, COPD remains a leading cause of morbidity and mortality in Veterans. This paper provides a narrative review of research conducted with US Veteran samples targeting improvement in COPD outcomes. We review key physiological, physical, and psychological health outcomes and intervention research that included US Veteran samples. We conclude with a discussion of directions for future research to continue advancing the treatment of COPD in Veterans and inform advancements in COPD research within and outside the VHA.