1
|
Kahkoska AR, Sprinkles J, Gopisetty N, Ercolino G, Fruik A, Muthukkumar R, Qu X, Mayer-Davis EJ, Cristello Sarteau A. The Cross-sectional Relationship Between Use of Automatic Insulin Delivery Systems and Eating Styles Among Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: An Exploratory Analysis. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2025; 19:5-10. [PMID: 39523581 PMCID: PMC11571612 DOI: 10.1177/19322968241296842] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/16/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The number of older adults with type 1 diabetes (T1D) is increasing. Use of automated insulin delivery (AID) may influence nutrition and eating behaviors. We explored how three eating styles (restrained, external, emotional) differ between older adults with T1D who use and do not use AID. METHODS We administered a one-time electronic survey from September to November 2023 to adults ≥65 years with T1D receiving care through a university-affiliated hospital system. Clinical and demographic information was collected from medical records. Eating styles were characterized with the Dutch Eating Behavior Questionnaire. RESULTS Our sample (n = 77, 95% non-Hispanic white) had mean (SD) age: 71.8 (4.1) years, diabetes duration: 33 (18) years, hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c): 6.83 (1.12%), and body mass index (BMI): 27.3 (4.7) kg/m2. Respondents reported variable eating styles, with the highest median scores for external and restrained eating and lower scores for emotional eating. Older adults using AID systems had higher median scores for emotional and external eating, and more varied restrained eating scores compared to those not using AID systems. Weak correlations were found between eating styles and HbA1c (restrained: r = -0.14; external: r = 0.08; emotional: r = 0.15), as well as between restrained (r = 0.09) and external (r = 0.04) eating with BMI, with a small correlation between emotional eating and BMI (r = 0.27). CONCLUSIONS Eating styles may vary between older adult AID users and non-users. To our knowledge, this is the first study to characterize eating styles in this population, though generalizability is limited by a non-diverse and small sample with high technology use overall (eg, continuous glucose monitoring, insulin pumps).
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna R. Kahkoska
- Department of Nutrition, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Division of Endocrinology and Metabolism, Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
- Center for Aging and Health, UNC School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Jessica Sprinkles
- Department of Nutrition, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | | | - Gabriella Ercolino
- Department of Nutrition, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Angela Fruik
- Department of Nutrition, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Rashmi Muthukkumar
- Department of Medicine, UNC School of Medicine, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Xiaorui Qu
- Department of Nutrition, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Elizabeth J. Mayer-Davis
- Department of Nutrition, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| | - Angelica Cristello Sarteau
- Department of Nutrition, UNC Gillings School of Global Public Health, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Embling R, Lee MD, Price M, Wilkinson LL. Testing an online measure of portion size selection: a pilot study concerned with the measurement of ideal portion size. Pilot Feasibility Stud 2021; 7:177. [PMID: 34535184 PMCID: PMC8446476 DOI: 10.1186/s40814-021-00908-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2021] [Accepted: 08/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/12/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Portion size is known to be a key driver of food intake. As consumed portions are often pre-planned, 'ideal portion size'-an individual's preferred meal size selected prior to eating-has been identified as a strong predictor of actual consumption. However, assessments of ideal portion size have predominantly relied on laboratory-based computer tasks, limiting use online. Therefore, this cross-sectional study sought to pilot test the validity of a web-based tool to measure ideal portion size. METHODS In an online study (N = 48), participants responded to images of a range of foods. Each food was photographed in a series of different portions and loaded into an 'image carousel' that would allow participants to change the size of the displayed portion by moving a slider left-to-right. Using this image carousel, participants selected their ideal portion size. They also completed measures of expected satiety and expected satiation and self-reported their age and body mass index (BMI). A non-parametric correlation matrix was used to explore associations between ideal portion size and identified predictors of food intake. RESULTS Supporting convergent validity of this measure, ideal portion size was significantly correlated with expected satiety (rs = .480) and expected satiation (rs = -.310) after controlling for effects of baseline hunger and fullness, consistent with past research. Similarly, supporting divergent validity of this measure, ideal portion size was not significantly correlated with age (rs = -.032) or BMI (rs = -.111,). CONCLUSIONS Pilot results support the validity of this web-based portion size selection tool used to measure ideal portion size, though further research is needed to validate use with comparisons to actual food intake.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rochelle Embling
- Department of Psychology, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK.
| | - Michelle D Lee
- Department of Psychology, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Menna Price
- Department of Psychology, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
| | - Laura L Wilkinson
- Department of Psychology, College of Human and Health Sciences, Swansea University, Swansea, SA2 8PP, UK
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Marty L, Franzon C, Jones A, Robinson E. Socioeconomic position, energy labelling and portion size selection: An online study comparing calorie and physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) labelling in UK adults. Appetite 2021; 166:105437. [PMID: 34126162 PMCID: PMC8385415 DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105437] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/19/2020] [Revised: 04/13/2021] [Accepted: 05/30/2021] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
Abstract
Limited research has examined the impact of energy labelling on portion size selection. It is also unclear whether physical activity calorie equivalent (PACE) is more effective than standard kilocalorie (kcal) energy labelling in promoting healthier dietary behaviour and whether effectiveness varies based on socioeconomic position (SEP). In the present online study, 1667 UK adults of lower and higher SEP made virtual portion size selections for 18 common main meal foods under one of four conditions: kcal labelling only, PACE labelling only, kcal and PACE labelling, no labelling. Contrary to predictions, participants in the kcal labelling condition (+55 kcal, p < 0.001) chose larger portion sizes compared to the no labelling condition, whereas the PACE labelling (−17 kcal, p = 0.065) and no labelling condition did not significantly differ. The presence of PACE information on labels was associated with selection of significantly smaller portions when compared to labels that only included kcal information. Effects of labels on portion size selection were not moderated by participant SEP in primary analyses. The present study of virtual portion size selections suggests that kcal labelling resulted in larger portion size selections than no labelling, but this counter-intuitive effect was attenuated when kcal and PACE labelling were combined. Further research examining the impact of PACE labelling on real-world food selection in participants of lower and higher SEP is now warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Lucile Marty
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Centre des Sciences Du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Agrosup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France.
| | - Caterina Franzon
- Centre des Sciences Du Goût et de l'Alimentation, Agrosup Dijon, CNRS, INRAE, Université Bourgogne Franche-Comté, Dijon, France
| | - Andrew Jones
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | - Eric Robinson
- Department of Psychological Sciences, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Health, pleasure, and fullness: changing mindset affects brain responses and portion size selection in adults with overweight and obesity. Int J Obes (Lond) 2019; 44:428-437. [PMID: 31213656 DOI: 10.1038/s41366-019-0400-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2018] [Revised: 04/04/2019] [Accepted: 05/01/2019] [Indexed: 02/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Increased portion size is an essential contributor to the current obesity epidemic. The decision of how much to eat before a meal begins (i.e. pre-meal planning), and the attention assigned to this task, plays a vital role in our portion control. OBJECTIVE We investigated whether pre-meal planning can be influenced by a shift in mindset in individuals with overweight and obesity in order to influence portion size selection and brain activity. DESIGN We investigated the neural underpinnings of pre-meal planning in 36 adults of different weight groups (BMI < 25 kg/m2 and BMI ≥ 25 kg/m2) by means of functional magnetic resonance imaging. To examine the important role of attentional focus, participants were instructed to focus their mindset on the health effects of food, expected pleasure, or their intention to stay full until dinnertime, while choosing their portion size for lunch. RESULTS We observed that participants of all weight groups reduced their portion size when adopting a health mindset, which was accompanied by enhanced activation of the self-control network (i.e. left prefrontal cortex). Fullness and pleasure mindsets resulted in contrasting reward responses in individuals with overweight and obesity compared to normal-weight individuals. Under the pleasure mindset, persons with overweight and obesity showed heightened activity in parts of the taste cortex (i.e. right frontal operculum), while the fullness mindset caused reduced activation in the ventral striatum, an important component of the reward system. Moreover, participants with overweight and obesity did not modify their behaviour under the pleasure mindset and selected larger portions than the normal-weight group. CONCLUSIONS We were able to identify specific brain response patterns as participants made a final choice of a portion size. The results demonstrate that different brain responses and behaviours during pre-meal planning can inform the development of effective strategies for healthy weight management.
Collapse
|
5
|
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW The dominant view in the literature is that increased neural reactivity to high-caloric palatable foods in the mesocorticolimbic system is a stable-specific characteristic of obese people. In this review, we argue that this viewpoint may not be justified, and we propose that the neural response to food stimuli is dynamic, and in synchrony with the current motivational and cognitive state of an individual. We will further motivate why a clear mental task in the scanner is a necessity for drawing conclusions from neural activity, and why multivariate approaches to functional MRI (fMRI) data-analysis may carry the field forward. RECENT FINDINGS From the reviewed literature we draw the conclusions that: neural food-cue reactivity depends strongly on cognitive factors such as the use of cognitive regulation strategies, task demands, and focus of attention; neural activity in the mesocorticolimbic system is not proportionate to the hedonic value of presented food stimuli; and multivariate approaches to fMRI data-analysis have shown that hedonic value can be decoded from multivoxel patterns of neural activity. SUMMARY Future research should take the dynamic nature of food-reward processing into account and take advantage from state-of-the-art multivariate approaches to fMRI data-analysis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne Roefs
- Faculty of Psychology and Neuroscience, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
6
|
|
7
|
Mattes RD. Evidence on the "normalizing" effect of reducing food-portion sizes. Am J Clin Nutr 2018; 107:501-503. [PMID: 29635509 DOI: 10.1093/ajcn/nqy054] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Richard D Mattes
- Department of Nutrition Science, Purdue University, West Lafayette, IN
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Almiron-Roig E, Navas-Carretero S, Emery P, Martínez JA. Research into food portion size: methodological aspects and applications. Food Funct 2018; 9:715-739. [PMID: 29219156 DOI: 10.1039/c7fo01430a] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Portion sizes for certain foods have been increasing dramatically in recent years alongside obesity rates, concurring with the phenomenon of the portion size effect (more is consumed when more is offered). Portion size may be defined based on different purposes such as for dietary assessment, or therapeutic advice or food labelling, resulting in a variety of measurement methods and specifications. This situation has resulted in disagreements on establishing portion size recommendations by manufacturers, food distributors, restaurants, health professionals and policy makers, contributing to confusion amongst consumers on the amounts of food to be consumed, and potentially increasing the likelihood of overeating and other obesity-related behaviours. Such variability is also reflected in the research field making comparison across studies on portion size difficult. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of definitions and methods used in research to evaluate portion-size related outcomes, including methods to estimate amounts consumed by individuals as part of dietary assessment; methods to analyse cognitive mechanisms related to portion size behaviour; and methods to evaluate the impact of portion size manipulations as well as individual plus environmental factors on portion size behaviour. Special attention has been paid to behavioural studies exploring portion size cognitive processes given the lack of previous methodological reviews in this area. This information may help researchers, clinicians and other stakeholders to establish clearer definitions of portion size in their respective areas of work and to standardise methods to analyse portion size effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eva Almiron-Roig
- Universidad de Navarra, Centre for Nutrition Research, Irunlarrea 1, 31008, Pamplona, Spain.
| | | | | | | |
Collapse
|