1
|
Ling Y, Chen J, Cai P, Jia W, Hei D, Li J, Cheng C, Shan Q. Determining rare-earth elements in aqueous solutions using PGNAA technology. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 2022. [DOI: 10.1007/s10967-021-08175-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/19/2022]
|
2
|
Shielding design in neutron activation experiment system based on D-T neutron tube. NUCLEAR TECHNOLOGY AND RADIATION PROTECTION 2022. [DOI: 10.2298/ntrp2201042c] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/27/2022] Open
Abstract
The deuterium-tritium neutron generator should be fully shielded for the
safety of the operators participating in the experiments since the D-T
neutron generator is commonly used in activation experiments. In this
study, MCNP5 code was used to simulate the shielding effect of the neutron
thermalization device previously designed by our group with Pb and
boron-containing polyethylene as the shielding material. The neutron dose
rate outside of the previous thermalization device can not meet the
requirement, so a concrete wall is needed between the device and the
operators. Two models are designed with concrete walls. One model is that
the device and the experimental operators are not in the same room, another
one is that the device and the experimental operators are in the same room,
and there is an L-shaped concrete wall between them. In both models, the
dose rate to the operators was less than 5 ?Svh-1.
Collapse
|
6
|
Niu C, Jiang M, Li N, Cao J, Hou M, Ni DA, Chu Z. Integrated bioinformatics analysis of As, Au, Cd, Pb and Cu heavy metal responsive marker genes through Arabidopsis thaliana GEO datasets. PeerJ 2019; 7:e6495. [PMID: 30918749 PMCID: PMC6428040 DOI: 10.7717/peerj.6495] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2018] [Accepted: 01/19/2019] [Indexed: 01/11/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Current environmental pollution factors, particularly the distribution and diffusion of heavy metals in soil and water, are a high risk to local environments and humans. Despite striking advances in methods to detect contaminants by a variety of chemical and physical solutions, these methods have inherent limitations such as small dimensions and very low coverage. Therefore, identifying novel contaminant biomarkers are urgently needed. METHODS To better track heavy metal contaminations in soil and water, integrated bioinformatics analysis to identify biomarkers of relevant heavy metal, such as As, Cd, Pb and Cu, is a suitable method for long-term and large-scale surveys of such heavy metal pollutants. Subsequently, the accuracy and stability of the results screened were experimentally validated by quantitative PCR experiment. RESULTS We obtained 168 differentially expressed genes (DEGs) which contained 59 up-regulated genes and 109 down-regulated genes through comparative bioinformatics analyses. Subsequently, the gene ontology (GO) and Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway enrichments of these DEGs were performed, respectively. GO analyses found that these DEGs were mainly related to responses to chemicals, responses to stimulus, responses to stress, responses to abiotic stimulus, and so on. KEGG pathway analyses of DEGs were mainly involved in the protein degradation process and other biologic process, such as the phenylpropanoid biosynthesis pathways and nitrogen metabolism. Moreover, we also speculated that nine candidate core biomarker genes (namely, NILR1, PGPS1, WRKY33, BCS1, AR781, CYP81D8, NR1, EAP1 and MYB15) might be tightly correlated with the response or transport of heavy metals. Finally, experimental results displayed that these genes had the same expression trend response to different stresses as mentioned above (Cd, Pb and Cu) and no mentioned above (Zn and Cr). CONCLUSION In general, the identified biomarker genes could help us understand the potential molecular mechanisms or signaling pathways responsive to heavy metal stress in plants, and could be applied as marker genes to track heavy metal pollution in soil and water through detecting their expression in plants growing in those environments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chao Niu
- School of Ecological Technology and Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics and Resources, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Chenshan Plant Science Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Min Jiang
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics and Resources, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Chenshan Plant Science Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Na Li
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics and Resources, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Chenshan Plant Science Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Jianguo Cao
- College of Life Sciences, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Meifang Hou
- School of Ecological Technology and Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Di-an Ni
- School of Ecological Technology and Engineering, Shanghai Institute of Technology, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| | - Zhaoqing Chu
- Shanghai Key Laboratory of Plant Functional Genomics and Resources, Shanghai Chenshan Botanical Garden, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
- Shanghai Chenshan Plant Science Research Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, Shanghai, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Cheng C, Jia W, Hei D, Li J, Cai P, Zhao D, Wei Z. Efficiency calibration of HPGe detector in a PGNAA system for the measurement of aqueous samples. Appl Radiat Isot 2018; 145:1-6. [PMID: 30557771 DOI: 10.1016/j.apradiso.2018.12.008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/08/2018] [Revised: 11/16/2018] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
In this work, a method was proposed for efficiency calibration of HPGe detector employed in a prompt gamma-ray neutron activation analysis (PGNAA) system for large aqueous sample analysis. Experimental measurements of a reference surface gamma-ray source were combined with efficiency transfer method to obtain efficiency of a volumetric source. Then efficiency curve over the energy range 0.5-8.5 MeV were determined with prompt gamma-rays of chlorine. To evaluate the performance of the calibration curve, an internal standard method was used to determine the aqueous sample containing manganese based on the calibration curve. The 7.058 MeV and 7.243 MeV manganese gamma-ray peaks were used to calculate the mass of manganese. The relative deviations of calculated values and actual value were 5.0% and 6.5%, respectively.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Can Cheng
- College of Astronautics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215000, China
| | - Wenbao Jia
- College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215000, China
| | - Daqian Hei
- College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215000, China.
| | - Jiatong Li
- College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215000, China
| | - Pingkun Cai
- College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China; Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, Suzhou 215000, China
| | - Dong Zhao
- College of Materials Science and Engineering, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China
| | - Zhiyong Wei
- College of Astronautics, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing 211106, China
| |
Collapse
|