[Prevalence of multiple medication and cardiovascular risk in patients over 65 years]

Primary care pharmacist-led medication review in older adult patients in coordination with general practitioners: an observational retrospective cohorts study

Background

Polypharmacy and risk of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP) in older adult are being continuously increased. Including a primary care pharmacist (PCP) in the healthcare team is associated with lower rates of medication-related problems (MRPs).

Objectives

To determine the impact (in terms of variation of PIP, MRPs and polymedication) of treatment reviews (TR) carried out by the PCP by comparing two cohorts: standard TR vs coordinated TR with prescribing General Practitioners (GP). To assess possible health outcomes in both groups 6 months post-TR.

Methods

This is an observational study of two retrospective cohorts (2018 to 2020). All patients who met the inclusion/exclusion criteria were analyzed. Patients ≥65 years, who underwent complete TR by the PCP were included. Patients in a situation of exitus at the time of TR and those who underwent a partial TR were excluded. Control group cohort consisted of patients who underwent standard TR, and intervention group cohort consisted of those who underwent TR coordinated with GP. Sociodemographic, clinical and pharmacological variables were analyzed.

Results

181 patients were enrolled. Mean age 84.4 ± 7.2 years, 78.5% women. Variables (GP-coordinated vs standard TRs) pre-post: decrease in drugs/patient 1.9 (95%CI: 1.4-2.4) vs 0.6 (95%CI: 0.2-1.3), p < 0.05; decrease in MRPs/patient 3.1 (95%CI: 2.8-3.4) vs 1.0 (95%CI: 0.6-1.4), p < 0.05; decrease in PIP/patient 2.0 (95% CI: 1.6-2.2) vs 0.6 (95% CI: 0.2-0.9), p < 0.05. Health outcomes: there was significant difference in average primary-care visits/patient 1.3 ± 0.5 vs 2.2 ± 1.8, p < 0.05.

Conclusions

Multidisciplinary interventions between PCP and GP, together with a systematic approach to TR can improve the quality of pharmacotherapy in the elderly. Prospective large follow-up studies are needed to demonstrate a positive trend in health outcomes.

[Validation into Spanish of the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire to assess patients' attitudes towards deprescribing. Research protocol]

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVE

Polypharmacy has become a priority public health problem in developed countries. In response to its approach, deprescription stands out. Its success will depend largely on the attitudes and beliefs of patients towards the number of drugs they are taking and their willingness to initiate a process of deprescription. To explore these factors, researchers have developed the revised Patients' Attitudes Towards Deprescribing (rPATD) questionnaire, originally in English. The objective of this study is the validation into Spanish of rPATD questionnaire, both older adults and caregivers versions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A first qualitative validation phase and a second phase of analysis of its psychometric characteristics will be carried out through an observational descriptive study of validation of a measurement instrument. One hundred and twenty subjects (polymedicated older adults and caregivers) from three health centers will be selected by consecutive sampling. The questionnaire will be provided and clinical and sociodemographic data will be collected. Feasibility, reliability (through internal consistency and intraobserver reliability) and validity (apparent, construct and criterion) of the questionnaire will be evaluated.

EXPECTED RESULTS

It is expected to obtain a questionnaire that will serve as a tool for the clinician to identify patients with a favorable predisposition to deprescription and that will allow to contribute the patient's perspective to this process.

CONCLUSION

The use of the rPATD questionnaire, alone or integrated into other more complex interventions, may lead to an improvement in the quality of care for the polymedicated patients.

New Simplified Diagnostic Decision Trees for the Detention of Metabolic Syndrome in the Elderly

BACKGROUND

A new simplified method for the detention of metabolic syndrome (MetS) is proposed using two variables (anthropometric and minimally invasive).

METHODS

A study of MetS prevalence was made on a sample of 361 older people. The anthropometric variables analyzed were: blood pressure, body mass index, waist circumference (WC), waist-height ratio, body fat percentage, and waist-hip ratio. A crude and adjusted binary logistic regression was performed, and receiver operating characteristic curves were obtained for determining the predictive capacity of those variables. For the new detection method, decision trees were employed using automatic detection by interaction through Chi-square.

RESULTS

The prevalence of the MetS was of 43.7%. The final decision trees uses WC and basal glucose (BG), whose cutoff values were: for men, WC ≥ 102.5 cm and BG > 98 mg/dL (sensitivity = 67.1%, specificity = 90.3%, positive predictive value = 85%, validity index = 79.9%); and for women, WC ≥ 92.5 cm and BG ≥ 97 mg/dL (sensitivity = 65.9%, specificity = 92.7%, positive predictive value = 87.1%, validity index = 81.3%). In older women the best predictive value of MetS was a WC of 92.5 cm.

CONCLUSIONS

It is possible to make a simplified diagnosis of MetS in older people using the WC and basal capillary glucose, with a high diagnostic accuracy and whose use could be recommended in the resource-poor health areas. A new cutting point in older women for the WC should be valued.

Use of an Electronic Clinical Decision Support System in Primary Care to Assess Inappropriate Polypharmacy in Young Seniors With Multimorbidity: Observational, Descriptive, Cross-sectional Study

BACKGROUND

Multimorbidity is a global health problem that is usually associated with polypharmacy, which increases the risk of potentially inappropriate prescribing (PIP). PIP entails higher hospitalization rates and mortality and increased usage of services provided by the health system. Tools exist to improve prescription practices and decrease PIP, including screening tools and explicit criteria that can be applied in an automated manner.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the prevalence of PIP in primary care consultations among patients aged 65-75 years with multimorbidity and polypharmacy, detected by an electronic clinical decision support system (ECDSS) following the 2015 American Geriatrics Society Beers Criteria, the European Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescription (STOPP), and the Screening Tool to Alert doctors to Right Treatment (START).

METHODS

This was an observational, descriptive, cross-sectional study. The sample included 593 community-dwelling adults aged 65-75 years (henceforth called young seniors), with multimorbidity (≥3 diseases) and polypharmacy (≥5 medications), who had visited their primary care doctor at least once over the last year at 1 of the 38 health care centers participating in the Multimorbidity and Polypharmacy in Primary Care (Multi-PAP) trial. Sociodemographic data, clinical and pharmacological treatment variables, and PIP, as detected by 1 ECDSS, were recorded. A multivariate logistic regression model with robust estimators was built to assess the factors affecting PIP according to the STOPP criteria.

RESULTS

PIP was detected in 57.0% (338/593; 95% CI 53-61) and 72.8% (432/593; 95% CI 69.3-76.4) of the patients according to the STOPP criteria and the Beers Criteria, respectively, whereas 42.8% (254/593; 95% CI 38.9-46.8) of the patients partially met the START criteria. The most frequently detected PIPs were benzodiazepines (BZD) intake for more than 4 weeks (217/593, 36.6%) using the STOPP version 2 and the prolonged use of proton pump inhibitors (269/593, 45.4%) using the 2015 Beers Criteria. Being a woman (odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% CI 1.01-2.01; P=.04), taking a greater number of medicines (OR 1.25, 95% CI 1.14-1.37; P<.001), working in the primary sector (OR 1.91, 95% CI 1.25-2.93; P=.003), and being prescribed drugs for the central nervous system (OR 3.75, 95% CI 2.45-5.76; P<.001) were related to a higher frequency of PIP.

CONCLUSIONS

There is a high prevalence of PIP in primary care as detected by an ECDSS in community-dwelling young seniors with comorbidity and polypharmacy. The specific PIP criteria defined by this study are consistent with the current literature. This ECDSS can be useful for supervising prescriptions in primary health care consultations.

[Prevalence and factors associated with polypharmacy among the elderly treated in Primary Healthcare in Belo Horizonte, State of Minas Gerais, Brazil]

The scope of this article is to analyze the prevalence of polymedication and excessive polypharmacy, as well as associated factors, among the elderly attended at two Basic Health Units in Belo Horizonte, State of Minas Gerais. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted using information obtained from a structured interview of the patient. The individual associations of each explanatory variable with polypharmacy and with excessive polypharmacy were analyzed. For the variables that showed a significant association with polypharmacy, multivariate analysis was performed using the logistic regression model. The elderly used, on average, 5.2 drugs. The prevalence of polymedication was 57.7% and excessive polypharmacy was 4.8%. In univariate analysis the conditions associated with polypharmacy were: age ≤ 70 years, schooling > 8 years, presence of more than three diseases and presenting symptoms of depression. For excessive polypharmacy, the presence of more than three diseases, self-perception of negative health, and partial dependence on instrumental activities of daily living were associated with the conditions. In the final multivariate model for polypharmacy, the age ≤ 70 years and presence of more than three disease variables remained.

Impact of an intervention program to improve potentially inappropriate prescription in hospitalized elderly patients

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

Potentially inappropriate prescription (PIP) is common in elderly people. It has become a global public health problem due to its association with adverse drug effects (ADE), increased morbidity and mortality, emergency care visits and resource use. The main aim of this study was to determine whether the use of a notification program of PIP in elderly patients admitted in the hospital led to a reduction of their prescription.

METHOD

A quasi-experimental before-after study was conducted. PIP were identified by using Beers (2012 update) and STOPP-START criteria (2008 version). An individualized report on PPI was prepared and the effect of this intervention was evaluated.

RESULTS

174 patients were included who presented 284 PIP. 54% (153) of the recommendations were accepted. Barthel index was the only variable that proved to contribute to the presence of PIP modifications. The patients whose PIP drugs were modified were significantly more dependent (p=0.005), presented cognitive impairment (p=0.001) and were more institutionalized (p=0.039) than those without any modifications. There were fewer readmissions, emergency care visits and mortality within six months after intervention comparing patients with and without PIP modifications, but without significant differences. 32 ADE were detected, 29 related with PIP drugs. Adverse events were significantly associated with PIP drugs, versus other medications (p<0.001), odds ratio 242.5 (CI95%: 56.9-1023.6).

CONCLUSIONS

Review of medication in elderly patients, along with the use of tools that help in the identification of dangerous drugs, entail a reduction of inadequate prescription and significantly contribute to the continuous improvement of chronic medication in elders.

Application of the STOPP criteria in hospitalised elderly patients to detect and optimise inappropriate psychopharmaceutical prescriptions

BACKGROUND

Psychotropic drugs are frequently used in the elderly population, but their inappropriate prescription can cause numerous adverse effects and interactions.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the impact of a multidisciplinary intervention to detect and optimise inappropriate prescriptions of psychotropic drugs in patients aged over 75 years in a hospital setting.

DESIGN, SETTING, SUBJECTS AND METHODS

A prospective study which included every patient aged over 75 years admitted to the Consorcio Hospital General in Valencia, Spain, and who had been prescribed psychotropic drugs inappropriately, carried out over 1 year. The intervention was to detect inappropriate prescriptions of psychotropic drugs using the STOPP criteria, treatment optimisation by a team of psychiatrists, readjustment of the electronic prescription register, and communication to the primary care physician. The impact of the intervention was assessed by measuring the persistence of the changes made 3 months after discharge and by quarterly assessment of inappropriate prescriptions.

RESULTS

Of 4571 admissions, 378 inappropriate prescriptions were detected in 346 patients. The drugs most frequently used were long half-life benzodiazepines (70%), which were substituted in 62% of the cases, withdrawn in 32%, and maintained in 6%. At 3 months follow-up, the changes had been maintained by the patients' primary care physician in 67%. Evaluation of the prescriptions during the subsequent quarters of the year showed a significant decrease in the inappropriate prescriptions, especially benzodiazepines.

CONCLUSIONS

Coordinated intervention by pharmacologists and psychiatrists in hospital settings, and communication between these professionals and primary care teams, can reduce psychotropic drugs inappropriately prescribed to the elderly.

Inappropriate Use of Medication by Elderly, Polymedicated, or Multipathological Patients with Chronic Diseases

The growth of the aging population leads to the increase of chronic diseases, of the burden of multimorbility, and of the complexity polypharmacy. The prevalence of medication errors rises in patients with polypharmacy in primary care, and this is a major concern to healthcare systems. This study reviews the published literature on the inappropriate use of medicines in order to articulate recommendations on how to reduce it in chronic patients, particularly in those who are elderly, polymedicated, or multipathological. A systematic review of articles published from January 2000 to October 2015 was performed using MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsychInfo, Scopus, The Cochrane Library, and Index Medicus databases. We selected 80 studies in order to analyse the content that addressed the question under consideration. Our literature review found that half of patients know what their prescribed treatment is; that most of elderly people take five or more medications a day; that in elderly, polymedicated people, the probability of a medication error occurring is higher; that new tools have been recently developed to reduce errors; that elderly patients can understand written information but the presentation and format is an important factor; and that a high percentage of patients have remaining doubts after their visit. Thus, strategies based on the evidence should be applied in order to reduce medication errors.

Programmed home visits by nursing professionals to older adults: prevention or treatment?

OBJETIVOS:

conocer la repercusión de la visita domiciliaria de los profesionales en enfermería a personas de 65 años o más, pluripatológicas, en morbimortalidad.

MÉTODO:

estudio retrospectivo caso-control por auditoria de historias clínicas. Muestreo aleatorio. Variables principales morbilidad, mortalidad; descriptivas: visitas de la enfermera, filiación, datos clínicos y socio sanitarios. Análisis por medidas de tendencia central, dispersión, posición, tabulación, frecuencias relativas, absolutas; no paramétricas, contrastes χ2; Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney.

RESULTADOS:

se estudiaron a 1743 pacientes, de ellos 199 recibieron visita domiciliaria; la edad media de quien recibe visita es de 81,99 años; estos presentan mayor número de patologías de media 3,76; habitan en domicilio particular, si bien en conjunto presentan más institucionalización que los controles; el 50% no tiene identificado el Cuidador Principal; es mayor el número de visitas de las enfermeras a los pacientes que viven en residencias (p < 0,001). El 50% de casos no tiene plan de cuidados, con relación significativa (p < 0,001). No existen diferencias significativas en tiempo de vida entre los casos y los controles.

CONCLUSIÓN:

la visita domiciliaria del profesional en enfermería no repercute en la morbimortalidad; visita a los pacientes cuando ya ha aparecido el problema de salud, no hay datos de prevención.

[Interventions to optimize pharmacologic treatment in hospitalized older adults: a systematic review]

OBJECTIVE

To summarise the evidence on interventions aimed at optimising the drug treatment of hospitalised elderly patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We conducted a search in the main medical literature databases, selecting prospective studies of hospitalised patients older than 65 years who underwent interventions aimed at optimising drug treatment, decreasing polypharmacy and improving the medication appropriateness, health outcomes and exploitation of the healthcare system.

RESULTS

We selected 18 studies whose interventions consisted of medication reviews, detection of predefined drugs as potentially inappropriate for the elderly, counselling from a specialised geriatric team, the use of a computer support system for prescriptions and specific training for the nursing team. Up to 14 studies assessed the medication appropriateness, 13 of which showed an improvement in one or more of the parameters. Seven studies measured the impact of the intervention on polypharmacy, but only one improved the outcomes compared with the control. Seven other studies analysed mortality, but none of them showed a reduction in that rate. Only 1 of 6 studies showed a reduction in the number of hospital readmissions, and 1 of 4 studies showed a reduction in the number of emergency department visits.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the heterogeneity of the analysed interventions and variables, we obtained better results in the process variables (especially in medication appropriateness) than in those that measured health outcomes, which had greater variability.

Osteonecrose mandibular relacionada com bifosfonatos orais em paciente idosa polimedicada

A polifarmácia define-se como o consumo de cinco ou mais fármacos simultâneos durante um período de tempo determinado e é cada vez mais frequente em pessoas maiores de 65 anos. A osteoporose é a alteração metabólica óssea mais frequente nos países ocidentais e o segundo problema sanitário no mundo, depois das doenças cardiovasculares. Sua maior complicação é a fratura por fragilidade, afetando mais mulheres que homens. A prevenção de fraturas por osteoporose é feita com diversos tipos de remédios e os mais usados são os bifosfonatos. Estes são fármacos com amplo uso em Atenção Primária, principalmente para osteoporose pós-menopáusica. Apesar de serem bem tolerados, não estão isentos de efeitos secundários, sendo um dos mais graves a osteonecrose mandibular, como ocorre no caso exposto neste trabalho. Por este e outros motivos, sempre é importante ponderar risco-benefício de forma individualizada antes de começar qualquer tratamento e, principalmente, quando se trata a de pacientes polimedicados.

[Potentially inappropriate prescription according to the "STOPP" Criteria in heavily polymedicated elderly patients]

INTRODUCTION

Appropriate prescribing is especially relevant in elderly people. The objective of this study is to analyse the potentially inappropriate prescription (PIP) in heavily polymedicated elderly patients according to the criteria Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in Primary Care on patients assigned to the Siero-Sariego (Asturias) Health Centre, who were over 64 years old and heavily polymedicated (consumption >10 drugs for six months). The 65 Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions criteria were reviewed in the electronic Primary Care patient records, collecting sociodemographic variables, prescribed medications, and chronic diseases. Frequency distributions were made for each criterion, and causes related to PIP were explored using contingency tables, the Spearman correlation coefficient, and logistic regression.

RESULTS

A total of 349 polymedicated elderly patients were analysed with a prevalence of 6.4 (95% CI:5.76-7.08), a mean age of 79.2 years (SD:3.7), 62.2% were female, 14% institutionalised, a Charlson index of 2.9. The mean of number of drugs was 11.5 (SD:1.7), and the most frequent pathologies were high blood pressure (64%), diabetes (46%), and osteoarticular diseases (41%). There was at least one PIP in 72.9% of heavily polymedicated elderly patients [(Mean: 1.32 (SD:1.2)]. The Screening Tool of Older Person's Prescriptions criteria least complied with were: therapeutic duplication (25.2%), use of long-acting benzodiazepines (15.8%), and inappropriate use of aspirin (10.9%). An association was found between having any inappropriate prescription and the number of medications prescribed (OR=1.22 [95% CI:1.04-1.43]) and inversely to the Charlson index (OR=0.76 [95% CI:0.65-0.89]).

CONCLUSIONS

PIP is common in heavily polymedicated elderly patients. Special attention must be paid to the use of psychotropic drugs, which are implicated in a high volume of PIP.

[A review of the medication in polymedicated elderly with vascular risk: a randomised controlled trial]

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the effectiveness of a medication review based on intervention directed at improving the appropriateness of drug treatments according to the established guidelines, as well as blood pressure, serum lipid and blood glucose control in elderly patients on multiple medication, and cardiovascular disease or high risk of cardiovascular disease.

DESIGN

A randomised controlled trial with blind evaluation.

SETTING

Fourteen Primary Health Care centres in Andalusia

PARTICIPANTS

A total of 323 patients older than 65 on polypharmacy and cardiovascular disease or high risk of cardiovascular disease.

INTERVENTION

A pharmacist interviewed the patient, reviewed the appropriateness of the drug treatment, taking in account health record data, proposed modifications and communicated them to the general practitioner or nurse. The control group received usual health care.

MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Percentage of patients with appropriate use of low doses of acetylsalicylic acid, blood pressure, LDL-cholesterol, HbA(1c), and quality of life scores.

RESULTS

A total of 41% of patients (average age 74, 61% women) had cardiovascular disease. Ten months after the intervention (18.3% withdrawals), more patients in the intervention group used low dose acetylsalicylic acid than in the control group (52.3% vs 38.6%; P=.024). There were no differences between groups in intermediate clinic outcomes. Quality of life scores improve in intervention group by 6.1 points (100 points scale), but was not statistically significant (P=.051).

CONCLUSION

Clinical medication review improves the appropriateness of antiplatelet treatment in the elderly on polypharmacy and with high risk of cardiovascular disease. No improvement in biochemistry measurements was found.