Education in asthma

Effectiveness of a Family-Caregiver Training Program in Home-Based Pediatric Palliative Care

Background: Pediatric palliative cares involve the whole family, along with the interdisciplinary pediatric palliative care (PPC) team. The commitment of the PPC team and the engagement of the family at different levels can play a key role in advancing a better quality of life in children and families. Method: A descriptive pre-post educational intervention study was carried out. The creation of a training program (with the term “school” used to denote this effort) strives to prepare caretakers to master the skills as well as provide support for the care of children with serious conditions requiring palliative through home-based initiatives. The analysis includes aspects of learning and satisfaction with the activity in a final sample of 14 families who had one child enrolled into a home-based palliative care program. Results: After the educational intervention in our school, the mean score of the theoretical evaluation was 9.14 points (SD 0.96), showing improvement with respect to the initial assessment, (mean diff. of +0.98 points). Although the analysis of all conceptual areas demonstrates a trend towards a positive impact of the intervention, feeding-related instruction saw the highest level of improvement, with a mean difference of +1.43 points. All enrolled parents expressed having a very positive experience during their participation in the educational program. Conclusions: The educational program showed a positive trend in the acquisition of knowledge and skills, resulting in a positive impact on the self-perception of their abilities. This psycho-educational space allowed them to share their experience of daily care for a child with complex needs with other families, showing them that they were not alone and that they could help each other.

[Asthma 2020 Nursing Consensus Document]

Asthma is a chronic respiratory disease which presents with a risk of exacerbations. Good patient management and continuous monitoring are crucial for good disease control, and pharmacological and non-pharmacological interventions are essential for proper treatment. Nurses specialised in asthma can contribute to the correct management of asthmatic patients. They play a key role in diagnostic tests, administration of medication, and patient follow-up and education. This consensus arose from the need to address an aspect of asthma management that does not appear in the specific recommendations of current guidelines. This document highlights and updates the role of specialized nurses in the care and management of asthma patients, offering conclusions and practical recommendations with the aim of improving their contribution to the treatment of this disease. Proposed recommendations appear as the result of a nominal consensus which was developed during 2019, and validated at the beginning of 2020.

Prevalence and impact of risk factors for poor asthma outcomes in a large, specialist-managed patient cohort: a real-life study

Background

Risk factors for poor asthma outcomes may have considerable influence on the control level and medical care of asthmatic patients. Our objective was to conduct a study that provides data on the level of symptom control and the frequency of specific risk factors for poor asthma outcomes on a large patient cohort.

Methods

A cross-sectional, non-interventional real-life study was conducted among asthmatic patients treated by respiratory specialists in Hungary. Asthma control and risk factor assessment were done according to Global Initiative for Asthma guideline (Box 2–2). In the data analysis, phase descriptive statistics, graphical outputs, and Fisher’s exact tests were used.

Results

Of 12743 patients enrolled by 187 specialists, asthma was well controlled in 36.0%, partially controlled in 29.29%, and uncontrolled in 34.71% of the cases. The most common comorbidities were rhinitis/sinusitis (66.84%), cardiovascular diseases (43.81%), and gastroesophageal reflux disease (20.11%). The following risk factors had the strongest relationship with uncontrolled disease: incorrect inhaler technique causing side effects (odds ratio, OR 4.86, 3.51–6.8), previous severe exacerbation (OR 4.79, 4.02–5.72), high short-acting beta agonist (SABA) use (OR 4.46, 4.03–4.93), incorrect inhaler technique associated with an exacerbation (OR 3.91, 3.06–5.03), and persistently low forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV₁, OR 3.14, 2.8–3.52). The most frequent risk factors were smoking (OR 1.47, 1.36–1.59) and obesity (OR 1.34, 1.24–1.45). Furthermore, high loss of control was associated with an initial low FEV₁ (OR 2.21, 2.01–2.44), frequent oral corticosteroid (OCS) use (OR 1.83, 1.64–2.05), poor adherence to treatment (OR 2.51, 2.21–2.86), and allergen exposure (OR 1.63, 1.47–1.81).

Conclusions

This study indicated that the presence of risk factors for poor asthma outcomes listed by the Global Initiative for Asthma document significantly influenced actual control level in a real-world large patient cohort, with high SABA use, previous severe exacerbation, incorrect inhaler technique, persistently low FEV₁, and poor adherence to treatment having the highest impact.

[Healthcare resources for asthma management at primary care level: Asthmabarometer Project]

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to describe the current provision of basic resources for asthma management in Primary Health Care (PHC).

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study, with an ad hoc quantitative survey.

LOCATION AND PARTICIPANTS

A total of 380 primary healthcare physicians in Spain.

INTERVENTIONS AND MAIN MEASUREMENTS

Analysis of perceptions of management and use of basic human, organisational and material resources to ensure appropriate care provision to asthma patients.

RESULTS

Survey respondents stated that their centre did not have a consultant doctor (64%) or nurse (62%) in respiratory disease. Almost all (92%) of the centres have spirometers, of which 70% have peak flow meters, and 93% have placebo inhalers. In the last year, respondents have received specific theoretical/practical training from the centre (46%), and by third parties (83%). More than three-quarters (78%) of the centres has educational material available for patients. There is no specific healthcare protocol in 36% of the centres, and 43% had no referral protocol. A clinical interview is conducted to monitor the patient (90%), but there are no validated questionnaires to measure therapeutic adherence (85%), or a checklist to check inhalation technique (83%). Differences are observed in the relevant variables in the analysis of each Spanish Autonomous Community.

CONCLUSIONS

Access to certain resources in the care of patients with asthma is limited in aspects of coordination between levels, varied according to Spanish Autonomous Community, and improved in most health resources in Asthma.