Effect of Nasal Continuous Positive Pressure on the Nostrils of Patients with Sleep Apnea Syndrome and no Previous Nasal Pathology. Predictive Factors for Compliance

Association of Allergic Rhinitis With Change in Nasal Congestion in New Continuous Positive Airway Pressure Users

Importance

Nasal congestion occurring after continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) treatment initiation impairs CPAP adherence. Allergic rhinitis is associated with worsening nasal congestion in patients who are exposed to nonallergic triggers. Use of CPAP presents potential nonallergic triggers (eg, humidity, temperature, pressure, and airflow).

Objective

To compare nasal congestion among CPAP users with allergic rhinitis, nonallergic rhinitis, and no rhinitis. We hypothesize that CPAP patients with baseline allergic rhinitis are more likely to experience a worsening of nasal congestion (or less improvement in nasal congestion) compared with patients with no baseline rhinitis.

Design, Setting, and Participants

This prospective cohort study included consecutive patients newly diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea in a tertiary sleep center who were using CPAP therapy 3 months after diagnosis. Baseline rhinitis status was assigned as allergic rhinitis, nonallergic rhinitis, or no rhinitis, based on questionnaire responses and past allergy testing. Data were collected from 2004 to 2008 and analyzed from July 2019 to February 2020.

Main Outcomes and Measures

At baseline before CPAP exposure and again 3 months later, subjective nasal congestion was measured with the Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) scale and a visual analog scale (VAS), each scored from 0 to 100 (100 = worst congestion). Changes in nasal congestion were tested over 3 months for the whole cohort, within each rhinitis subgroup (paired t test), and between rhinitis subgroups (multivariate linear regression).

Results

The study cohort comprised 102 participants, of whom 61 (60%) were male and the mean (SD) age was 50 (13). The study included 23 (22.5%) participants with allergic rhinitis, 67 (65.7%) with nonallergic rhinitis, and 12 (11.8%) with no rhinitis. Nasal congestion improved from baseline to 3 months in the whole cohort (mean [SD] NOSE score, 38 [26] to 27 [23], mean [SD] change, -10 [23]; 95% CI, -15 to -6; mean [SD] VAS score, 41 [27] to 32 [28]; mean [SD] change, -10 [26]; 95% CI, [-15 to -4]) and in each rhinitis subgroup. Adjusted improvement in nasal congestion at 3 months was significantly less in the allergic rhinitis subgroup compared with the no rhinitis subgroup (positive difference means less improvement) compared with baseline: NOSE score 14 (95% CI, 1 to 28) and VAS score 15 (95% CI, 0 to 30).

Conclusions and Relevance

Initiation of CPAP was associated with improved subjective nasal congestion, but less improvement in patients with baseline allergic rhinitis. Baseline allergic rhinitis may predict which patients are more vulnerable to potential congestive effects of CPAP.

Excessive Daytime Sleepiness in Depression and Obstructive Sleep Apnea: More Than Just an Overlapping Symptom

Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) is a significant public health concern, with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) being a common cause, and a particular relationship exists with the severity of depression. A literature search on OSA, depression, and EDS was performed in PubMed. The chosen evidence was limited to human studies. Available evidence was systematically reviewed to ascertain the association of EDS with depression and OSA according to the general population and some specific population subgroups. In addition, effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) was analyzed as a standard therapy for improving EDS and depression in patients with OSA. In the general population, patients with OSA, and some other subpopulations, the review contributed to: (1) delineating the prevalence of EDS; (2) substantiating the relationship of EDS and depression; (3) presenting the relationship between EDS and OSA; and (4) revealing that the duration of CPAP is crucial for its therapeutic effects in improving EDS and depressive symptoms in patients with OSA.

Role of rhinomanometry in the prediction of therapeutic positive airway pressure for obstructive sleep apnea

Background

This study was conducted to evaluate the relationship between nasal resistance in different posture and optimal positive airway pressure (PAP) level. Other potential factors were also assessed for possible influence on PAP pressure.

Methods

Forty- three patients diagnosed with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) were prospectively recruited in this study. Nasal resistance was assessed by active anterior rhinomanometry in a seated position and then in a supine position at pressures of 75, 150, and 300 pascal. The factors correlating with PAP pressure were analyzed, including nasal resistance and patients’ clinical data.

Results

Univariate analysis revealed that PAP pressure was correlated to nasal resistance in the supine position at 75 and 150 pascal (SupineNR75 and SupineNR150) (P = 0.019 and P = 0.004 in Spearman’s correlation coefficient analysis), but not correlated to nasal resistance in the seated position at different pressures or in the supine position at 300 pascal. The multiple linear regression analysis revealed that both SupineNR150 and body mass index (BMI) significantly predicted PAP pressure (β = 0.308, p = 0.044; β = 0.727, p = 0.006). The final PAP pressure predictive model was:

PAP pressure = 0.29 BMI + 2.65 SupineNR150 + 2.11.

Conclusions

Nasal resistance in the supine position measured at 150 pascal may provide valuable information regarding optimal PAP pressure. Rhinomanometry should be included in the treatment algorithm of OSA patients when PAP therapy is considered.

Clinical side effects of continuous positive airway pressure in patients with obstructive sleep apnoea

CPAP is considered the gold standard treatment in OSA and is highly efficacious in controlling OSA symptoms. However, treatment effectiveness is limited because of many factors including low adherence due to side effects. This review highlights the range of side effects associated with CPAP therapy in patients with OSA. This information is important for the initiation of patients onto CPAP as well as their continued care while on treatment, given the increase in non-medically supervised CPAP care models in use globally.

Oxidative stress and inflammatory profiles in obstructive sleep apnea: are short-term CPAP or aerobic exercise therapies effective?

PURPOSE

The effects of medium to long-term continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) or physical activity in decreasing oxidative stress, inflammatory, and cell-free DNA markers in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) have been explored. Here we evaluate oxidative stress markers (TBARS, AOPP, SOD), proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8), anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-4, IL-10), and cell-free DNA levels before and after 8-week CPAP treatment or moderate-intensity aerobic training in moderate to severe OSA.

METHODS

Thirty-nine patients diagnosed with OSA were randomly divided into CPAP (N = 18), with or without humidifier, and exercise groups (N = 21). Excessive daytime sleepiness and sleep quality were assessed by the Epworth Sleepiness Scale and the Pittsburgh questionnaire, respectively. Biomarkers for lipid and protein oxidation, pro and anti-inflammatory cytokines, and cell-free DNA were quantified in blood samples, before and after 8 weeks of both treatments.

RESULTS

After 8 weeks of either CPAP or exercise, no significant differences were observed in the levels of cell-free DNA, oxidative stress, and inflammation markers, except for an increase in AOPP and IL-17A levels in individuals who went through CPAP, which were higher when the CPAP device was used without the humidifier. We have also observed that CPAP significantly decreased the Pittsburgh scores and improved sleep efficiency and hours of sleep, while ESS scores remained unaffected.

CONCLUSIONS

Short-term treatment for OSA, be it CPAP therapy or moderate-intensity aerobic exercise, was not sufficient to alter either the oxidative stress and inflammatory profiles or the cell-free DNA levels of moderate to severe OSA patients. Short-term CPAP did, however, improve self-reported sleep quality.

Effectiveness of intranasal sodium hyaluronate in mitigating adverse effects of nasal continuous positive airway pressure therapy

BACKGROUND

Nasal continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) in moderate-to-severe cases of obstructive sleep apnea can cause nasal discomfort and other undesirable problems.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of our study was to test the effects of sodium hyaluronate on nasal problems that patients experienced in their daily lives, sleepiness, nasal resistance to airflow, nasal mucociliary clearance, changes in inflammatory markers, and compliance to CPAP in three groups of patients with obstructive sleep apnea syndrome on CPAP therapy.

METHODS

A total of 102 patients with a confirmed diagnosis of obstructive sleep apnea syndrome (apnea-hypopnea index [AHI] of ≥10/hour) were randomized into three treatment groups: (1) hyaluronate plus CPAP, (2) saline solution plus CPAP, and (3) CPAP-only groups. Outcome measures were the extent of improvement in the Mini Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire (MiniRQLQ) mean scores, sleepiness, nasal resistance to airflow, nasal mucociliary clearance, changes in inflammatory markers, and compliance to CPAP. Significant improvement in each outcome measure was determined by comparing scores at baseline and after 4 weeks for each treatment group.

RESULTS

Significant improvement in the MiniRQLQ overall mean score was observed both in the hyaluronate plus CPAP (p < 0.00001) and saline solution plus CPAP groups (p < 0.01), although the hyaluronate plus CPAP group had better improvement compared with the saline solution plus CPAP group (0.24 versus 0.12, respectively). An increase in nasal inflammatory markers and saccharin transit test score was observed in all three groups, although it was statistically lower in the hyaluronate plus CPAP group (all p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Intranasal hyaluronate showed significant benefits in patients who received CPAP therapy, but future studies over a longer period of time after treatment should be performed to corroborate our findings.

Early effects of continuous positive airway pressure in a rodent model of allergic rhinitis

BACKGROUND

Continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is the most commonly used treatment in obstructive sleep apnea. In a previous rat model study, we demonstrated that nasal CPAP induces early rhinitis expressed by nasal neutrophil extravasation. Here we hypothesized that nasal CPAP would worsen nasal inflammation on a previously inflamed mucosa. The objective of this study was to evaluate the early nasal CPAP effects of allergic rhinitis (AR) in a rodent model.

METHODS

Twenty Sprague-Dawley rats were sensitized with intraperitoneal ovalbumin (OVA). Nasal inflammation was induced by the administration of intranasal OVA during consecutive days. The same procedure was performed in 20 control rats treated with saline solution. The allergic (AR) and non-allergic (NAR) rats were then randomized to nasal CPAP at 10 cm H₂O for five hours or to sham CPAP. The degree of nasal inflammation was assessed by evaluating the percentage of neutrophils, eosinophils, basophils, and lymphocytes in the nasal mucosa. An unpaired Mann-Whitney test was used to analyze differences between groups.

RESULTS

The greatest inflammation was observed in the group of AR without CPAP (1.24% ± 0.94%), followed by NAR with CPAP (0.64% ± 0.30%), AR with CPAP (0.64% ± 0.40%), and NAR without CPAP (0.21% ± 0.29%).

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of nasal CPAP or allergy sensitization can produce, individually, neutrophil extravasation on the nasal mucosa of a rat model. The application of both stimuli is not responsible for increased inflammation. Therefore, this study suggests that rhinitis is not a major limitation for CPAP administration.