Short and Long-Term Impact of COVID-19 Infection on Previous Respiratory Diseases

A retrospective study of insurance coverage status and economic cost of rare diseases in Hainan Province

Rare diseases present a significant economic burden on patients, families, and healthcare systems worldwide. As the prevalence of these diseases rises in China, data regarding their impact, specifically in Hainan Province, is scarce. Thus, this study aims to evaluate insurance coverage, economic costs, and the factors contributing to the burden of rare diseases in Hainan. We employed a bottom-up approach to analyse the prevalence and economic burden from 2019 to 2023, utilising data from the Hainan Provincial Health Commission Databases. We assessed insurance coverage as well as expenditures related to hospitalisation, diagnostics, medications, surgery, and out-of-pocket costs. Of 4,975 patients diagnosed with 99 distinct rare diseases, 83.01% were insured. From 2019 to 2023, the number of patients increased from 760 to 1,328, while economic costs surged from 34.26 million CNY (US$ 4.89 million) to 64.74 million CNY (US$ 8.86 million). Thalassemia major, one of the most prevalent conditions, generated the highest costs. Hospitalisation expenses accounted for 49.16% of the total costs, with out-of-pocket expenses averaging 17.52%. The findings reveal a significant economic burden associated with rare diseases in Hainan, highlighting the necessity for targeted policy interventions. Furthermore, additional research is needed to refine estimates of this economic burden.

Pulmonary fibrosis complicated by lung cancer: bibliometric analysis from 2004 to 2024 - research status, trends and future directions

Objective

Although research on the association between pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer is of great significance, to date, no bibliometric analysis has been conducted on the comorbidity of these two diseases. This study aims to explore the current status and cutting - edge trends in this field through bibliometric analysis, and to establish new directions for future research.

Methods

Using the Web of Science Core Collection database, statistical calculations, graphic, and data visualization tools such as CiteSpace, VOSviewer, and Biblimatrix - biblioshiny were adopted.

Results

A total of 2,234 original Articles and Reviews on pulmonary fibrosis complicated by lung cancer published between 2004 and 2024 were identified. A slow growth trend in publications related to pulmonary fibrosis complicated by lung cancer was observed. The United States, Japan, and China were the countries with the greatest contributions. Professor Michael Kreuter from Marienhaus Clinic, Mainz, Germany, and the University of Michigan published the most articles. Through cluster analysis of co - cited literature, five main clusters were identified. Keyword analysis predicted that "nintedanib", "pirfenidone", "immunotherapy", etc. might become hot topics in the field of the comorbidity of pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer.

Conclusion

This bibliometric analysis shows that the literature related to the comorbidity of pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer is on a continuous upward trend. The research hotspots and trends identified in this study provide a reference for in - depth research in this field, aiming to promote the development of research on the comorbidity of pulmonary fibrosis and lung cancer.

Antiviral effectiveness and safety of azvudine in hospitalized SARS‐CoV‐2 patients with pre‐existing chronic respiratory diseases: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study

Although azvudine has become a priority in the treatment of SARS‐CoV‐2, its effectiveness and safety among COVID‐19 patients who already have chronic respiratory diseases (CRDs) have not been sufficiently validated. A retrospective, multicenter cohort study involving 10 hospitals in Henan Province was performed to assess inpatients with COVID‐19 and CRDs (Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT06349655). Azvudine recipients and the control group were matched at a 1:1 ratio using propensity scores. The clinical outcomes (all‐cause death and composite disease progression) were analyzed using Kaplan‒Meier and Cox regression analyses, with additional subgroup and sensitivity analyses performed. Eighteen clinical features were included to construct a nomogram for predicting the survival of inpatients with COVID‐19 and CRDs. Out of 37,606 hospitalized COVID‐19 patients, 1462 azvudine recipients and 1462 matched controls were included in the analysis. The results of Kaplan‒Meier and multivariate Cox regression analyses demonstrated that in contrast to the controls, azvudine use was associated with a decreased risk of all‐cause death in patients with COVID‐19 and pre‐existing CRDs (log‐rank: p = .012; HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.553‒0.956); but was not significantly different in terms of composite disease progression (log‐rank: p = .82; HR: 1.15; 95% CI: 0.948‒1.383). An analysis of subgroups and three sensitivity appraisals validate the above outcomes. The number and type of adverse events associated with azvudine treatment were acceptable. The concordance index (0.8499, 0.8497) and area under the curve (86.1%, 80.4%) of the nomogram showed satisfactory discriminative ability in the training and test sets. Azvudine could be effective in reducing all‐cause death among inpatients with COVID‐19 and CRDs and had few serious adverse events.

Increased circulating levels of SP-D and IL-10 are associated with the development of disease severity and pulmonary fibrosis in patients with COVID-19

Background

Patients with severe COVID-19 can rapidly develop acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), which further increases the risk of developing pulmonary fibrosis. The exact role of macrophage polarization and different cytokine production in the pathophysiology associated with COVID-19 induced ARDS or pulmonary fibrosis is unknown. It is necessary to identify potential biomarkers that can predict the progress of pulmonary fibrosis or other adverse consequences.

Methods

We analyze the plasma samples obtained from healthy individuals and COVID-19 patients who were stratified according to the disease severity and fibrotic-like changes on chest computed tomography (CT) scans. Surfactant Protein D (SP-D), Matrix Metalloproteinase 8 (MMP8), Krebs von den lungen-6 (KL-6), Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2), and macrophage polarization-related biomarkers were determined by ELISA. Data were collected and evaluated using regression models and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

Results

The plasma levels of SP-D, MMP8 in patients with ARDS were higher than those of non-ARDS patients. Patients with pulmonary fibrosis had higher plasma levels of SP-D compared to those without fibrotic changes. Among the biomarkers indicative of macrophage polarization, compared to non-ARDS patients, a significant increase in IL-10, Inducible nitric oxide synthase (iNOS), and Arginase-1 (Arg-1) were observed in ARDS patients, while Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) was decreased. The plasma level of IL-10 was also elevated in patients with fibrotic changes on CT, and was positively correlated with ACE2 and Arg-1. ROC curve results uncovered that SP-D showed higher efficacy in predicting pulmonary fibrosis and ARDS compared to other inflammatory markers. And IL-10 had similar predictive value with traditional inflammatory indicators such as CRP and PCT.

Conclusion

SP-D and IL-10 exhibited certain predictive abilities for the development of ARDS and pulmonary fibrosis in patients with COVID-19. The determination of these cytokines upon admission is crucial for evaluating the prognosis of COVID-19 patients.

Prevalence and risk factors of long COVID-19 persisting for 2 years in Hainan Province: a population-based prospective study

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) can lead to persistent symptoms, sequelae, and other medical complications that may last for weeks or months after recovery. The aim of the study is to assess the prevalence and risk factors of long COVID-19 persisting for 2 years in Hainan Province, China, to aid in its recognition, prevention, and treatment. Between July and August 2022, 960 individuals with confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection in Hainan, China, were recruited. An epidemiological questionnaire was conducted via phone interviews to assess participants' recovery status after 2 years. Among the participants, 120 patients (12.5%) experienced at least one long COVID-19 complication. The most common symptoms were cough (33.3%, 40/120), followed by fatigue (25.9%, 31/120), hair loss (23.3%, 28/120), and dizziness (20.8%, 25/120). Independent risk factors included age over 65, moderate to severe infection, chronic diseases, irregular diet, late sleeping, anxiety, and fewer than 2 vaccinations (p < 0.05). While most individuals infected with COVID-19 fully recover, approximately 12.5% experience intermediate or long-term effects. This study is the first to identify the incidence and associated risk factors of long COVID-19 with the longest follow-up time, providing valuable insights for the timely restoration of pre-COVID-19 health.

Midterm Effects of SARS-CoV-2 on Respiratory Function in Judokas With and Without Exercise-Induced Bronchoconstriction: A Retrospective Study

Objectives:

The clinical consequences of coronavirus infection in elite judokas with exercise-induced bronchoconstriction (EIB) are unclear. We aimed to determine potential respiratory function abnormalities and recovery in athletes with and without EIB after severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection.

Design:

Retrospective cohort study.

Setting:

Türkiye Olympic Preparation Centre.

Participants:

This retrospective study analyzed data collected from 25 consecutive elite judokas diagnosed with and without EIB and SARS-CoV-2 infection, routinely followed at an Olympic Sports Center between September 2020 and 2021.

Independent Variables:

Respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary function data were collected before and up to 90 days after SARS-CoV-2 infection.

Main Outcome Measures:

Measurements included maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), forced vital capacity (FVC), FEV1/FVC ratio, and peak expiratory flow (PEF).

Results:

Infected athletes with EIB had more markedly reduced respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary function than those without EIB. Maximal inspiratory pressure was decreased by 14% and MEP by 8% from baseline in infected athletes with EIB during follow-up. Likewise, FEV1 and FVC decreased by 4%. Maximal inspiratory pressure, MEP, FEV1, and FVC remained abnormal after 90 days of SARS-CoV-2 infection in EIB athletes but normalized rapidly in non-EIB athletes. Peak expiratory flow seemed unaffected during follow-up. Exercise-induced bronchoconstriction severity was moderately correlated with the maximum fall in MEP during follow-up.

Conclusions:

Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 infection notably decreases respiratory muscle strength and pulmonary function in judokas, especially those with pre-existing EIB, thereby prolonging spontaneous recovery time.

Integration of bioprinting advances and biomechanical strategies forin vitrolung modelling

The recent occurrence of the Covid-19 pandemic and frequent wildfires have worsened pulmonary diseases and raised the urgent need for investigating host-pathogen interactions and advancing drug and vaccine therapies. Historically, research and experimental studies have relied on two-dimensional cell culture dishes and/or animal models, which suffer from physiological differences from the human lung. More recently, there has been investigation into the use of lung-on-a-chip models and organoids, while the use of bioprinting technologies has also emerged to fabricate three-dimensional constructs or lung models with enhanced physiological relevance. Concurrently, achievements have also been made to develop biomimetic strategies for simulating thein vivobiomechanical conditions induced by lung breathing, though challenges remain with incorporating these strategies with bioprinted models. Bioprinted models combined with advanced biomimetic strategies would represent a promising approach to advance disease discovery and therapeutic development. As inspired, this article briefly reviews the recent progress of both bioprintedin vitrolung models and biomechanical strategies, with a focus on native lung tissue microstructure and biomechanical properties, bioprinted constructs, and biomimetic strategies to mimic the native environment. This article also urges that the integration of bioprinting advances and biomimetic strategies would be essential to achieve synergistic effects forin vitrolung modelling. Key issues and challenges are also identified and discussed along with recommendations for future research.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Migraine: The Patients' Perspective

The COVID-19 pandemic represents a global health phenomenon that will sadly remain part of our history. It had innumerable consequences for society and people's lives. With different mechanisms, COVID-19 has been pointed out as a factor in the pathophysiology of several secondary disorders or the deterioration of pre-existing conditions. Migraine is a frequent disorder that can be influenced by several conditions, including psychologically stressful conditions or infectious diseases. The purpose of the present study is to gain insight into the influence of COVID-19 on the clinical characteristics of patients with migraine. A self-administrable questionnaire has been developed, asking for migraine features before and after COVID-19 infection. One hundred and two patients who had been infected at least once were included. After COVID-19 infection, 54 reported the worsening of migraine, 45 noticed no variation, and 3 reported an improvement. After the infection, 21 patients changed preventive therapy due to the loss of efficacy of the previous one. The most effective treatments in this subpopulation were gene-related peptide monoclonal antibodies. The presented data confirm that the influence of COVID-19 is heterogeneous in patients with migraine, but new treatments may be effective in controlling the symptoms among those who report a worsening of the disease.

Musculoskeletal, Pulmonary, and Cardiovascular COVID-19 Sequelae in the Context of Firefighter Occupational Health: A Narrative Review

For most individuals infected with SARS-CoV-2, the acute illness resolves completely. However, for millions of people, symptoms or sequelae from COVID-19 recur or persist for months to years after infection. Post-COVID-19 sequelae are wide-ranging, often affecting the musculoskeletal, pulmonary, and cardiovascular systems. All who experience post-COVID-19 sequelae face significant challenges navigating home and work life. Occupations such as firefighting, however, are of particular concern given the strenuous nature of a job that relies on a healthy musculoskeletal, pulmonary, and cardiovascular system. Research has documented significant musculoskeletal impairment (including muscle weakness, pain, and fatigue), respiratory dysfunction (including reduced lung function, interstitial disease, and diffusion abnormalities), cardiovascular conditions (including cardiac events, ischemic disease, dysrhythmias, and infectious diseases), and diminished cardiorespiratory fitness that continues for months to years in some individuals. These persistent post-COVID-19 conditions may affect a firefighter's ability to return to work, function at full capacity while at work, and potentially compromise firefighter health and public safety. This review, therefore, explores musculoskeletal, pulmonary, and cardiovascular sequelae post-COVID-19 and the impact of these sequelae on firefighter health and occupational readiness.

Influence of high-flow nasal cannulae on clinical outcomes in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure: a prognostic risk factor analysis

OBJECTIVE

To explore the clinical effects of high-flow nasal cannulae (HFNC) in elderly patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) and analyze prognostic factors following oxygen therapy.

METHODS

We enrolled 200 ARF patients between January 2022 and June 2023, dividing them into an observation group (n=125) treated with HFNC, and a control group (n=75) receiving conventional oxygen therapy. We compared vital signs before and after treatment and categorized patients into good and poor prognosis groups to analyze demographic data and prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Post-treatment, both groups showed improved vital signs, with the observation group experiencing significantly greater improvements (P<0.05). However, the observation group had a higher incidence of complications compared to controls (P=0.001). Patients with a history of endotracheal intubation or high APACHE II scores were more prevalent in the poor prognosis group (both P<0.05). Logistic regression identified the APACHE II score as a risk factor for poor prognosis, while HFNC emerged as a protective factor.

CONCLUSIONS

HFNC is a safe and effective therapy that improves vital signs and alleviates hypoxia in elderly ARF patients. The APACHE II score and type of oxygen therapy are significant prognostic factors, with HFNC offering a protective effect.

The effect of oral antiviral therapy for COVID-19 in managing non-hospitalized patients with lung cancer

BACKGROUNDS

The effectiveness of oral antiviral therapy including nirmatrelvir plus ritonavir and molnupiravir in managing COVID-19 among individuals with pre-existing lung cancer was unclear. Therefore, this study was conducted to evaluate the usefulness of antiviral agents in the management of COVID-19 among patients with lung cancer.

METHODS

Utilizing data from the TriNetX - a global health research network, a retrospective cohort study was conducted involving 2484 patients diagnosed with both lung cancer and COVID-19. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to create well-balanced cohorts. The study assessed the primary outcome of all-cause hospitalization or mortality within a 30-day follow-up.

RESULTS

After PSM, the oral antiviral group exhibited a significantly lower risk of the primary composite outcome compared to the control group (6.1 % vs. 9.9 %; HR: 0.60; 95 % CI: 0.45-0.80). This association was consistent across various subgroups according to age, sex, vaccine status, type of oral antiviral agent, and lung cancer characteristics. Additionally, the oral antiviral group showed a lower risk of all-cause hospitalization (HR: 0.73; 95 % CI: 0.54-0.99) and a significantly lower risk of mortality (HR: 0.16; 95 % CI: 0.06-0.41).

CONCLUSION

The study suggests a favorable impact of oral antiviral therapy on the outcomes of COVID-19 in individuals with lung cancer and support the potential utility of oral antiviral agents in improving outcomes in this vulnerable population.

[Bronchiectasis not due to cystic fibrosis]

Bronchiectasis is a clinical-radiological condition composed of irreversible bronchial dilation due to inflammation and infection of the airways, which causes respiratory symptoms, usually productive cough and infectious exacerbations. Bronchiectasis can have multiple causes, both pulmonary and extrapulmonary, and its clinical presentation is very heterogenous. Its prevalence is unknown, although up to 35-50% of severe COPD and 25% of severe asthma present them, so their underdiagnosis is evident. Chronic bacterial bronchial infection is common, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa is the pathogen that has been found to imply a worse prognosis. Treatment of bronchiectasis has three fundamental characteristics: it must be multidisciplinary (involvement of several specialties), pyramidal (from primary care to the most specialized units) and multidimensional (management of all aspects that make up the disease).

An analysis of exogenous harmful substance exposure as risk factors for COPD and hypertension co-morbidity using PSM

Background

Some occupational and environmental exposures could increase the risk of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and hypertension in various work and living environments. However, the effect of exposure to multiple exogenous harmful substances on COPD and hypertension co-morbidities remains unclear.

Methods

Participants were selected from eight hospitals in five provinces in China using a multistage cluster sampling procedure. Participants' demographic, exposure, and disease information were collected through questionnaires, spirometry, and blood pressure examinations. Demographic data were used as matching factors, and 1:1 matching between the exposed and non-exposed groups was performed by employing propensity score matching (PSM) to minimize the influence on the results. A one-way chi-squared analysis and multifactorial logistic regression were used to analyze the association between the exposure to exogenous harmful substances (metals and their compound dust, inorganic mineral dust, organic chemicals, and livestock by-products) and the co-morbidity of COPD and hypertension.

Results

There were 6,610 eligible participants in the final analysis, of whom 2,045 (30.9%) were exposed to exogenous harmful substances. The prevalence of co-morbidities of COPD and hypertension (6.0%) in the exposure group was higher than their prevalence in the total population (4.6%). After PSM, exogenous harmful substance exposure was found to be a risk factor for the co-morbidity of COPD and hypertension [odds ratio (OR) = 1.347, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.011-1.794], which was not statistically significant before PSM (OR = 1.094, 95% CI: 0.852-1.405). Meanwhile, the results of different outcomes showed that the association between hypertension and exogenous harmful substance exposure was not statistically significant (OR = 0.965, 95% CI: 0.846-1.101). Smoking (OR = 4.702, 95% CI: 3.321-6.656), history of a respiratory disease during childhood (OR = 2.830, 95% CI: 1.600-5.006), and history of respiratory symptoms (OR = 1.897, 95% CI: 1.331-2.704) were also identified as risk factors for the co-morbidity of COPD and hypertension.

Conclusion

The distribution of exogenous harmful substance exposure varies in the population, and the prevalence of co-morbidities is generally higher in susceptible populations. Exposure to exogenous harmful substances was found to be a key risk factor after adjusting for demographic confounders.

COVID-19 IN INFLAMMATORY BOWEL DISEASE: SHOULD WE BE MORE CAREFUL WITH THE USE OF SALICYLATES?

BACKGROUNDS

Fortunately, much has been studied about COVID-19 in patients with inflammatory bowel diseases (IBD). Evidence suggests that these patients do not appear to be at increased risk of severe COVID-19. However, there are still some uncertainties regarding the clinical manifestations of COVID-19 in patients with immune-mediated diseases.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to describe the main symptoms of COVID-19 and their frequency in IBD patients and evaluate the impact of the IBD therapeutic drugs on clinical presentation of COVID-19 and to determine factors associated with COVID-19 in this population.

METHODS

Adult patients with IBD from three tertiary-care public, teaching hospitals in Ceará, Northeastern Brazil, were evaluated during one scheduled appointment from March to December 2020. Patients with possible or confirmed COVID-19 were compared with patients without COVID-19. Furthermore, incidences of each symptom were evaluated based on the use of IBD therapeutic drugs.

RESULTS

A total of 515 patients with IBD were included in the study: 234 with CD, and 281 with UC. Of these, 174 patients (34%) had possible/confirmed COVID-19 of whom 156 (90%) were symptomatic. Main symptoms were fever (65%) and headache (65%); gastrointestinal symptoms occurred in one third of patients and were higher than COVID-19 in general population. The factors associated with having COVID-19 were female gender (OR 1.71, 95%CI: 1.17-2.50); contact at home (OR 5.07, 95%CI: 3.31-7.78) and outside the home (OR 3.14, 95%CI: 2.10-4.71) with a case of COVID-19; work outside of the home (OR 1.87, 95%CI: 1.26-2.78); family history of COVID-19 (OR 2.29, 95%CI 1.58-3.33) use of salicylate (OR 1.71, 95%CI: 1.17-4.28); and asthma (OR 7.10, 95%CI: 1.46-34.57).

CONCLUSION

IBD patients at high risk of COVID-19 infection may need to avoid salicylate therapy but further studies are necessary to confirm this association.

Analysis of Patients Admitted for Asthma Exacerbation in a Tertiary Hospital in Spain

OBJECTIVES

To analyze the characteristics of adult patients admitted for asthma exacerbation and determine optimization, treatment adherence, and follow-up in clinics.

METHODS

Patients ≥ 18 years old admitted from May 2021 to June 2023 with a primary diagnosis of asthma exacerbation were included. Patients with a secondary diagnosis of asthma exacerbation and those without a confirmed diagnosis were excluded.

RESULTS

A total of 186 patients were analyzed, 63% were female, with a mean age of 49 ± 34 years, mean body mass index (BMI) of 26.4 ± 5 kg/m2, mean immunoglobulin E level of 132 ± 235 IU/mL (range: 25-2041), mean eosinophils count of 180 ± 443, and length of stay of 8.6 ± 5 days. Comparing patients with one admission to those with multiple admissions, differences were observed in age (39 ± 15 vs. 58 ± 20, p < 0.0001), BMI (25.2 ± 3 vs. 27.4 ± 4, p < 0.0003), comorbidity (15% vs. 60%, p < 0.0001), and length of stay (4.5 ± 2 vs. 11 ± 3, p < 0.0001). Of the patients, 15% had undiagnosed asthma, 28% had known asthma without maintenance therapy, 23% were managed by primary care, and 34% were followed by pneumology. The mean Test of Adherence to Inhalers (TAI) score was 42.5 ± 8 points, with 70% showing erratic non-adherence, 46% showing deliberate non-adherence, and 21% showing unconscious non-adherence.

CONCLUSIONS

The young population represents a significant percentage of admissions for asthma exacerbation due to poor follow-up in pulmonology clinics, inadequate treatment optimization, and low adherence. This study adds that it is necessary to improve the approach to asthma in primary care to optimize treatment, reduce under-diagnosis, and avoid hospital admissions.

Impact of obstructive sleep apnea on clinical outcomes of hospitalization due to influenza in children: A propensity score-matched analysis of the US Nationwide Inpatient Sample 2005-2018

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have explored the association between obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and clinical outcomes of influenza in adults, whereas limited research examined this relationship in pediatric populations. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of OSA on the outcomes of pediatric influenza hospitalizations.

METHODS

This was a population-based, retrospective study. Data of children aged 1-19 years hospitalized for influenza infection were extracted from the United States (US) Nationwide Inpatient Sample Database 2005-2018. Univariable and multivariable regression analyses determined associations between OSA, length of stay (LOS), total hospital costs, pneumonia, and life-threatening events.

RESULTS

After propensity-score matching, a total of 2100 children were analyzed. The logistic analysis revealed that children with OSA had a significantly increased LOS (β = 2.29 days; 95% confidence interval, CI: 1.01-3.57, p < .001) and total hospital costs (β = 26.06 thousand dollars; 95% CI: 6.62-45.51, p = .009), and higher odds of pneumonia (aged 6-10 years: odds ratio [OR] = 1.52; 95% CI: 1.01-2.27, p = .043; aged ≥ 11 years: OR = 1.83; 95% CI: 1.33-2.53, p < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

During influenza admissions, children with OSA had longer LOS, higher hospital costs, and an increased risk of pneumonia compared to those without OSA. These findings underscore the importance of recognizing and managing OSA in influenza-related infections among children.

COPD Self-Management: A Patient-Physician Perspective

This article is co-authored by five patients living with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and a primary care physician who has over 30 years of clinical experience and is involved in educating healthcare professionals. The first section of this article is authored by the patients, who describe their experiences of living with COPD. The section that follows is authored by the physician, who discusses the management of COPD in the context of the patients' experiences.

Long COVID in Children, Adults, and Vulnerable Populations: A Comprehensive Overview for an Integrated Approach

Long COVID affects both children and adults, including subjects who experienced severe, mild, or even asymptomatic SARS-CoV-2 infection. We have provided a comprehensive overview of the incidence, clinical characteristics, risk factors, and outcomes of persistent COVID-19 symptoms in both children and adults, encompassing vulnerable populations, such as pregnant women and oncological patients. Our objective is to emphasize the critical significance of adopting an integrated approach for the early detection and appropriate management of long COVID. The incidence and severity of long COVID symptoms can have a significant impact on the quality of life of patients and the course of disease in the case of pre-existing pathologies. Particularly, in fragile and vulnerable patients, the presence of PASC is related to significantly worse survival, independent from pre-existing vulnerabilities and treatment. It is important try to achieve an early recognition and management. Various mechanisms are implicated, resulting in a wide range of clinical presentations. Understanding the specific mechanisms and risk factors involved in long COVID is crucial for tailoring effective interventions and support strategies. Management approaches involve comprehensive biopsychosocial assessments and treatment of symptoms and comorbidities, such as autonomic dysfunction, as well as multidisciplinary rehabilitation. The overall course of long COVID is one of gradual improvement, with recovery observed in the majority, though not all, of patients. As the research on long-COVID continues to evolve, ongoing studies are likely to shed more light on the intricate relationship between chronic diseases, such as oncological status, cardiovascular diseases, psychiatric disorders, and the persistent effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection. This information could guide healthcare providers, researchers, and policymakers in developing targeted interventions.

SARS-CoV-2, periodontal pathogens, and host factors: The trinity of oral post-acute sequelae of COVID-19

COVID-19 as a pan-epidemic is waning but there it is imperative to understand virus interaction with oral tissues and oral inflammatory diseases. We review periodontal disease (PD), a common inflammatory oral disease, as a driver of COVID-19 and oral post-acute-sequelae conditions (PASC). Oral PASC identifies with PD, loss of teeth, dysgeusia, xerostomia, sialolitis-sialolith, and mucositis. We contend that PD-associated oral microbial dysbiosis involving higher burden of periodontopathic bacteria provide an optimal microenvironment for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) infection. These pathogens interact with oral epithelial cells activate molecular or biochemical pathways that promote viral adherence, entry, and persistence in the oral cavity. A repertoire of diverse molecules identifies this relationship including lipids, carbohydrates and enzymes. The S protein of SARS-CoV-2 binds to the ACE2 receptor and is activated by protease activity of host furin or TRMPSS2 that cleave S protein subunits to promote viral entry. However, PD pathogens provide additional enzymatic assistance mimicking furin and augment SARS-CoV-2 adherence by inducing viral entry receptors ACE2/TRMPSS, which are poorly expressed on oral epithelial cells. We discuss the mechanisms involving periodontopathogens and host factors that facilitate SARS-CoV-2 infection and immune resistance resulting in incomplete clearance and risk for 'long-haul' oral health issues characterising PASC. Finally, we suggest potential diagnostic markers and treatment avenues to mitigate oral PASC.

ACE2: the node connecting the lung cancer and COVID-19

Angiotensin-converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) collaborates with Angiotensin (Ang) 1-7 and Mas receptors to establish the ACE2-Ang (1-7)-Mas receptor axis. ACE2 impacts lung function and can cause lung injury due to its inflammatory effects. Additionally, ACE2 contributes to pulmonary vasculature dysfunction, resulting in pulmonary hypertension. In addition, ACE2 is a receptor for coronavirus entry into host cells, leading to coronavirus infection. Lung cancer, one of the most common respiratory diseases worldwide, has a high rate of infection. Elevated levels of ACE2 in lung cancer patients, which increase the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe disease, have been demonstrated in clinical studies and by molecular mechanisms. The association between lung cancer and SARS-CoV-2 is closely linked to ACE2. This review examines the basic pathophysiological role of ACE2 in the lung, the long-term effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on lung function, the development of pulmonary fibrosis, chronic inflammation in long-term COVID patients, and the clinical research and mechanisms underlying the increased susceptibility of lung cancer patients to the virus. Possible mechanisms of lung cancer in SARS-CoV-2-infected individuals and the potential role of ACE2 in this process are also explored in this review. The role of ACE2 as a therapeutic target in the novel coronavirus infection process is also summarized. This will help to inform prevention and treatment of long-term pulmonary complications in patients.

Short- and Long-Term Chest-CT Findings after Recovery from COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

While ground-glass opacity, consolidation, and fibrosis in the lungs are some of the hallmarks of acute SAR-CoV-2 infection, it remains unclear whether these pulmonary radiological findings would resolve after acute symptoms have subsided. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate chest computed tomography (CT) abnormalities stratified by COVID-19 disease severity and multiple timepoints post-infection. PubMed/MEDLINE was searched for relevant articles until 23 May 2023. Studies with COVID-19-recovered patients and follow-up chest CT at least 12 months post-infection were included. CT findings were evaluated at short-term (1-6 months) and long-term (12-24 months) follow-ups and by disease severity (severe and non-severe). A generalized linear mixed-effects model with random effects was used to estimate event rates for CT findings. A total of 2517 studies were identified, of which 43 met the inclusion (N = 8858 patients). Fibrotic-like changes had the highest event rate at short-term (0.44 [0.3-0.59]) and long-term (0.38 [0.23-0.56]) follow-ups. A meta-regression showed that over time the event rates decreased for any abnormality (β = -0.137, p = 0.002), ground-glass opacities (β = -0.169, p < 0.001), increased for honeycombing (β = 0.075, p = 0.03), and did not change for fibrotic-like changes, bronchiectasis, reticulation, and interlobular septal thickening (p > 0.05 for all). The severe subgroup had significantly higher rates of any abnormalities (p < 0.001), bronchiectasis (p = 0.02), fibrotic-like changes (p = 0.03), and reticulation (p < 0.001) at long-term follow-ups when compared to the non-severe subgroup. In conclusion, significant CT abnormalities remained up to 2 years post-COVID-19, especially in patients with severe disease. Long-lasting pulmonary abnormalities post-SARS-CoV-2 infection signal a future public health concern, necessitating extended monitoring, rehabilitation, survivor support, vaccination, and ongoing research for targeted therapies.

Beyond the Acute Phase: Long-Term Impact of COVID-19 on Functional Capacity and Prothrombotic Risk-A Pilot Study

Background and Objectives: Assessment of the prothrombotic, proinflammatory, and functional status of a cohort of COVID-19 patients at least two years after the acute infection to identify parameters with potential therapeutic and prognostic value. Materials and Methods: We conducted a retrospective, descriptive study that included 117 consecutive patients admitted to Iasi Pulmonary Rehabilitation Clinic for reassessment and a rehabilitation program at least two years after a COVID-19 infection. The cohort was divided into two groups based on the presence (n = 49) or absence (n = 68) of pulmonary fibrosis, documented through high-resolution computer tomography. Results: The cohort comprises 117 patients, 69.23% females, with a mean age of 65.74 ± 10.19 years and abnormal body mass index (31.42 ± 5.71 kg/m2). Patients with pulmonary fibrosis have significantly higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) (p < 0.05), WBC (7.45 ± 7.86/mm3 vs. 9.18 ± 17.24/mm3, p = 0.053), neutrophils (4.68 ± 7.88/mm3 vs. 9.07 ± 17.44/mm3, p < 0.05), mean platelet volume (MPV) (7.22 ± 0.93 vs. 10.25 ± 0.86 fL, p < 0.05), lactate dehydrogenase (p < 0.05), and D-dimers (p < 0.05), but not ferritin (p = 0.470), reflecting the chronic proinflammatory and prothrombotic status. Additionally, patients with associated pulmonary fibrosis had a higher mean heart rate (p < 0.05) and corrected QT interval (p < 0.05). D-dimers were strongly and negatively correlated with diffusion capacity corrected for hemoglobin (DLCO corr), and ROC analysis showed that the persistence of high D-dimers values is a predictor for low DLCO values (ROC analysis: area under the curve of 0.772, p < 0.001). The results of pulmonary function tests (spirometry, body plethysmography) and the 6-minute walk test demonstrated no significant difference between groups, without notable impairment within either group. Conclusions: Patients with COVID-19-related pulmonary fibrosis have a persistent long-term proinflammatory, prothrombotic status, despite the functional recovery. The persistence of elevated D-dimer levels could emerge as a predictive factor associated with impaired DLCO.

Pathological Lung Ultrasound May Take Time to Resolve Despite Respiratory Symptoms Improvement: A Pediatric Case Series Followed for Long COVID

Background:

Long COVID affects 8 to 10 % of children. Currently, the COVID-19 fo-llow-up protocols in children include chest auscultation, collection of growth parameters, including weight, height and body mass index, execution of the six-minute walking test, basal spirometry, and afterwards, bronchodilation test and lung ultrasound.

Case Presentation:

In this paper, the authors describe a case series of long COVID followed up for 9 months at the Department of Pediatrics of the University Luigi Vanvitelli. The review of the lite-rature was performed on PubMed using the keywords COVID-19, follow-up, children, and lung ul-trasound. The aim of this article was to highlight the need to create custom follow-up programs for long Covid in children through the description of a case followed up at our Pediatric Department and a review of the current literature

Discussion:

The reversal of pathological lung ultrasound signs occurred in six or nine months des-pite the early improvement of respiratory symptoms and pulmonary function. There are limited stu-dies on the ultrasonography follow-up of kids with COVID-19 in the literature, and there are still no follow-up COVID-19 guidelines for paediatric population.

Conclusion:

Pathological lung ultrasound in children recovered from COVID-19, may take time to resolve; therefore, evaluating patients with lung ultrasound in the following months could be a ra-diation-saving approach useful for children who have fully recovered and have no warning signs.

Direct impact of 2 years of COVID-19 on chronic disease patients: a population-based study in a large hard-hit Italian region

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to provide a region-wide comprehensive account of the direct effects of COVID-19 on chronic disease patients, in terms of disease incidence, severity and mortality, over a 2-year pandemic period (2020-2021).

DESIGN

Population-based retrospective study.

SETTING/PARTICIPANTS

Adult patients, affected by at least 1 of 32 prevalent chronic conditions, residing in the Emilia-Romagna Region in Italy, during the years 2020 (N=1 791 189, 47.7% of the overall adult regional population) and 2021 (N=1 801 071, 47.8%).

RESULTS

COVID-19 incidence among chronic disease patients was 4.1% (74 067 cases) in 2020 and 7.3% (126 556 cases) in 2021, varying across pathologies, with obesity and dementia showing the highest incidence. Hospitalisation rate for pneumonia or acute respiratory distress syndrome among SARS-CoV-2-positive patients was 15.4%. COVID-19-related excess mortality, that is, deaths from COVID-19 as either main or contributing (1.5% of the total) cause of death, was observed during the three pandemic waves, with observed/expected death ratios ranging from +38% (March 2020) to +11% (December 2021). Increased risks of both COVID-19-related hospitalisation and death were associated with male gender, elderly age and many pre-existing pathologies, including cardiovascular, cerebrovascular and respiratory diseases, neurological and psychiatric disorders, and metabolic dysfunctions. The higher the number of concomitant pathologies, the greater the risk of COVID-19-related adverse outcomes: the likelihood of hospitalisation and death more than doubled for people with more than two comorbidities, compared with those with one underlying condition.

CONCLUSIONS

This study presents a thorough and up-to-date quantification of the direct impact of COVID-19 on chronic disease patients. The results obtained are particularly relevant considering that people with pre-existing chronic conditions accounted for almost all cases of COVID-19-related hospitalisation (82.6%) and death (91.5%) in a vast region of Italy, among the hardest hit by the pandemic.

Prevalence, Knowledge and Perceptions of Smoking and Tobacco Products and Vape Among SEPAR Members

Introduction

The professional dedicated to respiratory health has an exemplary role in tobacco control, promoting smoking cessation in their patients. However, multiple circumstances cause a low implementation. Therefore, the objective of the study is to identify the consumption, knowledge and perception of tobacco and its emerging products in a representative sample of professionals involved in the treatment of respiratory patients integrated into the Spanish Society of Pneumology and Thoracic Surgery (SEPAR).

Methods

Descriptive analysis of a structured online interview addressed to 5340 SEPAR members.

Results

In a sample of 802 respondents, more than 33% have smoked at some time and 6.6% continue to smoke. More than 66% consider smoking as a chronic disease. More than 90% consider their role model important and advise their patients to quit smoking, but less than half carry out a smoking intervention. Only 35% of them believe that the ban on smoking in health centers is always complied. More than 75% do not consider nicotine delivery devices an option for smoking cessation or harm reduction. 22% are unaware of water pipes and 29% of heated tobacco.

Conclusions

Professionals specialized in respiratory diseases are highly sensitized to smoking. Despite this, there are still weak points such as the insufficient implementation of smoking cessation interventions or the scant training in smoking and in new emerging products.

Clinical standards for diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease

BACKGROUND: The aim of these clinical standards is to provide guidance on 'best practice' care for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease.METHODS: A panel of international experts representing scientific societies, associations and groups active in post-COVID-19 lung disease was identified; 45 completed a Delphi process. A 5-point Likert scale indicated level of agreement with the draft standards. The final version was approved by consensus (with 100% agreement).RESULTS: Four clinical standards were agreed for patients with a previous history of COVID-19: Standard 1, Patients with sequelae not explained by an alternative diagnosis should be evaluated for possible post-COVID-19 lung disease; Standard 2, Patients with lung function impairment, reduced exercise tolerance, reduced quality of life (QoL) or other relevant signs or ongoing symptoms ≥4 weeks after the onset of first symptoms should be evaluated for treatment and pulmonary rehabilitation (PR); Standard 3, The PR programme should be based on feasibility, effectiveness and cost-effectiveness criteria, organised according to local health services and tailored to an individual patient's needs; and Standard 4, Each patient undergoing and completing PR should be evaluated to determine its effectiveness and have access to a counselling/health education session.CONCLUSION: This is the first consensus-based set of clinical standards for the diagnosis, treatment and prevention of post-COVID-19 lung disease. Our aim is to improve patient care and QoL by guiding clinicians, programme managers and public health officers in planning and implementing a PR programme to manage post-COVID-19 lung disease.

Re-Emerging COVID-19: Controversy of Its Zoonotic Origin, Risks of Severity of Reinfection and Management

The re-emergence of COVID-19 has sparked controversy around its zoonotic origin, management strategies, risks posed by the virus, and the severity of reinfection. While it is widely accepted that the virus originated from animals, the exact source and transmission pathway remain unclear. This has led to debates regarding the regulation of wildlife markets and trade, as well as the need for more robust surveillance and monitoring systems. Hence, the objective of this review is to provide a brief overview of the disease's biology, preventative strategies, risk factors, degree of reinfection, and epidemiological profile. It offers a thorough examination of the disease's root cause, potential zoonotic transmission, and the most recent preventive measures, like vaccines. In terms of management, there is ongoing debate about the most effective strategies to mitigate the spread of the virus. While public health measures such as social distancing and mask-wearing have been widely implemented, there are differing opinions on the effectiveness of lockdowns and restrictions on public movement. The risks posed by COVID-19 are also a topic of debate, with some arguing that the virus is relatively low-risk for the majority of the population while others highlight the potential for severe illness, particularly among vulnerable populations such as the elderly or those with underlying health conditions. Finally, the possibility of reinfection has raised concerns about the longevity of immunity following infection or vaccination. While some studies have suggested that reinfection may be possible and potentially more severe, the overall risk remains uncertain and further research is needed to fully understand the implications of reinfection.

Post-COVID-19 Symptoms in Adults with Asthma-Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Research on the longer-term sequelae of COVID-19 in patients with asthma is limited.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the frequency and severity of long-term symptoms of COVID-19 in the population of asthma patients.

METHODS

A systematic review of the published literature was conducted in accordance with the recommendations of the PRISMA statement. EMBASE, MEDLINE/PubMed, Web of Science, CINAHL, and Scopus Scholar were searched for terms related to asthma and post or long COVID-19, and for systematic reviews related to specific questions within our review, up to June 2022.

RESULTS

Data from 9 references publications included in the review were extracted. A total of 1466 adult asthmatic patients with COVID-19 infection were described in all the publications mentioned above. Of the long-term symptoms reported after COVID-19, patients indicated: lower respiratory symptoms, fatigue, cognitive symptoms, psychological problems, and other such as skin rashes, gastrointestinal disorders, tachycardia, palpitations, ocular disorders, ageusia/hypogeusia, anosmia/hyposmia, and poor sleep quality. These symptoms in similar intensity were observed in the comparison groups without a diagnosis of asthma.

CONCLUSIONS

The published data neither confirm nor deny that long-term COVID-19 symptoms in patients with asthma diagnosis are different in strength and frequency from patients without asthma diagnosis. To indicate associations between asthma and COVID-19 infection and severity, as well as the frequency of long-term symptoms of COVID-19, more longitudinal research is needed in chronic asthma patients with different phenotypes, intensity of treatment, and degree of asthma control.

Respiratory Viruses and Cystic Fibrosis

The threat of respiratory virus infection to human health and well-being has been clearly highlighted by the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic. For people with cystic fibrosis (CF), the clinical significance of viral infections long predated the emergence of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2. This article reviews the epidemiology, diagnosis, and treatment of respiratory virus infection in the context of CF as well as the current understanding of interactions between viruses and other microorganisms in the CF lung. The incidence of respiratory virus infection in CF varies by age with young children typically experiencing more frequent episodes than adolescents and adults. At all ages, respiratory viruses are very common in CF and are associated with pulmonary exacerbations. Respiratory viruses are identified at up to 69% of exacerbations, while viruses are also frequently detected during clinical stability. The full impact of COVID-19 in CF is yet to be established. Early studies found that rates of COVID-19 were lower in CF cohorts than in the general population. The reasons for this are unclear but may be related to the effects of shielding, infection control practices, maintenance CF therapies, or the inflammatory milieu in the CF lung. Observational studies have consistently identified that prior solid organ transplantation is a key risk factor for poor outcomes from COVID-19 in CF. Several key priorities for future research are highlighted. First, the impact of highly effective CFTR modulator therapy on the epidemiology and pathophysiology of viral infections in CF requires investigation. Second, the impact of respiratory viruses on the development and dynamics of the CF lung microbiota is poorly understood and viral infection may have important interactions with bacteria and fungi in the airway. Finally, bacteriophages represent a key focus of future investigation both for their role in transmission of antimicrobial resistance and as a promising treatment modality for multiresistant pathogens.

Association between cigarette smoking patterns and severity of COVID-19: Findings from a study in 15 private Hospitals in Indonesia

INTRODUCTION

Indonesia is ranked fourth among countries with the highest smoking rates and has the highest number of male smokers globally. This study aimed to assess the association between cigarette smoking patterns and the severity of COVID-19 among patients in 15 Indonesian hospitals.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted from April to August 2020 using medical records of 490 COVID-19 patients, including the history of their smoking patterns from 15 private referral hospitals in 5 provinces. The severity was defined based on the Guidelines on the Prevention and Control of COVID-19 issued by the Indonesian Ministry of Health, which was indicated by the care provided to patients, namely outpatient, inpatient, and Intensive Care Unit (ICU) services for mild, moderate, and severe symptoms. Smoking patterns were grouped based on adult tobacco use classifications of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed.

RESULTS

The results showed that 69.8% of respondents had not smoked cigarettes, 17.1% were active smokers, and 13.1% were former smokers. A significant difference was seen in the number of cigarettes smoked by patients in the ICU, inpatients, and outpatients, among current smokers and passive smokers (p=0.018 and p=0.005, respectively). Furthermore, there was no significant difference in the severity of COVID-19 among current smokers, former smokers, and non-smokers. The time from when smoking was stopped among former smokers was not associated with the severity of COVID-19.

CONCLUSIONS

There was no significant difference in COVID-19 severity between groups of smokers. Passive smoking and the number of cigarettes smoked by smokers daily were associated with the severity of COVID-19. Smoke-free policies should be implemented continuously to protect people from the dangers of secondhand smoke.

Evaluation of Drug Interactions in Hospitalized Patients with Respiratory Disorders in Greece

Background: Patients with respiratory disorders often have additional diseases and are usually treated with more than one medication to manage their respiratory conditions as well as additional comorbidities. Thus, they are frequently exposed to polypharmacy (≥5 drugs), which raises the risk for drug-drug interactions (DDIs) and adverse drug reactions (ADRs). In this work, we present the results regarding the prevalence of DDIs in hospitalized patients with respiratory disorders in Greece. Methods: A 6-month descriptive single-center retrospective observational study enrolled 102 patients with acute or chronic respiratory disorders. Clinical characteristics and medication regimens were recorded upon admission, hospitalization, and discharge. The prevalence of DDIs and their clinical significance was recorded and analyzed. Results: Unspecified acute lower respiratory tract infection (25%), exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (12%) and pneumonia (8%) were the most frequent reasons for admission. Cardiovascular disorders (46%), co-existing respiratory disorders (32%), and diabetes (25%) were the most prevalent comorbidities. Polypharmacy was noted in 61% of patients upon admission, 98% during hospitalization, and 63% upon discharge. Associated DDIs were estimated to be 55% upon admission, 96% throughout hospitalization, and 63% on discharge. Pharmacodynamic (PD) DDIs were the most prevalent cases (81%) and referred mostly to potential risk for QT-prolongation (31.4% of PD-DDIs) or modulation of coagulation process as expressed through the international normalized ratio (INR) (29.0% of DDIs). Pharmacokinetic (PK) DDIs (19% of DDIs) were due to inhibition of Cytochrome P450 mediated metabolism that could lead to elevated systemic drug concentrations. Clinically significant DDIs characterized as "serious-use alternative" related to 7% of cases while 59% of DDIs referred to combinations that could be characterized as "use with caution-monitor". Clinically significant DDIs mostly referred to medication regimens upon admission and discharge and were associated with outpatient prescriptions. Conclusions: Hospitalized patients with respiratory disorders often experience multimorbidity and polypharmacy that raise the risk of DDIs. Clinicians should be conscious especially if any occurring arrhythmias, INR modulations, and prolonged or increased drug action is associated with DDIs.

Effectiveness of COVID-19 vaccine booster in the general population and in subjects with comorbidities. A population-based study in Spain

BACKGROUND

Research on the effectiveness of COVID-19 booster-based vaccine schedule is ongoing and real-world data on vaccine effectiveness (VE) in comorbid patients are limited. We aimed to estimate booster dose VE against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity in the general population and in comorbid patients.

METHOD

A retrospective test-negative control study was undertaken in Galicia-Spain (December 2020-November 2021). VE and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated using multivariate logistic regression models.

RESULTS

1,512,415 (94.13%) negative and 94,334 (5.87%) positive SARS-CoV-2 test results were included. A booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine is associated with substantially higher protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection than vaccination without a booster [VE_boosted = 87% (95%CI: 83%; 89%); VE_non-boosted = 66% (95%CI: 65%; 67%)]. The high VE was observed in all ages, but was more pronounced in subjects older than 65 years. VE against COVID-19 severity was analyzed in a mixed population of boosted and non-boosted individuals and considerable protection was obtained [VE: hospitalization = 72% (95%CI: 68%; 75%); intensive care unit administration = 83% (95%CI: 78%; 88%), in-hospital mortality = 66% (95%CI: 53%; 75%)]. Boosted comorbid patients are more protected against SARS-CoV-2 infection than those who were non-boosted. This was observed in a wide range of major diseases including cancer (81% versus 54%), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (84% versus 61%), diabetes (84% versus 65%), hypertension (82% versus 65%) and obesity (91% versus 67%), among others.

CONCLUSIONS

A booster dose of COVID-19 vaccine increases the protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and COVID-19 severity in the general population and in comorbid patients.

Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant: An in-silico study evaluating spike interactions and immune evasion

Background

The fundamentals of the infectivity and immune evasion of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant are not yet fully understood. Here, we carried out an in-silico study analyzing the spike protein, the protein electrostatic potential, and the potential immune evasion.

Methods

The analysis was based on the structure of the spike protein from two SARS-CoV-2 variants, the original Wuhan and the Botswana (Omicron). The full-length genome sequences and protein sequences were obtained from databanks. The interaction of the spike proteins with the human Angiotensin Converting Enzyme 2 (ACE2) receptor was evaluated through the open-source software. The Immune Epitope Database was used to analyze the potential immune evasion of the viruses.

Results

Our data show that the Omicron spike protein resulted in 37 amino acid changes. The physicochemical properties of the spike had changed, and the electrostatic potentials differed between both variants. This resulted in a decrease in protein interactions, which does not establish a greater interaction with the ACE2 receptor. These changes compromise key receptor-binding motif residues in the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that interact with neutralizing antibodies and ACE2.

Conclusions

These mutations appear to confer enhanced properties of infectivity. The Omicron variant appears to be more effective at evading immune responses.

COVID-19-associated pneumonia in Swyer-James-MacLeod syndrome: A case report

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) exerts differential effects on various individuals. The majority of infected individuals experience mild-to-moderate disease and usually recover, without requiring hospitalization. It has been reported that those who have underlying chronic diseases are more susceptible to infection and may thus develop significantly more serious illness. As a result, COVID-19 may aggravate pre-existing respiratory illnesses, such as interstitial lung disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and asthma. Swyer-James-MacLeod syndrome is an uncommon clinical condition marked by post-infectious infantile bronchiolitis obliterans. Traditionally, the diagnosis is made in infancy following an investigation for reoccurring respiratory infections, although in rare cases, the diagnosis is made in adulthood. The present study describes the case of a 45-year-old patient with Swyer-James-MacLeod syndrome hospitalized due to COVID-19, which is the first one to be reported. To the best of our knowledge, there are currently no data available on the effects of COVID-19 in these individuals, stheir optimal therapy, or the impact of COVID-19 vaccination on their clinical course. Thus, it is hoped that the present study sheds some light into this condition.