MASKED AND WHITE-COAT HYPERTENSION IN TWO COHORTS OF ELDERLY SUBJECTS, AMBULATORY AND HOSPITALIZED PATIENTS

Elevated Blood Pressure in Hospitalized Children Predicts True Elevated Blood Pressure Outpatient

OBJECTIVES

To determine if elevated blood pressure (EBP) in hospitalized children accurately predicts EBP outpatient.

METHODS

A multicenter retrospective chart review was conducted at a large hospital system in Northeastern United States. Mean blood pressures during hospitalizations were classified as elevated or not elevated, by using the American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) 2017 parameters. Mean blood pressure was then compared with each patient's mean blood pressure measured 3 times postdischarge. The data were analyzed to determine if inpatient EBP is an accurate predictor of outpatient EBP.

RESULTS

Of 5367 hospitalized children, 656 (12.2%) had EBP inpatient. Inpatient EBP was highly predictive of outpatient EBP, with a positive predictive value of 96% and negative predictive value of 98%.

CONCLUSIONS

Diagnosing hospitalized children with EBP, as defined by the AAP 2017 guidelines, accurately predicts true EBP outpatient.

Prevalence and management of hypertension in the inpatient setting: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Hypertension (HTN) is a major cardiovascular risk factor yet control rates remain suboptimal. Thus, improving recognition, treatment, and control of HTN by focusing on novel populations such as hospitalized patients is warranted. Current consensus guidelines do not address inpatient HTN, and little is known about HTN prevalence or patterns of care in this setting.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review of English-language studies published in 1976 or later that reported on HTN prevalence and care patterns among adult inpatients. We included MEDLINE-indexed randomized-controlled trials, meta-analyses, and observational studies that: (1) reported estimates of the prevalence of HTN in the inpatient setting, and (2) used HTN diagnosis or treatment as a primary focus. We excluded randomized, controlled trials that recorded measures of inpatient blood pressure but whose focus was not HTN.

RESULTS

We identified 9 studies meeting inclusion criteria, and in those studies, HTN was highly prevalent among inpatients, ranging from 50.5% to 72%. Intensification of antihypertensive treatment was inconsistent, and 37% to 77% of hypertensive patients remained hypertensive at the time of discharge. Most patients with inpatient HTN continued to have elevated blood pressures at outpatient follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

Inpatient HTN is prevalent and a large percentage of those with this condition remain hypertensive at the time of discharge and at follow-up. The potential exists for improved recognition and treatment of newly diagnosed and known, but uncontrolled, HTN observed in the inpatient setting.

[Differences in the degree of control of arterial hypertension according to the measurement procedure of blood pressure in patients ≥ 65 years. FAPRES study]

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES

Control of arterial blood pressure (BP) in hypertensive patients differs based on the evaluation procedure. This fact can be enhanced in subjects over 65 years of age. We have studied the degree of BP control with determinations in the office or ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM).

METHODS

A multicenter, cross-sectional study was conducted in primary care (PC) and hypertension units in the Valencian Community. The first three hypertensive patients ≥ 65 years who attended the consultation on the first day of visits of the week of each investigator were included in the study. Cardiovascular risk factors, target organ damage and associated cardiovascular disease were recorded. Good clinical control values were defined as < 140/90 in the office and < 130/80 by ABPM for 24-hour according to 2007 ESH/ESC guidelines.

RESULTS

A total of 1,028 hypertensive patients were included, 52.7% of whom were women, with a mean age of 72.6 years. Mean clinical BP was 146.7/81.1 mmHg and 24-hour ABPM 128.5/70.8 mmHg. Ninety-two percent of the patients were treated with antihypertensive drugs (35.6% monotherapy and 56.4% with combinations of two or more drugs). Good clinical control was found in 35.3% of cases (CI 95%: 32.4-38.2) and 50.9% (CI 95%: 47.8-54.0) (P < .001) had good control of 24-hour BP in ABPM. Male gender, personal background of heart disease and stroke were associated with good control of hypertension (P < .01) in 24-hour ABPM.

CONCLUSIONS

In hypertensive patients over 65 years, and compared to the clinical determination of BP, the evaluation of ABMP showed a better proportion of controlled subjects. These findings support a wider use of ABPM to evaluate the control of BP in this population.