Association between long-term care and chronic and lifestyle-related disease modified by social profiles in community-dwelling people aged 80 and 90; SONIC study

Multidimensional insights about healthy aging from the cohort study for community-dwelling older adults: The SONIC study

The Septuagenarian, Octogenarian, Nonagenarian Investigation with Centenarian (SONIC) study was established considering population trends and targeting the oldest-old population. This study is unique in its narrow age range, consisting of individuals aged in their 70s, 80s and 90s, and is carried out as a longitudinal cohort study with follow ups every 3 years in urban and rural areas of eastern and western Japan. The aims of the SONIC study are primarily to clarify aging-related changes in multiple domains of human functioning, explore the dynamics of interactions among these domains and identify factors influencing healthy longevity, including psychological well-being. Investigations spanning medical, dental, nutritional, psychological and sociological fields were carried out by specialists, yielding important results. Findings from the SONIC study in Japan, a super-aged society, will provide valuable information for addressing the global aging trend. This review introduces the results from the SONIC study, and explains factors contributing to healthy longevity and happy aging. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2025; 25: 346-355.

Study protocol of a cluster-randomised controlled trial assessing a multimodal machine-based exercise training programme in senior care facilities over 6 months - the bestform study (best function of range of motion)

BACKGROUND

Physical functioning is a crucial factor for independence and quality of life in old age. The aim of the "bestform-Best function of range of motion" trial is to investigate the effects of a 6 months multimodal machine-based strength, coordination and endurance training on physical function, risk of falls and health parameters in older adults.

METHODS

Bestform is a cluster-randomised trial including older adults  ≥ 65 years living in senior care facilities in Southern Germany. Senior care facilities are randomly allocated to the control group with usual care (n ≥ 10 care facilities) and to the intervention group (n ≥ 10 care facilities), overall including  ≥ 400 seniors. Residents belonging to the intervention group are offered a supervised machine-based exercise training programme twice weekly over 45-60 min over six months in small groups, while those in the usual care facilities will not receive active intervention. The primary outcome is the change in Short Physical Performance Battery over six months between groups. Secondary outcomes are change in risk of falling, fear of falling, number of falls and fall-related injuries, physical exercise capacity, handgrip strength, body composition, cardiac function, blood parameters, quality of life, risk of sarcopenia, activities of daily living, and cognition over three and six months.

DISCUSSION

The bestform study investigates the change in physical function between seniors performing exercise intervention versus usual care over six months. The results of the study will contribute to the development of effective physical activity concepts in senior care facilities.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04207307. Registered December 2019.

Factors associated with long-term care certification in older adults: a cross-sectional study based on a nationally representative survey in Japan

Background

Long-term care (LTC) prevention is a pressing concern in ageing societies. To understand the risk factors of LTC, it is vital to consider psychological and social factors in addition to physical factors. Owing to a lack of relevant data, we aimed to investigate the social, physical and psychological factors associated with LTC using large-scale, nationally representative data to identify a high-risk population for LTC in terms of multidimensional frailty.

Methods

We performed a cross-sectional study using anonymised data from the 2013 Comprehensive Survey of Living Conditions conducted by the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare of Japan. Among the 23,730 eligible people aged 65 years or older and those who were not in hospitals or care facilities during the survey, 1718 stated that they had LTC certification. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the factors associated with LTC certification.

Results

Factors positively associated with LTC certification in the multivariate analyses included older age, the interaction term between sex and age group at age 85–89 years, limb movement difficulties, swollen/heavy feet, incontinence, severe psychological distress (indicated by a Kessler Psychological Distress Scale [K6] score ≥ 13), regular hospital visits for dementia, stroke, Parkinson’s disease, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, fracture, rheumatoid arthritis, kidney disease, diabetes and osteoporosis. Factors negatively associated with LTC certification included the presence of a spouse, regular hospital visits for hypertension and consulting with friends or acquaintances about worries and stress.

Conclusions

In summary, we identified the physical, psychological and social factors associated with LTC certification using nationally representative data. Our findings highlight the importance of the establishment of multidimensional approaches for LTC prevention in older adults.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12877-021-02308-5.

Long-Term Care Admissions Following Hospitalization: The Role of Social Vulnerability

We sought to understand the association between social vulnerability and the odds of long-term care (LTC) placement within 30 days of discharge following admission to an acute care facility and whether this association varied based on age, sex, or pre-admission frailty. Patients admitted to hospital with acute respiratory illness were enrolled in the Canadian Immunization Research Network's Serious Outcomes Surveillance Network during the 2011/2012 influenza season. Participants (N = 475) were 65 years or older (mean = 78.6, SD = 7.9) and over half were women (58.9%). Incident LTC placement was rare (N = 15); therefore, we used penalized likelihood logistic regression analysis. Social vulnerability and frailty indices were built using a deficit accumulation approach. Social vulnerability interacted with frailty and age, but not sex. At age 70, higher social vulnerability was associated with lower odds of LTC placement at high levels of frailty (frailty index (FI) = 0.35; odds ratio (OR) = 0.32, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.09-0.94), but not at lower levels of frailty. At age 90, higher social vulnerability was associated with greater odds of LTC placement at lower levels of frailty (FI = 0.05; OR = 14.64, 95%CI = 1.55, 127.21 and FI = 0.15; OR = 7.26, 95%CI = 1.06, 41.84), but not at higher levels of frailty. Various sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. Although younger, frailer participants may need LTC, they may not have anyone advocating for them. In older, healthier patients, social vulnerability was associated with increased odds of LTC placement, but there was no difference among those who were frailer, suggesting that at a certain age and frailty level, LTC placement is difficult to avoid even within supportive social situations.