Alteration of cyclin D1 in Chinese patients with breast carcinoma and its correlation with Ki-67, pRb, and p53

The overexpression of cyclin D1 is a positive prognostic factor in advanced-stage breast carcinoma cases

OBJECTIVE

Cyclin D1 (CDDN1) is a protein required for mitotic cell cycle progression through the G1 phase, as well as a regulatory component of the cyclin-dependent kinases CDK4 and CDK6. In this study, we wanted to evaluate the relationship between CDDN1 expression and clinicopathological features in breast cancer (BC) cases and whether CDDN1 could be used as a prognostic biomarker for BC cases.

METHODS

A total of 70 cases, 30 cases each with limited and advanced-stage BC, and as the control group, 10 healthy breast tissue, without a cancer diagnosis, with examined for benign reasons (mammoplasty, breast reduction surgery, etc.) were included in this study. The pathological specimens from the cases were stained, immunohistochemically, and categorized as a "low" (L) group or a "high" (H) group for CDDN1 expression. The cases' clinicopathological features and survival rates were evaluated statistically, within a 95% of confidence interval, p<0.05, retrospectively.

RESULTS

The median follow-up period of the cases was 48.00 (range, 6-150) months. CDDN1 expression was significantly higher in advanced-stage BC cases than in normal breast tissue and limited-stage BC cases. The median overall survival (OS) was 96 months (CI 95%: 67.74-117.59) in the H-CDDN1 group, compared to the L-CDDN1 group not reached, but there was no relation (p>0.05). CDDN1 overexpression was more prominent in low-grade advanced BC cases (p=0.004). The median OS of advanced-stage BC cases with Grade 1 was significantly longer than those with other grades (p=0.04).

CONCLUSION

Our results suggest that CDDN1 expression can be used as a potentially appropriate positive prognostic biomarker for advanced-stage BC cases.

Aberrant Cyclin D1 splicing in cancer: from molecular mechanism to therapeutic modulation

Cyclin D1 (CCND1), a crucial mediator of cell cycle progression, possesses many mutation types with different mutation frequencies in human cancers. The G870A mutation is the most common mutation in CCND1, which produces two isoforms: full-length CCND1a and divergent C-terminal CCND1b. The dysregulation of the CCND1 isoforms is associated with multiple human cancers. Exploring the molecular mechanism of CCND1 isoforms has offer new insight for cancer treatment. On this basis, the alterations of CCND1 gene are described, including amplification, overexpression, and mutation, especially the G870A mutation. Subsequently, we review the characteristics of CCND1 isoforms caused by G870A mutation. Additionally, we summarize cis-regulatory elements, trans-acting factors, and the splice mutation involved in splicing regulation of CCND1. Furthermore, we highlight the function of CCND1 isoforms in cell cycle, invasion, and metastasis in cancers. Importantly, the clinical role of CCND1 isoforms is also discussed, particularly concerning prognosis, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. Last, emphasis is given to the corrective strategies that modulate the cancerous CCND1 isoforms. Thus, it is highlighting significance of aberrant isoforms of CCND1 as targets for cancer therapy.

High Expression of Cyclin D1 is an Independent Marker for Favorable Prognosis in Middle Eastern Breast Cancer

Purpose

The cyclin D1 protein regulates cell cycle progression which is mediated by its interactions with cyclin-dependent kinases. Over-expression of cyclin D1 has been observed in several human cancers. This study was conducted to evaluate cyclin D1 expression in a large cohort of Middle Eastern breast cancers and determine its prognostic significance.

Patients and Methods

Cyclin D1 expression was assessed immunohistochemically and its association with clinico-pathological parameters was analyzed in 1003 breast cancer patients.

Results

Cyclin D1 was over-expressed in 59.4% (596/1003) of cases and significantly associated with a subset of breast cancers having favorable prognostic features, such as low grade (p < 0.0001), low stage (p = 0.0276), estrogen receptor (p < 0.0001) and progesterone receptor positive (p < 0.0001) tumors. An inverse association was found with triple negative breast cancers (p < 0.0001). More importantly, cyclin D1 expression was an independent predictor of favorable overall survival in our cohort (hazard ratio = 0.70; 95% confidence interval = 0.50–0.98; p = 0.0395). Also, tumors that highly expressed cyclin D1 had a longer recurrence-free survival. However, this significant association was seen only in univariate analysis. We also found cyclin D1 to be associated with phospho-Rb in luminal subtype of breast cancer and co-expression of both these markers was an independent predictor of luminal A breast cancer.

Conclusion

Our results reinforced the role of cyclin D1 in breast cancer pathology and revealed its expression as a valuable independent prognostic indicator for breast cancer from Middle Eastern ethnicity.

The prognostic value of cyclin D1 expression in the survival of cancer patients: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

The relationship between the expression of cyclin D1 and cancer prognosis and outcomes in different malignancies has not been fully elucidated.

AIMS

In the presented meta-analysis, we assessed the association between the expression level of cyclin D1 with overall survival (OS) in several cancers.

METHODS

Eligible studies were identified using PubMed, EMBase, Scopus, Web of Sciences and Cochrane Library databases. For the prognostic meta-analysis, study-specific hazard ratios (HRs) of tissue cyclin D1 for survival were obtained. Finally we pooled data derived from one hundred and eight studies comprising 19,224 patients with 10 different cancer types.

RESULTS

In the pooled analysis, high expression of cyclin D1 was significantly related to a poor OS with a pooled HR of 1.11 (95% CI: 1.02-1.20, P = 0.015; random-effects). Sub-group analysis revealed that high expression of cyclin D1 was related to worse OS of head and neck cancers (HR = 2.08, 95% CI: 1.75-2.47; P < 0.001), but not in breast (HR = 1.033, 95% CI: 0.873-1.223, P = 0.702), gastrointestinal (HR = 1.025, 95% CI:0.824-1.275; P = 0.825), bladder (HR = 0.937, CI: 0.844-1.041; P = 0.225) and in lung cancer patients (HR = 1.092, CI: 0.819-1.455; P = 0.549).

CONCLUSION

Further large, prospective, and well-designed trials are warranted to elucidate the precise clinical importance of cyclin D1 overexpression in the prognosis of cancer patients receiving different treatment regimens.

Cyclin D1 overexpression in Algerian breast cancer women: correlation with CCND1 amplification and clinicopathological parameters

BACKGROUND

Cyclin D1 which is associated with cell cycle regulation is solidly established as an oncogene with an important pathogenetic role in breast carcinomas.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to relate the Cyclin D1 protein overexpression with the amplification of its gene CCND1 in Estrogen Receptors (ER) positive breast carcinomas, in order to investigate the prognostic effect of their aberrations in relation to ER status, also to correlate the Cyclin D1 overexpression with other prognostic parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) was used to identify CCND1 amplification on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded invasive ductal carcinoma, in which immunohistochemistry (IHC) had previously been performed in order to evaluate the pathological relevance of Cyclin D1 overexpression in human breast cancer (n = 138).

RESULTS

CCND1 amplification was identified in 17/138 (12.3%) tumors and 78/138 (56.5%) tumors have overexpressed Cyclin D1. A significant correlation was identified between CCND1 amplification and Cyclin D1 overexpression (P < 0.001) and both Cyclin D1 and CCND1 were related with ER expression.

CONCLUSION

Our results show a significant correlation between Cyclin D1 overexpression and CCND1 amplification. Overexpression of Cyclin D1was observed in high proportion of breast cancer which should be considered for routine diagnosis.

The long-term prognostic and predictive capacity of cyclin D1 gene amplification in 2305 breast tumours

BACKGROUND

Use of cyclin D1 (CCND1) gene amplification as a breast cancer biomarker has been hampered by conflicting assessments of the relationship between cyclin D1 protein levels and patient survival. Here, we aimed to clarify its prognostic and treatment predictive potential through comprehensive long-term survival analyses.

METHODS

CCND1 amplification was assessed using SNP arrays from two cohorts of 1965 and 340 patients with matching gene expression array and clinical follow-up data of over 15 years. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to determine survival differences between CCND1 amplified vs. non-amplified tumours in clinically relevant patient sets, within PAM50 subtypes and within treatment-specific subgroups. Boxplots and differential gene expression analyses were performed to assess differences between amplified vs. non-amplified tumours within PAM50 subtypes.

RESULTS

When combining both cohorts, worse survival was found for patients with CCND1-amplified tumours in luminal A (HR = 1.68; 95% CI, 1.15-2.46), luminal B (1.37; 1.01-1.86) and ER+/LN-/HER2- (1.66; 1.14-2.41) subgroups. In gene expression analysis, CCND1-amplified luminal A tumours showed increased proliferation (P < 0.001) and decreased progesterone (P = 0.002) levels along with a large overlap in differentially expressed genes when comparing luminal A and B-amplified vs. non-amplified tumours.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results indicate that CCND1 amplification is associated with worse 15-year survival in ER+/LN-/HER2-, luminal A and luminal B patients. Moreover, luminal A CCND1-amplified tumours display gene expression changes consistent with a more aggressive phenotype. These novel findings highlight the potential of CCND1 to identify patients that could benefit from long-term treatment strategies.

Function of cell-cycle regulators in predicting silent pituitary adenoma progression following surgical resection

The present study investigated the use of cell-cycle regulators for predicting the progression of silent pituitary adenoma (SPA) following surgical resection, via immunohistochemical analysis of tumor samples obtained by surgical resection. The medical records of patients diagnosed with SPA between January 2000 and December 2013 in the Samsung Changwon Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine (Changwon, South Korea) were reviewed. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on sections of the archived, paraffin-embedded tissues obtained by surgery, with all tissues stained for cell-cycle regulatory proteins p16, p15, p21, cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4, CDK6, retinoblastoma protein (pRb) and cyclin D1, as well as E3 ubiquitin-protein ligase mib1 (MIB-1) antigen and p53. The primary end-point was to investigate the expression of cell-cycle regulatory proteins in SPA. The secondary end-point was to estimate the progression-free survival of patients with SPA following surgical resection and to identify its association with the expression of cell-cycle regulatory proteins. Of the 127 SPA samples, 44 (34.6%) were from patients with progression during a mean follow-up period of 62.4 months (range, 24.2–118.9 months). Immunohistochemical overexpression was identified in 61 samples (48.0%) for p16, 38 samples (29.9%) for p15, 19 samples (15.0%) for p21, 49 samples (38.6%) for CDK4, 17 samples (13.4%) for CDK6, 57 samples (44.9%) for pRb and in 65 samples (51.2%) for cyclin D1. Multivariate analysis revealed that null cell adenoma [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.276–0.808], somatotroph SPAs (95% CI, 1.296–3.121), corticotroph SPAs (95% CI, 1.811–4.078), pluripotent SPAs (95% CI, 2.264–5.194), decreased expression of p16 (95% CI, 2.724–5.588), overexpression of pRb (95% CI, 2.557–5.333), cyclin D1 (95% CI, 1.894–4.122) and MIB-1 (95% CI, 1.561–4.133), increased mitotic index (95% CI, 1.228–4.079), increased p53 expression (95% CI, 1.307–4.065) and invasion into the cavernous sinus (95% CI, 3.842–7.502) predicted SPA progression following resection. The results of the present study suggested that specific cell-cycle regulators, including p16, cyclin D1 and pRb, were associated with SPA progression.

High expression of cyclin D1 is associated to high proliferation rate and increased risk of mortality in women with ER-positive but not in ER-negative breast cancers

Purpose

Cyclin D1 has a central role in cell cycle control and is an important component of estrogen regulation of cell cycle progression. We have previously shown that high cyclin D expression is related to aggressive features of ER-positive but not ER-negative breast cancer. The aims of the present study were to validate this differential ER-related effect and furthermore explore the relationship between cyclin D overexpression and CCND1 gene amplification status in a node-negative breast cancer case–control study.

Methods

Immunohistochemical nuclear expression of cyclin D1 (n = 364) and amplification of the gene CCND1 by fluorescent in situ hybridization (n = 255) was performed on tissue microarray sections from patients with T1-2N0M0 breast cancer. Patients given adjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. The primary event was defined as breast cancer death. Breast cancer-specific survival was analyzed in univariate and multivariable models using conditional logistic regression.

Results

Expression of cyclin D1 above the median (61.7%) in ER breast cancer was associated with an increased risk for breast cancer death (OR 3.2 95% CI 1.5–6.8) also when adjusted for tumor size and grade (OR 3.1). No significant prognostic impact of cyclin D1 expression was found among ER-negative cases. Cyclin D1 overexpression was significantly associated to high expression of the proliferation markers cyclins A (ρ 0.19, p = 0.006) and B (ρ 0.18, p = 0.003) in ER-positive tumors, but not in ER-negative cases. There was a significant association between CCND1 amplification and cyclin D1 expression (p = 0.003), but CCND1 amplification was not statistically significantly prognostic (HR 1.4, 95% CI 0.4–4.4).

Conclusion

We confirmed our previous observation that high cyclin D1 expression is associated to high proliferation and a threefold higher risk of death from breast cancer in ER-positive breast cancer.

No difference in CCND1 gene expression between breast cancer patients with and without lymph node metastasis in a Southern Brazilian sample

The Cyclin D1 protein has been extensively studied over the last decades, for its various roles in physiological processes, both in normal and cancer cells. Gene amplifications and overexpression of CCND1 are frequently reported in several types of cancers, including breast carcinomas, showing the increasing relevance of Cyclin D1 in tumorigenesis. Little is known about the role of this protein in the metastatic process, and the main objective of this study was to evaluate the importance of the CCND1 as a potential marker of tumor progression in breast carcinomas, in a sample collected in Southern Brazil. We studied 41 samples of formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections from invasive ductal breast carcinomas subdivided into metastatic (n = 19) and non-metastatic (n = 22) tumors. Gene expression analysis was performed through Quantitative Real-Time PCR and immunohistochemistry. In spite of the higher expression levels of CCND1 mRNA and protein in tumors when compared with the control samples, no differences were observed between the metastatic and non-metastatic groups, suggesting that, in these samples, the expression of CCND1 has no significant influence on the metastatic process. Further studies must be performed in an attempt to clarify the diagnostic and prognostic value of Cyclin D1 in breast cancers, as well as the mechanisms that trigger its overexpression in tumors.

Results of immunohistochemical staining of cell-cycle regulators: the prediction of recurrence of functioning pituitary adenoma

OBJECTIVE

This study was undertaken primarily to investigate the possible prognostic values of several cell-cycle regulators for the prediction of functioning pituitary adenoma (FPA) recurrence after surgical resection by immunohistochemically analyzing tumor samples obtained by surgical resection.

METHODS

The medical records of the patients with FPA diagnosed from January 2000 to December 2009 at the Department of Neurosurgery at Samsung Changwon Hospital and Dong-A University Medical Center were selected. Immunohistochemical staining was performed on archived paraffin-embedded tissues obtained by surgical resection for adenohypophysial cells, cell-cycle regulatory proteins (p16, p15, p21, cyclin-dependent kinase [CDK] 4 and 6, phosphorylated retinoblastoma [pRB] protein, and cyclin D1), MIB-1 antigen, and p53.

RESULTS

Of the 174 FPAs, 62 (35.6%) recurred during follow-up period (mean duration 62.4 months, range 24.2-118.9 months). Immunohistochemically, overstaining for p16 in 89 samples (51.1%), p15 in 27 samples (15.5%), p21 in 20 samples (11.5%), CDK4 in 54 samples (31.0%), CDK6 in 18 samples (10.3%), pRB protein in 69 samples (39.7%), and cyclin D1 in 87 samples (50.0%). Multivariate analysis using the Cox proportional hazard regression model showed that invasion into cavernous sinus (hazard ratio [HR] of 4.02; P < 0.001), immunohistochemical normostaining for p16 (HR of 3.16; P < 0.001), immunohistochemical overstaining for pRB protein (HR of 2.45; P = 0.008), cyclin D1 (HR of 2.13; P = 0.029), MIB-1 antigen (HR of 2.74; P = 0.002), and p53 (HR of 2.21; P = 0.002), predicted the recurrence of FPA after surgical resection.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings indicate that p16, pRB protein, and cyclin D1 are associated with recurrence FPA after surgical resection.

Alterations of ubiquitylation and sumoylation in conventional renal cell carcinomas after the Chernobyl accident: a comparison with Spanish cases

We determined whether ubiquitylation and sumoylation processes are involved in conventional renal cell carcinogenesis associated with chronic, long-term, persistent low doses of ionizing radiation (IR) in patients living for more than 20 years in cesium-137 ((137)Cs)-contaminated areas after the Chernobyl accident in Ukraine. To this end, we assessed the immunohistochemical expression of ubiquitin (Ub), SUMO1, SUMO E2 conjugating enzyme Ubc9, and the cell cycle regulators p53, mdm2, and p14(ARF) in 38 conventional renal cell carcinomas from Ukrainian patients with different degrees of radiation exposure after the Chernobyl accident. As control cases, 18 conventional renal carcinoma (cRCC) tissues from a Spanish cohort were analyzed. No significant differences between the Ukrainian and Spanish groups were found regarding Ub overexpression, although being higher in the Ukrainian cases. Furthermore, this expression was inversely associated with SUMO1 and Ubc9, with no correlation with tumor nuclear grade. There was also a direct relationship between Ubc9 and inflammatory response. These findings do not allow us to consider the immunohistochemical expression of ubiquitylation and sumoylation as valuable markers for discriminating the effects of long-term, low-dose IR exposure in cRCC carcinogenesis.

Biological Markers in DCIS and Risk of Breast Recurrence: A Systematic Review

Understanding of the biology and clinical behavior of ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) is currently inadequate. The aim of this comprehensive review was to identify important molecular biological markers associated with DCIS and candidate markers associated with increased risk of ipsilateral recurrence after diagnosis of DCIS. A comprehensive systematic review was performed to identify studies published in the past 10 years that investigated biological markers in DCIS. To be included in this review, studies that investigated the rate of biological expression of markers had to report on at least 30 patients; studies that analyzed the recurrence risk associated with biomarker expression had to report on at least 50 patients. There were 6,252 patients altogether in our review. Biological markers evaluated included steroid receptors, proliferation markers, cell cycle regulation and apoptotic markers, angiogenesis-related proteins, epidermal growth factor receptor family receptors, extracellular matrix-related proteins, and COX-2. Although the studies in this review provide valuable preliminary information regarding the expression and prognostic significance of biomarkers in DCIS, common limitations of published studies (case-series, cohort, and case-control studies) were that they were limited to small patient cohorts in which the extent of surgery and use of radiotherapy or endocrine therapy varied from patient to patient, and variable methods of determining biomarker expression. These constraints made it difficult to interpret the absolute effect of expression of various biomarkers on risk of local recurrence. No prospective validation studies were identified. As the study of biomarkers are in their relative infancy in DCIS compared with invasive breast cancer, key significant prognostic and predictive markers associated with invasive breast cancer have not been adequately studied in DCIS. There is a critical need for prospective analyses of novel and other known breast cancer molecular markers in large cohorts of patient with DCIS to differentiate indolent from aggressive DCIS and better tailor the need and extent of current therapies.

Nuclear EGFR in ductal invasive breast cancer: correlation with cyclin-D1 and prognosis

The epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-family and cyclin-D1 have been extensively studied in breast cancer; however systematic studies that examine protein expression and gene status in the same cohort of patients are lacking. Also emerging evidences suggest existence of a direct EGFR-signaling pathway, which involves cellular transport of EGFR from cell membrane to the nucleus, and transcriptional regulation of the target genes. Thus, we examined the protein expression of membrane EGFR, nuclear EGFR, cyclin-D1 and the corresponding gene status in 113 breast carcinomas by immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization using tissue microarrays. Membrane EGFR overexpression and EGFR gene amplification were detected in 2% cases, while nuclear EGFR was detected in 40% of cases, with 12% having high nuclear EGFR staining. Nuclear EGFR correlated with tumor size (P=0.0005), lymph node metastasis (P=0.0288), Nottingham prognostic index (P=0.0011) and estrogen receptor (ER) expression (P=0.0258) but the letter correlation was observed only in premenopausal group of patients. Strong cyclin-D1 expression and cyclin-D1 gene (CCND1) amplification were found in 64 and 13% of the cases, respectively. Cyclin-D1 expression showed positive correlation with ER (P=0.0113) and inverse correlation with Nottingham prognostic index (P=0.0309) and membrane EGFR (P=0.0201). CCND1 amplification also showed inverse correlation with membrane EGFR (P=0.0420). A strong correlation between membrane EGFR expression and gene amplification (P=0.0035), as well as cyclin-D1 overexpression and gene amplification (P=0.0362), was demonstrated. On univariate analysis cyclin-D1 expression showed a correlation with longer overall survival in the premenopausal group and nuclear EGFR correlated with shorter overall survival in whole cohort as well in the premenopausal group of patients. Multivariate analysis revealed nuclear EGFR to be an independent prognostic factor and showed 3.4 times greater mortality risk for nuclear EGFR+++ patients as compared with nuclear EGFR negative patients (hazard ratio =3.402; P=0.0026).