Successful treatment of neonatal atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome with C5 monoclonal antibody

Recent Advances in the Management of Microangiopathic Hemolytic Anemias (MAHA): A Narrative Review

Red blood cells (RBCs) start to break down early in hemolytic anemia, which can be chronic or life-threatening. It should be considered while determining if normocytic or macrocytic anemia is present. Hemolysis in the reticuloendothelial system may happen intravascularly, extravascularly, or both. It accounts for a broad spectrum of laboratory and clinical situations, both physiological and pathological. Whenever the frequency of RBC breakdown is rapid enough to lower hemoglobin levels below the normal range, hemolytic anemia occurs. Microangiopathic hemolytic anemia (MAHA) is a term used to describe non-immune hemolysis induced by intravascular RBC fragmentation caused by substances in the tiny blood arteries that generate schistocytes in the peripheral circulation. Microvasculature abnormalities, such as small arterioles and capillaries, are usually involved. Furthermore, MAHA can also be brought on by intravascular devices like a prosthetic heart valve or assistive technologies. Poor deformity results in entrapment, phagocytosis, antibody-mediated elimination through phagocytosis or direct complement activation, fragmentation brought about by microthrombi or acute mechanical stress, oxidation, or spontaneous cellular death. Hemolysis may cause acute anemia, jaundice, hematuria, dyspnea, tiredness, tachycardia, and possibly hypotension. This article aims to synthesize existing research, identify therapeutic strategies, and provide insights into current and emerging approaches for managing this complex hematological disorder.

Neonatal Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome in the Eculizumab Era

The atypical hemolytic uremic syndrome (aHUS) in the newborn is a rare disease, with high morbidity. Eculizumab, considered a first-line drug in older children, is not approved in neonates and in children weighing less than 5 kg. We present a 5-day-old female newborn, born at 36 weeks' twin gestation, by emergency cesarean section due to cord prolapse, with birth weight of 2,035 g and Apgar score of 7/7/7, who develops microangiopathic hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, and progressive acute renal failure. In day 5, after diagnosis of aHUS, a daily infusion of fresh frozen plasma begins, with improvement of thrombocytopenia and very slight improvement in renal function. The etiologic study (congenital infection, Shiga toxin, ADAMTS13 activity, directed metabolic study) was normal. C3c was slightly decreased. On day 16 for maintenance of anemia and severe renal failure, she started 300 mg/dose eculizumab. Anemia resolves in 10 weeks and creatinine has normal values after 13 weeks of treatment. The genetic study was normal. In this case, eculizumab is effective in controlling microangiopathy and in the recovery of renal function. Diagnosis of neonatal aHUS can be challenging because of phenotypic heterogeneity and potential overlap with other manifestations that may confound it, such as perinatal asphyxia or sepsis/disseminated intravascular coagulation.

Case Report: Neonatal Unexplained HUS Treated With Complement Inhibitor Eculizumab

Background: Hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) is rare in neonates. It is probably an under-recognized condition in the early postnatal period as it presents similarly to the most common perinatal asphyxia and to differentiate the two conditions is challenging. We describe the clinical presentation of a potential new subtype of neonatal HUS triggered by hypoxic-ischemic event. Our patient was successfully treated by a single dose of Eculizumab as early as at 9 days of life. Case Report: A 35-weeks infant was born with low hemoglobin and subsequently developed respiratory distress, hypotension, and acidosis. Blood transfusion was administered, acidosis corrected, neurological examination remained reassuring. Few hours later he developed renal failure, macroscopic hematuria, hemobilia, thrombocytopenia and coagulopathy refractory to platelet and fresh frozen plasma transfusions. No infection was found. Haptoglobin was non-measurable, and schistocytes present, complement factors C3, C4 and B were low, FBb increased. HUS was suspected. A single dose of Eculizumab™ was administered on day 9 of life. No genetic mutation of atypical HUS was found. He was discharged with improving renal function and developing cholestasis. Conclusion: In neonates with hemolytic anemia, thrombocytopenia, hematuria and renal failure, HUS should be suspected. In neonatal HUS Eculizumab should be considered as first-line therapy and discontinuation can be considered if no genetic mutation is found and clinical condition improves. In very young patients, cholestasis could appear as potential side effect of Eculizumab™.

Typical or Atypical Hemolytic Uremic Syndrome and the Use of Eculizumab: 4 Illustrative Cases

Typical hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS) in children is caused mostly by Escherichia coli 0157:H7 in our country. Atypical HUS (aHUS) causes include Streptococcus pneumoniae, methyl malonic aciduria, deficiency of ADAMST 13, and genetic or acquired disorder of the complement. Treatment of HUS relies on supportive measures while treatment of aHUS includes plasmapheresis and specific treatments. Recently, eculizumab has been proposed for the treatment of aHUS and many clinicians now believe that eculizumab should be the first-line standard of care. The purpose of this article is to illustrate the difficulties in the diagnostic process of HUS and therefore the subsequent problem to promptly choose the appropriate treatment. To date, workup of HUS continues to take many days leaving the clinicians with a choice between several therapeutic options. With the emergence of eculizumab, it becomes crucial to find faster diagnostic tools and to adapt HUS treatment protocols. We reported here clinical cases where eculizumab use was probably not appropriate once the correct diagnosis of typical HUS was made and cases where it would have been useful because of the late diagnosis of aHUS.

Therapeutic Plasma Exchange in Neonates and Infants: Successful Use of a Miniaturized Machine

Therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) in neonates and small infants is a treatment method at the forefront that may become a potentially life-saving procedure in a wide array of severe conditions. Indications for TPE in the pediatric population have been mainly derived from adult literature, with neonatal hyperbilirubinemia being the most notable exception. The only alternative to TPE in small pediatric patients is manual blood exchange transfusion, which, however, bears an unacceptably high risk of severe complications. Still, technical issues due to extracorporeal circulation in neonates have burdened TPE so far, since machines developed for adults require a relatively large blood volume to operate. We in this study, describe our preliminary experience of TPE for treating 2 potentially life-threatening conditions in neonatal age. To overcome the aforementioned limitations, plasmapheresis was performed in both cases using a machine specifically designed for patients weighing less than 10 kg.