|
1
|
van der Beek JN, Schenk JP, Morosi C, Watson TA, Coma A, Graf N, Chowdhury T, Ramírez-Villar GL, Spreafico F, Welter N, Dzhuma K, van Tinteren H, de Krijger RR, van den Heuvel-Eibrink MM, Littooij AS. Diagnostic magnetic resonance imaging characteristics of congenital mesoblastic nephroma: a retrospective multi-center International Society of Pediatric Oncology-Renal Tumor Study Group (SIOP-RTSG) radiology panel study. Pediatr Radiol 2024; 54:965-976. [PMID: 38609702 PMCID: PMC11111520 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-024-05918-4] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/06/2023] [Revised: 03/20/2024] [Accepted: 03/21/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Congenital mesoblastic nephroma is the most common solid renal tumor in neonates. Therefore, patients <3 months of age are advised to undergo upfront nephrectomy, whereas invasive procedures at diagnosis in patients ≥3 months of age are discouraged by the International Society of Pediatric Oncology-Renal Tumor Study Group (SIOP-RTSG). Nevertheless, discriminating congenital mesoblastic nephroma, especially from the more common Wilms tumor, solely based on imaging remains difficult. Recently, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become the preferred modality. Studies focusing on MRI characteristics of congenital mesoblastic nephroma are limited. OBJECTIVE This study aims to identify diagnostic MRI characteristics of congenital mesoblastic nephroma in the largest series of patients to date. MATERIALS AND METHODS In this retrospective multicenter study, five SIOP-RTSG national review radiologists identified 52 diagnostic MRIs of histologically proven congenital mesoblastic nephromas. MRI was performed following SIOP-RTSG protocols, while radiologists assessed their national cases using a validated case report form. RESULTS Patients (24/52 classic, 11/52 cellular, and 15/52 mixed type congenital mesoblastic nephroma, 2/52 unknown) had a median age of 1 month (range 1 day-3 months). Classic type congenital mesoblastic nephroma appeared homogeneous with a lack of hemorrhage, necrosis and/or cysts, showing a concentric ring sign in 14 (58.3%) patients. Cellular and mixed type congenital mesoblastic nephroma appeared more heterogeneous and were larger (311.6 and 174.2 cm3, respectively, versus 41.0 cm3 for the classic type (P<0.001)). All cases were predominantly T2-weighted isointense and T1-weighted hypointense, and mean overall apparent diffusion coefficient values ranged from 1.05-1.10×10-3 mm2/s. CONCLUSION This retrospective international collaborative study showed classic type congenital mesoblastic nephroma predominantly presented as a homogeneous T2-weighted isointense mass with a typical concentric ring sign, whereas the cellular type appeared more heterogeneous. Future studies may use identified MRI characteristic of congenital mesoblastic nephroma for validation and for exploring the discriminative non-invasive value of MRI, especially from Wilms tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Justine N van der Beek
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht/Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
| | - Jens-Peter Schenk
- Clinic of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Division of Pediatric Radiology, Heidelberg University Hospital, Heidelberg, Germany
| | - Carlo Morosi
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Tom A Watson
- Department of Paediatric Radiology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Ana Coma
- Department of Pediatric Radiology, Hospital Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Norbert Graf
- Department of Pediatric Oncology & Hematology, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg, Germany
| | - Tanzina Chowdhury
- Department of Haematology and Oncology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Gema L Ramírez-Villar
- Department of Paediatric Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Seville, Spain
| | - Filippo Spreafico
- Pediatric Oncology Unit, Department of Medical Oncology and Hematology, Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori, Milan, Italy
| | - Nils Welter
- Department of Pediatric Oncology & Hematology, Saarland University Medical Center and Saarland University Faculty of Medicine, Homburg, Germany
| | - Kristina Dzhuma
- Developmental Biology and Cancer Department, University College London Great Ormond Street Institute of Child Health, London, UK
- Department of Paediatric Urology, Great Ormond Street Hospital for Children NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - Harm van Tinteren
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Ronald R de Krijger
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Department of Pathology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Marry M van den Heuvel-Eibrink
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Division of Child Health, Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Annemieke S Littooij
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, University Medical Center Utrecht/Wilhelmina Children's Hospital, Utrecht University, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, The Netherlands
- Princess Máxima Center for Pediatric Oncology, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|