Impaction Bone Grafting in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty-Using Mesh and Cone to Contain the Defect: A Report of 3 Cases

Correction of Severe Posterior Tibial Slope in Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty With Cementation and Cone Technology

Failed primary total knee arthroplasties are becoming more common among a younger, more active patient demographic. Aseptic failures with proximal tibial bone loss, specifically severe posterior tibial collapse, are difficult problems not well described in the literature. There are limited options for reconstructing large defects of the proximal tibia that appropriately restore slope while providing adequate structural support. To our knowledge, this technique to address a large, uncontained posterior proximal tibial defect has not been described in the literature. The purpose of this case report was to detail the surgical technique of how the implementation of cone technology with cementation techniques produced excellent clinical results for a patient with this difficult problem.

Metaphyseal cones combined with diaphyseal impaction grafting provide good outcomes and survival in a complex revision total knee arthroplasty: a matched comparative analysis

PURPOSE

To compare clinical and radiological outcomes, implant survivorship at a minimum of 1-year follow-up using metaphyseal trabecular cones with or without impaction grafting in a complex revision TKA.

METHODS

A retrospective comparative matched analysis was performed and 15 patients who underwent revision surgery using the combination of porous trabecular metaphyseal cone and diaphyseal impaction grafting (MC-IBG) were matched with a group of 13 patients who also underwent revision surgery using metaphyseal cone (MC) without impaction grafting. All included patients presented severe bone defect (AORI 2,3) and a rotating-hinge prosthesis were implanted.

RESULTS

Both groups were comparable regarding the baseline demographic and clinical data. Patients had previously undergone a mean of 4 (range, 2-12) and 3 (range, 2-5) previous procedures in the MC-IBG and MC groups, respectively. The indications for revision were aseptic loosening in 11 (73.3%) and 11 (84.6%) patients; prosthetic joint infection in 4 (26.7%) and 2 (15.4%) in the MC-IBG and MC groups, respectively. There was no significant difference in the mean postoperative Knee Society Score between the study groups (p = 0.806). Overall, 4 patients had further revision. Two patients were revised in the MC-IBG group, one patient for aseptic loosening and the second one after 2 episodes of instability. Two patients in the MC group presented prosthetic joint infection and underwent a two-stage reimplantation. No significant difference was observed between the study groups at comparison (p = 0.92).

CONCLUSION

Trabecular metal cones with diaphyseal impaction grafting provide an alternative technique in a complex revision TKA surgery with early clinical and radiographic success.

Comparison of Different Strategies in Revision Arthroplasty of the Knee with Severe Bone Loss: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Outcomes

BACKGROUND

In revision total knee arthroplasty large bone lesions can jeopardize correct implant orientation and fixation. Different strategies have been proposed to tackle this issue. The purpose of this review and meta-analysis is to evaluate the midterm clinical and survivorship results of porous cones and porous-coated sleeves compared to morselized and structural grafts.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of the literature on the different strategies targeting moderate to large metaphyseal bone defects. The literature was evaluated for methodological quality. We analyzed results on survivorship using logistic regression correcting for follow-up time and number of knees. We compared these results using forest plots for early and midterm follow-up. Clinical outcome was evaluated by comparing standardized mean difference of patient-related outcome measures.

RESULTS

A total of 77 articles analyzing 4,391 knees were included. The logistic regression curve showed a nonsignificant odds ratio (OR) at 10 years of 0.91 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.699-1.192, P = .49) for failure comparing all porous implants with all grafting procedures. The available clinical reports show a bigger standardized mean difference increase for tantalum cones (OR 3.04, 95% CI 1.71-4.37) than for porous sleeves (OR 1.72, 95% CI 0.88-2.57).

CONCLUSION

Our analysis shows that the size and quality of the literature on metaphyseal bone defects is progressively improving. Porous implants are effective in tackling metaphyseal bone defects showing good survivorship outcome at midterm follow-up. In younger patients with less constrained prosthetic implants, surgeons might still consider the use of grafts without risking worse outcomes.

Zonal Fixation in Revision TKA: The Key Is Metaphyseal Fixation

As the volume of primary total knee arthroplasties continues to rise, so will the volume of revision arthroplasties. Bone loss is commonly encountered in revision surgery and must be managed appropriately to optimize outcomes. The concept of zonal fixation highlights the importance of attaining secure fixation within each of the three major osseous zones: the epiphysis, the metaphysis, and the diaphysis. While each zone is important, the metaphysis carries particular significance. The development of new implants such as metaphyseal cones and sleeves has greatly expanded the orthopedic surgeon's armamentarium to allow for solid metaphyseal fixation in virtually every case.