Squeaking in large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty

Fourth-generation Ceramic Head Fracture in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Case Report and Literature Review

Ceramics are used in total hip arthroplasty due to inherent wettability and low wear rates, but fracture risk is a known complication. Rates as high as 13.4% were reported in the past, yet as low as 0.02% in newer generations. Howard et al. reported a fracture rate of 0.009% for fourth-generation ceramic heads. We present a case report of a 69-year-old male with a BMI of 40.01 kg/m2 who suffered a fracture of a 36-mm ceramic femoral head with pseudoacetabular involvement of the polyethylene liner. This occurred 2 years and 3 months after his primary surgery after a 4-foot fall off of a ladder. The patient underwent revision of his total hip arthroplasty with arthroplasty of the polyethylene liner and femoral head component without stem explantation.

Two-Year Results of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Hip Resurfacing in an International Multicenter Cohort

BACKGROUND

Hip resurfacing arthroplasty (HRA) is a bone-conserving alternative to total hip arthroplasty. We present the 2-year clinical and radiographic follow-up of a novel ceramic-on-ceramic HRA in an international multicenter cohort.

METHODS

Patients undergoing HRA between September 2018 and January 2021 were prospectively included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in the form of the Forgotten Joint Score, Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Jr., Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Oxford Hip Score, and University of California, Los Angeles, Activity Score were collected preoperatively, and at 1 and 2 years postoperation. Serial radiographs were assessed for migration, component alignment, evidence of osteolysis or loosening, and heterotopic ossification formation.

RESULTS

The study identified 200 patients who reached a minimum 2-year follow-up (mean 3.5 years). Of these, 185 completed PROMs follow-up at 2 years. There was a significant improvement in Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (P < .001) and Oxford Hip Score (P < .001) between the preoperative, 1-year, and 2-year outcomes. Patients had improved activity scores on the University of California, Los Angeles, Active Score (P < .001), with 45% reporting a return to high-impact activity at 2 years. At 1 and 2 years, the Forgotten Joint Score was not significantly different (P = .38). There was no migration, osteolysis, or loosening of any of the implants. No fractures were reported over the 2-year follow-up, with only 1 patient reporting a sciatic nerve palsy. There were 2 revisions, 1 for unexplained pain at 3 months due to acetabular component malposition and 1 at 33.5 months for acetabular implant failure.

CONCLUSIONS

The ceramic-on-ceramic resurfacing at 2 years postoperation demonstrates promising results with satisfactory outcomes in all recorded PROMs. Further long-term data are needed to support the widespread adoption of this prosthesis as an alternative to other HRA bearings.

Lower Revision Rates and Improved Stability With a Monoblock Ceramic Acetabular Cup

BACKGROUND

Monoblock ceramic cups are designed to accommodate large-diameter femoral heads. This has the potential to offer the advantages of an increased range of motion and enhanced joint stability. These features could benefit younger and high-demand patients in need of total hip arthroplasty. The aim of this study was to assess the survival rate and the reasons for revision of the DeltaMotion cup.

METHODS

Data from the AOANJRR were analyzed for all patients who had undergone a primary conventional THA performed between January 1, 2001 and December 31, 2021. Only prostheses with ceramic/ceramic, ceramic/XLPE, metal/XLPE, or CM/XLPE bearing surfaces were included. The primary outcome measure was the cumulative percent revision for all causes. Secondary outcome measures were revision for dislocation/instability, ceramic breakage, or noise. A subanalysis for cup size was also performed.

RESULTS

There were 486,946 primary conventional THA procedures undertaken for any reason. Of these, 4,033 used the DeltaMotion cup and 482,913 were modular designs. The DeltaMotion cup had the lowest CPR for all diagnoses compared to the modular bearings at all time points, had a significantly lower revision rate for prosthesis dislocation and no revisions for squeaking compared to other modular bearings. There were 175 ceramic breakages recorded in the modular bearing group and 1 ceramic breakage in the DeltaMotion group.

CONCLUSIONS

The DeltaMotion cup had a low rate of all-cause revision, and for dislocation, ceramic breakage, and noise. Although this cup is no longer manufactured, ongoing follow-up of newer monoblock ceramic cups will determine their suitability for younger and more active patients.

Ceramic-related noise as an adverse outcome in total hip arthroplasty

Introduction Ceramic hip replacement bearings have shown to be low wearing and biocompatible. The last two generations of Biolox Forte and Biolox Delta ceramics have have established themselves as durable bearings. However, squeaking and noise from ceramic bearing THRs is well recognised in the 21st century.

The objective was to explore the problem of noise in the ceramic bearing of THA based on the analysis of the foreign and Russian literature.

Material and methods In presented the analysis of Foreign and Russian literature searches for the review were produced according to PRISMA recommendations using PubMed, Scopus, Google Scholar, eLibrary. MINOR was used to assess the methodological quality of articles.

Results and Discussion Noise in ceramics is observed in 37.7 %. There are many theories on the origin and mechanism of noise including liner impingement and loading, film disruption, third body, microseparation and resonance. However, there is still no consensus on what is noise in the ceramic bearing and how to solve this problem.

Conclusion Literature review of ceramic bearing indicated enough unanswered questions. The noise may play a role as a predictor of improper use of endoprosthesis with accumulated database resulting in better understanding of the phenomenon, methods of the correction and timely prevention of ceramic breakage.

Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty: I Can Hear You

Background

Squeaking is a known complication of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA), yet there is a lack of studies specifically quantifying its loudness. The aims of this study were: (1) to determine the incidence of squeaking in CoC THAs at long-term follow-up; (2) to identify risk factors; and (3) to quantify the loudness of the squeaking.

Methods

A specifically designed prospective questionnaire was used to determine the prevalence, characteristics, and loudness of squeaking in 130 (110 patients) primary THAs with fourth-generation CoC bearings at a mean follow-up of 10.5 years. The loudness of the squeaking was determined by the decibel (dB) scale from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

Results

Overall, 28% of the CoC hips experienced squeaking. The mean onset was 5.7 years postoperatively, with 39% of the cases having their onset more than 5 years after their THA. Patients with a lower body mass index were more likely to report squeaking (P = .009). The mean loudness of the squeak was 35 dB (range, 10-70 dB) and was loud in 36% of the hips. Patients who developed squeaking early postoperatively had louder squeaking than those with a later onset (P = .007). The loudness of the squeaking sound progressed in 25% of the cases, and these hips had louder squeaking (P = .04).

Conclusions

Squeaking after CoC THA is not uncommon, can be relatively loud, and increases over time. This needs to be considered in young patients that are candidates for CoC THAs.

Forte ceramic-on-delta ceramic cementless total hip arthroplasty: an 8- to 15-year follow-up study

INTRODUCTION

Forte ceramic head on delta ceramic liner articulation showed satisfactory midterm results without ceramic-related complication. We aimed to investigate the clinical and radiological outcomes of cementless total hip arthroplasty (THA) with forte ceramic head on delta ceramic liner articulation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Overall, 107 patients (57 men, 50 women; 138 hips) who underwent cementless THA with forte ceramic head on delta ceramic liner articulation were enrolled. The mean follow-up duration was 11.6 years. For the clinical assessments, Harris hip score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), presence of thigh pain, and presence of squeaking were evaluated. Radiographs were assessed to search for osteolysis, stem subsidence, loosening of implants. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were evaluated.

RESULTS

The mean HHS and WOMAC improved from 57.1 and 28.1 preoperatively to 81.4 and 13.1 at the final follow-up, respectively. Nine revisions (6.5%) were performed; 5 hips for stem loosening, 1 hip for ceramic liner fracture, 2 hips for periprosthetic fracture, and 1 hip for progressive osteolysis around cup and stem. Thirty-two patients (37 hips) complained squeaking, in which 4 cases (2.9%) were identified as ceramic-related noises. After a mean follow-up period of 11.6 years, 91% (95% CI 87.8-94.2) were free from revision of both femoral and acetabular components due to any reason.

CONCLUSIONS

Cementless THA with forte ceramic-on-delta ceramic articulation showed acceptable clinical and radiological results. Serial surveillance of these patients should be performed due to the possibility of cerami- related complications such as squeaking, osteolysis, and ceramic liner fracture.

A 10- to 12-year follow-up study of delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

We previously reported five-to-seven-year results of total hip arthroplasty (THA) with the use of delta ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearing. We conducted an extension study with a CT scan at a minimum of 10 years after surgery.

METHODS

From March 2009 to March 2011, 273 patients (310 hips) received cementless THA with delta CoC bearing, porous-coated cup and hydroxyapatite-coated stem. In this extended study, 252 patients (144 men and 108 women) (288 hips) with a mean age of 49.7 years (16-83) at surgery were followed for a mean of 10.4 years (10-12) with CT scans in 133 hips (46.2%, 133/288). Clinical and radiographic evaluations were made at each follow-up and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed with revision and reoperation as endpoints.

RESULTS

There were no more ceramic fractures. Compared to mid-term results, the incidence of squeaking and RLLs increased to 3.1% (9/288) and 19.4% (56/288), respectively. The RLL progressed to focal osteolysis in 3 hips (5.4%, 3/56). No hip had detectable wear or prosthetic loosening. Two hips were reoperated due to periprosthetic joint infection and periprosthetic femoral fracture in each. The survivorship decreased to 98.3% (96.7-99.9%) at 12 years.

CONCLUSION

During the extended follow-up, no additional ceramic fracture occurred, and the incidence of squeak increased by 0.7%. The long-term survivorship of Delta CoC THA was encouraging. However, focal osteolysis occurred around the hydroxyapatite-coated stem in 1% (3/288).

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II (Prospective cohort study).

Liner dissociation in a large-diameter ceramic-bearing acetabular component: a report of five cases

Background

Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings for total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been offering very favorable results and survivorship since their introduction. In order to increase range of movement (ROM) and decrease dislocation rates, some manufacturers have introduced larger diameter head (LDH) CoC bearings. This has been achieved with the use of preassembled cup designs, in which the ceramic liner is already fitted into the metal backing and implanted as a monoblock component by the surgeon. In this report we present data from a series of 5 patients with ceramic liner dissociation from a monoblock cup.

Case presentation

All cases were overweight men with acetabular components of 56 or 58 mm. After a mean of 5.5 (range, 3.5-6.7) years, all patients reported sudden pain and audible noise when performing activities of daily living. Liner displacement was suspected on plain radiographs and confirmed by Ct-scan. Pneumarthrosis was present in all cases. Taper modular junction wear and corrosion signs were observed in the four revised patients.

Conclusion

Although one of our case is still treated conservatively, implant revision is probably inevitable. Further LDH CoC implant design should take in consideration this potential complication by avoiding bearing diameters over 40mm and/or improving locking mechanism or by providing a real monoblock acetabular implant.

Comparison of accuracy of cup position using portable navigation versus alignment guide in total hip arthroplasty in supine position

BACKGROUND

Accelerometer-based portable navigation systems in supine total hip arthroplasty (THA) have been developed, but there are no reports on the accuracy of cup placement. We aimed to investigate and compare the accuracy of the accelerometer-based portable navigation system versus the acetabular alignment guide placed on the pelvis in THA using the direct anterior approach (DAA). Both devices tracked changes in the pelvic position.

METHODS

In this single-centre, retrospective study, we reviewed 115 hips in 113 patients who underwent primary THA via the DAA using an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in the supine position (portable navigation group) and 106 hips in 101 patients who underwent THA using an acetabular alignment guide (alignment guide group) as controls. Hips were evaluated postoperatively using computed tomography to measure cup orientation. The accuracy of cup orientation was compared between the 2 groups.

RESULTS

Absolute values of inclination error were 3.1° ± 2.2° and 2.9° ± 2.3° (p = 0.708) in the portable navigation and alignment guide groups and those of anteversion error were 2.8° ± 2.3° and 3.7° ± 2.7°, respectively (p = 0.005). The number of cups placed within 10° of error was 98.3% and 96.2% in the portable navigation and alignment guide groups, respectively (p = 0.304). The portable navigation group had significantly more hips (72.2%) placed within a 5° margin of error than did the alignment guide group (56.6%) (p = 0.016).

CONCLUSION

High accuracy in cup placement was achieved using accelerometer-based portable navigation in supine THA. Using a navigation system may contribute to improved long-term outcomes.

Biomaterial Properties of Femur Implant on Acetabulum Erosion: A Review

The hip is one in every of the various joint at intervals the body. The correct operating of this joint is essential. For the aim once the hip is injured whole, a substitution procedure of the entire joint ought to be done to reinstate its operating, that is known as absolute hip surgical process. It is finished with the assistance of inserts of various biomaterials, as an example, polymers, metals, and pottery. The primary issues with regard to the utilization of various biomaterials are the reaction of the body's instrument to wear trash. Throughout this audit, biomaterials that are developing is talked regarding aboard the wear and tear and tear conduct and instrument. To boot, the numerous properties of the biomaterials are talked regarding aboard the expected preferences and drawbacks of their utilization. Further, the blends of various biomaterials at intervals the articulating surfaces are cleft and so the problems regarding their utilization are assessed. This paper hopes to passes away an in depth review of the trauma fringe of bearing surfaces of hip prosthetic devices. Additionally, this paper can offer AN ordered blueprint of the materials nearby their favorable circumstances and detriments and besides the conceivable outcomes of use. Keywords: - Hip implant; Biomaterials; Wear mechanism; Bearing surfaces; Polymers

Articular Noise After THA Using Delta CoC Bearings Has Little Impact on Quality of Life

BACKGROUND

To report clinical outcomes and survival at a minimum of 10 years of a consecutive series of uncemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) with fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings and determine the incidence of articular noises, their risk factors, and impact on quality of life (QoL).

METHODS

From a series of 456 CoC THAs, there were 25 revisions, 38 deceased, and 36 lost to follow-up. The remaining 357 hips were assessed at 11.1 ± 0.7 years (range, 10-14) using the Forgotten Joint Score, Oxford Hip Score, and a questionnaire on articular noises. Kaplan-Meier survival was calculated, and multivariable analysis was performed to determine associations between articular noise and patient/surgical factors.

RESULTS

The 10-year survival was 96.3% for the cup, 96.5% for the stem, and 94.2% for all components. The Forgotten Joint Score was 79 ± 26 (range, 0-100), and Oxford Hip Score was 16 ± 7 (range, 12-60). The mean impact of articular noises on QoL was 1.8 ± 2.9 (range, 0-9): considered negligible in 60 hips (16%), moderate in 27 hips (7%), and severe in only 13 hips (4%). Multivariable analyses revealed that the incidence of articular noise decreased with age (odds ratio [OR], 0.94; P = .001), body mass index (OR, 0.85; P = .001), and in hips implanted with 32-mm (vs 36 mm) heads (OR, 0.18; P = .030).

CONCLUSION

Of 100 hips (28%) that reported some articular noises 10 years after CoC THA, the impact of articular noises on QoL was negligible for most patients. Although larger heads can improve mobility and reduce risks of dislocations, surgeons must be aware that increasing head size could also increase risks of articular noises, notably in young and active patients.

Correction of a Squeaky Knee After ACL Reconstruction Surgery: A Case Report

CASE

We report a squeaking knee complication on weight-bearing and active flexion-extension because of a migrating nonabsorbable FiberWire suture in a 16-year-old boy who underwent anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. Although not physically limiting, the noise caused psychological distress in our patient as a young adult. As the noise did not resolve with nonsurgical treatment, we performed arthroscopic surgical correction and removed loose FiberWire strands protruding from the femoral tunnel which completely eliminated the sound.

CONCLUSIONS

Squeaking knee complications because of migrating nonabsorbable sutures post-ACL reconstruction surgery do not heal with time and can be corrected surgically.

Squeaking Is Common and Increases Over Time Among Patients With Long-term Follow-up After Ceramic-on-ceramic THA

BACKGROUND

Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) is a durable bearing with excellent wear characteristics, but squeaking remains a concern. The proportion of patients who report squeaking varies widely between studies performed at short- and mid-term follow-up.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

(1) What proportion of patients treated with CoC THA bearings report squeaking at a minimum of 10 years of follow-up? (2) Are patient, implant, or radiographic factors associated with squeaking? (3) Are THAs that squeak more likely to be revised than those that do not? (4) Are patient-reported functional outcome scores lower between THAs that squeak and THAs that do not squeak at long-term follow-up?

METHODS

Between January 1, 2003 and August 31, 2008 a total of 80 patients received THAs with third-generation alumina-on-alumina bearings at one center. Of the original 80 patients, 1% (1 of 80) had died, and 21% (17 of 80) were lost to follow-up before 10 years, leaving 62 patients for analysis at a median (range) of 14 years (11 to 16). Ceramic-on-ceramic THA represented 23% (80 of 343) of all primary THAs performed during the study period. Ceramic-on-ceramic THA was used preferentially in patients younger than 50 years of age. The mean (range) age of patients in the cohort was 44 ± 11 years (18 to 65). Sixty-eight percent (42 of 62) were men. Two separate manufacturers' implants were included. There were uncemented acetabular and femoral components included in this study. All CoC bearings were third-generation alumina-on-alumina. Squeaking was determined through a mailed questionnaire or telephone interview. The 10-question survey developed by the researchers queried patients whether audible "squeaking" could be heard from their hip replacement. Patients were asked to write in their description of the noise to distinguish squeaking from other noises not relevant to the current study. Implant information, component position, and patient demographics were obtained via chart review and postoperative radiographs reviewed by one of the investigators not involved with the index operative procedure. Using revision for any reason as an endpoint, a Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to compare survivorship between THAs that squeaked versus those that did not. Patient-reported outcomes were surveyed using the Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (HOOS JR), which comprises six items regarding patient pain and function, raw summed scores range from 0 (perfect hip health) to 24 (total hip disability).

RESULTS

Squeaking was self-reported by 53% (33 of 62) of patients in this group. Squeaking was more common in patients who received the titanium-molybdenum-zirconium-iron stem than in patients with the titanium-aluminum-vanadium stem (63% [29 of 46] versus 31% [4 of 13]; odds ratio 3.8 [95% CI 1.02 to 14.4]; p = 0.046). We found no differences in the likelihood a patient would report squeaking based on component position, component size, patient age, sex, or BMI. Ten-year survivorship free from revision was not lower in patients who reported squeaking (91% [95% CI 74 to 97] versus 90% [95% CI 71 to 96]; p = 0.69). Patient-reported outcome scores (HOOS JR) were not lower in those who reported squeaking (3 ± 3 [95% CI 1.5 to 4.0] versus 3 ± 5 [95% CI 1.5 to 5.5]; p = 0.59).

CONCLUSION

At long-term follow-up, we found that CoC bearing squeaking in patients who underwent THA is more common than previously reported. Survivorship was lower than expected in this cohort, and most revisions in this series were for squeaking. Although implant-dependent, surgeons should counsel patients about the potential for squeaking in CoC THA, which may occur years after index procedure.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

The reasons for ceramic-on-ceramic revisions between the third- and fourth-generation bearings in total hip arthroplasty from multicentric registry data

This study aimed to evaluate (1) the overall reasons for first revision in CoC THAs; (2) whether the reasons for revision differ between third-generation and fourth-generation CoC THAs; and (3) the specific factors associated with bearing-related problems as the reason for revision. We retrospectively reviewed 2045 patients (2194 hips) who underwent first revision THA between 2004 and 2013, among which 146 hips with CoC bearings underwent revision. There were 92 hips with third-generation ceramic bearings and 54 hips with fourth-generation ceramic bearings. The major reasons for CoC THA revisions were ceramic fracture and loosening of the cup or stem. When ceramic fracture, squeaking, incorrect ceramic insertion, and unexplained pain were defined as directly related or potentially related to ceramic use, 28.8% (42/146) of CoC revisions were associated with bearing-related problems. Among the third-generation ceramic bearings, revision was performed in 41.3% (38/92) of cases owing to bearing-related problems whereas revisions were performed for only 7.4% (4/54) of cases with fourth-generation ceramic bearings owing to bearing-related problems (p < 0.001). Younger age, lower American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) grade, and preoperative diagnosis of osteonecrosis were factors related to CoC THA revisions due to bearing-related problems.

Effects of body mass index and range of motion on intraoperative change in pelvic tilt during total hip arthroplasty using the direct anterior approach

BACKGROUND

Intraoperative pelvic tilt changes that occurs during total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the supine position affects cup placement and sometimes causes malalignment. The relationship between body mass index (BMI) and pelvic movement has been reported for some procedures, but not the direct anterior approach (DAA). The purpose of this study was to investigate intraoperative pelvic tilt changes that occurs during DAA.

METHODS

In this single-center, retrospective study, we reviewed 200 hips that underwent primary THA via DAA in the supine position using an accelerometer-based navigation system. Intraoperative changes in pelvic tilt and axial rotation from the start of surgery to cup placement were assessed using the navigation system. Preoperative clinical factors that increased pelvic tilt and axial rotation toward the surgical side by > 10° were analyzed via univariate and multiple logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

The mean pelvic tilt value increased by 7.6° ± 3.8° (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.1-8.2; range, - 5.0-19.0) intraoperatively, and the axial rotation increased by 3.2° ± 2.7° (95% CI, 2.7-3.7; range, - 13.0-12.0). Univariate analysis revealed that the group with increased pelvic tilt showed significantly greater range of abduction and internal rotation, and significantly lower BMI than the group with no increased tilt. Pre-incisional pelvic tilt was significantly greater in the group with increased axial rotation than in the group with no increased rotation. On logistic regression analysis, BMI (odds ratio [OR], 0.889; 95% CI, 0.809-0.977; p = 0.014) and the range of internal rotation (OR, 1.310; 95% CI, 1.002-1.061; p = 0.038) were predictors of large increases in pelvic tilt. No predictors of large increases in axial rotation were identified.

CONCLUSION

Significant forward pelvic tilt was observed in patients with a low BMI values and high ranges of internal rotation via THA using the DAA. Findings indicated that surgeons should pay attention to intraoperative pelvic movements, which may help identify patients with significant pelvic tilt changes.

Arthroscopic evaluation and treatment of a squeaking hip. A case report

Background

Squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty is an unexpected complication which occurs in 1- 30% of patients. Revision surgery is required in 0.2% of the cases, when a ceramic fracture is suspected, or in case of severe malposition of the implants, subluxation, or impingement. Hip arthroscopy may be a useful diagnostic and therapeutic option in squeaking hips.

Case presentation

A patient presenting with a pain-free squeaking underwent hip arthroscopy to examine the sliding surfaces and the rim of the acetabulum, and to search for signs of impingement. Thorough lavage and debridement of hip synovitis and fibrous tissue was performed. The squeaking noise immediately disappeared after the surgery. The patient was allowed to fully weight bear as tolerated with 2 crutches for 2 weeks. Two years after the arthroscopy, the patient remained symptom-free.

Conclusions

The potential reasons for hip squeaking in our patient are discussed. Hip arthroscopy may prove useful as a diagnostic and therapeutic option for some patients presenting with a squeaking ceramic-on ceramic hip replacement.

Lewinnek Safe Zone References are Frequently Misquoted

BACKGROUND

Optimal acetabular component orientation in total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a necessity in achieving a stable implant. Although there has been considerable debate in the literature concerning the safe zone, to date, there has not been any review to determine if these references are consistent with the definition applied by Lewinnek et al. in 1978. Therefore, this article aims to examine the available literature in the PubMed database to determine how often a correct reference to the safe zone as defined by Lewinnek was applied to discussions regarding THA.

METHODS

A search for literature in the PubMed database was performed for articles from 1978 to 2019. Search criteria included terms 'Lewinnek,' 'safe zone,' and 'total hip arthroplasty.' Exclusions included abstract-only articles, non-English articles, articles unrelated to THA, and those lacking full content.

RESULTS

A review of literature yielded 147 articles for inclusion. Overall, only 11% (17) cited the Lewinnek article correctly. Forty-five percent (66) of articles referenced measurements in the supine position, 18% (26) referenced other positions, and 37% (55) did not specify. Nineteen percent (28) reported measurements of the acetabular cup orthogonal to the anterior pelvic plane, while 73% (108) did not, and 7% (11) did not specify. Twenty-three percent (34) measured from computed tomography scans instead of other methods.

CONCLUSIONS

In the discussion of the safe zone regarding THA, only 11% of articles listed are consistent with the definition established by Lewinnek. This warrants further investigation into a consistent application of the term and its implications for THA implant stability and dislocation rates.

Does prior core decompression have detrimental effect on subsequent total hip arthroplasty for osteonecrosis of the femoral head: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Core decompression (CD) is effective in relieving pain and delaying the progression to total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH). However, the influence of CD on subsequent THA has not yet been established. Therefore, we performed this systematic review to answer: does prior CD have detrimental effect on subsequent THA for ONFH, especially with regards to survivorship and functional results, as well as perioperative and postoperative complications.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

After registration on PROSPERO (CRD42019118861), literature published up to and including November 2018 was searched in the PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library databases with predetermined terms. Comparative studies on the clinical outcomes between conversion to THA with prior CD (the Prior CD group) and primary THA (the Control group) for ONFH were included. The outcomes of interest included survivorship free from revision, the postoperative functional performance, perioperative and postoperative complications. Data was extracted systematically and a meta-analysis was performed.

RESULTS

Overall, 5 retrospective cohort studies with 110 hips were identified for the Prior CD group and 237 hips were identified for inclusion in the Control group. All of the studies were of high quality in terms of the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. No difference in the rate of revision between the two groups (2/42 (4.8%) vs. 4/160 (2.5%); RR=1.92; 95% CI=0.34 to 10.75; p=0.46) was detected after a minimum two-year follow-up. The mean postoperative Harris Hip Score was similar between the two groups in all 5 studies. The two groups experienced similar blood loss (Mean difference=12.17ml; 95% CI= -15.28 to 39.61ml; p=0.38). Moreover, intraoperative fracture was increased in the Prior CD group, though this did not reach statistical significance (3/31 (9.7%) vs. 0/55 (0.0%); RR=7.05; 95% CI=0.82 to 60.78; p=0.08). Similarly, osteolysis or radiolucent lines were more likely to occur in the Prior CD group without statistical significance (9/81 (11.1%) vs. 6/200 (3.0%); RR=3.14, 95% CI=0.98 to 10.06; p=0.05).

DISCUSSION

The present evidence indicated that prior CD does not detrimentally affect the survivorship nor hip scores of subsequent THA. Attention should be paid, however, to the potential for intraoperative fracture, postoperative osteolysis or radiolucent lines.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III; systematic review and meta-analysis of level III retrospective comparative studies.

Large head ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in primary total hip arthroplasty: average 3-year follow-up of a multicentre study

BACKGROUND

Surgeons are increasingly using larger femoral head sizes in total hip arthroplasty (THA) to improve stability and reduce the rate of dislocation, 1 of the leading causes of revision surgery. Large ceramic head sizes up to 48 mm can now be used with monoblock acetabular components. National registries have shown promising results at short-term with large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic THA, with very low revision rates.This study reports on the average 3-year follow up of a press-fit monoblock large diameter acetabular shell with a pre-assembled ceramic liner, with emphasis on the radiographic outcome, complications related to the implantation of the cup, and the patient's clinical outcome.

METHODS

170 hips in 169 patients were reviewed at an average 38 ± 5.8 months following surgery.

RESULTS

The radiographic review revealed no acetabular cup loosening, no osteolysis and no cup migration. 1 acetabular cup was revised for malposition. The patient clinical outcome and the satisfaction rate were excellent. At 3 years, 7.1% of patients complained of groin pain and 3.5% spontaneously reported hip joint generated noise. 1 patient sustained a non-recurrent traumatic hip dislocation 2 years post surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

New technology should be introduced cautiously on the market. This is especially true for the large diameter ceramic monoblock acetabular component used in this study since it involves a new acetabular component design. At short term, we have not identified new modes of failure with this implant. Longer follow-up is still needed to assess the safety of large ceramic bearing in THA.

Outcome of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty with 4th Generation 36 mm Head Compared to that with 3rd Generation 28 mm Head by Propensity Score Matching

BACKGROUND

With the development of 4th generation ceramic bearing, the large ceramic head is available for ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty (THA). This retrospective study aimed to compare the outcomes of ceramic-on-ceramic THA with 4th generation 36 mm head to those with 3rd generation 28 mm head using propensity score matching.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the results of 133 ceramic-on-ceramic THAs with 4th generation 36 mm ceramic head in 129 patients and 133 ceramic-on-ceramic THAs identified from 405 ceramic-on-ceramic THAs with 3rd generation 28 mm head by propensity score matching. There were 83 males and 50 females in both groups with a mean age of 55 years. There was no significant difference in other demographic features except for follow-up period (4.2 years in the 36 mm group and 6.4 years in the 28 mm group, p < 0.001). Clinical and radiological results and occurrence of complication were compared between the two groups.

RESULTS

Harris Hip Score was increased significantly from 46.4 to 92.1 in the 36 mm group and from 46.7 to 93.6 in the 28 mm group. No loosening or osteolysis was observed in the 36 mm group. However, one hip showed radiologic sign of loosening in the 28 mm group. As for complication, postoperative dislocation was more frequent in the 28 mm group (6 in the 28 mm group vs. 0 in the 36 mm group, p = 0.03). Otherwise, there was no significant difference in other results including inguinal pain, squeaking or ceramic fracture.

CONCLUSION

Ceramic-on-ceramic THA with 4th generation 36 mm head significantly reduced postoperative dislocation rate without increasing the rate of inguinal pain, squeaking, or ceramic fracture compared to that with 3rd generation 28 mm head.

Ceramic-on-Ceramic Total Hip Arthroplasty with Large Diameter Heads: A Systematic Review

Ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) total hip arthroplasties (THAs) with large heads (>36 mm) were introduced to reduce dislocation rates and restore the hip anatomy as closely as possible to the native one. To date, the literature is scarce and fragmented; a review is desirable to point out the outcomes and the possible specific complications (noise, groin pain, and taperosis). A systematic review about large-diameter COC THAs was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The PubMed and Cochrane databases were searched using the terms "large", "big", "head", "hip", and "ceramic." The methodological quality of the papers was assessed using the MINORS (Methodological Index for Nonrandomized Studies) score. Seven papers (level of evidence: 5 case series and 2 case-control studies) met the inclusion criteria. Clinical outcomes were excellent in >90% of the patients. Groin pain was reported in only 1 article (7%). Radiological outcomes were positive. Minimal revision rates (<2%) were reported at short- to mid-term follow-ups. Dislocation rates were usually <1%. No bearing surfaces failed. No case of trunnionitis was reported. Noise occurred in up to 30% of the patients, mostly squeaking. The noise did not influence clinical outcomes or patients' satisfaction. Noise was inconstantly associated with component positioning, younger age, high articular excursions, and larger sizes. Large-diameter heads in COC THAs (≥40 mm) showed promising clinical and radiological outcomes with minimal revision rates. Noise is a cause of concern and should be carefully evaluated at longer follow-ups and in larger, prospective, and specifically designed case series.

Squeaking and other noises in patients with ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Noise in ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a potential symptom of abnormal bearing wear. Squeaking and other prosthetic hip noises are multi-factorial phenomena that can be analysed and may provide prognostic information.

METHODS

46 patients with noisy CoC bearings were investigated using X-ray, computed tomography and joint fluid analysis, and classified into either high or low risk of ceramic liner fracture groups according to previously published guidelines. Noise events from the bearings of 16 high risk cases which were subsequently revised were compared with 30 patients in the low risk control group who did not undergo revision. Noise events were analysed for their physical characteristics using a standardised protocol and classified as either low frequency and short duration 'clicking' or long duration and high frequency 'squeaking'.

RESULTS

The peak frequency of squeaking during forward walking was significantly higher for patients in the case group who were revised, compared with the control group. The patient-reported onset of squeaking (46 months postoperatively) was earlier than short-noise emissions (82 months). In the standardised sequence of movements, short-noise always occurred more frequently than squeaking. Small heads (28 mm) were more likely to develop short-noise, while large heads (⩾32 mm) were more likely to develop squeaking.

DISCUSSION

Noise evaluation may provide additional value for predicting failure of CoC bearings, though some questions should be better investigated in a dedicated prospective trial.

Comparison of ceramic-on-ceramic bearing vs ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene-bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty for avascular necrosis of femoral head: a prospective cohort study with a mid-term follow-up

Background

The ideal bearing surface for patients of avascular necrosis (AVN) undergoing total hip arthroplasty (THA) remains controversial. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes, health-related quality of life (HRQL), and wear of the bearing surface between ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) and ceramic-on-highly cross-linked polyethylene (CoXPE) THA for patients of AVN after midterm follow-up.

Methods

We performed a retrospective case-control analysis of 93 CoC and 77 CoXPE consecutive THAs for patients of AVN. The cases were followed at a minimum 5 years follow-up (average 7 years). Harris hip score (HHS) score and bearing-related complications were assessed. The health-related quality of life (HRQL) was assessed with the Short Form 36 (SF-36). Plain radiographs and computed tomography (CT) were used for radiographic evaluation.

Results

Both the CoC group and CoXPE group showed statistically significant improvements in HHS scores with no difference between the two bearing surfaces. There was no significant difference as for SF-36 at the latest follow-up between two groups, except for significant higher scores in the dimensions of general health in the CoC group (75.7 vs 64.7, P = 0.032). No radiographic evidence of osteolysis and loosening was present at the final follow-up. The mean wear rate of the CoC was 0.0096 mm/year and the CoXPE was 0.047 mm/year after evaluation with reconstructed CT.

Conclusions

CoC THAs acts as well as CoXPE THAs for patients with femoral head avascular necrosis after midterm follow-up. CoC bearing can significantly decrease the wearing rate than CoXPE bearing.

Are Ceramic Bearings Becoming Cost-Effective for All Patients Within a 90-Day Bundled Payment Period?

BACKGROUND

We analyzed whether the total hospital cost in a 90-day bundled payment period for ceramic-on-polyethylene (C-PE) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) bearings was changing over time, and whether the cost differential between ceramic bearings and metal-on-polyethylene (M-PE) bearings was approaching the previously published tipping point for cost-effectiveness of US$325.

METHODS

A total of 245,077 elderly Medicare patients (65+) who underwent primary THA between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the United States Medicare 100% national administrative hospital claims database. The total inpatient cost, calculated up to 90 days after index discharge, was computed using cost-to-charge ratios, and hospital payment was analyzed. The differential total inpatient cost of C-PE and COC bearings, compared to metal-on-polyethylene (M-PE), was evaluated using parametric and nonparametric models.

RESULTS

After adjustment for patient and clinical factors, and the year of surgery, the mean hospital cost up to 90 days for primary THA with C-PE or COC was within ±1% of the cost for primary THA with M-PE bearings (P < .001). From the nonparametric analysis, the median total hospital cost was US$296-US$353 more for C-PE and COC than M-PE. Cost differentials were found to decrease significantly over time (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patient and clinical factors had a far greater impact on the total cost of inpatient THA surgery than bearing selection, even when including readmission costs up to 90 days after discharge. Our findings indicate that the cost-effectiveness thresholds for ceramic bearings relative to M-PE are changing over time and increasingly achievable for the Medicare population.

32-mm ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty versus 28-mm ceramic bearings: 5- to 15-year follow-up study

INTRODUCTION:

This study aimed to compare the clinical and radiographic results of 28-mm ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasty (THA) to those of 32-mm CoC during a 5- to 15-year follow-up period.

METHODS:

107 joints (95 women and 6 men) underwent 28-mm CoC, and 60 (49 women and 7 men) underwent 32-mm CoC. The average patient age at the time of surgery was 56.1 and 55.7 years in the 28-mm and 32-mm CoC groups, respectively. Clinical and radiologic measurements of all patients were analysed.

RESULTS:

The mean preoperative Harris hip score (HHS) was similar in the 2 groups (28-mm, 58.9; and 32-mm, 58.5). However, at final follow-up, the mean HHS of the 32-mm CoC (91.8) was significantly better than that of the 28-mm CoC (88.2) ( p = 0.003), as were the ranges of motion (ROM) for flexion (98.3 ± 13.5° vs. 87.3 ± 19.3°, p < 0.001) and abduction (27.8 ± 14.9° vs. 22.1 ± 19.3°, p = 0.007). The mean wear rate was 0.0044 mm/year for the 28-mm CoC and 0.0044 mm/year for the 32-mm CoC. No ceramic fractures were found in the 2 groups. One joint in the 28-mm CoC (0.9%) required revision owing to progressive osteolysis. Kaplan-Meier survival at 10 years, with implant loosening or revision THA as the endpoint, was 98.3% for 28-mm CoC and 100% for 32-mm CoC ( p = 0.465).

CONCLUSION:

There was no significant difference in ceramic-related complications between the 2 groups. Our study demonstrated that the 32-mm and 28-mm CoC are safe and are associated with good clinical outcomes.

Could larger diameter of 4th generation ceramic bearing increase the rate of squeaking after THA?: A retrospective study

The present study aimed to evaluate the clinical outcomes and bearing-specific complications in a single center of 135 delta ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) total hip arthroplasties (THAs) and explore the occurrence rate of squeaking in 4th generation COC THAs and collate the risk factors for squeaking.We retrospectively analyzed consecutive cohorts of 127 patients (135 hips) who had primary THA with delta COC bearings in our hospital between April 2010 and April 2012. Preoperative Harris hip score (HHS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score, and University of California Los Angeles (UCLA) activity score were evaluated preoperatively and postoperatively. We also evaluated ceramic fracture, squeak, mid-term results, and survival.In our study, the final patient final follow-up date was July 31, 2016. The mean preoperative HHS improved from 39.5 to 93.1 points. Mean preoperative UCLA score was 3.2 points, improving to 8.2 points. The mean preoperative total WOMAC score was 55.5 points and the mean total WOMAC score was 13.3 points at the final follow-up. The Kaplan-Meier survival plot of revision for any reason as the end point was 98.5% and survival with ceramic fracture as the end point was 99.2% at a mean of 70 months' follow-up. One post-operative ceramic liner rim fracture occurred at 50 months after surgery. Thirteen of the 135 hips produced a squeaking sound. There were no significant differences in gender (P = .56), age (P = .20), body mass index (BMI) (P = .11), diagnosis (P = .46), cup inclination (P = .36), or cup anteversion (P = 1.0) between the squeaking and non-squeaking groups. However, the incidence of squeaking in the 36 mm COC femoral head bearings was higher than in the 28 mm size (13.6% vs 2.1%, P = .033).The 4th generation COC bearing performed well and provides an encouraging rate of survival with no osteolysis or loosening. However, we found that a squeaking sound associated with use of the delta ceramic occurred at a rate of 9.6%, with the larger-diameter heads having significantly higher incidence.

Primary total hip arthroplasty with fourth-generation ceramic bearings: Clinical and survival results with a minimum follow-up of 5 years

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the clinical results and survival of primary hip prosthesis with ceramic delta bearings (C-C) with a minimum follow-up of 5years.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A total of 205 primary hip arthroplasties performed between 2008 and 2012 were studied. The clinical results, pre-surgical and at 5years of follow-up were evaluated using the Harris Hip Score (HHS), the Short Form-36 (SF-36), the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the visual analogue scale (VAS). The position of the prosthetic components, periprosthetic osteolysis, loosening of the prosthetic components and ruptures of the ceramic components were studied radiologically. The adverse events related to bearings were recorded according to their diameter, paying special attention to prosthetic dislocations and the presence of noise. Survival with an endpoint of prosthetic revision for any cause was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Significant improvements were obtained in the HHS (88.7% of good/excellent results), SF36, WOMAC and EVA, P<.001. There were 19 adverse events related to the prosthesis (4 periprosthetic fractures, 4 dislocations, 2 superficial infections, 1 mobilization of the cup, 2 noises, 4 aseptic loosenings and 2 breaks of the prosthetic neck); 47.3% needed revision. The cumulative survival of the prostheses was 97.5% (95%CI: 96.4-98.5). No differences were found in survival, prosthetic adverse events, noise incidence or dislocations and clinical results among the different diameters used.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary hip prostheses with fourth-generation ceramic bearings showed good survival in the medium term, and good clinical results.

The Ideal Total Hip Replacement Bearing Surface in the Young Patient: A Prospective Randomized Trial Comparing Alumina Ceramic-On-Ceramic With Ceramic-On-Conventional Polyethylene: 15-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

The optimum bearing surface for total hip arthroplasty remains debatable. We have previously published our outcome at 10 years and this represents the 15-year follow-up.

METHODS

A total of 58 hips (in 57 patients with a mean age of 42 years) were randomized to receive either ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) or ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoP) total hip arthroplasty. We prospectively followed for survivorship, functional outcomes (using the Harris Hip Score and the St Michael's Hip Score [SMH]), and radiological outcomes.

RESULTS

At a minimum of 15 years, 3 patients had died, but not been revised. Seven were lost to follow-up. Five cases from the CoP group were revised (4 for polyethylene wear and osteolysis). Four from the CoC were revised; one each for head fracture, instability, infection, and trunnionosis. Both groups showed statistically significant improvements in Harris Hip Score scores and SMH functional scores, with no difference between the 2 bearings. For the CoP group, there was an improvement from 15.6 to 21.5 in the SMH and from 48.8 to 88.7 (P > .05); and for CoC, this improvement was 15.8 to 23.5 and 50.3 to 94.6 (P > .05), respectively. Mean wear rate of the polyethylene was 0.092 mm/y and for the CoC was 0.018 mm/y. Two patients in the CoC group had evidence of acetabular osteolysis vs 3 in the CoP. Six patients had femoral osteolysis in the CoC group and 12 in the CoP group.

CONCLUSION

Survivorship and function of the 2 bearing groups remains comparable; while the polyethylene wear and osteolysis may represent issues in the future.

Squeaking in fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement and the relationship with prosthesis brands: meta-analysis and systematic review

Background

Postoperative squeaking in patients who applied the fourth-generation ceramic bearing in primary hip replacement has not been reported systematically; we aim to study the squeaking incidence in the fourth-generation ceramic bearing and related risk factors for squeaking, and we also attempt to explore the relationship between squeaking and prosthetic brands.

Methods

The PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched, and 14 articles were finally included. Patients’ demographic data, surgical-related information, and prosthesis data were extracted. The occurrence rate of squeaking was calculated by meta-analysis, and subgroup analysis was performed based on prosthetic brands and follow-up time. Regression analysis was further applied to investigate the relationship between various risk factors and squeaking.

Results

The squeaking incidence in patients with the fourth-generation ceramic bearing was 3%. Age, gender, body mass index, and abduction and anteversion angles of acetabular cup might have no influence on squeaking. The squeaking incidence was significantly high with the presence of Delta Motion cup (DePuy, Warsaw, Indiana) and Secure-Fit stem (Stryker, Kalamazoo, MI), and the overall incidence of DePuy femoral stem was relatively small except for the Summit femoral stem. And there was no significant difference of squeaking incidence between less than 5-year and more than or equal to 5-year follow-up subgroups.

Conclusions

In our study, squeaking in the fourth-generation ceramic bearing occurred at a rate of 3%; occurrence rate was high when the Delta Motion cup was applied. We hope for more relevant researches to focus on this issue.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s13018-018-0841-y) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Bearing surfaces in primary total hip arthroplasty

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is widely considered one of the most successful surgical procedures in orthopaedics. It is associated with high satisfaction rates and significant improvements in quality of life following surgery. On the other hand, the main cause of late revision is osteolysis and wear, often a result of failure of bearing surfaces.Currently, several options are available to the surgeon when choosing the bearing surface in THA (ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC), ceramic-on-polyethylene (CoPE), metal-on-polyethylene (MoPE)), each with advantages and drawbacks.Very few studies have directly compared the various combinations of bearings at long-term follow-up. Randomized controlled trials show similar short- to mid-term survivorship among the best performing bearing surfaces (CoC, CoXLPE and MoXLPE). Selection of the bearing surface is often 'experience-based' rather than 'evidence-based'.The aim of this paper is therefore to evaluate the main advantages and drawbacks of various types of tribology in THA, while providing practical suggestions for the surgeon on the most suitable bearing surface option for each patient. Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3 DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.180300.

Are Ceramic Bearings Becoming Cost-Effective for All Patients?

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to analyze whether the cost for ceramic-on-polyethylene (C-PE) and ceramic-on-ceramic (COC) bearings used in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) was changing over time, and if the cost differential between ceramic bearings and metal-on-polyethylene (M-PE) bearings was approaching the previously published tipping point for cost-effectiveness of $325.

METHODS

A total of 245,077 elderly Medicare patients (65+) who underwent primary THA between 2010 and 2015 were identified from the United States Medicare 100% national administrative hospital claims database. The inpatient hospital cost, calculated using cost-to-charge ratios, and hospital payment were analyzed. The differential cost of C-PE and COC bearings, compared to M-PE, were evaluated using parametric and nonparametric models.

RESULTS

After adjustment for patient and clinical factors, and the year of surgery, the mean hospital cost and payments for primary THA with a C-PE or COC was within ±1% of the cost for primary THA with M-PE bearings (P < .001). From the nonparametric analysis, the median hospital cost was $318-$360 more for C-PE and COC than M-PE. The differential in median Medicare payment for THA with ceramic bearings compared to M-PE was <$100. Cost differentials were found to decrease significantly over time (P < .001).

CONCLUSION

Patient and clinical factors had a far greater impact on the cost of inpatient THA surgery than bearing selection. Because we found that costs and cost differentials for ceramic bearings were decreasing over time, and approaching the tipping point, it is likely that the cost-effectiveness thresholds relative to M-PE are likewise changing over time and should be revisited in light of this study.

Increase in Benign Squeaking Rate at Five-Year Follow-Up: Results of a Large Diameter Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearing in Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Squeaking is an on-going complication with a variable incidence of 0.5%-20.7%. The mechanism of squeaking has not been understood completely and is most likely multifactorial in nature. Previously, we have reported on a squeaking rate of 7.3% at 2 years. Our current results show a substantial increase in the squeaking incidence from 7.3% to 17.4% with the DeltaMotion articulation at the 5-year follow-up.

METHODS

Two hundred six total hip arthroplasties with a large ceramic-on-ceramic bearing were performed on 195 patients by 2 senior authors. The minimum duration of follow-up was 5 years (range 5-6.2).

RESULTS

The mean Harris Hip Score remained stable at 91.7 at 5 years compared to 92 after 2 years. However, we observed an increase in the squeaking rate from 7.3% after 2 years to 17.4% after 5 years. As in previous studies, we did not find significant differences between the silent and squeaking group in relation to age, height, weight, and femoral head diameter. In contrast, others reported no significant differences regarding range of motion and gender between the silent and the squeaking hip group at 2 years of follow-up, whereas at 5 years, the squeaking group showed a significantly higher combined range of motion and a higher relative risk of squeaking in women compared to the silent group.

CONCLUSION

While large diameter ceramic bearings may produce squeaking, especially in female patients, our mid-term clinical results of a large ceramic-on-ceramic bearing in total hip arthroplasty are encouraging. Nevertheless, long-term follow-up is recommended.

Third-generation pure alumina and alumina matrix composites in total hip arthroplasty: What is the evidence?

Wear, corrosion and periprosthetic osteolysis are important causes of failure in joint arthroplasty, especially in young patients.

Ceramic bearings, developed 40 years ago, are an increasingly popular choice in hip arthroplasty. New manufacturing procedures have increased the strength and reliability of ceramic materials and reduced the risk of complications.

In recent decades, ceramics made of pure alumina have continuously improved, resulting in a surgical-grade material that fulfills clinical requirements.

Despite the track record of safety and long-term results, third-generation pure alumina ceramics are being replaced in clinical practice by alumina matrix composites, which are composed of alumina and zirconium.

In this review, the characteristics of both materials are discussed, and the long-term results with third-generation alumina-on-alumina bearings and the associated complications are compared with those of other available ceramics.

Cite this article: EFORT Open Rev 2018;3:7-14. DOI: 10.1302/2058-5241.3.170034

Five-year follow-up of a prospective randomised trial comparing ceramic-on-metal and metal-on-metal bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty

AIMS

The primary aim of this independent prospective randomised trial was to compare serum metal ion levels for ceramic-on-metal (CoM) and metal-on-metal (MoM) bearing surfaces in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Our one-year results demonstrated elevation in metal ion levels above baseline with no significant difference between the CoM and MoM groups. This paper reviews the five-year data.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The implants used in each patient differed only in respect to the type of femoral head (ceramic or metal). At five-year follow-up of the 83 enrolled patients, data from 67 (36 CoM, 31 MoM) was available for comparison.

RESULTS

The mean serum cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) ion levels remained above baseline in both groups (CoM: Co 1.16 μg/l (0.41 to 14.67), Cr 1.05 μg/l (0.16 to 12.58); MoM: Co 2.93 μg/l (0.35 to 30.29), Cr 1.85 μg/l (0.36 to 17.00)) but the increase was significantly less in the CoM cohort (Co difference p = 0.001, Cr difference p = 0.002). These medium-term results, coupled with lower revision rates from national joint registries, suggest that the performance of CoM THA may be superior to that of MoM.

CONCLUSION

While both bearing combinations have since been withdrawn these results provide useful information for planning clinical surveillance of CoM THAs and warrants continued monitoring. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:1298-1303.

Patient Obesity Influences Pelvic Lift During Cup Insertion in Total Hip Arthroplasty Through a Lateral Transgluteal Approach in Supine Position

BACKGROUND

Movement of the pelvis during implantation of total hip arthroplasty (THA) has a major influence on the positioning of the acetabular cup. Strong traction caused by retractors leads to iatrogenic pelvic lift and can thus be partly responsible for cup malpositioning. The objective of this study was to investigate such factors that influence pelvic lift.

METHODS

The dynamic movement of the pelvis was measured during implantation of THA in 67 patients. This was done by measuring the acceleration using the SensorLog app on a smartphone.

RESULTS

At its maximum, the pelvis was lifted by an average of 6.7°. When impacting the press-fit cup, the surgical side was raised by 4.4° compared with the time of skin incision. This lift at the time of cup implantation correlates significantly with the body mass index and the patient's abdominal and pelvic circumference.

CONCLUSION

Every surgeon performing THA must be aware of the pelvic lift during an operation. Especially in patients with a high body mass index, a large abdominal circumference, or a large pelvic circumference, there is an increased risk of malpositioning of the acetabular cup. When impacting the cup, we recommend releasing the traction of the retractor, so that the pelvis can tilt back into its natural position, and thus, the anticipated cup positioning can be implemented as exactly as possible.

Influence of Surgical Approach on Pelvic Lift in Hip Arthroplasty During Cup Insertion

The position of the acetabular cup is a major factor in the long-term outcome of total hip arthroplasty (THA). Malpositioning of the acetabular cup frequently has been reported with the use of a minimally invasive implantation technique. It remains unclear whether the limited visibility or the increased retractor traction and thus tilting of the pelvis during cup implantation is the cause. This study investigated the influence of iatrogenically related pelvic lift using an anterolateral minimally invasive THA technique. In a group of 30 consecutive patients who underwent THA via a minimally invasive anterolateral approach, iatrogenic lifting of the pelvis was measured with a smartphone using a 3-axis accelerometer and compared with patients in a historical age- and sex-matched control group who underwent THA using a transgluteal approach. Postoperatively, the inclination and anteversion of the cup was determined on pelvic radiographs. In the anterolateral group, the pelvis was lifted by a maximum of 6.3° and by an average of 3.9° when the acetabular cup was impacted; no difference was noted compared with the transgluteal group. In contrast, the cups in the anterolateral group showed significantly increased inclination and reduced anteversion. In both techniques, the iatrogenic tilting of the pelvis at the time of cup implantation occurred to a comparable extent. Therefore, the significant differences in postoperative radiographs cannot be attributed to increased retractor traction on exposure of the acetabulum, which means that the limited visibility must be responsible. [Orthopedics. 2017; 40(4):e589-e593.].

The evolution of an uncemented acetabular component in alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty has improved clinical outcome

Aims

To determine the effect of a change in design of a cementless ceramic acetabular component in fixation and clinical outcome after total hip arthroplasty

Patients and Methods

We compared 342 hips (302 patients) operated between 1999 and 2005 with a relatively smooth hydroxyapatite coated acetabular component (group 1), and 337 hips (310 patients) operated between 2006 and 2011 using a similar acetabular component with a macrotexture on the entire outer surface of the component (group 2). The mean age of the patients was 53.5 (14 to 70) in group 1 and 53.0 (15 to 70) in group 2. The mean follow-up was 12.7 years (10 to 17) for group 1 and 7.2 years (4 to 10) for group 2.

Results

No hips were revised due to complications related to bearing fracture or to stem loosening. A total of 15 acetabular components were revised for aseptic loosening in group 1 and two in group 2. The survival rate for acetabular component aseptic loosening at eight years was 96.8% (95% confidence interval (CI) 94.8 to 98.7) for group 1 and 99.2% (95% CI 98.0 to 100) for group 2. The risk for aseptic loosening of the acetabular component was higher in group 1 (p = 0.04, Hazard Ratio (HR) 4.99), dysplastic acetabula (p = 0.01, HR 4.12), components outside Lewinnek´s zone (p < 0.001, HR 6.13) and in those with a hip rotation centre distance greater than 5 mm (p = 0.005, HR 4.09).

Conclusion

Alumina ceramic-on-ceramic THA is an excellent option for young patients. Although newer components appeared to improve fixation, acetabular reconstruction is essential to obtain a satisfactory outcome. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:749–58.

What Is the Frequency of Noise Generation in Modern Knee Arthroplasty and Is It Associated With Residual Symptoms?

BACKGROUND

Prior investigations have recognized the presence of patient-perceived noise generation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, questions remain regarding its overall frequency after both TKA and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) as well as with respect to its association with demographic and prosthesis-related factors and its association with patient-reported outcomes.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purposes of this study were (1) to determine the frequency with which patients report noise coming from the knee after TKA or UKA; (2) to identify patient and prosthesis-related factors associated with noise generation; and (3) to ascertain whether noise coming from the knee is associated with residual symptoms after knee arthroplasty.

METHODS

A five-center survey study was designed to identify patient-perceived noise and to quantify the degree of residual symptoms and functional deficits in patients after TKA or UKA. Data were collected by an independent, third-party survey center, which administered questions about residual symptoms, function, and pre- and postoperative activity levels. Patients meeting prespecified inclusion criteria were specifically questioned regarding perceived noises from their knee within the last 30 days; those who reported hearing noises sometimes, often, or extremely often were categorized as positive. We retrospectively identified 2671 patients who underwent TKA and 744 patients who underwent UKA and who met inclusion criteria; the final survey population included 1580 patients who underwent TKA and 476 patients who underwent UKA (68% response rate). TKA implant types included cruciate-retaining (59%), posterior-stabilized (16%), rotating-platform (13%), gender-specific (7%), and high-flex (5%). Differences in baseline demographic variables were accounted for using multiple logistic regression statistical analyses. Chi square analyses were used to compare the frequency of residual symptoms in those patients with and without noise generation.

RESULTS

Overall, 27% (557 of 2056; 95% confidence interval [CI], 25-29) of all patients undergoing knee arthroplasty reported hearing grinding, popping, or clicking from their operative knee in the last 30 days. Men (odds ratio [OR], 1.3; 95% CI, 1.0-1.6; p = 0.02) and younger patients (χ² [df = 7] = 67.3; p < 0.001) were more likely to report noise generation. After controlling for potential confounding variables, noise generation was more common after TKA (29%) than UKA (21%; OR, 1.5; 95% CI, 1.2-2.0; p < 0.001). Among TKA designs, the likelihood of noise generation was greater in posterior-stabilized (41%; OR, 2.5; 95% CI, 1.8-3.7; p < 0.001), rotating-platform (45%; OR, 2.8; 95% CI, 1.9-4.2; p < 0.001), and gender-specific (36%; OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2-3.2; p = 0.007) designs than in cruciate-retaining (23%) knees. Patient-perceived noise generation was associated with residual symptoms, including difficulty getting in and out of a chair (38% versus 25%, p < 0.001), limp (39% versus 25%, p < 0.001), swelling (42% versus 24%, p < 0.001), and stiffness (40% versus 23%, p < 0.001) compared with those who did not report noise generation after TKA.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients frequently perceive noises coming from the knee after arthroplasty, more so in TKA than UKA. Patients reporting noises from the knee were more likely to report functional limitations and the presence of a limp, swelling, and stiffness. Surgeons should inform patients preoperatively of this possibility, because unmet patient expectations are known to negatively impact patient satisfaction after surgery. Subsequent investigations should focus on determining if there is a causal relationship between noise generation and residual symptoms after knee arthroplasty.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, therapeutic study.

High prevalence of noise following Delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty

Aims

We evaluated the short-term functional outcome and prevalence of bearing-specific generation of audible noise in 301 patients (336 hips) operated on with fourth generation (Delta) medium diameter head, ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) total hip arthroplasties (THAs).

Patients and Methods

There were 191 female (63%) and 110 male patients (37%) with a mean age of 61 years (29 to 78) and mean follow-up of 2.1 years (1.3 to 3.4). Patients completed three questionnaires: Oxford Hip Score (OHS), Research and Development 36-item health survey (RAND-36) and a noise-specific symptom questionnaire. Plain radiographs were also analysed. A total of three hips (0.9%) were revised.

Results

There were 52 patients (54 hips, 17%) who reported noise, and in 25 (48%) of them the noise was frequently heard. In the multiple regression analysis, the only independent risk factor for noise was a specific THA brand, with a threefold increased risk (95% confidence intervals 1.39 to 6.45, p = 0.005) of noise compared with the reference THA brand. Patients with noisy hips had lower median OHS (43 versus 46.5, p = 0.002) and their physical functioning (p = 0.021) subscale in RAND-36 was reduced.

Conclusion

Noise was surprisingly common in this population. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2017;99-B:44–50.

Course of pelvic lift during total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

The position of the cup makes a major contribution to the success of total hip arthroplasty (THA). In conventional implantation of the prosthesis without navigation, the surgeon relies on the spatial position of the pelvis. However, iatrogenic manipulation of the pelvis during different surgical steps constantly changes the position of the pelvis during the operation. The position of the pelvis is substantial for the correct placement of the cup. The objective of this study was to investigate and visualize the course of this pelvic lift and correlate it to certain surgical steps.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Pelvic lift was measured in 67 patients during implantation of a THA. This was done by measuring acceleration using the SensorLog app on a smartphone. It was placed on the patient's contralateral anterior superior iliac spine and recorded the movement of the pelvis throughout the whole surgical procedure. The position of the pelvis was allocated to each of eight relevant surgical steps during the operation. These surgical steps were normed over the time axis and transferred to a diagram.

RESULTS

We found an average pelvic lift displacement of up to 14.9° upon placement in the figure-of-four position. This lift is particularly critical when exposing the acetabulum, as the true cup position can be unconsciously influenced. Average values of between 5.6° and 6.9° were found here.

CONCLUSIONS

When implanting a THA in supine position, the pelvis is not fixed on the operating table. Rather, the side to be operated on is lifted to a greater or lesser degree, depending on the surgical step to be performed. The retractor traction immediately before cup implantation should be minimized. Nevertheless, it should be taken into account that anteversion of the cup implant in relation to the table plane is systematically higher than in relation to the pelvic entry plane.

Is there any range-of-motion advantage to using bearings larger than 36mm in primary hip arthroplasty: A case-control study comparing 36-mm and large-diameter heads

BACKGROUND

Large-diameter (>36mm) total hip arthroplasty (THA) has developed rapidly since the advent of ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings and highly cross-linked polyethylene. Theoretically, the increase in diameter reduces the risk of instability, although the advantage of calibers beyond 36mm has not been demonstrated in terms of range-of-motion recovery. We conducted a comparative study with a single prosthesis model to determine whether increasing the caliber beyond 36mm provides: (1) better recovery of range-of-motion, (2) a higher functional score, and (3) reduction of the dislocation rate.

HYPOTHESIS

Increasing the range-of-motion by increasing the caliber beyond 36mm provides better range-of-motion.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We analyzed two consecutive, single-operator cementless THA series performed via the mini posterior approach, which differed only in the bearing system (51 metal-on-metal [MoM] with a mean caliber of 45mm±3.3 [range, 40-54] and 61 CoC with a 36-mm caliber). Both series were comparable preoperatively in terms of age, diagnosis, functional scores, preoperative range-of-motion, body mass index, UCLA activity level, and Charnley score. We compared the joint range of movement at follow-up and the gains in range of movement, onset of dislocation, and functional scores (Oxford, Postel-Merle d'Aubigné [PMA]).

RESULTS

The mean overall joint range-of-motion was 254°±39° (range, 150-310°) for an 81°±44° (range, -50 to 180°) gain in the MoM group and 256°±23° (range, 200-280°) for an 84°±40° (range, 0-160°) gain in the CoC group (NS). The MoM group presented the following results: Oxford=13.71±3.66 (range, 12-33) for a gain of 24.82 points±7.9 (range, -1 to 40), PMA=17.75±1.06 (range, 11-18) for a gain of 7.78 points±4.01 (range, 2-15). The CoC group had: Oxford=14.98±4.42 (range, 12-36) for a gain of 24.75 points±6.55 (range, 12-40), PMA 17.66±0.7 (range, 14-18) for a gain of 8 points±3.77 (range, 1-15). None of the gains and scores at follow-up differed significantly between the two groups. No episode of dislocation was identified.

DISCUSSION

The current trend of increasing femoral head diameters beyond 36mm to improve the gains in joint range-of-motion and function is not warranted. The potential side effects of increasing the caliber call for even greater caution in the use of large-diameter heads because our hypothesis has not been confirmed.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Case-control study, level III.

Morbidly Obese Patients Undergoing Reduced Cup Anteversion Through a Direct Lateral Approach

BACKGROUND

The presence of obesity negatively affects the results after total hip arthroplasty. The influence of morbid obesity on cup positioning is investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of radiographs from 790 patients in 2013 and 2014 was performed. The correlation of cup inclination and anteversion with body mass index (BMI) was analyzed. Three groups were formed: 139 patients with normal weight (BMI of <25 kg/m(2)), 566 patients with moderate obesity (BMI between 25 and 34 kg/m(2)), and 85 patients with morbid obesity (BMI of ≥35 kg/m(2)).

RESULTS

Cup anteversion significantly correlated with BMI (R = -0.127, p < 0.001) and patient age (R = 0.115, p = 0.001). This corresponded with a reduction of anteversion by 3.4° (p < 0.001) in the morbidly obese group compared with the normal-weight group. Cup inclination was not influenced by BMI or patient age.

CONCLUSIONS

The precision of cup positioning declines with increasing obesity. In addition, significantly reduced anteversion is found in younger patients. We assume that this is due to iatrogenically changed pelvic tilt resulting from increased pressure exerted on the dorsal and ventral acetabular rim retractors.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic Level III. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Results of Total Hip Arthroplasty after Core Decompression with Tantalum Rod for Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head

Background

Early stage osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) has many treatment options including core decompression with implantation of a tantalum rod. The purpose of this study was to evaluate clinical and radiological outcomes and potential complications during conversion total hip arthroplasty (THA) in such patients.

Methods

Six male patients (8 hips) underwent THA subsequent to removing a tantalum rod (group I) from April 2010 to November 2011. We retrospectively reviewed the medical records of these patients. We enrolled 12 age- and sex-matched patients (16 hips) during the same period, who had undergone primary THA without a previous operation as the control group (group II). All patients were followed for at least 3 years. We checked the Harris hip score (HHS), operative time, and volume of blood loss. Radiological results, including inclination, anteversion of the acetabular cup, presence of periprosthetic osteolysis, and subsidence of femoral stem were checked at the last follow-up.

Results

The mean preoperative HHS values were 56.5 (range, 50 to 62) and 59.1 (range, 42 to 70) in groups I and II, respectively. The HHS improved to 96.0 (range, 93 to 100) and 97.6 (range, 93 to 100), respectively, at the 3-year follow-up (p = 0.172). Mean operation time was 98.8 minutes (range, 70 to 120 minutes) in group I and 77.5 minutes (range, 60 to 115 minutes) in group II (p = 0.006). Total blood loss volumes were 1,193.8 mL (range, 960 to 1,360 mL) and 944.1 mL (range, 640 to 1,280 mL) in groups I and II, respectively (p = 0.004). No significant differences in inclination or anteversion of acetabular cup and no evidence of osteolysis or subsidence of the femoral stem were reported in either group in radiological follow-up results. However, one case of squeaking occurred in group I during the follow-up.

Conclusions

The two groups showed no clinical or radiological differences except extended operative time and increased blood loss. However, the incidence of squeaking (1 of 8 hips) was higher, as compared to the control group or previously reported values.

Oxidized zirconium head on crosslinked polyethylene liner in total hip arthroplasty: a 7- to 12-year in vivo comparative wear study

BACKGROUND

Osteolysis resulting from wear debris production from the bearing surfaces is a major factor limiting long-term survival of hip implants. Oxidized zirconium head on crosslinked polyethylene (XLPE) is a modern bearing coupling. However, midterm in vivo wear data of this coupling are not known.

QUESTIONS/PURPOSES

The purpose of this study was to investigate in vivo whether the combination of an oxidized zirconium femoral head on XLPE produces less wear than a ceramic head on XLPE or a ceramic head on conventional polyethylene (CPE) couplings and whether any of these bearing combinations results in higher hip scores.

METHODS

Between 2003 and 2007, we performed 356 total hip arthroplasties in 288 patients; of those, 199 (69.1%) patients (199 hips) were enrolled in what began as a randomized trial. Unfortunately, after the 57(th) patient, the randomization process was halted because of patients' preference for the oxidized zirconium bearing instead of the ceramic after (as they were informed by the consent form), and after that, alternate allocation to the study groups was performed. Hips were allocated into four groups: in Group A, a 28-mm ceramic head on CPE was used; in Group B, a 28-mm ceramic head on XLPE; in Group C, a 28-mm Oxinium head on XLPE; and in Group D, a 32-mm Oxinium head on XLPE. The authors prospectively collected in vivo wear data (linear wear, linear wear rate, volumetric wear, and volumetric wear rate) using PolyWare software. Preoperative and postoperative clinical data, including Harris and Oxford hip scores, were also collected at regular intervals. Of those patients enrolled, 188 (95%) were available for final followup at a minimum of 7 years (mean, 9 years; range, 7-12 years).

RESULTS

All bearing surfaces showed a varying high bedding-in effect (plastic deformation of the liner) up to the second postoperative year. At 5 years both oxidized zirconium on XLPE groups showed lower (p < 0.01) volumetric wear (mean ± SD mm(3)) and volumetric wear rates (mean ± SD mm(3)/year) (Group C: 310 ± 55-206 ± 55 mm(3)/year, Group D: 320 ± 58-205 ± 61 mm(3)/year) when compared with ceramic on CPE (Group A: 791 ± 124-306 ± 85 mm(3)/year) and ceramic on XLPE (Group B: 1420 ± 223-366 ± 88 mm(3)/year) groups. For those patients who had completed 10 years of followup (20 patients [44.5%] of Group A, 21 [45.7%] of Group B, 23 [47.9%] of Group C, and 22 [44.9%] of Group D), at 10 years, both oxidized zirconium on XLPE groups also showed lower (p < 0.01) volumetric wear (mean ± SD mm(3)) and volumetric wear rates (mean ± SD mm(3)/year) (Group C: 356 ± 64 to 215 ± 54 mm(3)/year, Group D: 354 ± 50 to 210 ± 64 mm(3)/year) when compared with ceramic on CPE (Group A: 895 ± 131 to 380 ± 80 mm(3)/year) and ceramic on XLPE (Group B: 1625 ± 253 to 480 ± 101 mm(3)/year) groups. When wear rates of both oxidized zirconium groups were compared, no differences were found at any time interval with the numbers available. Two hips (one from Group A and one from Group B) are scheduled for revision as a result of wear and osteolysis. There were no differences in hip scores among the groups with the numbers available.

CONCLUSIONS

In this study, in vivo wear parameters were lower when the combination of an oxidized zirconium head on XLPE liner was used at an average of 9 years (range, 7-12 years) followup. Further larger-scale clinical studies should confirm these findings and evaluate osteolysis and revision rates in association with the use of this bearing coupling.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, therapeutic study.

Review on squeaking hips

Squeaking is a well-recognized complication for hard-on-hard bearings. The nature of squeaking is not yet completely understood however it is considered a multifactorial phenomenon. Patient, implant, and surgical factors play a role in squeaking. It is believed that mechanisms damaging the fluid film lubrication in which these bearings function optimally have a critical role. Such mechanisms include edge loading, stripe wear, impingement, third body particles and ceramic fracture. The resonance of metallic parts can produce noise in the human audible range hence the implant metallurgic composition and design may play a role. Implant positioning can facilitate impingement and edge loading enhancing the occurrence of squeaking. The recent introduction of large heads (> 36 mm) 4^th generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearing may accentuate the conditions facilitating noise formation; however the current literature is insufficient. Clinically, squeaking may manifest in extreme hip positions or during normal gait cycle however it is rarely associated with pain. Evaluations of patients with squeaking include clinical and radiographic assessments. Computer tomography is recommended as it can better reveal ceramic breakage and implant malposition. The treatments for most squeaking patients include reassurance and activity modification. However for some, noise can be a problem, requiring further surgical intervention. In the occurrence of ceramic fracture, implant failure, extreme components malposition, instability and impingement, surgery should be advised. This review will aim to discuss the current literature regarding squeaking.