Outcome of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty in Management of Failed Metal-on-Metal Hip Arthroplasty

10-Year Clinical Review of Revision Hip Arthroplasty Following Previous Metal on Metal Hip Procedures with Preoperative Magnetic Resonance Imaging and Metal Ion Analysis: Abductor Tendon Avulsion Predicts Dislocation

INTRODUCTION

There is a paucity of long-term data following the revision of previous metal-on-metal (MoM) hip procedures. We hypothesized that functional and clinical results would be poor and that pre-revision serum ion levels and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings could predict the outcome.

METHODS

All patients who had completed a minimum of 10 years following the revision of a MoM hip procedure at our institution were contacted. Data recorded were post-revision complication, re-revision, Oxford Hip Score, and EuroQol-5-Dimension Score, along with pre-revision serum ion levels and MRI findings. There were 56 aseptic MoM revisions from a consecutive series of 86 that reached > 10 years of follow-up. The mean age at revision surgery was 60 years (range, 31 to 75), and the mean follow-up was 138 months (range, 120 to 161).

RESULTS

The mean Oxford Hip Score was 37.4 and was lower in the MoM resurfacing group (mean 36.1) versus the MoM THA group (mean 38.0), P=0.46. The mean EQ-5D was 8.9. Re-revision rate was 16%, which was associated with the exchange of both components, P=0.029. The overall dislocation rate was 11%, and 5% developed infection. Preoperative MRI was available for 46 hips: abductor tendon avulsion was present in 30% and was positively associated with postoperative dislocation, P=0.043. Pseudotumor formation was present in 20%. The mean metal ion levels preoperatively were cobalt, 366.1 nmol/L, and chromium, 211.6 nmol/L, with cobalt levels above our mean value of 366.1 nmol/L associated with Goutallier grades 3/4 abductor insufficiency, P=0.033, and trending towards association with pseudotumor formation, P=0.087.

CONCLUSION

Satisfactory patient-reported functional outcomes are attainable at over 10 years following revision surgery for failed MoM hip surgery. However, there is a significant risk of re-revision and dislocation, which may be predicted with MRI evidence of abductor insufficiency and adverse reaction to metal debris.

The use of dual mobility cups in revision total hip arthroplasty for failed large head metal-on-metal bearings

PURPOSE

Revision of failed large head metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a challenging procedure particularly to reconstruct acetabular bone defect due to osteolysis and to achieve hip stability due to soft tissue damages, both potentially caused by adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD). This study aimed to evaluate the outcome of dual mobility cup (DMC) constructs in revision THA for failed large head MoM bearings with a special attention to the occurrence of dislocation or re-revision.

METHODS

Between 2015 and 2019, 57 patients (64 THAs, 41 men, mean age = 65 ± 10 years) underwent revision for MoM THA with the use of DMC were prospectively included in our total joint registry. Mean time to revision was 11 ± 2.5 years. The causes for revision were adverse reaction to metal debris (ARMD) in 49 THAs (76%), painful hip with elevated blood cobalt-chromium ions in seven (11%), and acetabular aseptic loosening in eight (13%). The revision was complete in 22 THAs (34%) and acetabular only in 42 (66%). Clinical and radiographic outcomes, complications, and re-revisions were evaluated at most recent follow-up.

RESULTS

At mean follow-up of six ± 1.5 years, the pre- to postoperative Harris Hip Score improved from 74 ± 19 to 92 ± 4 (p = 0.004). Complications occurred in 11 cases (17%): five dislocations (8%), three periprosthetic infections (5%), two aseptic loosening of the acetabular component (3%), and two periprosthetic fractures (3%). Re-revision was required in six cases (9%).

CONCLUSION

The use of DMC is a reliable option to prevent instability and ensure a stable acetabular reconstruction in revision THA for failed large head MoM bearings. However, dislocation after revision remains a concern, particularly in cases of severe soft tissue damage related to ARMD.

Long-term Follow-up on Revisions of a Recalled Large Head Metal-on-metal Hip Prosthesis: A Single Surgeon Series

Background

In 2010, a recall was issued for a specific monoblock large head metal-on-metal (MoM) hip prosthesis due to short-term revision rates of 12%-13% (articular surface replacement, DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc., Warsaw, IN). High complication, infection, and rerevision rates for revised MoM implants have been reported. The purpose of the study is to report long-term outcomes and trend metal ion levels of this recalled MoM prosthesis from a single surgeon series.

Methods

Retrospective chart review was performed on all patients that underwent revision of large MoM hip replacements between 2010 and 2015. Pre- and post-revision Harris Hip Score (HHS), cup abduction angles, anteversion angles, and cup sizes were compared. Survivorship and HHS were the primary outcomes measured; serum cobalt and chromium levels were secondary outcomes. Multivariate linear regression was used to examine the correlation between prerevision serum metal ion levels and HHS.

Results

A total of 24 hips (21 patients) met inclusion criteria. Mean time to revision was 4.12 years ± 1.1. Mean follow-up was 10.0 years (7-11.9 years). Mean HHS increased significantly after revision from 48.5 to 89.5 (P < .001). Higher prerevision cobalt levels were correlated with lower prerevision HHS (cobalt R = 0.25; chromium R = 0.3160). There was no correlation with prerevision cobalt (P = .2671) or chromium (P = .3160) with postrevision HHS. Most recent metal ion testing revealed a significant decrease in both cobalt (P = .0084) and chromium (P = .0115). Survival rate is 100%.

Conclusions

Our study showed excellent survivorship and outcomes at 10 years. There were no failures for any reason including infection. This differs from previous studies and confirms excellent long-term results are possible with revision of this recalled MoM implant.

Do cobalt and chromium blood metal ion levels normalize after revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip replacements?

INTRODUCTION

Increased cobalt (Co) and chromium (Cr) serum levels are one reason for revision surgery in metal on metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA) patients. Dual mobility liners are a simple revision option; however, they preserve the metal shell and stem and it is therefore not clear if metal ion levels will fully normalize after revision surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Between April 2013 and December 2017 25 hips (24 patients) underwent revision from a MoM THA to an off-label dual mobility liner. Five patients were lost to follow-up and one patient refused leaving 18 patients (11 men, 7 female, average age 63.9 years) for pre- and postoperative metal ion level blood tests at a minimum follow-up of 2 years.

RESULTS

Fourteen patients were revised for osteolysis, two for elevated metal ion levels and two for fluid or cysts around the femoral or acetabular component. The average preoperative Co and Cr levels were 8.3 µg/l and 5.0 µg/l, respectively. At a minimum follow-up of 2 years (30-95 months), metal ions dropped to 0.8 µg/l. Harris Hip Score (HHS), Hip Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (HOOS), Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and the UCLA activity score improved non-significantly from pre- to postoperative. There was one postoperative complication in the study cohort. One patient with persisting pain required revision surgery to a standard acetabular component during the follow-up period.

CONCLUSION

The off-label use of a dual-mobility liner in the current study resulted in normalization of the metal ion levels suggesting that preserving the cobalt-chromium acetabular component has little impact on ion levels. In addition, dual mobility liners have a low complication and revision rate.

Uncemented versus cemented arthroplasty after metal-on-metal total hip replacement in patients with femoral neck fractures: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the clinical outcomes of primary metal-on-metal total hip replacement (MoM-TR) converted to uncemented total hip replacement (UTR) or cemented total hip replacement (CTR) in patients with femoral neck fractures (AO/OTA: 31B/C).

METHODS

Patient data of 234 UTR or CTR revisions after primary MoM-TR failure from March 2007 to January 2018 were retrospectively identified. Clinical outcomes, including the Harris hip score (HHS) and key orthopaedic complications, were collected at 3, 6, and 12 months following conversion and every 12 months thereafter.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up was 84.12 (67-100) months for UTR and 84.23 (66-101) months for CTR. At the last follow-up, the HHS was better in the CTR- than UTR-treated patients. Noteworthy dissimilarities were correspondingly detected in the key orthopaedic complication rates (16.1% for CTR vs. 47.4% for UTR). Statistically significant differences in specific orthopaedic complications were also detected in the re-revision rate (10.3% for UTR vs. 2.5% for CTR), prosthesis loosening rate (16.3% for UTR vs. 5.9% for CTR), and periprosthetic fracture rate (12.0% for UTR vs. 4.2% for CTR).

CONCLUSION

In the setting of revision of failed primary MoM-TR, CTR may demonstrate advantages over UTR in improving functional outcomes and reducing key orthopaedic complications.

Mid-term outcomes of uncemented or cemented arthroplasty revision following metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty failure: a retrospective observational study

Objective

To retrospectively compare the mid-term outcomes of uncemented or cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision for prior primary metal-on-metal (MoM) THA failure.

Methods

Data from 278 patients (278 hips) who underwent uncemented THA (UTHA) or cemented THA (CTHA) for prior primary MoM-THA failure from 2006 to 2016 were retrospectively analysed. Follow-up was performed 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and then every 2 years after conversion. The mean follow-up time was 96 months (range, 64–128 months). The primary endpoint was the modified Harris hip score (HHS). The secondary endpoint was the major orthopaedic complication rate.

Results

The HHS showed significantly greater differences in the CTHA than UTHA group 12 months after conversion. From the 12th month after conversion to the final follow-up, CTHA yielded better functional outcomes than UTHA. There were significant differences between the UTHA and CTHA groups in the rates of re-revision (14.4% vs. 4.9%, respectively), aseptic loosening (17.3% vs. 6.8%, respectively), and periprosthetic fracture (11.5% vs. 3.9%, respectively).

Conclusion

CTHA has more advantages than UTHA in terms of improving functional outcomes and decreasing the major orthopaedic complication rate.

Revision of failed metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty using cemented arthroplasty: a mean 10-year follow-up of 157 consecutive patients

OBJECTIVE

This study was performed to assess the outcomes of Asian patients who underwent conversion from metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (MoM-THA) to cemented THA (CTHA).

METHODS

One hundred and fifty-seven consecutive patients (157 hips) who underwent CTHA following primary MoM-THA from January 2005 to February 2015 were retrospectively analysed. The primary endpoints were the clinical outcomes. Follow-ups occurred at 3 months, 6 months, 1 year, 2 years, and then every 2 years following revision of MoM-THA.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up after conversion was 10 years (range, 5-14 years). Statistically significant improvements in the mean Harris hip score were observed between the preoperative and final follow-up evaluations (62.71 ± 13.85 vs. 84.03 ± 16.21, respectively). The major orthopaedic complication rate was 16.5% (26/157). Six (3.8%) patients underwent revision at a mean of 3.5 ± 1.3 years after conversion, predominantly because of prosthesis loosening or recurrent dislocation. Nine (5.7%) patients developed prosthesis loosening at a mean of 2.6 ± 1.1 years following conversion, two of whom requested revision surgery. Eleven (7.0%) patients developed prosthesis dislocation, four of whom requested revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

CTHA may yield favourable functional outcomes and a reduced rate of major orthopaedic complications.

Modular dual-mobility cups using ceramic liners: an original solution for selected indications?

BACKGROUND

Dual mobility (DM) has been shown to improve stability both in primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) and is increasingly used in patients at high risk of dislocation and in the treatment of THA instability. The introduction of modular liners has helped to overcome some of the limitations of monoblock DM cups. In this context, the use of a ceramic liner would avoid the conventional cobalt-chromium liner in the titanium shell, which can be problematic in some situations. The aim of this paper is to report the outcomes of a consecutive series of patients undergoing revision THA using a modular DM cup with a ceramic liner instead of the conventional metal one, and to clarify the rationale for this currently "off-label" use.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

This is a retrospective series of patients who received this new DM bearing in a single institution. Patients were followed up clinically and radiologically at 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and yearly thereafter.

RESULTS

5 patients received the ceramic liner in the study period (2014-2019). The indications were instability or high risk of dislocation in ceramic liner fracture and ARMD with soft tissue damage after MoM THA. The mean age at surgery was 74 (63-82) years, the mean follow-up was 36 (12-72) months. No dislocation occurred, and no adverse events related to the implant were recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of a ceramic liner in a modular DM cup offers several advantages in selected patients, and the results of our cohort are encouraging. However, caution is needed in introducing this new bearing because knowledge is currently limited. Further studies on a larger number of patients and with longer follow-ups are needed to confirm these findings and before widespread use of the device.

Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Revisions: Pearls and Pitfalls

BACKGROUND

At the turn of the 21st century, there was a re-emergence of metal-on-metal (MoM) articulation with 35% of all total hip arthroplasty implants having MoM articulation. Approximately 10 years after its peak use, MoM articulation began to decrease dramatically as revisions became more apparent because of adverse reaction to metal debris. Today, there are surveillance guidelines and reconstructive clinical pearls a surgeon should recognize.

METHODS

This article gives a literature-based overview of clinical pearls and discusses how to avoid pitfalls when performing revision of a metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty.

RESULTS

Patients with MoM can be risk-stratified based on symptom, implant, and testing variables. Those patients who are symptomatic and/or develop adverse reaction to metal debris with local tissue destruction will require a revision. The revision of MoM can be challenging due to bone and soft tissue destruction. Constraint may be needed in cases of abductor deficiency.

CONCLUSION

Although MoM implants for THA have declined significantly, surgeons are still faced with the revision burden from a decade of high use. Risk stratification tools are available to aid in revision decision making, and the surgeon should be prepared to address the challenges these revisions present.

Revision of Failed Metal-on-Metal Total Hip Arthroplasty: Midterm Outcomes of 203 Consecutive Cases

BACKGROUND

Metal-on-metal (MoM) revisions have shown high rates of complications from aseptic loosening, deep infection, and dislocation. The purpose of this study is to report on outcomes and complications of a large consecutive series of patients who were revised for failed MoM total hip arthroplasty (THA).

METHODS

We evaluated 188 patients (203 hips) who underwent revisions of failed MoM THA. Mean age at the revision was 60 years old. Gender was female in 112 hips (55%) and male in 91 hips (45%). Mean interval to failure after primary THA was 4.9 years (range, 0-18 years). The acetabular component was revised in 183 cases (92%). Clinical outcomes assessed included pain score and Harris hip score.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up from revision was 4.2 years. Harris hip score improved from 53.6 pre-revision to 73.5 at most recent follow-up (P < .001). Pain level significantly improved from 17.2 pre-revision to 32.8 post-revision (P < .001). Reoperations occurred in 28 (14%) hips. Re-revision was required in 16 hips (7.9%). The most common reasons for re-revision were aseptic loosening (5), dislocation (3), infection (2), and iliopsoas tendonitis (2). Re-revision was significantly higher in cases of pseudotumor. There was no difference in survival with ultraporous cups. Three hips required re-revision to custom triflange components. All-cause survival was 90.5% at 4.2 years. Metal ion levels significantly declined after revision.

CONCLUSION

Revisions of failed MoM THA showed improvements in clinical outcomes, but present significant surgical challenges and complications especially in cases with soft tissue damage and pseudotumor.

Perioperative factors associated with increased length of stay after revision of metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty

Objective

To investigate patient factors influencing length-of-stay (LOS) after revision metal-on-metal (MoM) total hip arthroplasty (THA).

Methods

We reviewed 23 hips undergoing revision of a MoM THA with minimum 2-year follow-up. A multiple linear regression was calculated to predict LOS using multiple variables.

Results

Average length of stay (LOS) was 2.1 days. Multiple linear regression analysis identified a significant correlation between presence of an abductor injury (beta = 0.8886; p < 0.0001), patient age (beta = -0.4452, p = 0.0083), and pre-revision head size (beta = 0.4082; p = 0.0172) with LOS (R² = 0.6351, p = 0.0002).

Conclusion

Patients with abductor injury, larger femoral heads, and younger age are at risk for longer LOS.

Risk Factors Associated With Early Complications of Revision Surgery for Head-Neck Taper Corrosion in Metal-on-Polyethylene Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Adverse local tissue reactions (ALTRs) due to tribocorrosion of head-neck taper junctions in contemporary metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) total hip arthroplasty (THA) are emerging as an important reason for failure requiring revision surgery. This study aimed at: (1) reporting early complication rates and outcome, and (2) identifying risk factors associated with complications of revision surgery for head-neck taper corrosion in patients with MoP THA.

METHODS

Forty consecutive revision surgeries in 39 patients (male, 16; female, 23) with MoP THA were evaluated. The follow-up period after revision was a minimum of 14 months (range, 14-45). The indication for revision surgery was the presence of symptomatic ALTR on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) with elevated metal ion levels.

RESULTS

The overall complication rate was 25% and the reoperation rate was 10%. The median serum level of cobalt ions decreased significantly 8.2 μg/L (1.2-56.1 μg/L) pre-revision to 3.1 μg/L (0.2-14.0 μg/L) post-revision (P < .01). High fretting and corrosion grades (Goldberg score ≥ 3) were observed in 82% of retrieved implants. MRI findings of solid lesion(s) with abductor deficiency (P < .01) and intraoperative tissue damage at revision (P = .02) were significantly associated with post-revision complications.

CONCLUSION

A high rate of early complications (25%) and re-revisions (10%) was observed after revision of ALTR associated with head-neck taper corrosion. Pre-revision MRI findings of solid lesion(s) with abductor deficiency and intraoperative tissue damage were risk factors associated with the occurrence of a complication after revision surgery. This information provides clinically useful information for clinical decision-making and preoperative counseling of MoP THA patients undergoing revision surgery for head-neck taper corrosion.

[Mid- and long-term effectiveness and failure causes analysis of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty]

Objective

To explore the effectiveness and failure causes of large-head metal-on-metal total hip arthroplasty (large-head MoM THA).

Methods

Between March 2007 and May 2010, 159 patients (183 hips) underwent large-head MoM THA, and the clinical data were analyzed. There were 50 females (54 hips) and 109 males (129 hips) with an average age of 50 years (range, 20-78 years). Single hip was involved in 135 cases (left hip in 69 cases and right hip in 66 cases) and double hips in 24 cases. The causes included femoral head necrosis in 74 cases (93 hips), Legg-Calve-Perthes in 1 case (1 hip), osteoarthritis in 18 cases (19 hips), developmental dysplasia of the hip in 17 cases (18 hips), osteoarthritis after hip septic infection in 8 cases (8 hips), traumatic arthritis of the hip in 6 cases (6 hips), femoral neck fracture in 17 cases (17 hips), ankylosing spondylitis in 8 cases (11 hips), rheumatoid arthritis of hip in 9 cases (9 hips), and adult onset Still's disease in 1 case (1 hip). Before operation, visual analogue scale (VAS) was 6.59±0.87; Harris score was 45.99±8.07.

Results

Healing of incisions by first intention was achieved, and no operative complication occurred. The patients were followed up 1.2-8.2 years (mean, 6.1 years). Implant failure was observed in 15 cases (17 hips), and the 5-year survival rate of large-head MoM THA was 91.80% (168/183). The causes of implant failure after THA were inflammatory pseudotumor in 4 cases (4 hips), acetabular aseptic loosening in 3 cases (3 hips), osteolysis in 4 cases (5 hips), acetabular aseptic loosening combined with inflammatory pseudotumor in 3 cases (3 hips), and functional disused in 1 case (2 hips). Of them, 9 cases (11 hips) did not receive revision surgery for various reasons, while 6 cases (6 hips) underwent revision surgery at 1.2-5.4 years (mean 3.7 years) after large-head MoM THA. At last follow-up, VAS and Harris score were 1.72±1.48 and 81.37±10.75 respectively, showing significant differences when compared with preoperative scores ( t=-35.547， P=0.000； t=33.823， P=0.000). The function was excellent in 44 hips, good in 89 hips, fair in 33 hips, and poor in 17 hips.

Conclusion

Large-head MoM THA has a high revision rate during mid- and long-term follow-up because of inflammatory pseudotumor, acetabular aseptic loosening, and osteolysis. Early revision can effectively improve the function of the hip and improve patients'quality of life.