Bone Remodeling in Acetabular Reconstruction Using a Kerboull-Type Reinforcement Device and Structural Bone-Grafting in Total Hip Arthroplasty

The 'Japanese paradox' of total hip arthroplasty: where are we going?

INTRODUCTION

There is a worldwide trend toward 'revisiting' cemented total hip arthroplasty (THA). In Japan, however, cemented THAs accounts for 11%, and the percentage of cemented hemiarthroplasty is estimated to be less than 10%. This review was designed to reconsider the option of cemented THA and to encourage policy changes in Japan to support the best possible care for patients.

AREA COVERED

In this article, we reviewed the history of THA and the current situations of the world, based on past reports and nationwide registries. Merits and demerits of cemented THA were evaluated from various perspectives.

EXPERT OPINION

Cemented THA had great advantages, including establishment of the acetabular cup, diversity of the femoral stem, antibiotic-loaded acrylic cement, revision, low incidence of periprosthetic fracture, and hemiarthroplasty. In patients older than 75 years of age, cemented THA resulted in the lowest risk of revision. Guidelines for femoral neck fracture recommended the use of cemented hemiarthroplasty in many countries because of low incidence of periprosthetic fracture. Numerous contradictions regarding implant price and cost of operations have also been noted in Japan. For the patients, we need to rethink what is truth and what is fiction.

Computer simulation study of cementless cup placement for dysplastic hip osteoarthritis using subluxation percentage of Crowe classification

It is often difficult to achieve adequate bone coverage of the cup in total hip arthroplasty in cases of severe developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH). This study aimed to evaluate the relationship between subluxation percentage of Crowe classification and cup center-edge (cup-CE) angle to investigate whether subluxation percentage according to the Crowe classification is a useful indicator for cementless cup placement. Cementless cup placement was simulated in 77 women with DDH in 91 hips (Crowe I, 35 hips; Crowe II, 35 hips; and Crowe III, 21 hips) using computed tomography-based computer simulation software. The cups were placed at the anatomic hip center (AHC) and 10-mm high hip center (HHC). The relationship between the subluxation percentage and cup-CE angle was evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation coefficient. In addition, the cutoff values for the subluxation percentage that satisfied a cup-CE angle ≥0° were determined using the receiving operating characteristic curve. The cup-CE angle was negatively correlated with the subluxation percentage in both AHC and 10-mm HHC (correlation coefficient ρ = -0.542 [p < 0.01] and -0.704 [p < 0.01], respectively). The cutoff values for subluxation percentage that satisfied a cup-CE angle ≥0° were 56.1% and 73.6% for AHC and 10-mm HHC, respectively. Cementless cup placement in AHC is difficult in cases with the subluxation percentage ≥56.1%, and HHC reconstruction or femoral structural autograft technique should be considered as an alternative. Moreover, placement at 10 mm above AHC is difficult in cases with subluxation percentage ≥73.6%.

Trabecular Metal Augments During Complex Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Background

Trabecular metal augments (TMAs) have been extensively used in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) to address acetabular bone defects. However, limited data exists regarding TMA utilization during primary THA. This study aims to assess the clinical and radiographic outcomes of TMAs used during primary THA.

Methods

A single-institution retrospective case series of primary THA patients treated with TMA between 2010 and 2019 was performed. Patient demographics, complications, and revisions were recorded. Cup position, center of rotation, leg length, and radiolucent lines were assessed radiographically. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to compute implant survivorship.

Results

Twenty-six patients (30 hips) were included with average age of 52.6 ± 15.3 years (range: 22-78) and mean follow-up of 4.1 ± 2.1 years (range: 2.0-8.9). Most TMAs were indicated for developmental dysplasia of the hip (n = 18; 60.0%). On average, hip center of rotation was lowered 1.5 ± 1.3 cm and lateralized 1.2 ± 1.5 cm, while leg length and global offset were increased by 2.4 ± 1.2 cm and 0.4 ± 1.0 cm, respectively. At final follow-up, 3 hips (10.0%) required revision: one (3.3%) for aseptic loosening and 2 (6.7%) for instability. No patients had progressive radiolucent lines at final follow-up. Five-year survival with aseptic loosening and all-cause revision as endpoints was 100% (95% confidence interval: 90.0%-100.0%) and 92.1% (95% confidence interval: 81.3%-100.0%), respectively. One patient required revision for aseptic loosening after the 5-year mark.

Conclusions

Trabecular metal augmentation during primary THA demonstrates satisfactory early to mid-term outcomes. TMA is a viable option for complex primary THA when bone loss is encountered or secondary support is required.

Level of Evidence

Level IV.

Treatment strategies for recurrent dislocation following total hip arthroplasty: relationship between cause of dislocation and type of revision surgery

Background

There are many therapeutic options for dislocation following total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aim of this study was to evaluate the results of revision surgery for dislocated hips.

Methods

Between November 2001 and December 2020, 71 consecutive revision hip surgeries were performed at our institution for recurrent dislocation following THA. We conducted a retrospective study of all 65 patients (71 hips), who were followed for a mean of 4.7 ± 3.2 years (range, 1–14). The cohort included 48 women and 17 men, with a mean age of 71 ± 12.3 years (range, 34–92). The mean number of previous surgeries was 1.6 ± 1.1 (range, 1–5). From intraoperative findings, we created six categories of revision hip surgery for recurrent dislocation following THA: open reduction and internal fixation (2 hips); head change or liner change only (6 hips); cup change with increased head size only (14 hips); stem change only (7 hips); cup and stem change (24 hips); and conversion to constrained cup (18 hips). Prosthesis survival was analyzed by the Kaplan-Meier method, with repeat revision surgery for re-dislocation or implant failure as the endpoint. A cox proportional hazards model was used for risk factors of re-revision surgery.

Results

Re-dislocation occurred in 5 hips (7.0%) and implant failure in 1 hip (1.4%). The 10-year survival rate was 81.1% (95% confidence interval, 65.5–96.8). A Dorr classification of “positional” was a risk factor for re-revision surgery due to re-dislocation.

Conclusion

Clear understanding of the cause of dislocation is essential for optimizing revision procedures and improving the rate of successful outcomes.

Comparison of re-revision rate and radiological outcomes between Kerboull-type plate and metal mesh with impaction bone grafting for revision total hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

This study compared the re-revision rate and radiographic outcomes of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device (KT plate) with bulk structural allograft and metal mesh with impaction bone grafting (IBG).

METHODS

Ninety-one hips of 81 patients underwent revision THA for American Academy of Orthopedic Surgeons (AAOS) classification type III defects from 2008 to 2018. Of these, seven hips of five patients and 15 hips of 13 patients were excluded due to insufficient follow-up information (< 24 months) and large bone defects with a vertical defect height ≥ 60 mm, respectively. The current study compared the survival and radiographic parameters of 45 hips of 41 patients using a KT plate (KT group) and 24 hips of 24 patients using a metal mesh with IBG (mesh group).

RESULTS

Eleven hips (24.4%) in the KT group and 1 hip (4.2%) in the mesh group exhibited radiological failure. Moreover, 8 hips in the KT group (17.0%) required a re-revision THA, while none of the patients in the mesh group required a re-revision. The survival rate with radiographic failure as the endpoint in the mesh group was significantly higher than that in the KT group (100% vs 86.7% at 1-year and 95.8% vs 80.0% at 5-years, respectively; p = 0.032). On multivariable analysis evaluating factors associated with radiographic failure, there were no significant associations with any radiographic measurement. Of the 11 hips with radiographic failure, 1 (11.1%), 3 (12.5%), and 7 (58.3%) hips were of Kawanabe classification stages 2, 3, and 4, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this study suggest that revision THA using KT plates with bulk structure allografts could provide poorer clinical outcomes than revision THA using a metal mesh with IBG. Although revision THA using KT plates with bulk structural allografts could set the true hip center, there is no association between a high hip center and clinical outcomes. The relationship between the position of the KT plate and the host bone might be considered more carefully.

Endofemoral Shooting Technique for Removing Well-fixed Cementless Stems

Background

The removal of a well-fixed cementless stem poses technical challenges. The aim of this study was to evaluate the outcomes of our endofemoral extraction technique established in 2001.

Methods

Between January 2001 and December 2016, 118 consecutive revisions following bipolar or total hip arthroplasty, which required cementless femoral stem removal, were performed at our institution. This retrospective study evaluated 106 patients (108 hips) who were followed up for a mean of 9.2 years (range, 5-20 years). The patients included 15 men and 91 women with a mean age of 65 years (range, 33-87 years). Endofemoral extracted stem removal was performed as follows. Multiple Kirschner wires were sequentially inserted into the interface between the implant and cortical bone, after which the implant was detached using a thin chisel. After the cementless stem was removed, it was replaced with a cemented stem using an autograft, as needed. Radiological loosening of the femoral stem was defined as definite or probable loosening, based on the criteria of Harris et al. Prosthesis survival was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, with the endpoint set as repeat revision surgery for stem loosening or femoral fracture.

Results

Re-revision surgery was performed in 7 hips. Stem loosening was observed in 4 hips, and the mean subsidence was 0.3 mm (0-3 mm). The 10-year survival rate was 97.7% (95% confidence interval, 93.2-100).

Conclusions

Our technique for removing well-fixed cementless stems yielded successful results.

Impaction Bone Grafting with Low Dose Irradiated Freeze-Dried Allograft Bone for Acetabular Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Reconstruction of acetabular defects has been extremely challenging in both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Impaction bone grafting (IBG) can restore the acetabulum bone mass and anatomically reconstruct the acetabulum. Our study aimed to report the short and medium-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of IBG for acetabular reconstruction in the cemented THA in the Chinese population.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective review enrolling 57 patients between May 2013 and July 2019. The patients with acetabular defects were treated with IBG, using low dose irradiated freeze-dried allograft bone with or without autograft bone, in the cemented THA performed by one senior surgeon. Harris hip score (HHS), standard pelvis anterior-posterior radiograph and lateral hip radiograph were obtained before operation and at 1 week, 3 months, 12 months, and yearly. Graft osteointegration was evaluated by Oswestry's criteria, and complication was documented at the last follow-up. Independent sample ANOVA test and Pearson chi-square tests are used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 61 hips in 57 patients. The average follow-up time was 35.59 months (5-77 months). According to AAOS classification, a total of 18 hips were identified as segmental bone deficiency (type I), with 21 and 22 hips for cavitary bone deficiency (type II) and the combined bone deficiency (type III), respectively. The average HHS was improved from 44.49 (range: 32-58) preoperatively to 86.98 (range: 78-93) postoperatively. Graft osteointegration was satisfactory (Oswestry score ≥2) in all patients. No dislocation occurred in the 57 patients (61 hips) during follow-up. Although one cup migrated, no revision, re-revision, radiographic loosening, graft bone lysis, or postoperative complications were detected at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

IBG with low-dose irradiated freeze-dried allograft bone in acetabular bone defect reconstruction is a reliable technique for restoring acetabular bone defects in THA.

Revision total hip arthroplasty using a Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement device and allogeneic structural bone graft

PURPOSE

One of the major problems in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) is severe acetabular bone loss. The aim of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes of revision THA using a Kerboull-type reinforcement device (KT plate) and allogeneic structural bone graft.

METHODS

This retrospective study evaluated 48 hips that underwent revision THA using a KT plate and allogeneic structural bone graft between 2008 and 2016, with a median follow-up of 6.2 years (range 3-12.6 years). Functional outcome was assessed using the Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) hip score. Postoperative and follow-up radiographs were compared to assess migration and breakage of the implant.

RESULTS

The mean JOA hip score improved from 45.6 (±16.3) points before surgery to 72.1 (±11.9) points at the most recent follow-up examination (p < 0.001). Two hips (4.2%) underwent re-revision THA because of cup loosening due to breakage of the KT plate. A total of 13 hips (27.1%) were classified as radiological failures. Binomial logistic regression analysis showed that a Kawanabe classification of stage 4, which indicates massive bone defects in the weight-bearing area, was a risk factor for radiological failure (odds ratio: 4.57; 95% confidence interval: 1.01-26.35).

CONCLUSIONS

A KT plate with an allogeneic structural bone graft is a useful method of acetabular reconstruction in revision THA that restores bone stock and improves hip function. Our findings indicated that a Kawanabe classification of stage 4 was a risk factor for radiological failure of the implant.

Acetabular reconstruction for primary and revision total hip arthroplasty using Kerboull-type acetabular reinforcement devices-case-control study with factors related to poor outcomes of surgery

Kerboull-type acetabular support rings (KT) and allogenic bone graft were used for severe periacetabular bone loss with primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). The purpose of this case-control study is to evaluate the risk factors related to poor outcomes of surgery.Sixty patients underwent primary THA and revision THA using allogenic bone graft with KT for large acetabular deficiency. These patients were retrospectively evaluated postoperatively and followed-up by radiograph. The minimum follow-up period was 4 years and averaged 7 years. A radiological failure was defined by the following criteria:Expected risk factors were defined as female, age >75 years, body mass index (BMI) >25%, medical history of hypertension, renal failure, liver steatosis, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, cardiac infarction, smoking, American Academy of Orthopedic Surgery (AAOS) classification III or IV, bleeding>500 mL, time of surgery >3hours, high hip center-type KT, inclination of KT >45 degrees, screw angle >25 degrees, morselized bone graft, Kawanabe's classification stage 3 or 4 and revision surgery. Nineteen hips (31.6%) revealed radiological failure according to our criteria, and revision THA was performed in 2 hips (3.3%). In the statistical analysis, morselized bone graft and high hip center-type KT were identified as factors of poor outcomes of surgery.

The Use of Porous Tantalum Augments for the Reconstruction of Acetabular Defect in Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Given the lack of studies of acetabular defect reconstruction in primary total hip arthroplasty (THA) using tantalum augments, this study aims to evaluate clinical and radiographic results for treatment with tantalum augments to reconstruct acetabular defects in primary THA.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed 19 patients (19 hips) with acetabular defects who underwent primary THA using tantalum augments, with a minimum follow-up of 2 years. Clinical, radiographic, and surgical data were retrospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 5.1 years (range 2.5-7.6). Harris Hip Score improved from 35.8 (range 19-56) preoperatively to 85.3 (63-98) at last follow-up (P < .01). Oxford Hip Score, University of California Los Angeles activity scale, and Short Form-12 score also improved significantly from presurgery to last follow-up. Mean operation time and blood loss were 124.7 minutes and 530 mL, respectively. Mean hip center position was 2.97 cm (range 2.35-3.58) horizontally and 2.06 cm (1.29-2.92) vertically, and mean acetabular inclination was 38.9° (range 27°-47°) at last follow-up. These parameters were not significantly different from those recorded immediately postoperatively (P > .05). There was no aseptic loosening, cup and augment migration, screw breakage, or presence of hip infection at last follow-up. All hips were radiographically stable.

CONCLUSION

Porous tantalum augments combined with titanium shells lead to satisfactory clinical and radiographic outcomes for the reconstruction of acetabular defect in primary THA at a mean 5.1 years of follow-up. This approach confers anatomical cup placement, simple operation, and a high rate of stable fixation.

Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using the Kerboull Acetabular Reinforcement Device and Structural Allograft for Severe Defects of the Acetabulum

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study is to review our experience with Kerboull reinforcement device combined with bulk allograft for management of severe acetabular defects.

METHODS

We investigated the results of revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) in 65 hips of 59 patients (10 male, 49 female) with Paprosky type 3A or 3B acetabular bone defects. Functional outcome was assessed using the Merle d'Aubigne hip score. Post-operative radiographs were examined for evidence of cup loosening. The mean age at revision THA was 59.1 years (23-85) and mean follow-up duration was 11.2 years (2-15).

RESULTS

The Merle d'Aubigne hip score improved from 10.6 points (5-15) before surgery to 17.1 points (15-18) (P < .05) at the time of last investigation. In this series, mean coverage of the bone graft was 83.0% (34.6-100) of the loading portion in the horizontal plane on radiography immediately after revision. However, consolidation of the bone graft was completed within 12 months for all cases. There were 4 radiological failures due to acetabular aseptic loosening at a mean of 10.8 years (8-13) after index surgery; all 4 cases demonstrated massive bone loss that no part of the rounded plate could be placed on the host bone. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the 15.2-year survival rate was 85.1% (95% confidence interval 71-99) with re-revision surgery for any reason as the end point.

CONCLUSION

Despite massive bone defects, we achieved favorable results for revision THA using bulk allograft and the Kerboull reinforcement device.