Favorable Early Results of Impaction Bone Grafting With Reinforcement Mesh for the Treatment of Paprosky 3B Acetabular Defects

Early clinical and radiological outcomes of the new porous titanium shell in combination with locking screw in revision total hip arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Extensive acetabular bone loss and poor bone quality are two key challenges often encountered in revision total hip arthroplasty. A new 3D-printed porous acetabular shell has been made available with the option to insert multiple variable-angle locking screws. We sought to evaluate the early clinical and radiological outcomes of this construct.

METHODS

A retrospective review of patients operated by two surgeons was performed in a single institution. Fifty-nine revision hip arthroplasties were performed in 55 patients (34 female; mean age 68.8 ± 12.3 years) for Paprosky defects I (n = 21), IIA/B (n = 22), IIC (n = 9), III (n = 7) between February 2018 and January 2022 using the novel porous titanium acetabular shell and multiple variable angle locking screws. Postoperative clinical and radiographic outcomes were locally maintained. Patient-reported outcome measures collected included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), the Oxford Hip Score, and the 12-item Short Form Survey.

RESULTS

After a mean follow-up of 25.7 ± 13.9 months, two cases of shell migration were noted. One patient had a failed constrained mechanism and received revision to a cemented dual mobility liner. No other acetabular shells showed any evidence of radiographic loosening at the final follow-up. Preoperatively, 21 defects were classified as Paprosky grade I, 19 grade IIA, 3 grade IIB, 9 IIC, 4 grade IIIA, and 3 IIIB. The mean postoperative WOMAC function score was 84 (SD 17), WOMAC (stiffness) 83 (SD 15), WOMAC (pain) 85 (SD 15), and WOMAC (global) 85 (SD 17). The mean postoperative OHS was 83 (SD 15), and mean SF-12 physical score was 44 (SD 11).

CONCLUSION

The additional augmentation of porous metal acetabular shells with multiple variable-angle locking screws provides reliable initial fixation with good clinical and radiological outcomes in the short term. Further studies are needed to establish the medium- and long-term outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV.

Medial wall reconstruction using metal disc augments in revision total hip arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Medial acetabular bone defects are frequently encountered in revision total hip arthroplasty (THA), but few studies have focused on their reconstruction. This study aimed to report the radiographic and clinical results after medial acetabular wall reconstruction using metal disc augments in revision THA.

METHODS

Forty consecutive revision THA cases using metal disc augments for medial acetabular wall reconstruction were identified. Post-operative cup orientation, the centre of rotation (COR), stability of acetabular components and peri-augments osseointegration were measured. The pre-operative and post-operative Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index (WOMAC) were compared.

RESULTS

The mean post-operative inclination and anteversion were 41.88 ± 6.70° and 16.73 ± 5.35°, respectively. The median vertical and lateral distance between the reconstructed CORs and the anatomic CORs were -3.45 mm (interquartile range [IQR]: -11.30 mm, -0.02 mm) and 3.18 mm (IQR: -0.03 mm, 6.99 mm). Thirty-eight cases completed the minimum two year clinical follow-up, whereas 31 had a minimum two year radiographic follow-up. Acetabular components were radiographically stable with bone ingrowth in 30 cases (30/31, 96.8%) while one case was classified as radiographic failure. Osseointegration around disc augments was observed in 25 of 31 cases (80.6%). The median HHS improved from 33.50 (IQR: 27.50-40.25) pre-operatively to 90.00 (IQR: 86.50-96.25) (p < 0.001), whereas the median WOMAC significantly improved from 38.02 (IQR: 29.17-46.09) to 85.94 (IQR: 79.43-93.75) (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In revision THA with severe medial acetabular bone defect, disc augments could provide favorable cup position and stability, peri-augments osseointegration, with satisfactory clinical scores.

Favorable mid-to-long-term results of impaction bone grafting using a fresh frozen allograft bone with cemented stem for the treatment of Paprosky IV femoral bone defects

BACKGROUND

Femoral revision surgery in patients with substantial bone loss is challenging. Impaction bone grafting using a cemented stem can be a good solution for reconstruction of the femur with poor bone stock and extensive bone loss. This study aimed to evaluate the mid-to-long-term clinical and radiographic results of impaction bone grafting using a cemented stem for Paprosky IV femoral bone defects.

METHODS

Thirteen patients (13 hips) who underwent revision total hip arthroplasty with impaction bone grafting using a cemented stem and were followed up for at least 5 years were enrolled in this study. In all patients, a sufficient amount of fresh frozen bone of good quality was used. When cortical segmental defects were present, peripheral reinforcement with metal mesh and strut allograft was performed. The average follow-up duration was 11.1 (range, 5.3-15.1) years. The clinical and radiographic outcomes were reviewed at the final follow-up.

RESULTS

The average Harris hip score was 82.5 (range, 79-94), and the average University of California, Los Angeles activity score was 5.6 (range, 4-8) at the final follow-up. Radiographic assessment revealed an average femoral component subsidence level of 0.67 (range, 0.05-2.81) mm. There were no complications, except one case (7.6%) of periprosthetic fracture.

CONCLUSIONS

Impaction bone grafting using a cemented stem yielded excellent mid-to-long-term outcomes. It is a reliable technique for Paprosky IV femoral bone defects, and even when severe femoral cortical bone defects are present, long-term stability can be obtained using a metal mesh and/or strut allograft.

Impaction Bone Grafting with Low Dose Irradiated Freeze-Dried Allograft Bone for Acetabular Reconstruction

OBJECTIVE

Reconstruction of acetabular defects has been extremely challenging in both primary and revision total hip arthroplasty (THA). Impaction bone grafting (IBG) can restore the acetabulum bone mass and anatomically reconstruct the acetabulum. Our study aimed to report the short and medium-term clinical and radiographic outcomes of IBG for acetabular reconstruction in the cemented THA in the Chinese population.

METHODS

This was a single-center retrospective review enrolling 57 patients between May 2013 and July 2019. The patients with acetabular defects were treated with IBG, using low dose irradiated freeze-dried allograft bone with or without autograft bone, in the cemented THA performed by one senior surgeon. Harris hip score (HHS), standard pelvis anterior-posterior radiograph and lateral hip radiograph were obtained before operation and at 1 week, 3 months, 12 months, and yearly. Graft osteointegration was evaluated by Oswestry's criteria, and complication was documented at the last follow-up. Independent sample ANOVA test and Pearson chi-square tests are used for statistical analysis.

RESULTS

There were 61 hips in 57 patients. The average follow-up time was 35.59 months (5-77 months). According to AAOS classification, a total of 18 hips were identified as segmental bone deficiency (type I), with 21 and 22 hips for cavitary bone deficiency (type II) and the combined bone deficiency (type III), respectively. The average HHS was improved from 44.49 (range: 32-58) preoperatively to 86.98 (range: 78-93) postoperatively. Graft osteointegration was satisfactory (Oswestry score ≥2) in all patients. No dislocation occurred in the 57 patients (61 hips) during follow-up. Although one cup migrated, no revision, re-revision, radiographic loosening, graft bone lysis, or postoperative complications were detected at the final follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

IBG with low-dose irradiated freeze-dried allograft bone in acetabular bone defect reconstruction is a reliable technique for restoring acetabular bone defects in THA.

Impaction Bone Grafting Combined with Titanium Mesh for Acetabular Bone Defects Reconstruction in Total Hip Arthroplasty Revision: A Retrospective and Mini-Review Study

Objective

To investigate the application of impaction bone grafting (IBG) combined with Ti‐alloy mesh for acetabular bone defect reconstruction in total hip arthroplasty (THA) revision and follow up the clinical outcomes and imaging findings.

Methods

The clinical and imaging data of patients who were admitted to our hospital from January 2000 to December 2020 and underwent acetabular bone defects reconstruction using IBG combined with titanium mesh were retrospectively analyzed. Preoperative and post‐revision Oxford and Harris scores, and post‐revision complications were evaluated. Radiographs were used to determine center of rotation (COR) of the hip joint, transparency line, bone graft fusion, and bone mineral density (BMD) around the hip joint.

Results

Significant improvement was observed in both Oxford and Harris scores (P < 0.05). The radiographs taken at the last follow‐up examination showed no significant differences in the acetabulum COR, offsets, inclination angle, mean ratio of vertical value, and BMD analysis between the post‐revision side and contralateral side (P > 0.05). The follow‐up data showed restoration of the mesh implant and graft bone fusion.

Conclusions

The application of IBG combined with titanium‐alloy mesh in revision THA patients with acetabular defects was found to provide satisfactory outcomes. However, large‐scale studies are still needed to further elucidate the long‐term outcomes.

Acetabular impaction grafting with mesh for acetabular bone defects: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

In conjunction with impaction bone grafting (IBG), metal meshes have been proposed to minimise defects of the medial and superolateral walls in order to convert combined complex uncontained segmental defects into contained cavitary defects to facilitate IBG.

METHODS

The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), EMBASE, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews were queried for publications from January 1980 to March 2019 utilising keywords pertinent to total hip arthroplasty (THA), acetabular impaction bone grafting, clinical or functional outcomes, revision THA, or postoperative complications.

RESULTS

7 articles were found to be suitable for inclusion in the present study. The mean modified Coleman methodology score for methodological deficiencies of the studies was 45.3 (range 38-59). Severe acetabular bone loss was present in 56% of cases having moderate bone loss in 18%, and mild in 26%. The all-cause reoperation rate was 7.4%, while the all-cause revision rate of the acetabular component was 6.2%.

CONCLUSIONS

IBG with mesh is effective for selected patients with acetabular bone defects. Most patients with moderate bone loss as well as selected patients with large superolateral defects can be successfully treated with IBG combined with mesh. There is limited data to show that IBG with mesh might be associated with decreased survival rates in patients with severe lateral defects (Paprosky IIIA) combined with ischial or medial wall osteolysis who require combined medial and lateral meshes. In addition, patients with severe superomedial migration of the cup (Paprosky IIIB) should not be treated with IBG and mesh.

The Diagnosis and Treatment of Acetabular Bone Loss in Revision Hip Arthroplasty: An International Consensus Symposium

Despite growing evidence supporting the evaluation, classification, and treatment of acetabular bone loss in revision hip replacement, advancements have not been systematically incorporated into a single document, and therefore, a comprehensive review of the treatment of severe acetabular bone loss is needed. The Stavros Niarchos Foundation Complex Joint Reconstruction Center at Hospital for Special Surgery held an Acetabular Bone Loss Symposium on June 21, 2019, to answer the following questions: What are the trends, emerging technologies, and areas of future research related to the evaluation and management of acetabular bone loss in revision hip replacement? What constitutes the optimal workup and management strategies for acetabular bone loss? The 36 international experts convened were divided into groups, each assigned to discuss 1 of 4 topics: (1) preoperative planning and postoperative assessment; (2) implant selection, management of osteolysis, and management of massive bone loss; (3) the treatment challenges of pelvic discontinuity, periprosthetic joint infection, instability, and poor bone biology; and (4) the principles of reconstruction and classification of acetabular bone loss. Each group came to consensus, when possible, based on an extensive literature review. This document provides an overview of these 4 areas, the consensus each group arrived at, and directions for future research.

Impaction bone grafting in hip re-revision surgery

AIMS

Bone stock restoration of acetabular bone defects using impaction bone grafting (IBG) in total hip arthroplasty may facilitate future re-revision in the event of failure of the reconstruction. We hypothesized that the acetabular bone defect during re-revision surgery after IBG was smaller than during the previous revision surgery. The clinical and radiological results of re-revisions with repeated use of IBG were also analyzed.

METHODS

In a series of 382 acetabular revisions using IBG and a cemented component, 45 hips (45 patients) that had failed due to aseptic loosening were re-revised between 1992 and 2016. Acetabular bone defects graded according to Paprosky during the first and the re-revision surgery were compared. Clinical and radiological findings were analyzed over time. Survival analysis was performed using a competing risk analysis.

RESULTS

Intraoperative bone defect during the initial revision included 19 Paprosky type IIIA and 29 Paprosky type IIIB hips; at re-revision, seven hips were Paprosky type II, 27 type IIIA and 11 were type IIIB (p = 0.020). The mean preoperative Harris Hip Score was 45.4 (SD 6.4), becoming 80.7 (SD 12.7) at the final follow-up. In all, 12 hips showed radiological migration of the acetabular component, and three required further revision surgery. The nine-year cumulative failure incidence (nine patients at risk) of the acetabular component for further revision surgery was 9.6% (95% confidence interval (CI) 2.9 to 21.0) for any cause, and 7.5% (95% CI 1.9 to 18.5) for aseptic loosening. Hips with a greater hip height had a higher risk for radiological migration (odds ratio 1.09, 95% CI 1.02 to 1.17; p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

Bone stock restoration can be obtained using IBG in revision hip surgery. This technique is also useful in re-revision surgery; however, a better surgical technique including a closer distance to hip rotation centre could decrease the risk of radiological migration of the acetabular component. A longer follow-up is required to assess potential fixation deterioration. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(3):492-499.

[Short- and mid-term effectiveness of impaction bone allograft with acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects]

Objective

To investigate the short- and mid-term effectiveness of revision hip arthroplasty by using impaction bone allograft and acetabular components in treatment of severe acetabular defects.

Methods

A clinical data of 42 patients (44 hips) with severe acetabular defects between February 2011 and May 2018 were retrospectively analyzed. All patients underwent revision hip arthroplasty by using impaction bone allograft and acetabular components. Cemented cup (24 cases, 24 hips) and non-cemented cup (18 cases, 20 hips) were used in the revision surgery. There were 17 males and 25 females with an average age of 62.8 years (range, 22-84 years). The interval between the first total hip arthroplasty and revision was 2.5-12.0 years (mean, 8.3 years). The patients were accepted revision surgery for prosthesis aseptic loosening in 32 hips (31 cases) and the periprosthetic infection in 12 hips (11 cases). Twenty-nine hips (28 cases) were Paprosky type ⅢA and 15 hips (14 cases) were type ⅢB. The preoperative Harris score was 22.25±10.31 and the height of hip rotation center was (3.67±0.63) cm and the length difference of lower limbs was (3.41±0.64) cm.

Results

The operation time was 130-245 minutes (mean, 186 minutes) and the intraoperative blood loss was 600-2 400 mL (mean, 840 mL). The postoperative drainage volume was 250-1 450 mL (mean, 556 mL). Superficial infection of the incision occurred in 1 case, and the incisions healed by first intention in the other patients. All patients were followed up 6-87 months, with an average of 48.6 months. At last follow-up, the Harris score was 85.85±9.31, which was significantly different from the preoperative score ( t=18.563, P=0.000). Imaging examination revealed that the allogeneic bone gradually fused with the host bone, and no obvious bone resorption was observed. At last follow-up, the height of the hip rotation center was (1.01±0.21) cm, which was significantly different from the preoperative level ( t=17.549, P=0.000); the length difference of lower limbs was (0.62±0.51) cm, which was significantly different from the preoperative level ( t=14.211, P=0.000). The Harris score in the cemented group and non-cemented group increased significantly at last follow-up. The height of the hip rotation center decreased, and the hip rotation centers of both groups were within the Ranawat triangle zone. The length difference of the lower limbs also decreased, and the differences in all indexes were significant between pre- and post-operation ( P<0.05). There was significant difference in the height of the hip rotation center between groups ( t=2.095, P=0.042), but there was no significant difference in the Harris score and the length difference of lower limbs between groups ( P>0.05).

Conclusion

For severe acetabular defect (Paprosky type Ⅲ), the hip can be reconstructed with the impaction bone allograft and cemented or non-cemented components in revision hip arthroplsty. The short- and mid-term effectiveness are satisfactory.

Measuring bone defects for acetabular revision surgery for choosing an appropriate reconstruction strategy: A concept study on plastic models

BACKGROUND

Bone defects can be filled with autografts, allografts and artificial bone-materials. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether the digitization of known defect models with a navigation system is a reliable measurement method for estimating the size of a bone defect.

METHODS

Six preformed, cylindrical and cone-shaped defects on an artificial hip-bone were digitalized by six different observers. Reference volumes were gathered by measuring the depth of the defects, using an alginate impression material to fill out the defects and calculating the volumes from a CT scan.

RESULTS

One out of the six preformed defects showed a statistically significant difference between the digitalization and the calculation, four showed a significant difference between the digitalization and the mould as well as between the digitalization and the CT calculation.

CONCLUSIONS

This technique offers satisfactory results and consistent reproducibility when digitalizing big defects with relatively simple shape. Decreasing size and increasing complexity of the defects leads to more imprecise measurements.

A 2- to 16-Year Clinical Follow-Up of Revision Total Hip Arthroplasty Using a New Acetabular Implant Combined With Impacted Bone Allografts and a Cemented Cup

BACKGROUND

Treatment of acetabular bone loss with impaction bone grafting (IBG) at revision total hip arthroplasty is highly dependent on mechanical stability and graft compression for clinical success. Here, we describe a new technique to further compress and stabilize the acetabular graft bed with a thin, perforated titanium shell.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 170 cases of acetabular revision arthroplasty 7 years (standard deviation 2.8) after IBG combined with a graft-compressing titanium shell implant. The patients were reviewed by clinical score and radiography. Three patients were lost to follow-up. The medical journals of the 33 deceased cases were reviewed for any reoperation. Of the 170 cases, 74 had a cavitary acetabular bone defect, 93 had combined segmental and cavitary bone defects, and 3 had a pelvic dissociation. Bone graft incorporation was assessed and correction of the hip center of rotation was calculated.

RESULTS

Five cases (3%) were reoperated for mechanical loosening. One more was assessed as loose but asymptomatic and was not planned for revision. There were 3 reoperations for recurrent dislocation, 2 for deep infection and 1 for technical error. Reoperation for any reason, as the end point of survivorship, showed a survival rate of 92% after 10 years. Hip score according to Merle, d'Aubigne, and Postel increased from 10.8 (preoperatively) to 16.4 at follow-up. The clinical and radiological results were excellent.

CONCLUSION

IBG combined with the compressing shell results in excellent results for this challenging condition.