Continued Inpatient Care After Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty Increases 30-Day Post-Discharge Complications: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis

Thromboprophylaxis in patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation and skilled nursing facilities post total joint arthroplasty

PURPOSE

Thromboprophylaxis has significantly reduced the incidence of venous thromboembolic events (VTE) after total joint arthroplasty (TJA). Recent studies have established protocols for VTE prevention using aspirin, given its comparable efficacy to prophylactic anticoagulants and a lower risk of bleeding complications. However, patients admitted to inpatient rehabilitation (IPR) or skilled nursing facilities (SNF) after TJA may require more potent agents due to an increased risk of VTE. This study aims to compare the incidence of symptomatic VTE and postoperative complications in TJA patients receiving aspirin versus anticoagulants in the setting of IPR and SNF.

METHODS

We reviewed an all-payer, national database for patients who had hip and/or knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TJA between October 1, 2015 and April 30, 2021 (n = 713,548). Patients discharged to IPR or SNF were identified using CPT codes. A propensity score match was performed to limit potential confounders. Patients were stratified into aspirin (n = 2,343) and anticoagulant (n = 2,343) cohorts based on the postoperative VTE prophylaxis they received; anticoagulants included dabigatran, enoxaparin, heparin, rivaroxaban, and warfarin. Complications were identified using ICD-10 codes and included VTE, aseptic revision, cardiac complications, periprosthetic joint infections, surgical site infections, the need for transfusion, and wound complications 90 days after surgery.

RESULTS

The aspirin cohort had a VTE incidence of 4.4% compared to 2.3% in the anticoagulant cohort (p <.001), indicating nearly double the odds of VTE with aspirin use compared to anticoagulant. The odds ratio for VTE was 0.52 (95% CI: 0.37-0.72), with the aspirin cohort as the reference. Incidence rates of other complications were similar between the two cohorts.

CONCLUSION

This study demonstrates a higher risk of VTE with aspirin compared to anticoagulant in patients discharged to IPR or SNF after primary TJA. Surgeons should consider using rivaroxaban, enoxaparin, heparin, dabigatran, or warfarin for VTE prophylaxis instead of aspirin in these high-risk patients.

Results of Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients on Chronic Psychotropic Medications

BACKGROUND

Psychotropic medications are commonly used to treat several mental health conditions. The aim of this study was to determine the impact of psychotropic medications in patients undergoing primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with respect to postoperative opioid use, complications, patient-reported outcome measures, and satisfaction.

METHODS

This is a retrospective cohort study of 514 consecutive patients undergoing primary TKA. There were 120 patients (23.3%) who were excluded due to preoperative opioid usage. The remaining 394 patients had a minimum 1-year follow-up. Of those, 133 (34%) were on psychotropic medications preoperatively and were compared to the remaining 261 (66%) patients who were not on psychotropics. Clinical data, satisfaction, Knee Society (KS) scores, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Index Score, Forgotten Joint Scores, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, postoperative opioid medication usage, and complications were compared.

RESULTS

The study cohort (psychotropic medications) had significantly lower postoperative KS Function, KS Knee, Forgotten Joint Scores, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, Western Ontario McMaster Universities Arthritis Index, and Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Index Score compared to the control group. The study group had a lower overall satisfaction score (Likert scale 1 to 5) and a lower percentage of patients either satisfied or very satisfied (4.55 versus 4.79, P < .001; 92.0 versus 97.24%, P = .03, respectively). Postoperative opioid usage was significantly greater in the study group at both 6.4 weeks (range, 4 to 8) and 12-month follow-up (52.76 versus 13.33%, P < .001; 5.51 versus 0.39%, P = .002, respectively). There were no differences in complications and revisions between the groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients on psychotropic medications should be educated on the risk of increased opioid consumption, diminished satisfaction, and patient-reported outcome measures following primary TKA. Given the large number of patients on psychotropic medications undergoing TKA, additional studies are needed to further improve clinical outcomes in this group.

The Investigation of Preoperative Factors Associated With Postoperative Outcomes Following Total Knee Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review

This study aimed to investigate preoperative factors associated with non-home discharges from acute care hospitals in patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) due to osteoarthritis. It was a scoping review focused on patients who received their first unilateral TKA for osteoarthritis. The research targeted observational studies that examined the destinations of patients post-surgery based on preoperative factors, with a literature search conducted in April 2023. Out of 3,255 identified papers, 28 met the eligibility criteria. A total of 26 preoperative factors were identified as potentially related to discharge destinations, including age, gender, comorbidities, and obesity. By selecting an appropriate discharge destination based on preoperative factors, there may be potential for more efficient use of medical resources. Future studies should consider preoperative factors in the context of national healthcare systems and lengths of hospital stay.

Aspirin is Not for Everyone: Discharge to Non-home Facilities After Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty Increases Risk of Venous Thromboembolism

Background

Patients discharged to non-home facilities (NHD) after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee (TKA) arthroplasty experience higher rates of adverse events and may require more aggressive venous thromboembolism (VTE) chemoprophylaxis. Our aim was to compare the rates of VTE in NHD patients and those discharged home (HD) after THA/TKA. Our secondary aim was to determine VTE rates within HD and NHD groups when stratified by chemoprophylactic regimen.

Methods

A retrospective cohort of primary THA and TKA patients were stratified into HD and NHD, then allocated into groups by chemoprophylactic regimen on discharge: aspirin alone (AA), more aggressive (MA) chemoprophylaxis, and other regimens (other). The primary outcome was VTE. Rates of VTE in HD and NHD patients, as well as AA and MA regimens, were analyzed using a generalized linear regression model.

Results

Six thousand three hundred seventy-nine patients were included with 1.03% experiencing VTE. HD had lower rates of VTE compared to NHD (0.83% vs 2.17%, P < .001). AA had similar rates of VTE compared to MA (0.99% vs 1.08%, P = .82). NHD patients had a lower VTE rate with MA vs AA prophylaxis (1.47% vs 3.83%, P = .016). HD patients treated with AA vs MA had no difference in VTE rates (0.76% vs 0.96%, P = .761).

Conclusions

NHD patients have higher rates of VTE than HD patients. However, NHD patients have significantly lower rates of VTE on MA chemoprophylaxis compared to those on AA. Providers should consider prescribing MA VTE chemoprophylaxis for NHD patients. Prospective, randomized studies are necessary to confirm these recommendations.

The Current Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States From 2016 to 2022

BACKGROUND

The number of revision total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) is projected to reach 268,200 cases annually by 2030 in the United States. The growing demand for revision TKA can be attributed to the successes of primary TKAs combined with an aging population, patient desires to remain active, as well as expanded indications for younger patients. Given the evolving nature of revision TKAs, an epidemiological analysis of: (1) etiologies; (2) demographics, including age and region; as well as (3) lengths of stay (LOS) offers a way to minimize the gap between appropriate understanding and effective intervention.

METHODS

From 2016 to 2022, a national, all-payer database was queried. Incidences and indications were analyzed for a total of 135,983 patients who had revision TKA procedures.

RESULTS

The most common etiologies for revision TKA procedures were infection (19.3%) and aseptic loosening (12.8%), followed by mechanical complications (7.9%). The largest age group was 65 to 74 years (34.9%) followed by 55 to 64 years (32.2%), then age >75 years (20.5%). The South had the largest total procedure cohort (39.8%), followed by the Midwest (28.6%), then the Northeast (18.6%), and the West (13.0%). The mean length of stay was 3.86 days (range, 1.0 to 15.0).

CONCLUSIONS

Our study details the current status of revision TKA through 2022. While infection and aseptic loosening remain leading causes, we found a low aseptic loosening rate of 12.8%.

Increase in the Initial Outpatient Rehabilitation Utilization for Patients With Total Knee Arthroplasty

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this study was to examine the patient characteristics and features associated with the initial rehabilitation utilization with a particular emphasis on outpatient rehabilitation after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) among 2016-2018 Texas Medicare enrollees.

DESIGN

This is a retrospective cohort study. We used chi-square tests to examine the variability in patient demographic and clinical characteristics across the different post-acute rehabilitation settings after TKA. A Cochran-Armitage trend test was used to investigate the yearly trend of outpatient rehabilitation utilization after TKA.

SETTING

Post-acute rehabilitation settings after TKA.

PARTICIPANTS

The target population was Medicare beneficiaries aged ≥65 with an initial TKA in 2016-2018 and complete demographic and residential information (N=44,313).

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We identified whether patients first used (1) outpatient rehabilitation, (2) home health, (3) self-care, (4) inpatient rehabilitation, (5) skilled nursing, or (6) other setting within the 3 months after TKA.

RESULTS

Our results demonstrated an increasing use of the initial outpatient rehabilitation and home health, while the use of skilled nursing and inpatient rehabilitation facilities decreased from 2016 to 2018. The increase in outpatient utilization was significant in 2018 compared with 2016 controlling for distance to the TKA facilities, comorbid conditions, sex, race/ethnicity groups (White, Black, Hispanic, and Others), lower income (Medicaid eligible), Medicare entitlement types, age groups, and rurality (OR 1.23, 95% CI 1.12-1.34). However, the overall utilization rate of the initial outpatient rehabilitation after TKA remained low, increasing from 7.36% in 2016 to 8.60% in 2018.

CONCLUSION

Despite the growing use of the initial outpatient rehabilitation after TKA, the overall rate of outpatient rehabilitation utilization remained low. Our findings raise an important question as to whether certain patient demographics and clinical groups might have limited access to outpatient rehabilitation after TKA.

Predicting Need for Skilled Nursing or Rehabilitation Facility after Outpatient Total Hip Arthroplasty

Purpose

Outpatient classified total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a safe option for a select group of patients. An analysis of a national database was conducted to understand the risk factors for unplanned discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) or acute rehabilitation (rehab) after outpatient classified THA.

Materials and Methods

A query of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database for THA (Current Procedural Terminology [CPT] 27130) performed from 2015 to 2018 was conducted. Patient demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification, functional status, NSQIP morbidity probability, operative time, length of stay (LOS), 30-day reoperation rate, readmission rate, and associated complications were collected.

Results

A total of 2,896 patients underwent outpatient classified THA. The mean age of patients was 61.2 years. The mean body mass index (BMI) was 29.6 kg/m² with median ASA 2. The results of univariate comparison of SNF/rehab versus home discharge showed that a significantly higher percentage of females (58.7% vs. 46.8%), age >70 years (49.3% vs. 20.9%), ASA ≥3 (58.0% vs. 25.8%), BMI >35 kg/m² (23.3% vs. 16.2%), and hypoalbuminemia (8.0% vs. 1.5%) (P<0.0001) were discharged to SNF/rehab. The results of multivariable logistic regression showed that female sex (odds ratio [OR] 1.47; P=0.03), age >70 years (OR 3.08; P=0.001), ASA ≥3 (OR 2.56; P=0.001), and preoperative hypoalbuminemia (<3.5 g/dL) (OR 3.76; P=0.001) were independent risk factors for SNF/rehab discharge.

Conclusion

Risk factors associated with discharge to a SNF/rehab after outpatient classified THA were identified. Surgeons will be able to perform better risk stratification for patients who may require additional postoperative intervention.

Epidemiology of Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty in the United States, 2012 to 2019

Background

As primary total knee arthroplasty volume continues to increase, so will the number of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA) procedures. The purpose of this study is to provide an updated perspective on the incidence, indications, and financial burden of rTKA in the United States.

Material and methods

This was a retrospective epidemiologic analysis using the National Inpatient Sample. International Classification of Diseases ninth and tenth revision codes were used to identify patients who underwent rTKA and create cohorts based on rTKA indications from 2012 to 2019. National and regional trends for length of stay, cost, and discharge location were evaluated.

Results

A total of 505,160 rTKA procedures were identified. The annual number of rTKA procedures increased by 29.6% over the study period (56,490 to 73,205). The top 3 indications for rTKA were aseptic loosening (23.1%), periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) (20.4%), and instability (11.0%). Over the study period, the proportion of patients discharged to skilled nursing facility decreased from 31.7% to 24.1% (P < .001). Hospital length of stay decreased from 4.0 days in 2012 to 3.8 days in 2019 (P < .001). Hospital costs increased by $1300 from $25,730 to $27,077 (P < .001). The proportion of rTKA cases performed at urban academic centers increased (52.1% to 74.3%, P < .001) while that at urban nonacademic centers decreased (39.0% to 19.2%, P < .001).

Conclusion

The top 3 indications for rTKA were aseptic loosening, PJI, and instability, with PJI becoming the most common indication in 2019. These cases are increasingly being performed at urban academic centers and away from urban nonacademic centers.

Level of Evidence

3 (Retrospective cohort study).

Discharge to Rehabilitation Predicts Increased Morbidity in Patients Undergoing Posterior Cervical Decompression and Fusion

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

The aim was to compare 30-day readmission and postdischarge morbidity for posterior cervical decompression and fusion (PCDF) in patients who were discharged to home versus rehabilitation.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

An increasing number of patients are being discharged to postacute inpatient care facilities following spine surgery. However, little research has been performed to evaluate the effect of this trend on short-term outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients who underwent PCDF from 2011 to 2018 were identified using the National Surgical Quality Improvements Program (NSQIP)-database. Regression was utilized to compare primary outcomes between home and rehabilitation groups and to control for predictors of outcomes.

RESULTS

We identified 8912 patients. Unadjusted analysis revealed that rehabilitation-discharge patients had greater readmission (10.4% vs. 8.0%, P=0.002) and postdischarge morbidity (7.1% vs. 4.0%, P<0.001) rates. After controlling for patient-related factors, rehabilitation-discharge independently predicted postdischarge morbidity (P<0.001, odds ratio=2.232). Readmission no longer differed between groups (P=0.071, odds ratio=1.311). Rates of discharge to rehabilitation increased from 23.5% in 2011 to 25.3% in 2018, while postdischarge morbidity rates remained stagnant.Patients discharged to rehabilitation were older (66.9 vs. 59.4 y); more likely to be African American (21.4% vs. 13.8%) and have diabetes (27.1% vs. 17.5%), steroid use (6.4% vs. 4.7%, P=0.002), and American Society of Anaesthesiologists (ASA)-class ≥3 (80.2% vs. 57.7%); less likely to be male (53.9% vs. 57.4%, P=0.004) and smokers (20.3% vs. 26.6%); and had greater operative time (198 vs. 170 min) and length of hospital stay (5.9 vs. 3.3 d) (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Despite controlling for significant factors, discharge to rehabilitation independently predicted a 2.2 times increased odds of postdischarge morbidity. Rates of discharge to rehabilitation increased overtime without an appreciable decrease in postdischarge morbidity, suggesting that greater resources are being utilized in the postacute care period without an obvious justification. Therefore, home-discharge should be prioritized after hospitalization for PCDF when feasible. These findings are notable in light of reform efforts aimed at reducing costs while improving quality of care.

Discharge to inpatient care facilities following hip fracture surgery: incidence, risk factors, and 30-day post-discharge outcomes

BACKGROUND

Discharge to an inpatient care facility (skilled-care or rehabilitation) has been shown to be associated with adverse outcomes following elective total joint arthroplasties. Current evidence with regard to hip fracture surgeries remains limited.

METHODS

The 2015-2016 ACS-NSQIP database was used to query for patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty, hemiarthroplasty and open reduction internal fixation for hip fractures. A total of 15,655 patients undergoing hip fracture surgery were retrieved from the database. Inpatient facility discharge included discharges to skilled-care facilities and inpatient rehabilitation units. Multi-variate regression analysis was used to assess for differences in 30-day post-discharge outcomes between home-discharge versus inpatient care facility discharge, while adjusting for baseline differences between the 2 study populations.

RESULTS

A total of 12,568 (80.3%) patients were discharged to an inpatient care facility. Discharge to an inpatient care facility was associated with higher odds of any complication (OR 2.03 [95% CI, 1.61-2.55]; p < 0.001), wound complications (OR 1.79 [95% CI, 1.10-2.91]; p = 0.019), cardiac complications (OR 4.49 [95% CI, 1.40-14.40]; p = 0.012), respiratory complication (OR 2.29 [95% CI, 1.39-3.77]; p = 0.001), stroke (OR 7.67 [95% CI, 1.05-56.29]; p = 0.045, urinary tract infections (OR 2.30 [95% CI, 1.52-3.48]; p < 0.001), unplanned re-operations (OR 1.37 [95% CI, 1.03-1.82]; p = 0.029) and readmissions (OR 1.38 [95% CI, 1.16-1.63]; p < 0.001) following discharge.

CONCLUSION

Discharge to inpatient care facilities versus home following hip fracture surgery is associated with higher odds of post-discharge complications, re-operations and readmissions. These results stress the importance of careful patient selection prior to discharge to inpatient care facilities to minimise the risk of complications.

Effects of Skilled Nursing Facility Partnerships on Outcomes Following Total Joint Arthroplasty

INTRODUCTION

Post-total joint arthroplasty (TJA) discharge to a skilled nursing facility (SNF) is associated with higher costs and more complications than home discharge; however, some patients still require postoperative SNF care. To improve outcomes for patients requiring postoperative SNF care, this article analyzed the effect of SNF-surgeon partnerships on TJA postoperative costs and patient outcomes.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of primary TJA patients who were part of Medicare's Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) pilot program at our urban, academic medical center. We identified all patients discharged to SNF and designated SNFs as "preferred" if they maintained a partnership with our surgical team. SNF costs, total 90-day postoperative costs, average length of stay in SNF, 90-day readmission rates, and readmission diagnoses were recorded. Data were compared using Student t-tests. Readmission rates and the presence of a readmission diagnosis were analyzed using z-scores.

RESULTS

Our search identified 189 patients (22.9%) discharged to SNFs, with 128 (67.8%) discharged to preferred and 61 (32.2%) discharged to nonpreferred facilities. Over the 4-year CJR pilot program, SNF costs ($10,981.23 versus $7,343.34; P < 0.005) and overall postdischarge costs ($23,952.52 versus $18,339.26; P = 0.07) were higher for patients discharged to nonpreferred SNFs versus preferred SNFs. Patients discharged to nonpreferred SNFs also had increased length of stay (14.8 versus 10.1 days; P < 0.005) and increased readmission rates (19.7% versus 3.9%; P < 0.005). These differences became more pronounced across the study period.

CONCLUSION

For patients undergoing primary TJA, hospital partnership with SNFs can improve CJR performance by cost reduction and overall outcomes for TJA patients.

Risk Factors for Readmissions After Total Joint Replacement: A Meta-Analysis

»

We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of predictive modeling studies examining the risk of readmission after total hip arthroplasty (THA) and total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to synthesize key risk factors and evaluate their pooled effects. Our analysis entailed 15 compliant studies for qualitative review and 17 compliant studies for quantitative meta-analysis.

»

A qualitative review of 15 predictive modeling studies highlighted 5 key risk factors for risk of readmission after THA and/or TKA: age, length of stay, readmission reduction policy, use of peripheral nerve block, and type of joint replacement procedure.

»

A meta-analysis of 17 studies unveiled 3 significant risk factors: discharge to a skilled nursing facility rather than to home (approximately 61% higher risk), surgery at a low- or medium-procedure-volume hospital (approximately 26% higher risk), and the presence of patient obesity (approximately 34% higher risk). We demonstrated clinically meaningful relationships between these factors and moderator variables of procedure type, source of data used for model-building, and the proportion of male patients in the cohort.

»

We found that many studies did not adhere to gold-standard criteria for reporting and study construction based on the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses) and NOS (Newcastle-Ottawa Scale) methodologies.

»

We recommend that these risk factors be considered in clinical practice and future work alike as they relate to surgical, discharge, and care decision-making. Future work should also prioritize greater observance of gold-standard reporting criteria for predictive models.

Differences in time to return to work among patients undergoing simultaneous versus staged bilateral total knee arthroplasty

AIMS

Many patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have severe osteoarthritis (OA) in both knees and may consider either simultaneous or staged bilateral TKA. The implications of simultaneous versus staged bilateral TKA for return to work are not well understood. We hypothesized that employed patients who underwent simultaneous bilateral TKA would have significantly fewer days missed from work compared with the sum of days missed from each operation for patients who underwent staged bilateral TKA.

METHODS

The prospective arthroplasty registry at the Hospital for Special Surgery was used. Baseline characteristics and patient-reported outcome scores were evaluated. We used a linear regression model, adjusting for potential confounding variables including age, sex, preoperative BMI, and type of work (sedentary, moderate, high activity, or strenuous), to analyze time lost from work after simultaneous compared with staged bilateral TKA.

RESULTS

We identified 152 employed patients who had undergone simultaneous bilateral TKA and 61 who had undergone staged bilateral TKA, and had completed the registry's return to work questionnaire. The simultaneous group missed a mean of 46.2 days (SD 29.1) compared with the staged group who missed a mean total of 68.0 days of work (SD 46.1) when combining both operations. This difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). In multivariate mixed regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, BMI, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, and type of work, the simultaneous group missed a mean of 16.9 (SD 5.7) fewer days of work compared with the staged group (95% confidence interval 5.8 to 28.1; p = 0.003).

CONCLUSION

Employed patients undergoing simultaneous bilateral TKA missed a mean of 17 fewer days of work as a result of their surgical treatment and rehabilitation compared with those undergoing staged bilateral TKA. This information may be useful to surgeons counselling employed patients with bilateral OA of the knee who are considering surgical treatment. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2021;103-B(6 Supple A):108-112.

The Effect of a Discharge Disposition Algorithm on Patient Outcomes and Satisfaction

Total joint arthroplasties are one of the most common procedures performed in the United States. As changes have occurred in the surgical techniques of these procedures, postoperative recovery time has decreased and patients have been able to safely transition to home rather than a post-acute care facility. The demand for total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is expected to grow 44% as the prevalence of lower extremity osteoarthritis continues to rise (Sher et al., 2017) because of an aging baby boomer population. In the next 20 years, it is expected that the demand for total hip arthroplasty will grow by 174% and demand for total knee arthroplasty will grow by as much as 670% (Napier et al., 2013). An area with high variability in the postoperative period is in postdischarge rehabilitation. Post-acute inpatient care can account for up to 36% of the bundled costs of a TJA. There is a lack of evidence that patients recover better or have decreased complications by transitioning to an inpatient rehabilitation setting compared with transitioning to home. The aims of this literature search were to (a) identify the safest discharge disposition for patients following TJA; (b) determine the rate of complications and readmissions among those discharged to skilled nursing facility, inpatient rehabilitation unit, and home; and (c) explore how specified care pathways affect patient expectations and outcomes. The Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature (CINAHL), PubMed, ProQuest, and Cochrane were searched using the following key terms: discharge disposition, total joint arthroplasty, joint replacement, hip arthroplasty, knee arthroplasty, care pathway, discharge outcomes and readmissions, discharge protocols, and discharge algorithms. Five key themes emerged. Patients with significant comorbidities may require longer length of stay in the hospital or potentially discharge to a facility, discharge to facility associated with high rate of complications, setting patient expectations increases likelihood of discharge home, discharge to inpatient facilities does not improve outcomes, and discharge to any post-acute care facility is more expensive than discharge to home. This review identified themes in postoperative care of TJA patients that can be utilized to create a discharge disposition algorithm using best practices to stratify patients into the appropriate discharge disposition while setting appropriate expectations for patients undergoing these procedures to ensure high levels of patient satisfaction following these procedures.

A Preoperative Risk Prediction Tool for Discharge to a Skilled Nursing or Rehabilitation Facility After Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Discharge to rehabilitation or a skilled nursing facility (SNF) after total joint arthroplasty remains a primary driver of cost excess for bundled payments. An accurate preoperative risk prediction tool would help providers and health systems identify and modulate perioperative care for higher risk individuals and serve as a vital tool in preoperative clinic as part of shared decision-making regarding the risks/benefits of surgery.

METHODS

A total of 10,155 primary total knee (5,570, 55%) and hip (4,585, 45%) arthroplasties performed between June 2013 and January 2018 at a single institution were reviewed. The predictive ability of 45 variables for discharge location (SNF/rehab vs home) was tested, including preoperative sociodemographic factors, intraoperative metrics, postoperative labs, as well as 30 Elixhauser comorbidities. Parameters surviving selection were included in a multivariable logistic regression model, which was calibrated using 20,000 bootstrapped samples.

RESULTS

A total of 1786 (17.6%) cases were discharged to a SNF/rehab, and a multivariable logistic regression model demonstrated excellent predictive accuracy (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve: 0.824) despite requiring only 9 preoperative variables: age, partner status, the American Society of Anesthesiologists score, body mass index, gender, neurologic disease, electrolyte disorder, paralysis, and pulmonary circulation disorder. Notably, this model was independent of surgery (knee vs hip). Internal validation showed no loss of accuracy (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve: 0.8216, mean squared error: 0.0004) after bias correction for overfitting, and the model was incorporated into a readily available, online prediction tool for easy clinical use.

CONCLUSION

This convenient, interactive tool for estimating likelihood of discharge to a SNF/rehab achieves excellent accuracy using exclusively preoperative factors. These should form the basis for improved reimbursement legislation adjusting for patient risk, ensuring no disparities in access arise for vulnerable populations.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

More Patients Are Being Discharged Home After Total Knee Arthroplasty, However Rates Vary Between Large Databases

BACKGROUND

There have been significant advancements in perioperative care for total knee arthroplasty (TKA). It is essential to quantify the impact of efforts to better optimize patients and deliver care. The purpose of this study is to assess trends in discharge destination, length of stay (LOS), and complications.

METHODS

Patients undergoing primary TKA were identified in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) and Humana claims databases using procedural codes. Patients were classified as being discharged home or not home (skilled nursing facility, acute rehab, other non-home destinations). Changes in discharge destination, LOS, comorbidity burden, readmissions, and reoperation were assessed.

RESULTS

In total, 254,195 ACS NSQIP patients underwent TKA, with an increase in home discharge from 67.2% in 2011 to 85.3% in 2017 (P < .0001). There were 178,071 TKA patients in the Humana database and home discharge increased from 62.1% in 2007 to 74.7% in 2016 (P < .0001). LOS decreased and proportion of patients with an American Society of Anesthesiologists score ≥3 or Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥2 increased significantly for both home and non-home going patients. Home going patients had a decrease in 30-day readmissions (ACS NSQIP: 2011: 3.6%, 2017: 2.7%, P = .001; Humana: 2007: 4.0%, 2016: 2.4%, P < .0001).

CONCLUSION

Patients undergoing TKA were discharged home more often, had shorter LOS, and had significantly lower readmission rates, despite an increasingly comorbid patient population. It is likely that these improvements in postoperative care have resulted in significant cost savings, for both payers and hospitals. The efforts necessary to create and maintain such improvements, as well as the source of data, should be considered when changes to reimbursement are being evaluated. The metrics studied in this paper should provide a comparison for further improvement with continued transition to bundle payments and transition to outpatient surgery with removal of TKA from the inpatient-only list.

Physical Therapist Management of Total Knee Arthroplasty

A clinical practice guideline on total knee arthroplasty was developed by an American Physical Therapy (APTA) volunteer guideline development group that consisted of physical therapists, an orthopedic surgeon, a nurse, and a consumer. The guideline was based on systematic reviews of current scientific and clinical information and accepted approaches to management of total knee arthroplasty.

Outpatient, Home-Based Physical Therapy Promotes Decreased Length of Stay and Post-Acute Resource Utilization After Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Patients and healthcare systems are increasingly focused on evaluating interventions that increase the value of care delivered. Our objective of this study is to evaluate early post-operative outcomes among those patients who underwent total joint arthroplasty with and without the participation in our piloted Outpatient Physical Therapy Home Visits (OPTHV) program.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty and total knee arthroplasty at a single institution from July 2016 to September 2017 was performed. Matched cohorts were compared according to OPTHV enrollment status.

RESULTS

In total, 1729 patients were included in this study. Two hundred ninety-three patients were enrolled in OPTHV, while 1436 patients received institutional standard care. Patients were matched by gender (56.7% vs 57.7% female, P = .751), age (67.75 vs 66.95 years, P = .167), body mass index (30.18 vs 30.12 kg/m², P = .859), and average American Society of Anesthesiologists score (2.31 vs 2.36, P = .131). OPTHV patients had a shorter length of stay (1.39 vs 1.64 days, P < .001) and were more likely to discharge to home (89.8% vs 74.7%, P < .001). Ninety-day re-admissions (2.7% vs 2.6%, P = .880) and emergency room visits (4.1% vs 4.3%, P = .864) were equivalent.

CONCLUSION

OPTHV is a novel program that facilitates discharge home and decreased length of stay after total joint arthroplasty without increasing re-admissions or emergency room visits. Utilization of OPTHV may contribute toward reducing the episode of care costs by reducing utilization of skilled nursing facility and home health services. Further prospective studies are needed to evaluate the effect of OPTHV on the total cost of care and functional outcomes.

High-Quality Skilled Nursing Facilities Are Associated With Decreased Episode-of-Care Costs Following Total Hip and Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

With the increasing popularity of alternative payment models following total hip (THA) and knee arthroplasty (TKA), efforts have focused on reducing post-acute care (PAC) costs, particularly patients discharged to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs). The purpose of this study is to determine if preferentially discharging patients to high-quality SNFs can reduce bundled payment costs for primary THA and TKA.

METHODS

At our institution, a quality improvement initiative for SNFs was implemented at the start of 2017, preferentially discharging patients to internally credentialed facilities, designated by several quality measures. Claims data from Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services were queried to identify patients discharged to SNF following primary total joint arthroplasty. We compared costs and outcomes between patients discharged to credentialed SNF sites and those discharged to other sites.

RESULTS

Between 2015 and 2018, of a consecutive series of 8778 primary THA and TKA patients, 1284 (14.6%) were discharged to an SNF. Following initiation of the program, 498 patients were discharged to an SNF, 301 (60.4%) of which were sent to a credentialed facility. Patients at credentialed facilities had significantly lower SNF costs ($11,184 vs $8198, P < .0001), PAC costs ($18,952 vs $15,148, P < .0001), and episode-of-care costs ($34,557 vs $30,831, P < .0001), with no difference in readmissions (10% vs 12%, P = .33) or complications (8% vs 6%, P = .15). Controlling for confounding variables, being discharged to a credentialed facility decreased SNF costs by $1961 (P = .0020) and PAC costs by $3126 (P = .0031) per patient.

CONCLUSION

Quality improvement efforts through partnership with selective SNFs can significantly decrease PAC costs for patients undergoing primary THA and TKA.

The Impact of Metabolic Syndrome on 30-Day Outcomes Following ORIF for Ankle Fractures

Introduction: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) is associated with significant postoperative morbidity. Despite an increasing prevalence of MetS in the US population, its impact on postoperative outcomes following ankle fractures remains limited. Materials and Methods: The 2012-2016 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was queried for patients undergoing open reduction with internal fixation (ORIF) for ankle fractures using Current Procedural Terminology codes: 27766, 27769, 27792, 27814, 27822, and 27823. The study cohort was divided into 2 groups: MetS versus No MetS. MetS was identified using a predefined criteria as the coexistence of (1) diabetes mellitus, (2) hypertension, and (3) body mass index ≥30 kg/m2. Results: A total of 1013 (6.7%) MetS underwent ORIF for ankle fractures. Following adjustment for baseline differences, MetS was an independent predictor of experiencing any 30-day complication (odds ratio [OR] = 1.35; P = .020), wound complications (OR = 1.67; P = .024), renal complications (OR = 3.54; P = .022), 30-day readmissions (OR = 1.66; P = .001), 30-day unplanned reoperations (OR = 1.69; P = .009) and decreased odds of home discharge (OR = 0.66; P < .001). Conclusion: Patients with MetS undergoing ORIF for ankle fractures are at an increased risk of experiencing adverse 30-day complications, readmissions, and reoperations. Providers should understand the need of appropriate postoperative surveillance in this high-risk group to minimize the risk of poor outcomes. Level of Evidence: Level III.

The "Hip Fracture" Bundle-Experiences, Challenges, and Opportunities

Introduction:

With growing popularity and success of alternative-payment models (APMs) in elective total joint arthroplasties, there has been recent discussion on the probability of implementing APMs for geriatric hip fractures as well.

Significance:

Despite the growing interest, little is known about the drawbacks and challenges that will be faced in a stipulated “hip fracture” bundle.

Results:

Given the varying intricacies and complexities of hip fractures, a “one-size-fits-all” bundled payment may not be an amenable way of ensuring equitable reimbursement for participating physicians and hospitals.

Conclusions:

Health-policy makers need to advocate for better risk-adjustment methods to prevent the creation of financial disincentives for hospitals taking care of complex, sicker patients. Hospitals participating in bundled care also need to voice concerns regarding the grouping of hip fractures undergoing total hip arthroplasty to ensure that trauma centers are not unfairly penalized due to higher readmission rates associated with hip fractures skewing quality metrics. Physicians also need to consider the launch of better risk-stratification protocols and promote geriatric comanagement of these patients to prevent occurrences of costly adverse events.

Establishing a patient centered, outpatient total joint home recovery program within an integrated healthcare system

Outpatient total joint home recovery (HR) is a rapidly growing initiative being developed and employed at high volume orthopedic centers. Minimally invasive surgery, improved pain control and home health services have made HR possible. Multidisciplinary teams with members ranging from surgeons and anesthesiologists to hospital administrators, physical therapists, nurses and research analysts are necessary for success. Eligibility criteria for outpatient total joint arthroplasty will vary between medical centers. Surgeon preference in addition to medical comorbidities, social support, preoperative patient mobility and safety of the HR location are all factors to consider when selecting patients for outpatient total joint HR. As additional knowledge is gained, the next steps will be to establish 'best practices' and speciality society-endorsed guidelines for patients undergoing outpatient total joint arthroplasty.

Shoulder Arthroplasty for a Fracture Is Not the Same as Shoulder Arthroplasty for Osteoarthritis: Implications for a Bundled Payment Model

INTRODUCTION

The Center for Medicare Services currently bundles all shoulder arthroplasties, total shoulder arthroplasty and reverse total shoulder arthroplasty, into one Diagnosis-Related Group on which bundled reimbursements are then further characterized. An arthroplasty performed for traumatic indications, such as fractures, may have a different postoperative course of care compared with the one being done for degenerative arthritis/osteoarthritis (OA), despite having the same Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) and Diagnosis-related Group code.

METHODS

The 2012 to 2016 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program databases were queried using CPT-23472 to retrieve records of patients undergoing total shoulder arthroplasty/reverse total shoulder arthroplasty for degenerative arthritis/OA or proximal humerus fracture.

RESULTS

A total of 8,283 (92.5%) and 667 (7.5%) patients underwent a shoulder arthroplasty for OA and proximal humeral fracture, respectively. After adjustment, the fracture group was associated with a higher risk for a longer length of stay of >2 days (P < 0.001), 30-day surgical complications (P = 0.005), revision surgeries within 30 days (P = 0.008), 30-day medical complications (P < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (P = 0.013), postoperative transfusions (P < 0.001), non-home discharge (P < 0.001), and 30-day readmissions (P < 0.001).

DISCUSSION

Shoulder arthroplasty is associated with higher resource utilization when this procedure is performed for a fracture. As we move toward the era of bundled payment models, an appropriate risk adjustment based on the indication of surgery should be promoted to maintain the quality of care for all patients.

The Effect of Psychiatric Diagnosis and Psychotropic Medication on Outcomes Following Total Hip and Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Nearly 20% of the US adult population lives with mental illness, and less than 50% of these receive treatment. Preoperative mental health may affect postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing total joint arthroplasty (TJA), yet is rarely addressed; poor outcomes increase the cost of care and burden on the healthcare system. This study examines the influence of patients with psychiatric diagnosis (PD) and taking psychotropic medication (PM) on emergency room visits, readmissions, and discharge disposition following TJA.

METHODS

Single institution retrospective analysis of a consecutive series of 3020 primary TJA performed between January 2017 and June 2018. Chi-squared, t-tests, and analysis of variance were used to quantify differences between groups.

RESULTS

Nine hundred seventy-six (32.3%) patients had a PD, most had depression (10.1%), anxiety (8.6%), or both (8.4%); 808 (26.8%) patients were on PM. Patients with PD were more likely to experience emergency room visits (6.3% vs 10.0%, P = .034) and skilled nursing facility discharge (11.6% vs 17.9%, P = .005). Patients taking PM were more likely to experience skilled nursing facility discharge (12.4 vs 17.1, P = .047); those taking >2 PM had the highest rate (21.6%).

CONCLUSION

Patients with PD on or off PM may experience increased healthcare utilization in the postoperative period. Increased patient education and support may reduce these discrepancies. PD is not a deterrent for TJA, but targeted interventions should be developed to provide additional support where needed and avoid unnecessary utilization of resources.

Variation in rehabilitation setting after uncomplicated total knee or hip arthroplasty: a call for evidence-based guidelines

Background

High-level evidence consistently indicates that resource-intensive facility-based rehabilitation does not provide better recovery compared to home programs for uncomplicated knee or hip arthroplasty patients and, therefore, could be reserved for those most impaired. This study aimed to determine if rehabilitation setting aligns with evidence regardless of insurance status.

Methods

Sub-study within a national, prospective study involving 19 Australian high-volume public and private arthroplasty centres. Individuals undergoing primary arthroplasty for osteoarthritis participated. The main outcome was the proportion participating in each rehabilitation setting, obtained via chart review and participant telephone follow-up at 35 and 90 days post-surgery, categorised as ‘facility-based’ (inpatient rehabilitation and/or ≥ four outpatient-based sessions, including day-hospital) or ‘home-based’ (domiciliary, monitored or unmonitored home program only). We compared characteristics of the study cohort and rehabilitation setting by insurance status (public or private) using parametric and non-parametric tests, analysing the knee and hip cohorts separately.

Results

After excluding ineligible participants (bilateral surgeries, self-funded insurance, participation in a concurrent rehabilitation trial, experience of a major acute complication potentially affecting their rehabilitation pathway), 1334 eligible participants remained. Complete data were available for 1302 (97%) [Knee: n = 610, mean age 68.7 (8.5) yr., 51.1% female; Hip: n = 692, mean age 65.5 (10.4) yr., 48.9% female]; 26% (158/610) of knee and 61% (423/692) of hip participants participated predominantly in home-based programs. A greater proportion of public recipients were obese and had greater pre-operative joint impairment, but participated more commonly in home programs [(Knee: 32.9% (79/240) vs 21.4% (79/370) (P = 0.001); Hip: 71.0% (176/248) vs 55.6% (247/444) (P <  0.001)], less commonly in inpatient rehabilitation [Knee: 7.5% (18/240) vs 56.0% (207/370) P (< 0.001); Hip: 4.4% (11/248) vs 33.1% (147/444) (P <  0.001], and had fewer outpatient treatments [Knee: median (IQR) 6 (3) vs 8 (6) (P < 0.001); Hip: 6 (4) vs 8 (6) (P < 0.001)].

Conclusions

Facility-based programs remain the norm for most knee and many hip arthroplasty recipients with insurance status being a major determinant of care. Development and implementation of evidence-based guidelines may help resolve the evidence-practice gap, addressing unwarranted practice variation across the insurance sectors.

Electronic supplementary material

The online version of this article (10.1186/s12891-019-2570-8) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Discharge to inpatient facilities after lumbar fusion surgery is associated with increased postoperative venous thromboembolism and readmissions

BACKGROUND CONTEXT

Postdischarge care is a significant source of cost variability after posterior lumbar fusion surgery. However, there remains limited evidence associating postdischarge inpatient services and improved postoperative outcomes, despite the high cost of these services.

PURPOSE

To determine the association between posthospital discharge to inpatient care facilities and postoperative complications.

STUDY DESIGN

A retrospective review of all 1- to 3-level primary posterior lumbar fusion cases in the 2010-2014 National Surgical Quality Improvement Program registry was conducted. Propensity scores for discharge destination were determined based on observable baseline patient characteristics. Multivariable propensity-adjusted logistic regressions were performed to determine associations between discharge destination and postdischarge complications, with adjusted odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI).

RESULTS

A total of 18,652 posterior lumbar fusion cases were identified, 15,234 (82%) were discharged home, and 3,418 (18%) were discharged to continued inpatient care. Multivariable propensity-adjusted analysis demonstrated that being discharged to inpatient facilities was independently associated with higher risk of thromboembolic complications (OR [95% CI]: 1.79 [1.13-2.85]), urinary complications, (1.79 [1.27-2.51]), and unplanned readmissions (1.43 [1.22-1.68]).

CONCLUSIONS

Discharge to continued inpatient care versus home after primary posterior lumbar fusion is independently associated with higher odds of certain major complications. To optimize clinical outcomes as well as cost savings in an era of value-based reimbursements, clinicians and hospitals should consider further investigation into carefully investigating which patients might be better served by home discharge after surgery.

Comparison of pharmacologic prophylaxis in prevention of venous thromboembolism following total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulants are used following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) to prevent venous thromboembolism (VTE). These drugs reduce VTE risk but may lead to bleeding-related complications. Recently, surgeons have advocated using antiplatelet agents including aspirin (ASA). However, there is no consensus regarding which medication has the optimal risk/benefit profile. The purpose of this study was to compare rates of VTE using different anticoagulants in anticoagulation-naïve patients being discharged home after TKA.

METHODS

A national private insurance database was used to identify patients undergoing unilateral TKA. Patients with a prior history of VTE were excluded. Anticoagulants included ASA, low molecular weight heparin (LMWH), warfarin, factor Xa inhibitors (XaI), and fondaparinux. Postoperative complications, including VTE, blood transfusion, myocardial infarction, and hematoma, were identified using ICD-9 diagnosis codes. Risk of each complication was compared between groups using multivariate logistic regression controlling for demographics, length of stay, and comorbidities.

RESULTS

Of 30,813 patients, 1.82% were diagnosed with VTE. Using ASA as a baseline, there was significantly decreased risk of VTE with LMWH (OR 0.47), XaI (OR 0.50), and fondaparinux (OR 0.32). There was significantly higher risk of transfusion with LMWH (OR 1.56) and fondaparinux (OR 1.84), but no difference in hematoma between medications.

CONCLUSIONS

This study shows that there is a decreased risk of VTE with LMWH, XaI, and fondaparinux compared to ASA. However, these medications also had higher rates of bleeding-associated complications. The choice of pharmacologic prophylaxis should be made based on a balance of the risk/benefit profile of each medication.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Continued Inpatient Care After Primary Total Shoulder Arthroplasty Is Associated With Increased Short-term Postdischarge Morbidity: A Propensity Score-Adjusted Analysis

Advances in surgical technique and implant design during the past several decades have resulted in annual increases in shoulder arthroplasty procedures performed in the United States. The purpose of this investigation was to use the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database to analyze the rates of morbidity following shoulder arthroplasty. The authors hypothesized that, independent of predischarge patient factors, discharge to inpatient facilities is associated with increased short-term morbidity. Patient demographics, intraoperative variables, and information about postoperative complications/readmissions up to 30 days after the operative event were collected from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database for the period 2005 to 2015. Patients were divided into 2 cohorts based on discharge to home vs non-home facilities. Unadjusted baseline patient characteristics were compared using Pearson's chi-square test, and a propensity score-adjusted comparison was also performed. Overall, 9058 patients were included. Of these, 7996 (88.3%) were discharged to home and 1062 (11.7%) were discharged to a non-home facility. On propensity-adjusted analysis, complications determined to be statistically significantly associated with non-home discharge included cardiac (odds ratio, 4.19; 95% confidence interval, 1.75-10.04; P=.001), respiratory (odds ratio, 2.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.47-4.70; P=.001), urinary tract infection (odds ratio, 2.66; 95% confidence interval, 1.52-4.67; P=.001), and death (odds ratio, 7.51; 95% confidence interval, 2.42-23.27; P<.001). Overall, complications were statistically significantly associated with non-home discharges (odds ratio, 2.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.59-2.64; propensity-adjusted P<.001). This investigation indicated an association between postdischarge placement into non-home facilities and an increase in short-term morbidity, regardless of preoperative patient comorbidities. [Orthopedics. 2019; 42(2):e225-e231.].

30-day adverse events, length of stay and re-admissions following surgical management of pelvic/acetabular fractures

INTRODUCTION

Pelvic/acetabular fractures are associated with significant morbidity, mortality and cost to the society. We sought to utilize a national surgical database to assess the incidence and factors associated with prolonged length of stay (LOS), non-home discharge destination, 30-day adverse events and readmissions following surgical fixation of pelvic/acetabular fractures.

MATERIALS & METHODS

The 2011-2016 ACS-NSQIP database files were queried using CPT codes (27215, 27217, 27218, 27226, 27227, 27228) for patients undergoing open reduction/internal fixation (ORIF) for pelvic/acetabular fractures. Patients undergoing additional procedures for associated fractures (vertebral fractures, distal radius/ulna fractures or femoral neck/hip fractures) were excluded from the analysis to ensure that a relevant population of patients with isolated pelvic/acetabular injuries were included in the analysis. A total of 572 patients were included in the final cohort. Severe adverse events (SAE) were defined as: death, ventilator use >48 h, unplanned intubation, stroke, deep venous thrombosis, pulmonary embolism, cardiac arrest, myocardial infarction, acute renal failure, sepsis, septic shock, re-operation, deep SSI and organ/space SSI. Minor adverse events (MAE) included - wound dehiscence, superficial SSI, urinary tract infection (UTI) and progressive renal insufficiency. An extended LOS was defined as >75th centile (>9days).

RESULTS

Factors associated with AAE were partially dependent functional health status pre-operatively (p = 0.020), transfusion ≥1 unit of packed RBCs (p = 0.001), and ASA > II (p < 0.001). Experiencing a SAE was associated with congestive heart failure (CHF) pre-operatively [p = 0.005), total operative time >140 min (p = 0.034) and Hct <36 pre-operatively (p = 0.003). MAE was associated with transfusion≥1 unit of packed RBCs (p = 0.022) and ASA > II (p = 0.007). Patients with an ASA > II (p = 0.001), total operative time>140 min (p < 0.001) and Hct <36 (p = 0.006) were more likely to have a LOS >9 days. Male gender (p = 0.026), prior history of CHF (p = 0.024), LOS >9 days (p = 0.030) and >10% bodyweight loss in last 6 months before the procedure (p = 0.002) were predictors of 30-day mortality.

CONCLUSION

Patients with ASA grade > II, greater co-morbidity burden and prolonged operative times were likely to experience adverse events and have a longer length of stay. Surgeons can utilize this data to risk stratify patients so that appropriate pre-operative and post-operative medical optimization can take place.

Post-acute Transitional Journey: Caring for Orthopedic Surgery Patients in the United States

As the geriatric population in the United States continues to age, there will be an increased demand for total hip and total knee arthroplasties (THAs and TKAs). Older patients tend to have more comorbidities and poorer health, and will require post-acute care (PAC) following discharge. The most utilized PAC facilities following THA and TKA are skilled nursing facilities (SNFs), in-patient rehabilitation facilities (IRFs), and home with home health care (HHC). Coordination of care between hospitals and PACs, including the complete transfer of patient information, continues to be a challenge which impacts the quality of care provided by the PACs. The increased demand of hospital resources and PACs by the geriatric population necessitates an improvement in this transition of care process. This review aims to examine the transition of care process currently utilized in the United States for orthopedic surgery patients, and discuss methods for improvement. Employing these approaches will play a key role in improving patient outcomes, decreasing preventable hospital readmissions, and reducing mortality following THA and TKA. The extensive nature of this topic and the ramification of different types of healthcare systems in different countries were the determinant factors limiting our work.

Discharge to Inpatient Care Facility Following Revision Posterior Lumbar Fusions-Risk Factors and Postdischarge Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Recent literature has denoted care in an inpatient facility after discharge to be linked with worse outcomes after elective primary lumbar and cervical fusions. No study has explored the risk factors and associated postdischarge outcomes after discharge to inpatient facility after revision posterior lumbar fusion.

METHODS

The 2012-2016 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program were queried using Current Procedural Terminology codes for posterior lumbar fusions (22630, 22633, 22614) combined with Current Procedural Terminology codes for revision-22830 (exploration of spinal fusion), 22849 (reinsertion of spinal fixation device), 22850 (removal of posterior nonsegmental instrumentation), and 22852 (removal of posterior segmental instrumentation).

RESULTS

Of 1170 patients who underwent revision posterior lumbar fusion, 253 (21.6%) were discharged to an inpatient care facility and 917 (78.4%) were discharged to home. Significant risk factors associated with discharge to inpatient care facility were age 60-69 years (odds ratio [OR] 3.62), age ≥70 years (OR 7.46), female gender (OR 1.61), partially dependent functional health status before surgery (OR 2.94), history of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (OR 1.92), a length of stay >3 days (OR 3.13), and the occurrence of any predischarge complication (OR 4.10). Discharge to inpatient care facilities versus home was associated with a higher risk of experiencing any postdischarge complication (8.3% vs. 3.2%; OR 2.2).

CONCLUSIONS

Providers should understand the need of construction of care pathways and reducing discharge to inpatient facilities to mitigate the risks of experiencing adverse outcomes and consequently reduce the financial burden on the health care system.

Discharge to Inpatient Care Facility After Anterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Incidence, Predictors, and Postdischarge Outcomes

BACKGROUND

Despite a significant number of patients being discharged to inpatient care facilities after anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF), the current literature remains limited regarding the predictors associated with a nonhome discharge and the impact of continued inpatient care in a facility on postdischarge outcomes.

METHODS

The 2013-2016 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program was queried using Current Procedural Terminology (CPT) codes for ALIF (CPT-22558) and additional level fusions (CPT-22585). Discharge to inpatient care facilities included discharge to skilled care facilities and/or inpatient rehabilitation units.

RESULTS

Independent predictors of an inpatient care facility discharge were age older than 45 years (P < 0.001), female sex (P < 0.001), more than 10% body weight loss in the last 6 months prior to surgery (P=0.012), American Society of Anesthesiologists grade greater than II (P=0.005), undergoing a 2-level (P < 0.001) or more than 2-level fusion (P=0.017), a length of stay greater than 3 days (P < 0.001), and the occurrence of any predischarge complication (P < 0.001). After adjustment for differences in clinical and baseline characteristics between the 2 groups, discharge to an inpatient care facility after ALIF was independently associated with higher odds of any postdischarge complication (P=0.010), postdischarge wound complication (P=0.005), and postdischarge septic complications (P=0.011). No significant impact was seen on 30-day readmissions (P=0.943), 30-day reoperations (P=0.228), and 30-day mortality (P=0.913).

CONCLUSIONS

With an increasing focus toward minimizing costs associated with postacute care, providers should understand the need of appropriate preoperative risk stratification and construction of care pathways aimed at a home discharge to reduce the occurrence and/or risk of experiencing postdischarge complications.

Does Surgeon Volume Affect Outcomes Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty? A Systematic Review

BACKGROUND

Surgeon volume has been identified as an important factor impacting postoperative outcome in patients undergoing orthopedic surgeries. With an absence of a detailed systematic review, we sought to collate evidence on the impact of surgeon volume on postoperative outcomes in patients undergoing primary total hip arthroplasty.

METHODS

PubMed (MEDLINE) and Google Scholar databases were queried for articles using the following search criteria: ("Surgeon Volume" OR "Provider Volume" OR "Volume Outcome") AND ("THA" OR "Total hip replacement" OR "THR" OR "Total hip arthroplasty"). Studies investigating total hip arthroplasty being performed for malignancy or hip fractures were excluded from the review. Twenty-eight studies were included in the final review. All studies underwent a quality appraisal using the GRADE tool. The systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines.

RESULTS

Increasing surgeon volume was associated with a shorter length of stay, lower costs, and lower dislocation rates. Studies showed a significant association between an increasing surgeon volume and higher odds of early-term and midterm survivorship, but not long-term survivorships. Although complications were reported and recorded differently in studies, there was a general trend toward a lower postoperative morbidity with regard to complications following surgeries by a high-volume surgeon.

CONCLUSION

This systematic review shows evidence of a trend toward better postoperative outcomes with high-volume surgeons. Future prospective studies are needed to better determine long-term postoperative outcomes such as survivorship before healthcare policies such as regionalization and/or equal-access healthcare systems can be considered.

Geographic Variability in Discharge Setting and Outpatient Postacute Physical Therapy After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Despite the frequency of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the Medicare population, little is known about the use of postacute physical therapy among those discharged to home.

OBJECTIVE

The objectives of this study were to explore factors associated with geographic variability in discharge disposition and outpatient physical therapy utilization for Medicare patients after TKA discharged to home/self-care.

DESIGN

The design of the study was a retrospective cohort study.

METHODS

Medicare patients with TKA discharged alive from July 1, 2010, to June 30, 2011, with discharge disposition to home/self-care (HSC), home health agency (HHA), inpatient rehabilitation facility (IRF), or skilled nursing facility (SNF) were selected. Geography was measured with Census region. Outpatient physical therapy utilization was calculated from Medicare Part B claims. Odds ratios for discharge disposition and adjusted means for physical therapy utilization variables by Census region were calculated, accounting for county-clustered data and adjusting for demographics, clinical, and environmental characteristics.

RESULTS

There was significant variation with discharge destination by Census region among 18,278 patients. With discharge disposition analysis, the patients from the West region who were discharged home were the referent group. The patients from the South and Northeast regions had higher odds for discharge to HHAs (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI = 1.80 [1.48-2.19] and 2.20 [1.70-2.84]), SNFs (1.34 [1.08-1.66] and 4.42 [3.38-5.79]), and IRFs (2.36 [1.80-3.09] and 8.83 [6.41-12.18]). For those discharged to HSC, 40.4% received outpatient physical therapy within 4 weeks. Significant differences were found with time to first physical therapy visit (Midwest <South <[West = Northeast]) and length of therapy episode, but not with the number of therapy visits by geographic region.

CONCLUSIONS

Geographic region was associated with discharge setting, postacute physical therapy, and outpatient therapy utilization in Medicare beneficiaries after TKA. Differences in outcomes of outpatient therapy should be assessed to better describe the impact of geographic variation in care.

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease is an independent predictor for 30-day readmissions following 1- to 2-level posterior lumbar fusions

Background

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common cause of morbidity and mortality worldwide. Past literature has demonstrated that patients with COPD are at an increased risk of post-operative complications. We assessed the impact of COPD on 30-day outcomes following a 1- to 2-level posterior lumbar fusion (PLF).

Methods

The 2012-2016 American College of Surgeons-National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS-NSQIP) database was queried using current procedural terminology (CPT) codes 22612, 22630 and 22633 to identify patients undergoing PLFs. Only patients undergoing a 1- to 2-level PLF for degenerative spine pathologies were included.

Results

In total, 1,123 (4.8%) of 23,481 patients undergoing an elective PLF had a diagnosis of COPD at the time of the surgery. Following adjusted logistic regression analysis, COPD was significantly associated with a longer length of stay of >3 days [odds ratio (OR), 1.40; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.32-1.48; P=0.008], shorter total operative time (OR, 0.83; 95% CI: 0.73-0.94; P=0.003), discharge to skilled nursing care or rehabilitation facility (OR, 1.28; 95% CI: 1.09-1.51; P=0.002), pneumonia (OR, 2.53; 95% CI: 1.62-3.97; P<0.001) and 30-day readmissions (OR, 1.31; 95% CI: 1.03-1.65; P=0.025).

Conclusions

Patients with COPD are more likely to have a longer length of stay, discharge to nursing care/rehabilitation facility, and higher risk of pneumonia and readmissions within 30-days following 1- and 2-level PLF. Our analysis of a large national cohort of patients highlights the importance of pre-operative and post-operative medical optimization in these high-risk patients.

Reducing Length of Stay Does Not Increase Emergency Room Visits or Readmissions in Patients Undergoing Primary Hip and Knee Arthroplasties

BACKGROUND

Total hip and total knee arthroplasty (total joint arthroplasty [TJA]) are 2 of the most common elective surgeries. Identifying which patients are at highest risk for emergency room (ER) visits or readmissions within 90 days of surgery and the reasons for return are crucial to formulate ways to decrease these visits and improve patient outcomes.

METHODS

This is a retrospective review of a consecutive series of 7466 unilateral primary TJA performed from July 2013 to June 2017; any patients who had an ER visit or readmission in the first 90 days after surgery were identified, and a detailed chart review was performed. Patients discharged home or to rehab were analyzed separately.

RESULTS

Three hundred thirty-six (4.5%) patients had 380 ER visits and 250 (3.3%) patients had 291 readmissions in the first 90 days after TJA. Patients returning to the ER were equivalent to those who did not. Patients who went to a rehab facility on discharge were significantly more likely to be readmitted (P = .000). Patients who were readmitted had a higher American Society of Anesthesiologists score (P = .000). Length of stay decreased over the study period from 2.66 days to 1.63 days, while the number of unplanned interventions remained steady. Pain and swelling was the most common reason for return for ER visits (33.2%) and readmissions (14.1%).

CONCLUSION

The overall number of unplanned interventions after TJA in this population was low and remained consistent over time despite decreasing length of stay. Patients who went to rehab were more likely to experience readmission. The majority of unplanned interventions occurred in the first 4 weeks after surgery.

Hip Fracture Does Not Belong in the Elective Arthroplasty Bundle: Presentation, Outcomes, and Service Utilization Differ in Fracture Arthroplasty Care

BACKGROUND

Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services reimbursement is the same for hip arthroplasty performed electively for arthritis and urgently for femoral neck fracture.

METHODS

An analytic report of hip arthroplasty for a 5-hospital network identified 2362 cases performed from January 2014 to May 2016. Resource utilization was determined using 90-day charges.

RESULTS

The fracture population (623 hips) was older (P < .01), had more medical comorbidities (28.3% vs 3.8%, P < .01), and was more likely to be anemic and malnourished (P < .01), and had longer hospital stay (5.7 vs 3.0 days, P < .0001), more frequent intensive care unit admission (4.5% vs 0.5%, P < .01), less frequent discharge to home (16.2% vs 83.6%, P < .01), more emergency department visits (26.5% vs 10.7%, P < .01), and more readmissions after hospital discharge (25.2% vs 12.2%, P < .01). Utilization of services ($50,875 vs $38,705, P < .0001) and the standard deviation of these services ($22,509 vs $9,847, P < .0001), from 90-day charges, were significantly greater in the fracture population.

CONCLUSION

This study supports exclusion of fracture care from the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement bundled payment program.

Discharge to Inpatient Rehab Does Not Result in Improved Functional Outcomes Following Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Monitored rehabilitation has long been considered an essential part of the recovery process in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the optimal setting for rehabilitation remains uncertain. We sought to determine whether inpatient rehabilitation settings result in improved functional and patient-reported outcomes after primary TKA.

METHODS

All patients undergoing primary TKA from May 2007 to February 2011 were identified from our institutional total joint registry. Propensity score matching was then performed, resulting in a final cohort of 1213 matched pairs for discharge destination to either home or a rehabilitation facility (inpatient rehab or skilled nursing facility). Length of stay, need for manipulation, 6-month complications, and 2-year Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, Lower Extremity Activity Scale, 12-item Short Form Health Survey, and Hospital for Special Surgery knee expectations surveys were compared.

RESULTS

Patients discharged to a rehab facility were noted to have a shorter hospital length of stay (5.0 vs 5.4 days). Patients discharged to inpatient rehabilitation reported more fractures at 6 months postoperatively. However, no differences in manipulation rates, 2-year outcome scores, or changes in outcome scores were found between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

Inpatient rehabilitation settings did not result in lower complications at 6 months or improved functional or patient-reported outcomes at 2 years compared to discharge directly to home when patients are propensity matched for age, living situation, comorbidities, baseline functional status, and insurance status. This finding has important cost implications and calls into question whether the healthcare system should allow otherwise healthy patients to use inpatient rehabilitation services postoperatively after primary TKA.

Fast-tracking for total knee replacement reduces use of institutional care without compromising quality

Background and purpose - Fast-tracking shortens the length of the primary treatment period (length of stay, LOS) after total knee replacement (TKR). We evaluated the influence of the fast-track concept on the length of uninterrupted institutional care (LUIC) and other outcomes after TKR. Patients and methods - 4,256 TKRs performed in 4 hospitals between 2009-2010 and 2012-2013 were identified from the Finnish Hospital Discharge Register and the Finnish Arthroplasty Register. Hospitals were classified as fast track (Hospital A) and non-fast track (Hospitals B, C and D). We analyzed length of uninterrupted institutional care (LUIC), LOS, discharge destination, readmission, revision, manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) and mortality rate in each hospital. We compared these outcomes for TKRs performed in Hospital A before and after fast-track implementation and we also compared Hospital A outcomes with the corresponding outcomes for the other 3 hospitals. Results - After fast-track implementation, median LOS in Hospital A fell from 5 to 3 days (p < 0.001) and (median) LUIC from 7 to 3 (p < 0.001) days. These reductions in LOS and LUIC were accompanied by an increase in the discharge rate to home (p = 0.01). Fast-tracking in Hospital A led to no increase in 14- and 42-day readmissions, MUA, revision or mortality compared with the rates before fast-tracking, or with those in the other hospitals. Of the 4 hospitals, LOS and LUIC were most reduced in Hospital A. Interpretation - A fast-track protocol reduces LUIC and LOS after TKR without increasing readmission, complication or revision rates.

Arthroplasty care redesign related to the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement model: results at a tertiary academic medical center

Background

Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) remains the highest expenditure in the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) budget. One model to control cost is the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) model. There has been no published literature to date examining the efficacy of CJR on value-based outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and sustainability of a multidisciplinary care redesign for total joint arthroplasty under the CJR paradigm at an academic tertiary care center.

Methods

We implemented a system-wide care redesign, affecting all patients who underwent a total hip or total knee arthroplasty at our academic medical center. The main study outcomes were cost (to CMS), discharge destination, complications and readmissions, and length of stay (LOS); these were measured using the 2017 initial CJR reconciliation report, as well as our institutional database.

Results

The study included 1536 patients (41% Medicare). Per-episode cost to CMS declined by 19.5% to 11% below the CMS-designated national target. Home discharge increased from 62% to 87%. CMS readmissions declined from 15% to 6%; major complications decreased from 2.3% to 1.9%; and LOS declined from 3.6 to 2.1 days.

Conclusions

A mandatory episode-based bundled-payment program can induce favorable changes to value-based metrics, improving quality and outcomes for health-care consumers. Quality and value were improved in this study, evidenced by lower 90-day episode cost, more home discharges, lower readmissions and complications, and shorter LOS. This approach has implications not just for CMS, but for private payers, corporate health programs, and fixed-budget health-care models.

Risk factors associated with newly psychiatric disorder in spinal cord injury: A retrospective cohort study

AIM AND OBJECTIVES

To predict the risk factors related to newly diagnosed psychiatric disorders resulting from spinal cord injuries (SCIs).

BACKGROUND

SCIs are a common result of devastating accidents; they can have an essential negative impact on the psychological health of those so afflicted. Psychiatric disorders commonly occur worldwide and are often associated with pain and disability; however, few studies have investigated the risk factors of psychiatric disorders among persons with SCIs.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study design with data obtained from the Taiwan Health Insurance Research Database (THIRD). THIRD involves the claims data on recipients recorded in the Taiwan National Health Insurance (TNHI), which was set up in 1995 and covers about 99% of the 23 million persons in Taiwan.

METHODS

We used THIRD to predict the risk factors related to newly diagnosed psychiatric disorders among victims of spinal cord injury.

RESULTS

The majority of persons with SCI were men (51.2%), and their average age was 52.8 years. All 5,828 newly diagnosed psychiatric disorders were included from 1997-2009 in 64,907 SCI in the THIRD data set. These results demonstrated notable differences in hazard risk (HR); the injured persons were inspected for the level of SCI, age, hypertension and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (HR: 1.637, 95% CI: 1.452-1.844, p < .0001; HR: 1.005, 95% CI: 1.002-1.009, p = .0019; HR: 0.724, 95% CI: 0.642-0.816; HR: 1.267, 95% CI: 1.105-1.454, p = .0007; HR: 1.368, 95% CI: 1.183-1.582, p < .0001, respectively); the persons with SCI exhibited significant independent associations with psychiatric disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

The results revealed that the level of SCI, female gender and age, respectively, affects the incidence of newly diagnosed psychiatric disorder related to SCI.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

This study showed that psychiatric disorders may be associated with the development of SCI, and that this risk was more predominant in females with SCI. Our results are of direct clinical relevance as they are meant to assist clinical assessment, counselling, guidance of symptomatic monitoring and early clinical intervention.

Bundled Payments in Total Joint Replacement: Keeping Our Care Affordable and High in Quality

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The purpose of this review was to evaluate the literature regarding bundle payment reimbursement models for total joint arthroplasty (TJA).

RECENT FINDINGS

From an economic standpoint, TJA are cost-effective, but they represent a substantial expense to the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS). Historically, fee-for-service payment models resulted in highly variable cost and quality. CMS introduced Bundled Payments for Care Improvement (BPCI) in 2012 and subsequently the Comprehensive Care for Joint Replacement (CJR) reimbursement model in 2016 to improve the value of TJA from the perspectives of both CMS and patients, by improving quality via cost control. Early results of bundled payments are promising, but preserving access to care for patients with high comorbidity burdens and those requiring more complex care is a lingering concern. Hospitals, regardless of current participation in bundled payments, should develop care pathways for TJA to maximize efficiency and patient safety.