Seasonality of Periprosthetic Femur Fractures in 12,700 Primary and Revision Total Hip Arthroplasties

Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fractures following hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

Periprosthetic femoral fracture (PPFF) is a serious complication following hip arthroplasty. The objective of this study was to determine the risk factors for PPFF following hip arthroplasty from existing studies.

METHODS

A comprehensive systematic search was performed in 4 databases: Pubmed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library. The last search was carried out on 26th July 2024. We focused on identifying risk factors for PPFF following hip arthroplasty. Study eligibility required PPFF as an outcome and reporting of associated risk factors. Quality assessment was performed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS), with evidence certainty evaluated via Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE). Meta-analyses employed both fixed-effect and random-effects models to pool odds ratios for identified risk factors.

RESULTS

Out of 1553 articles, 36 studies published between 2006 and 2024 were included. Risk factors associated with increased incidence of PPFF ranges from very Low to High. High-quality evidence supported the use of uncemented stems (Odds Ratio [OR]: 3.36, 95% Confidence Interval [95% CI]: 3.02-3.74), major teaching hospital (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.37-3.05). Moderate-quality evidence: female gender (OR: 1.60, 95% CI: 1.43-1.78), morbid obesity (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.01-2.16), higher Deyo-Charlson index (OR: 1.44, 95% CI: 1.18-1.77), rheumatoid arthritis (OR: 1.89, 95% CI: 1.16-3.06), femoral Dorr type C (OR: 4.23, 95% CI: 2.82-6.33). Low evidence: age > 70 years (OR: 1.67, 95% CI: 1.19-2.34), revision hip arthroplasty (OR: 2.60, 95% CI: 1.59-4.27). BMI > 30 and history of hip surgery are not the risk (very low). Diagonized as osteoarthritis before surgery is a protective factor (OR:0.51, 95%CI: 0.40-0.65, quality = High).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis provided some low-to-high evidence about the risk of PPFF following hip arthroplasty. It's recommended that clinicians consider these risk factors when evaluating patients for hip arthroplasty and take steps to mitigate their impact, like optimizing patients health preoperatively, using cemented stems, and monitoring high-risk patients closely.

Periprosthetic Fractures of the Femur during the Operation of Primary Total Hip Arthroplasties

Objective  To determine the incidence of periprosthetic femoral fractures during the operation in primary hip arthroplasties and correlate them with the inherent risk factors associated with patients, implants, and the diagnosis of coxarthrosis and/or femoral neck fractures. Methods  Cross-sectional study, with retrospective analysis of medical records and image exams of patients operated between 2014 and 2019. The variables analyzed followed those proposed by the world literature, namely: age, sex, Dorr index, surgical indication, Vancouver classification, location, type of fixation (cemented or non-cemented), implant model used, intraoperative diagnosis, and corresponding treatment approach. All surgeries used the same posterolateral access route and were performed by the same group of surgeons. Results  Within the sample of 2,217 arthroplasties (2,154 patients), 12 fractures (0.56%) were identified in 12 patients. The sample consisted of 8 females and 4 males, with an average age of 62.53 years. In all diagnosed cases, protective cerclages were added at the level of the lesser trochanter and/or the greater trochanter, and, in 3 cases, there was a change from uncemented to cemented femoral stems and only 1 required revision. Conclusion  Data Analysis Allows Us To State That The Risk Of Intraoperative Periprosthetic Fracture Is Greater In Women And With The Use Of Cementless Stems. The Occurrence Of These In This Study Had A Rate Of Less Than 1%.

Risk factors for periprosthetic femoral fractures around total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Periprosthetic fractures are becoming increasingly common, often leading to poor patient outcomes. The aim of this study was to identify risk factors associated with periprosthetic femoral fractures (PPFFx).

METHODS

Two independent reviewers conducted a systematic review of the databases MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane Library according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines, from the earliest available date to December 2017. We included all clinical articles reporting more than 100 post-operative PPFFx around total hip arthroplasty (THA). Outcomes included demographics, fracture type, risk factors and time to fracture.

RESULTS

A total of 12 868 PPFFx were reported across 18 eligible studies; 64% occurred following primary THA and 36% occurred after revision THA, and 66% of all fractures were in females. Vancouver B2 fractures were the most common type (39%). We found the odds of sustaining a PPFFx is significantly lower after a primary THA compared to revision THA (odds ratio 0.31, 95% confidence interval 0.24-0.40, P < 0.00001). The incidence of PPFFx is 2.96 per 1000 person-years following primary THA compared to 9.08 per 1000 person-years following revision THA (odds ratio 0.33, 95% confidence interval 0.27-0.40). The time to fracture was 6.03 years following primary THA and 4.08 years following revision THA. Gender and cementation did not significantly affect the odds of fracture.

CONCLUSION

The odds of sustaining a PPFFx following revision THA is three times greater compared to primary THA. Other risk factors including gender and cementation did not affect the odds of fracture.

Incidence, Classification, and Risk Factors for Intraoperative Periprosthetic Femoral Fractures in Patients Undergoing Total Hip Arthroplasty With a Single Stem: A Retrospective Study

BACKGROUND

The collum femoris preserving (CFP) stem was a specially designed femoral neck preserving component. The incidence, classification, and risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures with this special stem remain unclear.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study. We analyzed the clinical and radiological data of all patients who underwent primary hip arthroplasty with a CFP stem in our hospital between January 2006 and November 2018. Demographic characteristics and radiological features were obtained from the medical records and the Picture Archiving and Communication System, respectively. The incidence, Vancouver classification, and risk factors for intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures were identified.

RESULTS

A total of 1633 hips were included. The incidence rate of periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty with a CFP stem was 3.2%. According to the Vancouver classification, there were 24 patients (45.3%) with Vancouver type A fractures, 27 patients (50.9%) with Vancouver type B fractures, and 2 patients (3.8%) with Vancouver type C fractures. Five independent risk (protective) factors were found, including surgical history (odds ratio [OR] = 3.275, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.192-8.997), neck-shaft angle (OR = 1.104, 95% CI = 1.058-1.152), neck length preserved (OR = 0.913, 95% CI = 0.850-0.980), canal flare index (OR = 0.636, 95% CI = 0.413-0.980), and bone mineral density (OR = 0.083, 95% CI = 0.016-0.417).

CONCLUSION

The detailed characteristics of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients who received a CFP stem were identified in this study. Cracks of the femoral neck and fractures on the front side of the proximal femur were more common in patients with CFP stems. As a kind of a femoral neck preserving stem, the anatomical features (eg, neck-shaft angle, preserving length) of the remaining femoral neck might influence the incidence and characteristics of intraoperative periprosthetic femoral fractures in patients with CFP stems.