Uncemented vs Cemented Cruciate Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Body Mass Index Greater Than 30

Cemented vs. uncemented total knee arthroplasty in obese patients: A systematic review of implant survival, complications, and clinical outcomes

Introduction

Obesity is a primary global health concern that negatively affects the outcomes of total knee arthroplasty (TKA). To mitigate complications, both cemented and uncemented fixation techniques have been considered. However, there remains no consensus in the literature regarding the optimal fixation method for obese patients despite the renewed interest in uncemented fixation. This systematic review aims to compare the survival rates, causes of failure, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between cemented TKA (cTKA) and uncemented TKA (uTKA) in the obese population.

Materials and methods

A comprehensive literature search was conducted according to PRISMA guidelines across five databases-PubMed, Scopus, Embase, Medline, and Cochrane-focusing on studies directly comparing cTKA and uTKA in obese patients. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess the risk of bias, while the PRISMA flow diagram guided the study selection process based on predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. This systematic review was registered on PROSPERO.

Results

Four retrospective studies encompassing 1622 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final qualitative analysis. Among these, 50 % of patients underwent uTKA, with three studies exclusively analyzing individuals with at least class II obesity (BMI ≥35 kg/m2). All four studies reported higher rates of aseptic loosening in the cemented fixation group. However, only two studies demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in implant survival, reduced aseptic loosening, and lower revision rates with cementless fixation in the short-to mid-term follow-up. Regarding clinical outcomes, only one study reported a significant improvement in Knee Society Score (KSS) function, range of motion (ROM), and pain scores in the cementless group compared to the cemented group, particularly in the subgroup analysis of posterior-stabilized constrained TKA.

Conclusion

This systematic review suggests that in obese patients, particularly those with BMI ≥35 kg/m2, cementless fixation offers comparable or superior implant survival rates and lower rates of aseptic loosening compared to cemented fixation in the short-to mid-term follow-up. Furthermore, cementless fixation may provide similar or enhanced clinical outcomes in this high-risk and growing patient population.

Revision Rates for Aseptic Loosening in the Obese Patient: A Comparison Between Stemmed, Uncemented, and Unstemmed Tibial Total Knee Arthroplasty Components

Background

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is an effective treatment option for high body mass index (BMI) patients achieving similar outcomes to nonobese patients. However, increased rates of aseptic loosening in patients with a high BMI have been reported. Component fixation is a concern when performing TKA in the obese patient. To address this concern in cemented TKA, extended tibial stems have been used. Uncemented implants that take advantage of biologic osseointegration have also been advocated. This retrospective study examined the use of and revision rates of extended cemented tibial stems and uncemented implants compared with conventional cemented implants in our high BMI patient population.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed a prospectively maintained database of 3239 primary Attune TKAs (Depuy, Warsaw, Indiana). All obese patients (BMI > 30 kg/m2) with > 30 months of follow-up were included in our analysis. Those who underwent cemented TKA using a tibial stem extension (Group 1) (n = 145) and those where cementless implants were used (Group 2) (n = 100) were compared to a control group (n = 1243) using a standard cemented implant. Primary outcome measures were all-cause revision, revision for aseptic loosening, and revision for tibial loosening. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and Cox regression models were used to compare the primary outcomes between groups.

Results

In total, there were 1512 knees that met the inclusion criteria. The mean follow-up was 6.8, 5.1, and 5.3 years for cemented, stemmed, and cementless groups, respectively. There were 37 all-cause revisions identified. Seven were for aseptic loosening (2 tibial, 1 femoral, and 4 involving both components); all of these were in the standard cemented implant group. There were no revisions in the stemmed or cementless implant groups. Survival analysis did not show any significant differences between groups for either all-cause revision or for aseptic loosening.

Conclusions

This retrospective analysis showed that there were no revisions required for aseptic loosening when a cemented, stemmed, or uncemented implant was used in obese patients. These findings show that cementless and extended stem implants are a reasonable option in obese patients.

Level of evidence

Level III.

Short-Term Outcomes of Noncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty in Patients With Morbid Obesity

INTRODUCTION

Noncemented primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) compromises over 14% of all primary TKA procedures reported in the American Joint Replacement Registry. While studies have indicated similar outcomes for cemented and noncemented TKA in obese individuals, the efficacy and safety of noncemented TKA in morbidly obese patients (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 40 kg/m2) remain unexplored. This study compares short-term postoperative outcomes and complications between noncemented and cemented TKA in morbidly obese patients.

METHODS

A retrospective review of 605 cases of patients with a BMI of at least 40 kg/m2 (22.5% of 2,691 total cases at a single tertiary center) who underwent TKA was conducted. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 1 year. Data collected included age, BMI, sex, race, ethnicity, American Society of Anesthesiologists status, and the Charlson Comorbidity Index. Postoperative complications were tracked, including 90-day readmission, 1-year mortality, 1-year revision surgery, wound complications, fractures, and infections. Categorical variables were analyzed with chi-square tests and continuous variables with t-tests.

RESULTS

Of the included patients with a BMI ≥ 40 kg/m2, 40 (6.6%) received noncemented TKA. The noncemented TKA group had a lower mean BMI (43.3 ± 3.1 vs. 45.0 ± 4.4; P = 0.012) and a higher proportion of male patients compared with the cemented group (n = 17 [42.5%] vs. n = 143 [25.3%]; P = 0.028). Surgical time was shorter for noncemented TKA (97 ± 27 minutes) than for cemented TKA (118.0 ± 39.4 minutes; P = 0.001). No significant differences were found in length of stay and postoperative complications, including 90-day readmission, 1-year mortality, revision surgery rates, wound complications, fractures, and infections.

CONCLUSION

The findings of the study suggest that noncemented TKA may be a feasible, safe alternative and not inferior to the standard cemented TKA in patients with morbid obesity with the benefit of decreasing surgical time.

Mid-term radiographic evaluation of a monoblock trabecular metal tibia following total knee arthroplasty in obese and morbidly obese patients

BACKGROUND

Indications for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have become more inclusive of morbidly obese patients, however, higher rates of complications and lower implant survival have also been reported in this population. The purpose of this study was to investigate the mid-term survival, clinical, and radiographic outcomes of a cementless trabecular metal monoblock tibial component in severely obese patients.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of class II and III obese (BMI > 35) patients who received a cementless primary TKA. Standing radiographs were assessed for the presence of progressive tibial radiolucent lines (RLL), and clinical measures were assessed at least 2 years post-operative via the Oxford Knee Score (OKS), UCLA Activity and Satisfaction Score, and the Euro-QoL 5-dimension (EQ-5D-5L) index and visual analogue scale (EQ-VAS) health status.

RESULTS

Patients (n = 176) were 61.2 ± 8.3 years of age, BMI 44.9 ± 6.5 kg/m2, and were predominantly female (n = 118, 66.7%). Mean follow-up was 59.2 ± 17.1 months. There were two total revisions at 6- and 57-months post-operative, respectively, and the 5-year survival estimate was 98.3% (95% confidence interval: 93.0%, 99.6%). Patient satisfaction was 93.9% and the post-operative OKS, EQ-5D-5L index, and EQ-VAS were 40.2 ± 7.9, 0.856 ± 0.205, and 73.6 ± 14.7, respectively. No cases of radiolucent lines were detected.

CONCLUSIONS

At 6 years this cementless monoblock tibial component demonstrated excellent survival without radiographic indications of aseptic loosening in a population of severely obese patients.

Clinical outcomes and radiolucent line analysis in cementless mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective multicentre study in Japan

The objective of this study was to assess radiolucent lines (RLLs) and to determine their effect on clinical outcomes of the newly introduced cementless mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty (TKA) system. This was prospective, multicentre study. Seventy-eight patients with knee osteoarthritis who underwent primary TKA were enrolled. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and radiographic assessments were evaluated at preoperative baseline and at 6 weeks, 1 year, and 2 years after surgery. KOOS, PKIP, 2011KSS, EQ-5D-3L and SKO improved from preoperative baseline to all postoperative timepoints, with no loosening of components. No RLLs were detected at 6 weeks after surgery. However, RLLs ≥ 1 mm developed in 2.8% of the patients for the femur and 9.7% for the tibia at 1 year after surgery, and values were 5.7% and 10.9%, respectively, at 2 years after surgery. RLL incidence was not correlated with PROMs. Age, sex, body mass index, range of motion knee flexion, posterior cruciate ligament treatment and β angle did not impact the occurrence of RLLs. There were no intraoperative complications, revisions or reoperations. This TKA system improved PROMs and showed less incidence of RLLs compared to the previous reported TKA without implant-related complications.

Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Resurgence-Who, When, Where, and How?

BACKGROUND

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is one of the most common procedures in orthopaedics, but there is still debate over the optimal fixation method for long-term durability: cement versus cementless bone ingrowth. Recent improvements in implant materials and technology have offered the possibility of cementless TKA to change clinical practice with durable, stable biological fixation of the implants, improved operative efficiency, and optimal long-term results, particularly in younger and more active patients.

METHODS

This symposium evaluated the history of cementless TKA, the recent resurgence, and appropriate patient selection, as well as the historical and modern-generation outcomes of each implant (tibia, femur, and patella). Additionally, surgical technique pearls to assist in reliable, reproducible outcomes were detailed.

RESULTS

Historically, cemented fixation has been the gold standard for TKA. However, cementless fixation is increasing in prevalence in the United States and globally, with equivalent or improved results demonstrated in appropriately selected patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Cementless TKA provides durable biologic fixation and successful long-term results with improved operating room efficiency. Cementless TKA may be broadly utilized in appropriately selected patients, with intraoperative care taken to perform meticulous bone cuts to promote appropriate bony contact and biologic fixation.

Total knee arthroplasty using a cemented single-radius, condylar-stabilized design performed without posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice

Aims

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) with a highly congruent condylar-stabilized (CS) articulation may be advantageous due to increased stability versus cruciate-retaining (CR) designs, while mitigating the limitations of a posterior-stabilized construct. The aim was to assess ten-year implant survival and functional outcomes of a cemented single-radius TKA with a CS insert, performed without posterior cruciate ligament sacrifice.

Methods

This retrospective cohort study included consecutive patients undergoing TKA at a specialist centre in the UK between November 2010 and December 2012. Data were collected using a bespoke electronic database and cross-referenced with national arthroplasty audit data, with variables including: preoperative characteristics, intraoperative factors, complications, and mortality status. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected by a specialist research team at ten years post-surgery. There were 536 TKAs, of which 308/536 (57.5%) were in female patients. The mean age was 69.0 years (95% CI 45.0 to 88.0), the mean BMI was 32.2 kg/m2 (95% CI 18.9 to 50.2), and 387/536 (72.2%) survived to ten years. There were four revisions (0.7%): two deep infections (requiring debridement and implant retention), one aseptic loosening, and one haemosiderosis.

Results

Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated no difference in implant survival according to sex, age, or obesity status. Ten-year PROMs were available for 196/387 (50.6%) surviving patients and were excellent: mean Oxford Knee Score 34.4 (95% CI 32.7 to 36.1); mean Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) 51.2 (95% CI 16.1 to 86.3); mean EuroQol five-dimension five-level questionnaire score 69.9 (95% CI 46.8 to 93.0); 141/196 (71.9%) achieved the 22-point FJS patient-acceptable symptom state (PASS); and 156/196 (79.6%) were "very satisfied or satisfied".

Conclusion

This is the only large study reporting ten-year implant survival and functional outcomes of TKA using a cemented single-radius design and with a CS tibial bearing construct. The findings of excellent implant survival, safety, and functional outcomes indicate that this combination is a safe and effective option in routine TKA. Further investigation of this single-radius design TKA with CS tibial bearings with well-matched patient study groups will allow further insight into the performance of these implants.

Cementless TKA use as an alternative to cemented TKA in high BMI patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Purpose

Obesity is prevalent, with nearly one-third of the world's population being classified as obese. In patients with high body mass index (BMI)/body mass undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA), there is an increase in strain placed on the implant fixation interfaces. As such, component fixation is a potential concern when performing TKA in the obese patient. To address the growing concerns around the longevity of implant fixation, some have advocated cementless over cemented fixation. However, there is no clear consensus on whether a cementless fixation has more favourable outcomes. The aim of this paper was to present a systematic review and meta-analysis of the existing evidence to establish if cementless TKA has a lower rate of aseptic loosening in high BMI patients when compared to cemented TKA procedures.

Methods

A systematic review was performed, and the following databases Medical Literature Analysis and Retrieval System Online (1946 to date), PubMed (1966 to date) and Excerpta Medica Database (1974 to date) were searched. All studies comparing cementless to cemented TKA in patients with BMI > 30 were considered. Meta-analysis compared aseptic loosening and all-cause revision between cemented and uncemented implant use in BMI > 30 patients.

Results

The search returned 91 articles in total; after duplicates were removed, the yield was 44 studies. Of the remaining studies that were assessed, three studies met the inclusion criteria for meta-analysis. The pooled odds ratio for all-cause revisions was 0.17 (95%, 0.08-0.36) in favour of uncemented implants (p < 0.01). The pooled odds ratio for aseptic loosening was 0.15 (95% confidence interval, 0.02-0.90) in favour of uncemented implants (p = 0.04).

Conclusions

Meta-analysis demonstrated a significant decrease in all-cause revisions and revisions for aseptic loosening when using uncemented fixation in high BMI patients when compared to the use of cemented implants.

Level of Evidence

The level of evidence is 1 for our systematic review.

Comparison of bilateral cementless total knee arthroplasty results between patients in different BMI groups

INTRODUCTION

The aim of this study was to compare the results of cementless bilateral total knee arthroplasty (TKA) between individuals in different obesity groups.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study. Patients with a body mass index (BMI) greater than 25 who underwent bilateral TKA for gonarthrosis between 2014 and 2020 and completed a minimum follow-up of 24 months were included. Age, sex, height, weight, BMI, operation time, length of stay, patient satisfaction, knee scores and complications were compared. Patients with missing data, who were followed for less than 24 months or had postoperative fractures around the knee were excluded.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between the groups in terms of operation time (Class III > overweight > Class II > Class I p < 0.001). There was a significant difference in complications between the groups (Class III > Class I > Class II > overweight p = 0.010). According to our pairwise comparison, complications were more common in the class III group than in the overweight group. Knee score (KS) and function score (FS) increased significantly after surgery in all groups (p < 0.001), with no difference in FS (p = 0.448). Knee score changes were greater in the overweight and class I groups (p < 0.001). There was a significant interaction between both KS and FS and person satisfaction (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Cementless TKA improved KS and FS in all obesity groups, yielded high patient satisfaction. Although the incidence of complications was higher in the morbidly obese patients than in the overweight patients, the difference was not significant. Patients with morbid obesity should be informed about related risks before planning cementless TKA.

Sequentially Irradiated and Annealed Highly Cross-Linked Polyethylene: Clinical and Radiographic Outcomes in Total Knee Arthroplasty at 10-Year Follow-up

Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) has become the preferred bearing surface in total hip arthroplasty. However, its acceptance in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has not been as robust because of concerns pertaining to wear and its impact on implant failure. Therefore, this multicenter study was purposed to evaluate the 10-year (1) radiographic outcomes; (2) complications; and (3) implant survivorship in patients with TKA receiving a sequentially irradiated and annealed HXLPE. A retrospective, multi-center study was performed on 139 patients (171 TKAs) who underwent primary TKA with HXLPE and possessed a minimum of 10-year follow-up. Radiographs were analyzed for radiolucencies along the implant-fixation interface using the Modern Knee Society Radiographic Evaluation System. Kaplan-Meier analysis determined implant survivorship when the end points were revision for polyethylene wear and polyethylene revision for any reason. Sixteen TKAs (9.9%) demonstrated periprosthetic linear radio-lucencies. Seventeen TKAs (9.9%) required additional surgeries, 9 (5.3%) of which were revisions, with 1 (0.6%) TKA requiring revision because of polyethylene wear. Other causes of revision included instability (1.8%), infection (1.6%), and arthrofibrosis (1.6%). The mean time to revision was 5.9 years (range, 0.1-11.1 years). Survivorship pertaining to polyethylene revision for wear was 99.4%, whereas all-cause polyethylene revision was 94.7%. This study in patients undergoing primary TKA using a second-generation HXLPE demonstrated excellent results with respect to polyethylene wear characteristics and strength with a 99.4% survivorship at 10 years. [Orthopedics. 2023;46(2):e111-e117.].

The Evolution, Current Indications and Outcomes of Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty

Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been performed by orthopedic surgeons for decades, but the cementless TKA has only recently gained much interest in the world of arthroplasty. Initially, early designs had multiple complications, particularly with aseptic loosening due to osteolysis and micromotion. However, modifications have shown good outcomes and excellent survivorship. Over the last several decades, changes in implant designs as well as implant materials/coatings have helped with bone in growth and stability. Furthermore, surgeons have been performing TKA in younger and more obese patients as these populations have been increasing. Good results from the cementless TKA compared to cemented TKA may be a better option in these more challenging populations, as several studies have shown greater survivorship in patients that are younger and have a greater BMI. Additionally, a cementless TKA may be more cost effective, which remains a concern in today's healthcare environment. Overall, cemented and cementless TKA have great results in modern times and there is still a debate as to which implant is superior.

Does Body Mass Index Influence the Outcomes and Survivorship of Modern Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Higher body mass index (BMI) has been associated with higher rates of aseptic loosening following cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, there is a paucity of evidence on the effect of BMI on the durability of modern cementless TKA. We aimed to assess the association between BMI and clinical outcomes following cementless TKA and to determine if there was a BMI threshold beyond which the risk of revision significantly increased.

METHODS

We identified 1,408 cementless TKAs of a modern design from an institutional registry. Patients were classified into BMI categories: normal (n = 136), overweight (n = 476), obese class I (n = 423), II (n = 258), and III (n = 115). The Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and 12-item Short Form Health Survey scores were collected preoperatively and 2 years postoperatively. Survivorship was recorded at minimum 2 years (range, 24 to 88 months). BMI was analyzed as a continuous and categorical variable.

RESULTS

The improvement in patient-reported outcomes was similar across the groups. Thirty four knees (2.4%) were revised and 14 (1.0%) were for aseptic failure. Mean time-to-revision was 1.2 ± 1.3 years and did not differ across BMI categories (P = .455). Survivorship free from all-cause and aseptic revision was 97.1% and 99.0% at mean 4 years, respectively. Using Cox regression to control for demographics and bilateral procedures, BMI had no association with all-cause revision (P = .612) or aseptic revision (P = .186). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis found no relationship between BMI and revision risk (c-statistic = 0.51).

CONCLUSION

BMI did not influence functional outcomes and survivorship of modern cementless TKA, possibly due to improved biological fixation at the bone-implant interface. Longer follow-up is necessary to confirm these findings.

Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty Shows Less Blood Loss but a Higher Rate of Aseptic Loosening Compared With Cementless Fixation: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Comparative Studies

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to update the current evidence on functional outcomes, complications, and reoperation rates between cemented and cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) by evaluating comparative studies published over the past 15 years.

METHODS

The PubMed, MEDLINE, Scopus, and the Cochrane Central databases were used to search keywords and a total of 18 studies were included. Random and fixed effect models were used for the meta-analysis of pooled mean differences (MDs) and odds ratios (ORs).

RESULTS

A total of 5,222 patients were identified with a mean age of 64.4 ± 9.4 and 63 ± 8.6 years for the cemented and cementless TKA groups, respectively. The mean follow-up was 107.9 ± 30 and 104.3 ± 10 months for the cemented and cementless TKA groups, respectively. Cemented TKA showed a significantly greater postoperative Knee Society Score (MD = -0.95, 95% CI [-1.57, 0.33], P = .003) and range of motion (MD = -1.09, 95% CI [-1.88, -0.29], P = .0007), but no differences in other outcome scores were found. The incidence of periprosthetic joint infection, radiolucent lines, instability, and polyethylene wear was also comparable. Cemented TKA showed less perioperative blood loss (SMD = -438.41, 95% CI [-541.69, -35.14], P < .0001) but a higher rate of manipulation under anesthesia (OR = 3.39, 95% CI [1.64, 6.99], P = .001) and aseptic loosening (OR = 1.62, 95% CI [1.09, 2.41], P = .02) than cementless TKA. No differences were found in terms of the reoperation rate.

CONCLUSION

When cemented and cementless fixations are compared in primary TKA, comparable functional outcomes and reoperation rates can be achieved. Cemented TKA showed less blood loss but a higher rate of manipulation under anesthesia and aseptic loosening.

Clinical outcomes and survivorship of cementless triathlon total knee arthroplasties: a systematic review

Background

Over the last decade, cementless total knee arthroplasty has demonstrated improved outcomes and survivorship due to advances in technologies of implant design, manufacturing capabilities, and biomaterials. Due to increasing interest in cementless implant design for TKA, our aim was to perform a systematic review of the literature to evaluate the clinical outcomes and revision rates of the Triathlon Total Knee system over the past decade.

Methods

A systematic review of the literature was conducted following PRISMA guidelines for patients who underwent total knee arthroplasty with cementless Triathalon Total Knee System implants. Patients had a minimum of two-year follow-up and data included clinical outcome scores and survivorship data.

Results

Twenty studies were included in the final analysis. The survivability of the Stryker Triathlon TKA due to all causes was 98.7%, with an aseptic survivability of 99.2%. The overall revision incidence per 1,000 person-years was 3.4. Re-revision incidence per 1,000 person-years was 2.2 for infection, and 1.3 for aseptic loosening. The average KSS for pain was 92.2 and the average KSS for function was 82.7.

Conclusions

This systematic review demonstrated excellent clinical outcomes and survivorship at a mean time of 3.8 years. Additional research is necessary to examine the long-term success of the Stryker Triathlon TKA and the use of cementless TKAs in obese and younger populations.

Level of evidence

III.

A Short-Term Multicenter Analysis of Radiolucent Lines in a Single Uncemented Rotating Platform Implant for Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Uncemented total knee arthroplasty is increasing as a potential solution for aseptic loosening via biologic fixation and to increase operative efficiency. However, postoperative radiolucent lines (RLLs) remain a concern for some clinicians. We report on a multicenter analysis of these RLLs over a 2-year period to identify their incidence, progression, and clinical significance.

Material and methods

Institutional review board approval was obtained for this retrospective, multicenter case series. A total of 312 patients treated with a single cruciate-retaining, fully porous coated femoral and tibial component design were included in the study. All patients were evaluated clinically and radiographically in the early postoperative period and at final follow-up (average 2.0 years). Average age of the study group was 58.2 years, and average body mass index was 30.7. Of the total, 66% were male, and 34% were female. Two independent surgeons evaluated the radiographs at the initial postoperative visit and at the most recent follow-up for RLLs. Knee Society Scores and range of motion (ROM) were collected at each visit.

Results

We identified RLLs in 25% of patients. All RLLs were less than 1 mm in size and located at the periphery of the tibial implant. None of the RLLs were progressive. At the final follow-up, compared with early postoperative imaging, no new RLLs were identified. Average ROM in flexion was 124 degrees, and the average Knee Society Scores at the most recent clinical follow-up was 96.

Conclusion

RLLs are commonly seen following cementless TKA, most commonly underneath the tibial tray. Based on this data set, there does not appear to be progression of these RLLs with time, and they do not appear to have an effect on ROM or clinical outcome at 2 years.

Cemented Versus Cementless Total Knee Arthroplasty in Obese Patients With Body Mass Index ≥35 kg/m2: A Contemporary Analysis of 812 Patients

BACKGROUND

Cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has been shown to have higher failure rates in obese patients, and cementless TKA may provide more durable fixation. This study compared outcomes and survivorship of obese patients undergoing cemented and cementless TKA of the same modern design.

METHODS

We identified a consecutive series of 406 primary cementless TKA performed in obese patients with body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m² in 2013-2018. Each case was matched 1:1 with 406 cemented TKA based on age, sex, BMI, bearing surface, and year of surgery. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and Short Form-12 were collected preoperatively, at 6 months and 2 years. Implant survivorship was recorded at mean 4.0 years (range 2.0-7.8).

RESULTS

There was no difference in mean BMI between the cemented (38.6 ± 3.4 kg/m²; range, 35-60) and cementless cohorts (38.7 ± 3.3 kg/m²; range, 35-54; P = .706). Both groups had similar final postoperative scores and improvement in scores at 2 years. Furthermore, a similar percentage met the minimal clinically important difference (Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement, 70.0% vs 71.2%, P = .700; Short Form-12 Physical, 74.1% vs 70.4%, P = .240). Both groups demonstrated high 7-year survivorship free from aseptic revision (99.0% vs 99.5%, P = .665).

CONCLUSION

Obese patients with BMI ≥35 kg/m² undergoing cementless and cemented TKA of the same modern design had similar outcomes and survivorship at early to mid-term follow-up. Continued surveillance of this high-risk population is necessary.

Similar Healthcare Utilization and 1-Year Patient-Reported Outcomes between Cemented and Cementless Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Cementless fixation for total knee arthroplasty (TKA) has gained traction with the advent of newer fixation technologies. This study assessed (1) healthcare utilization (length of stay (LOS), nonhome discharge, 90-day readmission, and 1-year reoperation); (2) 1-year mortality; and (3) 1-year joint-specific and global health-related patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) among patients who received cementless versus cemented TKA. Patients who underwent cementless and cemented TKA at a single institution (July 2015-August 2018) were prospectively enrolled. A total of 424 cementless and 5,274 cemented TKAs were included. The cementless cohort was propensity score-matched to a group cemented TKAs (1:3-cementless: n = 424; cemented: n = 1,272). Within the matched cohorts, 76.9% (n = 326) cementless and 75.9% (n = 966) cementless TKAs completed 1-year PROMs. Healthcare utilization measures, mortality and the median 1-year change in knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score (KOOS)-pain, KOOS-physical function short form (PS), KOOS-knee related quality of life (KRQOL), Veteran Rand (VR)-12 mental composite (MCS), and physical composite (PCS) scores were compared. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for PROMs was calculated. Cementless TKA exhibited similar rates of median LOS (p = 0.109), nonhome discharge disposition (p = 0.056), all-cause 90-day readmission (p = 0.226), 1-year reoperation (p = 0.597), and 1-year mortality (p = 0.861) when compared with cemented TKA. There was no significant difference in the median 1-year improvement in KOOS-pain (p = 0.370), KOOS-PS (p = 0.417), KOOS-KRQOL (p = 0.101), VR-12-PCS (p = 0.269), and VR-12-MCS (p = 0.191) between the cementless and cemented TKA cohorts. Rates of attaining MCID were similar in both cohorts for assessed PROMs (p > 0.05, each) except KOOS-KRQOL (cementless: n = 313 (96.0%) vs. cemented: n = 895 [92.7%]; p = 0.036). Cementless TKA provides similar healthcare-utilization, mortality, and 1-year PROM improvement versus cemented TKA. Cementless fixation in TKA may provide value through higher MCID improvement in quality of life. Future episode-of-care cost-analyses and longer-term survivorship investigations are warranted.

Forgotten Joint Score Post Total Knee Arthroplasty and Its Correlation with the New Knee Society Score

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) is designed to asses patient recovery post Total Knee Arthroplasty (TKA) in a new dimension. It assess the ability to forget the operated joint as artificial during activities of daily living. New Knee Society Score (NKSS) is developed to encompass objective and subjective outcome as well as an assessment of patient expectation and satisfaction. Our purpose was (1) to determine FJS at 1 year post TKA in Indian Patients, and (2) to assess convergent validity between FJS and the NKSS. We hypothesised that FJS should strongly correlate with the Satisfaction (SS) and Knee perception(KPS) sub-component of NKSS.

METHODS

We enrolled 181 patients who underwent primary TKA during an 8-month duration. They were prospectively followed up at 1-year review clinic when FJS and NKSS were administered. 169 patients completed the assessment forms and 13 patients were lost to follow-up. Statistical evaluation was done with Spearman correlation test.

RESULTS

Mean FJS at 1 year was 66.6 ± 25.9 with 14% ceiling and 1% floor effects. There was a mild to moderate correlation of FJS with NKSS (p < 0.001, r = 0.47) and its sub-scores (p < 0.001; r = 0.43 and r = 0.44). There was a weak correlation of FJS with NKSS sub-components of SS and KPS (p < 0.001; r = 0.37 and 0.25, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Mean FJS at 1 year post TKA showed convergent validity with NKSS; however, the correlation was not strong enough to use them interchangeably. Hypothesis that FJS should strongly correlate with the NKSS sub-components of satisfaction and joint perception was refuted. We conclude, FJS provides unique evaluation in recovery post TKA, different from NKSS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

A comprehensive comparison between cementless and cemented fixation in the total knee arthroplasty: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Whether the cement should be used in the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) was still in controversy. This meta-analysis was performed to compare the efficacy of two kinds of fixation.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs), prospective/retrospective observational studies from PubMed (on 2019 September), EMBASE (on 2019 September), and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Web of Science (on 2019 September) were searched. Only studies followed more than 2 years was included for the review. The PRISMA guidelines and Cochrane Handbook were adopted to assess the quality of the results reported in included studies to ensure that the results of our meta-analysis were reliable and veritable. The continuous and dichotomous outcomes were collected in a standard form, and the data were analyzed by Review Manager 5.3 software. Finally, the results were presented in the Forest plots.

RESULTS

Twenty-six studies involving 2369 patients in cementless TKA and 2654 patients in cemented TKA were included. The rate of revision was not significantly different in two groups (p = 0.55). More than eight reasons caused revision were found in our study, the aseptic loosing was the most common, followed by the periprosthetic joint infection (PJI), neither was significantly different (p = 0.88 and 0.45, respectively). While significantly better long-term functional recovery was found in cementless TKA in terms of Knee Society Function Score (p = 0.004) and manipulation under anesthesia (p = 0.007).

CONCLUSION

Cementless fixation did not decrease the rate of revision after the total knee arthroplasty compared with the cemented fixation, while the long-term functional recovery was significantly better in the cementless group.

Is obesity associated with short-term revision after total knee arthroplasty? An analysis of 121,819 primary procedures from the Dutch Arthroplasty Register

BACKGROUND

The prevalence of obesity is increasing. The association with knee osteoarthritis is well documented, resulting in the population requesting total knee arthroplasty (TKA) for invalidating symptoms to be heavier in nature. The purpose of the current analysis was to assess the association between preoperative body mass index (BMI) and short-term revision rate after TKA. The secondary aim was to investigate the influence of implant fixation method on the association between BMI and survivorship.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected registry data (Dutch Arthroplasty Register; LROI). All primary TKA procedures in patients >18 years of age with registered BMI were selected (n = 121,819). Non-obese patients (BMI 18-25) were compared with overweight (BMI 25-30) and class I-III obese (BMI >30, >35, >40) patients. Crude all-cause revision rates were calculated using competing risk analysis. Adjusted hazard ratios (HRs) were determined with Cox multivariable regression analyses for all-cause, septic and aseptic revision and secondary patellar resurfacing.

RESULTS

Revision rates were 3.3% for non-obese patients, 3.5% for overweight patients, 3.7% for class I obese patients, 3.6% for class II obese patients and 3.7% for class III obese patients. Class III obese patients had a significant higher risk for septic revision compared with non-obese patients (HR 1.53, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.06-2.22). Class I obese patients had a higher risk for secondary patellar resurfacing (HR 1.52, 95% CI 1.12-2.08). All-cause and aseptic revision rates were similar between BMI groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Obesity appeared to be associated with some short-term revision risks after TKA, but was not associated with an overall increase in revision rate.

Cementless Fixation for Total Knee Arthroplasty in Various Patient Populations: A Literature Review

The number of total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) performed in the United States has increased considerably in recent years, with a major contribution from younger patients. Maximizing survivorship of these implants has always been a point of emphasis. Early TKA designs with cementless fixation were associated with high rates of complications and implant failures. However, recent advances in cementless designs have shown excellent results. The decision to use cemented or cementless fixation for patients undergoing TKA is typically based on the surgeon's experience and preference. However, several patient characteristics must also be taken into account. The purpose of this review was to describe the clinical outcomes of studies in which a cementless TKA system was utilized for patients who (1) were less than 60 years of age, (2) were greater than 75 years of age, (3) were obese, (4) had rheumatoid arthritis, and (5) had osteonecrosis of the knee. Based on the studies included in this review, it appears that cementless fixation is a viable option for patients who have all of the above demographics.

Cemented vs Uncemented Femoral Components: A Randomized, Controlled Trial at 10 Years Minimum Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

The type of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) fixation (cemented or uncemented) is still subject to debate. The aim of this study is to assess the survival rate, clinical outcomes, and radiological results of TKA according to the fixation type.

METHODS

A total of 130 patients were randomly assigned to either the cement group (cemented femoral and tibial implants) or the hybrid group (cemented tibial implant, uncemented femoral implant). The inclusion criteria were patients between 50 and 90 years old who underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis between 2004 and 2005 without a history of open knee surgery. Revisions and complications were reported, as well as clinical scores and radiological signs of loosening.

RESULTS

One hundred eighteen patients had complete data at 10 years of minimum follow-up (59 in each group). The mean age was 72 years old. The mean follow-up was 13 years. The survival rate was 98% at 13 years in both groups (1 aseptic loosening at 2 years in the cement group, 1 septic loosening in the hybrid group). The complication rate in the cement group was 8.5% (n = 5) vs 12.1% (n = 7) in the hybrid group (P = .8). The clinical results were not significantly different. In the cement group, 25% of patients (n = 15) had radiolucent lines at 10 years. In the hybrid group, 33% of patients had bone transparencies, not evolving or symptomatic.

CONCLUSION

At a minimum follow-up of 10 years, there were no significant differences between cemented TKA and hybrid TKA for the survivorship, the complication rate, the clinical scores, or the radiological signs of loosening.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I.

Titanium Porous Coating Using 3D Direct Energy Deposition (DED) Printing for Cementless TKA Implants: Does It Induce Chronic Inflammation?

Because of the recent technological advances, the cementless total knee arthroplasty (TKA) implant showed satisfactory implant survival rate. Newly developed 3D printing direct energy deposition (DED) has superior resistance to abrasion as compared to traditional methods. However, there is still concern about the mechanical stability and the risk of osteolysis by the titanium (Ti) nanoparticles. Therefore, in this work, we investigated whether DED Ti-coated cobalt-chrome (CoCr) alloys induce chronic inflammation reactions through in vitro and in vivo models. We studied three types of implant surfaces (smooth, sand-blasted, and DED Ti-coated) to compare their inflammatory reaction. We conducted the in vitro effect of specimens using the cell counting kit-8 (CCK-8) assay and an inflammatory cytokine assay. Subsequently, in vivo analysis of the immune profiling, cytokine assay, and histomorphometric evaluation using C57BL/6 mice were performed. There were no significant differences in the CCK-8 assay, the cytokine assay, and the immune profiling assay. Moreover, there were no difference for semi-quantitative histomorphometry analysis at 4 and 8 weeks among the sham, smooth, and DED Ti-coated samples. These results suggest that DED Ti-coated printing technique do not induce chronic inflammation both in vitro and in vivo. It has biocompatibility for being used as a surface coating of TKA implant.

The Natural History of Radiolucencies Following Uncemented Total Knee Arthroplasty at 9 Years

BACKGROUND

Aseptic loosening remains a common cause of failure in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). There is an increased interest in using uncemented TKA to reduce this complication. Radiolucencies (RLs) following uncemented TKA can be concerning. We report on the 9-year history of RLs in patients with uncemented TKA.

METHODS

Twenty-one patients (26 knees) were treated with a cruciate-retaining fully porous coated femur/tibia and cemented patella. At final follow-up, 17 patients (22 knees) were available for review. Average follow-up was 9.6 years, average age was 59.1, and average body mass index was 34.1. X-rays were taken at 6 weeks, 1 year, and at final follow-up. RLs were measured using the Knee Society scoring system and read by two separate surgeons.

RESULTS

At 6 weeks, we identified RL in all patients on both the tibia and femur. The majority were beneath the tibial tray and femoral chamfer. At 1 year, 4 femurs and 4 tibias showed new RLs (<2 mm) in similar zones. Eighteen femurs and 18 tibias showed fewer or no change in RLs. At final follow-up, no new tibia or femur developed a new RL. In total, 9 of the 22 tibias and 17 of the 22 femurs had remaining RLs, all less than 2 mm and none were progressive or new. Knee Society Score averaged 92.5 (6 weeks), 95.1 (1 year), and 97.3 (final).

CONCLUSION

RLs are common following uncemented TKA. Many resolve by 1 year. There does not appear to be any association between the presence of RLs and long-term follow-up function in this group of patients.