Identifying Risk Factors for the Development of Stiffness After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Revision for stiff knee after knee replacement

Stiffness following total knee replacement is defined as >15° flexion contracture and/or flexion <75° or, for other authors, arc of motion <70° or 45° or 50°. Alternatively, it could be defined as a range of motion less than the patient needs in order to be able to do what they wish. The first step in management is to determine the causes: preoperative (history of stiffness, patient-related risk factors, etc.), intraoperative (technical error: malpositioning, oversizing, overhanging, etc.), and postoperative (defective pain management and/or rehabilitation, etc.). Treatment depends on the interval since replacement and on the type of stiffness (flexion or extension), and should be multidisciplinary (surgery, rehabilitation, pain management). For intervals less than 3 months, manipulation under anesthesia gives good results for flexion. If this fails, surgery should be considered. If there was no significant technical error, arthrolysis may be indicated, and is usually arthroscopic. It is technically difficult, but has a low rate of complications. Open arthrolysis allows greater posterior release and replacement of the insert by a thinner model. In case of malpositioning or oversizing or of failure of other procedures, implant revision is the only option, although the risk of complications is high. After exposure, which is often difficult, the aim is to correct the technical errors and to restore joint-line height and two symmetrical, well-balanced spaces in extension and flexion. A semi-constrained or even hinged implant may be needed, although with uncertain lifetime for young patients in the latter case. In all cases, the patient needs to accept that treatment is going to be long, with more than the intervention itself (i.e., specific pain management and rehabilitation), and that expectations have to be reasonable as results are often imperfect. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: expert opinion.

Etiology and prosthesis model have no influence in the functional outcomes of total knee arthroplasty revision surgery at five years

Background

The rising number of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) replacements and their uncertain functional results according to the revision etiology and the prosthesis model implanted are a challenge for orthopedic surgeons and patients. A better knowledge of these results is mandatory to make the best decision. We present our clinical outcomes with a 5-year follow-up.

Methods

We retrospectively reviewed 104 patients, 108 knees (77 aseptic and 31 septic), who underwent TKA revision surgery from 2007 to 2017 with three different models of prosthesis. KSS score, range of motion (ROM), pain, and independence for walking were recorded at 5 years according to our own database and the clinical interview and compared to the different models of prosthesis and the etiology of the revision.

Results

The results showed 81.5 % of good or excellent functional outcomes in our patients with a mean KSS score of 76,7 ± 14,3, a mean ROM of 1.68 ± 0.30 radians, and 77 % of them are independent for walking without any aids. The results do not show any difference between the groups comparing the model of prosthesis and the etiology of the revision surgery.

Conclusions

At 5 years, TKA revision surgery offers good clinical and functional outcomes, independence for walking, good range of motion, and low residual pain regardless of the cause of the revision or the model of prosthesis.

A mapping review on preoperative prognostic factors and outcome measures of revision total knee arthroplasty

To map literature on prognostic factors related to outcomes of revision total knee arthroplasty (rTKA), to identify extensively studied factors and to guide future research into what domains need further exploration. We performed a systematic literature search in MEDLINE, Embase, and Web of Science. The search string included multiple synonyms of the following keywords: "revision TKA", "outcome" and "prognostic factor". We searched for studies assessing the association between at least one prognostic factor and at least one outcome measure after rTKA surgery. Data on sample size, study design, prognostic factors, outcomes, and the direction of the association was extracted and included in an evidence map. After screening of 5,660 articles, we included 166 studies reporting prognostic factors for outcomes after rTKA, with a median sample size of 319 patients (30 to 303,867). Overall, 50% of the studies reported prospectively collected data, and 61% of the studies were performed in a single centre. In some studies, multiple associations were reported; 180 different prognostic factors were reported in these studies. The three most frequently studied prognostic factors were reason for revision (213 times), sex (125 times), and BMI (117 times). Studies focusing on functional scores and patient-reported outcome measures as prognostic factor for the outcome after surgery were limited (n = 42). The studies reported 154 different outcomes. The most commonly reported outcomes after rTKA were: re-revision (155 times), readmission (88 times), and reinfection (85 times). Only five studies included costs as outcome. Outcomes and prognostic factors that are routinely registered as part of clinical practice (e.g. BMI, sex, complications) or in (inter)national registries are studied frequently. Studies on prognostic factors, such as functional and sociodemographic status, and outcomes as healthcare costs, cognitive and mental function, and psychosocial impact are scarce, while they have been shown to be important for patients with osteoarthritis.

Does design change in total knee arthroplasty implants affect patient-reported outcomes?

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the early results of patient-reported outcomes between two generations of a total knee system.

METHODS

Between June 2018 and April 2020, 121 first-generation, cemented TKAs (89 patients) and 123 s-generation, cemented TKAs (98 patients) were performed by a single surgeon. Demographic and surgical data were collected from all patients. Starting at the 6-month follow-up, patient-reported outcome measures Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score, Joint Reconstruction (KOOS-JR) and Knee Society (KS) clinical and radiographic scores were prospectively recorded. This study represents a retrospective review of these prospectively collected data.

RESULTS

There were no statistically significant differences between the two groups in terms of demographic variables such as age, body mass index, gender and race. KOOS-JR and Knee Society (KS) scores improved significantly (p < 0.001) from their preoperative values in both device generations. There were no differences, pre-operatively, between the two groups in terms of KOOS-JR, KS functional, KS objective, patient satisfaction, and expectation scores; however, there were statistically significant (p < 0.001) lower values of KOOS-JR and KS functional scores for first versus second generation at 6 months (81 vs. 89 and 69 vs. 74, respectively).

CONCLUSION

While significant improvement in KS objective, subjective, and patient satisfaction scores were noted with both knee systems, KOOS-JR and KS function scores were significantly higher at the early (6-month) follow-up in the second-generation group. Patients responded acutely to the design change as evidenced by significantly improved patient-reported outcome scores for the second generation.

Racial Differences in Manipulation Under Anesthesia Rates Following Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Despite the extensive literature on racial disparities in care and outcomes after total knee arthroplasty (TKA), data on manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) is lacking. We aimed to determine (1) the relationship between race and rate of (and time to) MUA after TKA, and (2) annual trends in racial differences in MUA from 2013 to 2018.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study (using 2013-2018 Medicare Limited Data Set claims data) included 836,054 primary TKA patients. The primary outcome was MUA <1 year after TKA; time from TKA to MUA in days was also recorded. A mixed-effects multivariable model measured the association between race (White, Black, Other) and odds of MUA. Odds ratios (OR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were reported. A Cochran Armitage Trend test was conducted to assess MUA trends over time, stratified by race.

RESULTS

MUA after TKA occurred in 1.7%, 3.2% and 2.1% of White, Black, and Other race categories, respectively (SMD = 0.07). After adjustment for covariates, (Black vs White) patients had increased odds of requiring an MUA after TKA: odds ratio (OR) 1.97, 95% confidence intervals (CI) 1.86-2.10, P < .0001. Moreover, White (compared to Black) patients had significantly shorter time to MUA after TKA: 60 days (interquartile range [IQR] 46-88) versus 64 days (interquartile range [IQR] 47-96); P < .0001. These disparities persisted from 2013 through 2018.

CONCLUSION

Continued racial differences exist for rates and timing of MUA following TKA signifying the continued need for efforts aimed toward understanding and eliminating inequalities that exist in total joint arthroplasty (TJA) care.

Human outgrowth knee fibroblasts from patients undergoing total knee arthroplasty exhibit a unique gene expression profile and undergo myofibroblastogenesis upon TGFβ1 stimulation

Arthrofibrosis is characterized by excessive extracellular matrix (ECM) deposition that results in restricted joint motion after total knee arthroplasties (TKAs). Currently, treatment options are limited. Therefore, an in vitro model of knee-related myofibroblastogenesis is valuable to facilitate investigation of the arthrofibrotic process, diagnostic and therapeutic options. In this study, we obtained intraoperative posterior capsule (PC), quadriceps tendon (QT), and suprapatellar pouch (SP) tissues from the knees of four patients undergoing primary TKAs for osteoarthritis. From these tissues, we isolated primary cells by the outgrowth method and subsequently characterized these cells in the absence and presence of the pro-myofibroblastic cytokine, transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFβ1). Light microscopy of knee outgrowth cells revealed spindle-shaped cells, and immunofluorescence (IF) analysis demonstrated staining for the fibroblast-specific markers TE-7 and vimentin (VIM). These knee outgrowth fibroblasts differentiated readily into myofibroblasts as reflected by enhanced α-smooth muscle actin (ACTA2) mRNA and protein expression and increased mRNA expression of collagen type 1 (COL1A1) and type 3 (COL3A1) with collagenous matrix deposition in the presence of TGFβ1. Outgrowth knee fibroblasts were more sensitive to TGFβ1-mediated myofibroblastogenesis than adipose-derived mesenchymal stromal/stem cells (MSCs). While outgrowth knee fibroblasts isolated from three anatomical regions in four patients exhibited similar gene expression, these cells are distinct from other fibroblastic cell types (i.e., Dupuytren's fibroblasts) as revealed by RNA-sequencing. In conclusion, our study provides an in vitro myofibroblastic model of outgrowth knee fibroblasts derived from patients undergoing primary TKA that can be utilized to study myofibroblastogenesis and assess therapeutic strategies for arthrofibrosis.

Lysis of Adhesion for Arthrofibrosis After Total Knee Arthroplasty Is Associated With Increased Risk of Subsequent Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study is to determine incidence of lysis of adhesion (LOA) for postoperative arthrofibrosis following primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA), patient factors associated with LOA, and impact of LOA on revision TKA.

METHODS

Patients who underwent primary TKA were identified in the Humana and Medicare databases. Patients who underwent LOA within 1 year after TKA were defined as the "LOA" cohort. Multiple binomial logistic regression analyses were performed to identify patient factors associated with undergoing LOA within 1 year after index TKA, and identify risk factors including LOA on risk for revision TKA within 2 years of index TKA.

RESULTS

In total, 58,538 and 48,336 patients underwent primary TKA in the Medicare and Humana databases, respectively. Incidence of LOA within 1 year after TKA was 0.56% in both databases. Age <75 years was a significant predictor of LOA in both databases (P < .05 for both). Incidence of revision TKA was significantly higher for the "LOA" cohort when compared to the "TKA Only" cohort in both databases (P < .0001 for both). LOA was the strongest predictor of revision TKA within 2 years after index TKA in both databases (P < .0001 for both). Additionally, age <65 years, male gender, obesity, fibromyalgia, smoking, alcohol abuse, and history of anxiety or depression were independently associated with increased odds of revision TKA within 2 years after index TKA (P < .05 for all).

CONCLUSION

Incidence of LOA after primary TKA is low, with younger age being the strongest predictor for requiring LOA. Patients who undergo LOA for arthrofibrosis within 1 year after primary TKA have a substantially high risk for subsequent early revision TKA.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III, Retrospective Cohort Study.

Range of Motion at Discharge Predicts Need for Manipulation following Total Knee Arthroplasty

Stiffness following total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a common complication that can result in unsatisfactory outcomes. Manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) has been widely employed to treat this problem. It is uncertain whether an association exists between range of motion (ROM) at discharge and need for MUA following primary TKA.A retrospective review of an institutional joint registry identified cases of primary TKA performed by three surgeons at a single institution over a 22-month period. A logistic regression model was used to examine the association between ROM at discharge and subsequent MUA controlling for confounding variables related to patient demographics and perioperative details. Of the 1,546 cases identified, 113 (7.3%) cases underwent subsequent MUA. As discharge ROM increased, manipulation rates decreased. Patients with discharge flexion <65 degrees were more likely to undergo MUA than those with flexion >90 degrees (odds ratio [OR] = 17.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] [7.97, 38.73], p < 0.0001). The largest differential in odds of MUA was observed between the <65 degrees at discharge group (OR = 17.57) and the 65 ≤ 75 degrees at discharge group (OR = 7.89). At discharge ROM of 80 ≤ 90 degrees of flexion, patients had more than a twofold increase in odds of MUA relative to those in the >90 degrees group (OR = 2.22, 95% CI [1.20, 4.10], p = 0.011). The results of this study suggest that there is an association between lower ROM at discharge and greater risk of MUA post primary TKA. Counseling patients in regard to discharge ROM and associated risk of MUA may optimize gains in ROM during recovery.

Impact of continuous passive motion on rehabilitation following total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

There is an ongoing controversy in respect of the usage of continuous passive motion (CPM) following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We analysed the impact of CPM on the early rehabilitation after TKA and the clinical outcome over the time.

METHODS

Forty patients were prospectively randomized to postoperative protocols following TKA. Half of them (n = 20) received the standard manual therapy alone and the others (n = 20) were treated additionally with CPM. Identical implants were used in all patients. Passive range of movement (PROM) was noted. Patient satisfaction and knee function was evaluated using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) as well as the Knee Society Score (KSS) at time of discharge and 2 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

The patients in the solitary manual therapy group (MT) showed preoperatively a 7.2° greater PROM (p = .03) with 5.4° higher flexion (p = .05). Analogously, the KSS presented with 42.7 points a higher score result compared to the CPM group with 35.9 points (p = .03). Although the preoperative ability with 105.2° for flexion and 97.2° for the PROM were in favour of the group without CPM (99.8° resp. 90.0°), at time of discharge the patients with CPM reached with 111.0° a significant higher flexion and with 109.0° a higher PROM (MT group: 107.0° resp. 103.5°) (p = .04/.02). At 2 years follow-up both scores (WOMAC/KSS) and function (extension, flexion and PROM) were balanced (p > .05). Patella resurfacing showed no impact on the clinical results at discharge or at time of last follow-up (p > .05).

DISCUSSION

Although the addition of CPM did significantly improve knee flexion in the early postoperative stage, the difference might not represent a clinical relevance. Further, there were no notable effects on long-term clinical and functional results following TKA, so the routine application of CPM in the above stated setting might be ceased.

Manipulation Under Anesthesia After Total Knee: Who Still Requires a Revision Arthroplasty?

BACKGROUND

Stiffness after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is a multifactorial complication involving patient, implant, surgical technique, and rehabilitation, occasionally necessitating manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) or revision. Few modern databases contain sufficient longitudinal information of all factors. We characterized MUA after primary TKA and identified independent risk factors for revision TKA after MUA from the American Joint Replacement Registry.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed primary TKAs for American Joint Replacement Registry patients ≥65 years from January 1, 2012 to 31 March, 2019. We linked these to the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services database to identify MUA and revision TKA procedure codes. We compared groups with chi-squared testing, identifying independent risk factors for subsequent revision with binary logistic regression presented as odds ratios with 95% confidence intervals.

RESULTS

Of 664,604 primary TKAs, 3918 (0.6%) underwent MUA after a median of 2.0 ± 1.0 months. Revision surgery occurred in 131 (3.4%) MUA patients after a median of 9.0 months. Timing of MUA was not different between revision and no revision patients (P = .09). Patients undergoing MUA compared to no MUA were older (age 71.5 vs 70.7, P < .01), predominantly female (63.9% vs 61.2%, P < .01), current/former tobacco users (24.2% vs 13.3%, P < .01), with osteoarthritis diagnoses (98.0% vs 84.3%, P < .01). Independent risk factors for revision after MUA were male gender (1.56, 1.09-2.22).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of MUA after primary TKA is low (0.6%) in Medicare patients ≥65 years of age; 3.4% progress to revision after a median of 9 months. Being male was significantly associated with revision TKA after MUA.

Diabetes mellitus does not increase the risk of knee stiffness after total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of 7 studies including 246 053 cases

Purpose

Methods

Results

Conclusion

Level of evidence