Treatment of High-Grade Acetabular Defects: Do Porous Titanium Cups Provide Better Stability Than Traditional Titanium Cups When Combined With an Augment?

Cemented acetabular components combined with trabecular metal augments provide excellent long-term survivorship for severe acetabular bone loss

BACKGROUND

Acetabular bone loss is a challenging problem for revision hip surgeons. This study aimed to explore long-term outcomes of patients who have undergone cemented acetabular revision in conjunction with trabecular metal augmentation and impaction bone grafting in cases with significant segmental bone loss.

METHODS

All patients who underwent cemented acetabular revision requiring impaction bone grafting and trabecular metal augments with a minimum Paprosky score of 2B and minimum follow up of 5 years were identified. Pre- and postoperative WOMAC scores were compared. An assessment of pre- and postoperative hip centre of rotation was performed and compared to native centre of rotation. Immediate postoperative centre of rotation was then compared to radiographs at latest follow up to measure for migration of acetabular components.

RESULTS

42 patients were identified. Mean age was 53 years old with 7 males and 35 female patients. Mean follow-up was 9.5 years. Preoperative WOMAC score was 30 and there was an increase to 90 (p < 0.01) at latest follow-up. No hips were revised for loosening or infection. There was a mean improvement in centre of rotation of 6.80 mm (CI, 4.57-9.03 mm) which was significant (p < 0.00002). There was no change of position of centre of rotation from immediate postoperative radiographs and those at latest follow up (p = 0.3).

CONCLUSIONS

Cemented acetabular components work well in conjunction with trabecular metal augments and impacted bone grafts in reconstructing complex acetabular defects. Together they provide immediate and long-term component stability, with excellent long-term clinical and radiological outcomes.

[Strategies for cup revision]

Hip arthroplasty revision management can range from simple procedures using standard implants to complex surgical interventions requiring the combined use of revision cups, metal augments, bone grafts, and antiprotrusio cages. The adequate restoration of biomechanics and function of the hip joint with reconstruction of the original center of rotation can be challenging. We present an overview of various available techniques with the associated implant and anchoring strategies and the respective clinical results depending on the acetabular defect situation.

Clinical Application and Biological Functionalization of Different Surface Coatings in Artificial Joint Prosthesis: A Comprehensive Research Review

With advances in materials science and biology, there have been continuing innovations in the field of artificial joint prostheses. Cementless prostheses have the advantages of long service life, easy revision, and good initial stability and are widely used in artificial joint replacement. Coatings are the key to cementless prostheses and are at the heart of their excellent functionality. This article mainly studies the clinical application of hydroxyapatite (HA) coating, standard porous coating represented by Porocoat coating, and new high-porosity coating represented by Gription coating. The clinical application and biological functionalization of different artificial joint prosthesis surface coatings are clarified, and it provides a reference for the clinical selection and development of different prosthesis surface coating materials.

Osseointegration of porous titanium and tantalum implants in ovariectomized rabbits: A biomechanical study

BACKGROUND

Today, biological fixation of uncemented press-fit acetabular components plays an important role in total hip arthroplasty. Long-term stable fixation of these implants depends on the osseointegration of the acetabular cup bone tissue into the acetabular cup implant, and their ability to withstand functional loads.

AIM

To compare the strength of bone-implant osseointegration of four types of porous metal implants in normal and osteoporotic bone in rabbits.

METHODS

The study was performed in 50 female California rabbits divided into non-ovariectomized (non-OVX) and ovariectomized groups (OVX) at 6 mo of age. Rabbits were sacrificed 8 wk after the implantation of four biomaterials [TTM, CONCELOC, Zimmer Biomet's Trabecular Metal (TANTALUM), and ATLANT] in a 5-mm diameter defect created in the left femur. A biomechanical evaluation of the femur was carried out by testing implant breakout force. The force was gradually increased until complete detachment of the implant from the bone occurred.

RESULTS

The breakout force needed for implant detachment was significantly higher in the non-OVX group, compared with the OVX group for all implants (TANTALUM, 194.7 ± 6.1 N vs 181.3 ± 2.8 N; P = 0.005; CONCELOC, 190.8 ± 3.6 N vs 180.9 ± 6.6 N; P = 0.019; TTM, 186.3 ± 1.8 N vs 172.0 N ± 11.0 N; P = 0.043; and ATLANT, 104.9 ± 7.0 N vs 78.9 N ± 4.5 N; P = 0.001). In the OVX group, The breakout forces in TANTALUM, TTM, and CONCELOC did not differ significantly (P = 0.066). The breakout force for ATLANT in the OVX group was lower by a factor of 2.3 compared with TANTALUM and CONCELOC, and by 2.2 compared with TTM (P = 0.001). In the non-OVX group, the breakout force for ATLANT was significantly different from all other implants, with a reduction in fixation strength by a factor of 1.9 (P = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

TANTALUM, TTM, and CONCELOC had equal bone-implant osseointegration in healthy and in osteoporotic bone. ATLANT had significantly decreased osseointegration (P = 0.001) in healthy and in osteoporotic bone.

Effect of cup medialization on primary stability of press-fit acetabular cups

BACKGROUND

Appropriate restoration of the native centre of rotation is of paramount importance in total hip arthroplasty. Reconstruction of the centre of rotation depends on reaming technique: conventional approaches require more cup medialization than anatomical preparations. To date, the influence of cup medialization on socket stability in cementless implants is still unknown.

METHODS

Ten cadaveric hemipelvises were sequentially reamed using anatomical technique (only subchondral bone removal with restoration of the native centre of rotation) and conventional preparation (reaming to the lamina and medializing the cup). A biomechanical test was performed on the reconstructions. Implant motions were measured with digital image correlation while a cyclic load of increasing magnitude was applied.

FINDINGS

No significant difference was measured between the two implantation techniques in terms of permanent cup migrations. The only significant difference was found for the cup inducible rotations, where the conventional technique was associated with larger rotations.

INTERPRETATION

Conventional reaming and cup medialization do not improve initial cup stability. Beyond the recently questioned concerns about medialization and hip biomechanics, this is another issue to bear in mind when reaming the acetabulum.

Early results of a high friction surface coated uncemented socket in revision hip arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Revision hip arthroplasty with high friction trabecular metal sockets has resulted in good medium-term results. Many manufacturers have therefore introduced higher friction coatings to their implants to meet a growing demand for similar implants. The Pinnacle Gription was introduced in 2007 as an evolution of the standard Pinnacle socket. This study aimed to assess the early results of this socket in a revision setting.

METHODS

Between August 2009 and December 2016, the Gription socket was used in 146 revision hip replacements. The mean age was 63 (19-88) years. Defects were classified as Paprosky Grade 2 in 71(2A [28], 2B [19], 2C [24]) and grade 3 in 20 (3A [18], 3B [2]). Bearing combinations were ceramic-on-ceramic in 23, metal-on-polyethylene in 71, ceramic-on-polyethylene in 52. Screws were used in 112 cases, impaction bone grafting in 34 and metal augments in 1 case. Radiographs were analysed for progressive radiolucent lines and migration.

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 43.5 (range 25-62) months. There were 6 re-revisions (2 for deep infection, 2 for recurrent dislocation and 2 for aseptic loosening). None of the other cases had evidence of socket migration or progressive radiolucent lines. There were no intraoperative or postoperative periprosthetic fractures. The crude survivorship for all-cause failure was 95.8% and the survivorship for aseptic loosening was 98.6%. at 43.5 months follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the largest reported series of Gription socket use in revision arthroplasty and demonstrates encouraging early results. We therefore advocate the continued cautious use of this implant.

Primary Stability of Revision Acetabular Reconstructions Using an Innovative Bone Graft Substitute: A Comparative Biomechanical Study on Cadaveric Pelvises

Hip implant failure is mainly due to aseptic loosening of the cotyle and is typically accompanied by defects in the acetabular region. Revision surgery aims to repair such defects before implantation by means of reconstruction materials, whose morselized bone graft represents the gold standard. Due to the limited availability of bone tissue, synthetic substitutes are also used. The aim of this study was to evaluate if a synthetic fully resorbable tri-calcium phosphate-based substitute can provide adequate mechanical stability when employed to restore severe, contained defects, in comparison with morselized bone graft. Five cadaveric pelvises were adopted, one side was reconstructed with morselized bone graft and the other with the synthetic substitute, consisting of dense calcium phosphate granules within a collagen matrix. During the biomechanical test, cyclic load packages of increasing magnitude were applied to each specimen until failure. Bone/implant motions were measured through Digital Image Correlation and were expressed in terms of permanent and inducible translations and rotations. The reconstruction types exhibited a similar behavior, consisting of an initial settling trend followed by failure as bone fracture (i.e., no failure of the reconstruction material). When 2.2 Body Weight was applied, the permanent translations were not significantly different between the two reconstructions (p = 0.06–1.0) and were below 1.0 mm. Similarly, the inducible translations did not differ significantly (p = 0.06–1.0) and were below 0.160 mm. Rotations presented the same order of magnitude but were qualitatively different. Overall, the synthetic substitute provided adequate mechanical stability in comparison with morselized bone graft, thus representing a reliable alternative to treat severe, contained acetabular defects.

A method to assess primary stability of acetabular components in association with bone defects

The objectives of this study were to develop a simplified acetabular bone defect model based on a representative clinical case, derive four bone defect increments from the simplified defect to establish a step-wise testing procedure, and analyze the impact of bone defect and bone defect filling on primary stability of a press-fit cup in the smallest defined bone defect increment. The original bone defect was approximated with nine reaming procedures and by exclusion of specific procedures, four defect increments were derived. The smallest increment was used in an artificial acetabular test model to test primary stability of a press-fit cup in combination with bone graft substitute (BGS). A primary acetabular test model and a defect model without filling were used as reference. Load was applied in direction of level walking in sinusoidal waveform with an incrementally increasing maximum load (300 N/1000 cycles from 600 to 3000 N). Relative motions (inducible displacement, migration, and total motion) between cup and test model were assessed with an optical measurement system. Original and simplified bone defect volume showed a conformity of 99%. Maximum total motion in the primary setup at 600 N (45.7 ± 5.6 µm) was in a range comparable to tests in human donor specimens (36.0 ± 16.8 µm). Primary stability was reduced by the bone defect, but could mostly be reestablished by BGS-filling. The presented method could be used as platform to test and compare different treatment strategies for increasing bone defect severity in a standardized way.

Titanium Acetabular Component Deformation under Cyclic Loading

Acetabular cup deformation may affect liner/cup congruency, clearance and/or osseointegration. It is unclear, whether deformation of the acetabular components occurs during load and to what extent. To evaluate this, revision multi-hole cups were implanted into six cadaver hemipelvises in two scenarios: without acetabular defect (ND); with a large acetabular defect (LD) that was treated with an augment. In the LD scenario, the cup and augment were attached to the bone and each other with screws. Subsequently, the implanted hemipelvises were loaded under a physiologic partial-weight-bearing modality. The deformation of the acetabular components was determined using a best-fit algorithm. The statistical evaluation involved repeated-measures ANOVA. The mean elastic distension of the ND cup was 292.9 µm (SD 12.2 µm); in the LD scenario, 43.7 µm (SD 11.2 µm); the mean maximal augment distension was 79.6 µm (SD 21.6 µm). A significant difference between the maximal distension of the cups in both scenarios was noted (F(1, 10) = 11.404; p = 0.007). No significant difference was noted between the compression of the ND and LD cups, nor between LD cups and LD augments. The LD cup displayed significantly lower elastic distension than the ND cup, most likely due to increased stiffness from the affixed augment and screw fixation.

In vitro examination of the primary stability of three press-fit acetabular cups under consideration of two different bearing couples

BACKROUND

For preclinical statements about the anchoring behavior of prostheses, the primary stability of the prosthesis is of special importance. It was the aim of this study to examine and compare the relevant relative micromotions of three different acetabulum prostheses by introducing three-dimensional torques.

METHODS

The cups were implanted under standard conditions into an anatomical artificial bone model. Three-dimensional torques were applied to the acetabular cups. Taking into account the resulting frictional moments of two different bearing couples, ceramic-on-ceramic and ceramic-on-polyethylene, the relative micromotions of the cups were recorded as maximum total micromotion, translational and rotational micromotion, and the primary stability values of the three cups were compared.

RESULTS

Relative micromotion of all cup models was always significantly smaller with the CoC bearing couples than with the CoP bearing couples (p < 0.001). The rotational micromotion was always lower (p < 0.001) than the translational micromotion, and the rotational as well as the translational micromotions were each always lower than the maximum total micromotion (p < 0.001, p < 0.010). The thinnest-walled cup system always showed the largest relative micromotions.

CONCLUSION

The results of our study can be interpreted as indicating that the low relative micromotions of all cups - irrespective of the use of CoC or CoP bearing couples - are within an acceptable range favoring secondary osseointegration of the implants. Furthermore, we were able to show that the cup wall thickness and the surface quality of the cup systems have an influence on the primary stability and the elastic deformability of the examined cup systems.