Cruciate-Retaining vs Posterior-Stabilized Primary Total Arthroplasty. Clinical Outcome Comparison With a Minimum Follow-Up of 10 Years

Survivorship and Patient Outcomes of Conforming Bearings in Modern Primary Total Knee Arthroplasty: Mean 3.5 Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

Conforming and congruent bearings in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) have rapidly increased due to the benefits of increased stability and the potential for replicating normal knee kinematics. However, limited data exist for these newly available bearings. This study evaluated revision-free survivorship and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) of a large granular database of primary TKAs using a single conforming bearing design.

METHODS

A total of 1,306 consecutive primary TKAs performed using a single conforming bearing design (85% cemented and 15% cementless) were retrospectively reviewed. Kaplan-Meier (KM) survivorship estimates were calculated based on the latest clinical follow-up. The PROMs and minimal clinically important differences (MCIDs) were evaluated. A total of 93% of cases achieved minimum 1-year clinical follow-up (mean 3.5 years; range, 1 to 7), with a subset of 261 cases that achieved minimum 5-year follow-up (mean 5.8 years; range, 5 to 7).

RESULTS

All-cause and aseptic KM survivorship estimates were 97.6 (95% CI [confidence interval], 97 to 99) and 98.1% (95% CI, 97 to 99) at 7.0 years. Revision-free survivorship did not differ by cemented or cementless fixation (98 versus 97%, P = 0.163). All PROM scores significantly improved from preoperative baseline (P < 0.001), and ≥ 86% of patients achieved MCIDs for Knee Society pain and Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS JR) total scores. A total of 89% of cases reported their knees to 'sometimes or always' feel normal. For cases with minimum 5-year PROMs, 93% were 'very satisfied' or 'satisfied.'

CONCLUSION

Conforming-bearing TKA demonstrated excellent survivorship up to 7.0 years. In addition, PROMs were comparable to other designs reported in the literature. While mid-term (mean 3.5-year) results are promising, long-term data are warranted on survivorship due to potential polyethylene wear in conforming bearings with more surface area in contact with articulating surfaces.

Impact of Selective Posterior Cruciate Ligament Fiber Release on Femoral Rollback in Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Computational Study

BACKGROUND

Partial or total release of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) is often performed intraoperatively in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (CR-TKA) to alleviate excessive femoral rollback. However, the effect of the release of selected fibers of the PCL on femoral rollback in CR-TKA is not well understood. Therefore, we used a computational model to quantify the effect of selective PCL fiber releases on femoral rollback in CR-TKA.

METHODS

Computational models of 9 cadaveric knees (age: 63 years, range 47 to 79) were virtually implanted with a CR-TKA. Passive flexion was simulated with the PCL retained and after serially releasing each individual fiber of the PCL, starting with the one located most anteriorly and laterally on the femoral notch and finishing with the one located most posteriorly on the medial femoral condyle. The experiment was repeated after releasing only the central PCL fiber. The femoral rollback of each condyle was defined as the anterior-posterior distance between tibiofemoral contact points at 0° and 90° of flexion.

RESULTS

Release of the central PCL fiber in combination with the anterolateral (AL) fibers, reduced femoral rollback a median of 1.5 [0.8, 2.1] mm (P = .01) medially and by 2.0 [1.2, 2.5] mm (P = .04) laterally. Releasing the central fiber alone reduced the rollback by 0.7 [0.4, 1.1] mm (P < .01) medially and by 1.0 [0.5, 1.1] mm (P < .01) laterally, accounting for 47 and 50% of the reduction when released in combination with the AL fibers.

CONCLUSIONS

Releasing the central fibers of the PCL had the largest impact on reducing femoral rollback, either alone or in combination with the release of the entire AL bundle. Thus, our findings provide clinical guidance regarding the regions of the PCL that surgeons should target to reduce femoral rollback in CR-TKA.

Faster improvement in outcome scores in posterior stabilised total knee arthroplasty compared to medial congruent system with posterior cruciate ligament retained

Most studies comparing medial pivot to the posterior stabilised (PS) systems sacrifice the PCL. It is unknown whether retaining the PCL in the Medial Congruent (MC) system may provide further benefit compared to the more commonly used PS system. A retrospective review of a single-surgeon's registry data comparing 44 PS and 26 MC with PCL retained (MC-PCLR) TKAs was performed. Both groups had similar baseline demographics. The PS and MC-PCLR groups had similar pre-operative range of motion (ROM) (PS:104º ± 20º vs. MC-PCLR: 101º ± 19º, p = 0.70), Oxford Knee Score (OKS) (PS: 27 ± 6 vs. MC-PCLR: 26 ± 7, p = 0.62), and Knee Society Scoring System (KS) Function Score (KS-FS) (PS: 52 ± 24 vs. MC-PCLR: 56 ± 23, p = 0.49). The pre-operative KS Knee Score (KS-KS) was significantly lower in the PS group (PS: 44 ± 14 vs. MC-PLR: 53 ± 18, p < 0.05). At 12-months post-operation, there was significant improvement in all parameters (p < 0.01). Both groups had similar ROM (PS: 115º ± 13º vs. MC-PCLR: 114º ± 10º, p = 0.98), OKS (PS: 41 ± 5 vs. MC-PCLR: 40 ± 4, p = 0.50), KS-FS (PS: 74 ± 22 vs. MC-PCLR: 77 ± 16, p = 0.78), and KS-KS (PS: 89 ± 10 vs. MC-PCLR: 89 ± 10, p = 0.89). The PS group had significant improvement in all parameters from preoperation to 3-month postoperation (p < 0.05), but not from 3-month to 1-year postoperation (p ≥ 0.05). The MC-PCLR group continued to have significant improvement from 3-month to 1-year postoperation (p < 0.05). Preserving the PCL when using MC may paradoxically cause an undesired additional restrain that slows the recovery process of the patients after TKA. Compared to MC-PCLR, a PS TKA may expect significantly faster improvement at 3 months post operation, although they will achieve similar outcomes at 1-year post operation.

Is Mediolateral Translation of Femur Caused by Total Knee Arthroplasty Being Ignored?

Purpose

This study aims to show the change in overall congruency due to mediolateral translation after total knee arthroplasty compared with normal knee anatomy.

Methods

This study was performed in two parts. In part 1, the relationship between femur and tibia was defined by new parameters on the antero-posterior radiographs of 84 patients. In part 2, this relationship was evaluated on the postoperative radiographs of 136 total knee arthroplasty patients. Two parallel lines to the tibial anatomical axis were drawn tangent to the most lateral and most medial parts of the tibial plateau. After creating medial and lateral tangential lines, the distance between the most lateral point of the lateral femoral epicondyle and lateral tangential line and the most medial point of the medial femoral epicondyle and medial tangential line was measured. Another new parameter described in the study is epicondylar distance ratio. The ratios between the shortest distance between tibial anatomical axis and lateral femoral epicondyle and the distance between tibial anatomical axis and medial femoral epicondyle were defined.

Results

It was found that the lateral tangent was not superposed in any measurement to the femoral lateral condyle, the closest tangent was passed, and the mean lateral space distance was 1.8 mm (SD 1.5, 95% CI 0-5.3 mm). The medial tangent was passed from the lateral to the femoral medial epicondyle, and the medial crossing distance was 8.5 mm (SD 5.7, 95% CI 5-14 mm). Epicondylar distance ratio used as the second measurement was 0.8 (0.5-0.9). After total knee arthroplasty measurements showed that the line passing through the lateral tibia crossed the lateral epicondyle of the femur and intersected at an average distance of 4.3 mm (SD 4.1, 95% CI 1-11.2 mm).

Conclusions

There is a coronal plane congruence between tibia and femur in the healthy knees, which get changed after total knee arthroplasty.

Complications of Bicruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: The Importance of Alignment and Balance

Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty (BCR TKA) results in kinematics closer to the native knee and in greater patient satisfaction but information concerning its outcome and complications is lacking.The goal of this study is to report the clinical and radiological outcomes of BCR prosthesis implanted using a spacer-based gap balancing technique and to assess if some preoperative factors are associated with a worse prognosis.A cohort of 207 knees in 194 patients who underwent BCR TKA, with a minimum 1-year follow-up, was retrospectively analyzed.Patients were followed at 6 weeks, 6 months, 1 year, and then every following year postoperatively, and filled questionnaires (Knee Society and Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score) at every visit. Clinical and radiological assessments included range of motion, knee alignment, pain, and complications as defined by the Knee Society's Standardized list and definition of Complication of Total Knee Arthroplasty.Forty-three knees (20.8%) suffered major complications. Twenty-one knees (10.1%) underwent revision at an average of 32.1 months after the index procedure. Revision-free survival at 100 months was 85.7%. Revision was performed for aseptic tibial loosening in eight knees (3.9%) and stiffness in five knees (2.4%). There were 29 reoperations other than revision (14.0%), the most frequent procedure being manipulation under anesthesia in 14 knees (6.8%). Minor complications included tendonitis (20.8%), persistent synovitis (6.8%), and superficial wound infections (6.3%).All outcomes scores were greatly improved at the 1-year follow-up compared with preoperatively (p < 0.001). However, maximum flexion at the last follow-up was significantly reduced compared with preoperatively (mean maximum flexion ± standard deviation: 119.9 ± 15.6 vs. 129.9 ± 14.4, p < 0.001). Aseptic tibial loosening was associated with a hypercorrection in varus of preoperative valgus knees (p = 0.012).BCR TKA can give functional results similar to other types of prostheses but involves a substantial risk of complications. Important factors that can explain failed BCR TKA and guide its use were identified, more particularly knee alignment and its role in aseptic tibial loosening.

Comparing Outcomes of Bicruciate-Stabilized and Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty

Background

Bicruciate-stabilized (BCS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA) aims to restore normal kinematics by replicating the function of both cruciate ligaments. Conventional cruciate-retaining (CR) design in TKA has shown previous clinical success with lower complication rates. This study compared the patient-reported outcomes between the BCS and CR TKA designs.

Methods

This retrospective study examined patients who underwent primary TKA using a CR or a BCS implant. Patient demographics, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS, JR), and Forgotten Joint Score (FJS) were compared between two cohorts. Patient-reported outcome measures were analyzed using independent samples t-tests.

Results

There were no significant preoperative demographic differences between groups. The CR cohort (n = 756) had significantly higher average KOOS, JR Scores compared to the BCS cohort (n = 652) at 3 months (59.7 ± 3.8 vs. 53.0 ± 3.9, p < 0.001) and 2 years (62.6 ± 8.0 vs. 53.8 ± 6.7, p = 0.001) after TKA. Within the cohort, KOOS, JR delta differences were not significant for CR when comparing patient scores 3 months to 1 year after surgery. Meanwhile, the BCS patients did show significant delta improvement (4.1 ± 1.9, p = 0.030) when compared 3 months to 1 year after surgery. One year postoperatively, the BCS cohort (n = 134) showed a significantly higher average FJS score (49.5 ± 31.4, vs. 36.8 ± 28.5, p = 0.028) than the CR cohort (n = 203). Both cohorts displayed a significant difference in delta improvements within their respective cohort when measuring FJS from 3 months to 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years after surgery.

Conclusions

The CR cohort performed better on average, compared to the BCS cohort in measures of KOOS, JR scores at the 2-year follow-up. The BCS cohort performed marginally better regarding FJS only at 1-year follow-up.

12-Year clinical and radiological results of a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

A subject of ongoing debate among orthopedic surgeons is the importance of preserving the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee arthroplasty (TKA), but long-term survival studies are scarce. The aim of this study was to compare long-term survival rates, and clinical and radiological follow up of a double-blind randomized controlled trial comparing posterior cruciate-retaining (PCR) versus posterior-stabilizing (PS) implant design of an AGC TKA.

METHODS

A total of 114 patients were included in the survival analysis (PCR n = 61; PS n = 53). Forty-five patients (PCR n = 25; PS n = 20) participated in the long-term follow up using patient-reported outcome measures (Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) and Kujala score (measuring anterior knee pain)). Thirty-one patients were assessed with a physical test (Knee Society Score (KSS)) and radiographs.

RESULTS

Overall survival rate was 95.6% (PCR 98.4% vs. PS 92.5%), with five patients having a major revision (PCR n = 1 vs. PS n = 4, respectively). Satisfying outcome scores for both groups were described at on average 12-year follow up with no significant differences in KSS knee and function scores, WOMAC, SF-36, or Kujala scores between groups. Radiographically, there were no findings of femoral or tibial loosening or polyethylene wear in either group.

CONCLUSIONS

Good long-term survival rates were described for the PCR and the PS design of an AGC TKA. There were no significant differences in clinical and radiological outcomes between a PCR and a PS design 12 years postoperatively.

Investigation into the factors affecting bearing thickness when performing rotating-platform posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Rotating-platform posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS-TKA) has become a commonly used procedure. It has the potential risk of causing mobile-bearing spinout. In our study, we investigated the factors affecting the bearing thickness when performing rotating-platform PS-TKA.

METHODS

This single-arm, prospective, single-hospital cohort study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent rotating-platform PS-TKA between September 2020 and August 2022. We examined the relationship between bearing thickness and several patient characteristics.

RESULTS

The results of the univariate analysis showed that the bearing thickness was significantly associated with weight (risk ratio = 3.4; 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.1-11.0; P = 0.016) and implant size of the tibia (risk ratio = 3.4; 95% CI = 1.0-11.5; P = 0.030). We performed multivariate analysis regarding the weight and implant size of the tibia. Neither the weight nor the implant size of the tibia was significantly different from the bearing thickness in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSIONS

In rotating-platform PS-TKA, body weight and tibia size may affect the bearing thickness. Weight >60 kg and tibial implant size >67 cm may be risk factors for bearing thickening. Therefore, the surgery can be performed better if these risk factors are considered.

Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: Current Concepts Review

Posterior cruciate-retaining (CR) total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis of the knee is a popular implant choice. At present, there is no consensus on whether sacrifice or retention of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) offers superior outcomes. This review explores the current literature available on CR total knee arthroplasty (TKA). PubMed was searched by keyword to find relevant articles for inclusion. Additional sources came from article references and joint registry reports. CR design knees have distinct kinematic gait patterns from posterior-stabilizing (PS) knees and exhibit paradoxical anterior femoral movement with less femoral rollback. While CR implants offer less flexion than PS designs, the difference is not clinically detectable as clinical scores are similar in the short and long term. CR implants have better long-term survival compared to PS knees, likely due to lower risk of aseptic loosening. CR total knee arthroplasties also have shorter operating times and lower risk of peri-prosthetic fractures. Because the CR implant is unconstrained, there may be an increased risk of instability compared to PS designs, but the literature is mixed. Overall, the current literature supports the continued use of CR TKAs due to their lower risk of complications, durability, and demonstrated equivalence in function to posterior-substituting models.

Association between bone marrow lesions and bone mineral density of the proximal tibia in end-stage osteoarthritic knees

This retrospective cross-sectional study investigated the association between bone marrow lesions (BMLs) and bone mineral density (BMD) in the proximal tibia of end-stage osteoarthritic knees from a large patient sample. Overall, 1308 end-stage osteoarthritic knees were enrolled before total knee arthroplasty. The preoperative range of motion was recorded. Bone mineral density in the medial tibial plateau (MTP), lateral tibial plateau (LTP), and metaphysis were measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. The MTP/LTP, MTP/metaphysis, and LTP/metaphysis ratios were calculated. BMLs were scored using a whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging scoring system. The relationship between BMD and BML scores was investigated using linear regression analysis. The highest BMD was 0.787 ± 0.176 g/cm² at the MTP, followed by 0.676 ± 0.180 g/cm² and 0.572 ± 0.145 g/cm² at the metaphysis and LTP, respectively. The prevalence of BMLs was 90.4% and 24.2% in the MTP and LTP, respectively. In women, higher BML scores at the MTP were positively correlated with the BMD of the MTP (p < 0.001, r = 0.278), MTP/LTP (p < 0.001, r = 0.267), and MTP/metaphysis ratios (p < 0.001, r = 0.243). Regression analysis showed that higher BML scores in the MTP were correlated with higher BMD in the MTP (p < 0.001) and lower BMD in the LTP (p < 0.001). High BML scores in the MTP were positively associated with high BMD in the MTP, which also induced the medial to lateral imbalance of BMD in the proximal tibia.

Bicruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty non-inferior to posterior-stabilized prostheses after 5 years: a randomized, controlled trial

PURPOSE

Bicruciate-retaining (BCR) prostheses may improve satisfaction of patient undergoing total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The objective of this randomized controlled trial was to assess whether BCR prostheses provide better clinical outcomes than posterior-stabilized (PS) prostheses.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This is a randomized single-blind control trial involving a total of 77 patients with knee osteoarthritis, randomly assigned to undergo TKA with a BCR or PS implant between 2015 and 2019. Mean follow-up period was 39 months. Clinical and demographic data were extracted manually from medical records. Data acquisition included patient demographics, knee range of motion, and patient-reported outcomes via KSS, KOOS, WOMAC, and SF-12 scores.

RESULTS

A total of 38 patients were randomized to the PS group and 39 to the BCR group. At the 5-year follow-up, no statistical differences were noted for knee range of motion or patient-reported outcomes between the two groups, except for a greater knee flexion in the early follow-up period in the PS group. Five adverse events occurred in the BCR group compared to none in the PS group (p = 0.02).

CONCLUSION

BCR TKA yield similar clinical and patient-reported outcomes 5 years following the intervention compared with PS TKA. The BCR TKA had more complications.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

I (Randomized Controlled Trial).

No difference in clinical outcomes between functionally aligned cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty

PURPOSE

To compare the clinical outcomes of subjects undergoing primary robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty (RA-TKA), following functional alignment (FA) principles, with cruciate-retaining (CR) or posterior-stabilized (PS) bearing designs, at a minimum of 24 months of follow-up.

METHODS

This observational, retrospective study included 167 consecutive patients undergoing RA-TKA with cemented PS and cementless CR implants performed with a CT-base robotic-arm assisted system (Mako, Stryker), following FA principles, between 2017 and 2020. Patients were followed up with a clinical and radiographic assessment and were administered the Forgotten Joint Score-12 (FJS-12), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement (KOOS-JR), and the 5-level Likert scale (5-LLS).

RESULTS

Three TKA revisions were performed (2 PS, 1 CR); therefore, a total of 164 knees with a mean age of 71.7 years (SD 8.9) were considered (80 cemented PS; 84 cementless CR). No statistically significant differences were recorded between study groups relative to FJS-12, KOOS-JR, and 5-LLS at a minimum of two year follow-up (FJS-12 89.3 ± 9.2 vs 87.5 ± 12.8, p-value 0.46; KOOS-JR 88.8 ± 10.0 vs 86.7 ± 14.0, p-value 0.31; 5-LLS 4.5 ± 0.7 vs 4.5 ± 0.8, p-value 0.34).

CONCLUSION

No significant outcome differences were reported between patients undergoing PS and CR RA-TKA at a minimum of two year follow-up. RA-TKA achieves excellent clinical results and high satisfaction scores, regardless of the implant design used.

Cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty has a better 10 year survival than posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

There has been a long standing debate regarding superiority of cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty over posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty regarding the short-term outcomes as well as long-term survivorship. The proponents of both the techniques have published vast evidence in favor of their respective surgical method and early outcome in meta-analyses does not seem to be significantly different. The decision to select either design should depend on their long-term survivorship but the literature comparing their long-term survival is sparse.This meta-analysis was conducted in order to answer the following questions: (1) Does cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty has a better long-term survival beyond 10 years.compared to posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty? (2) Does cruciate retaining knee arthroplasty has higher complication rates compared to posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty?

METHODS

The present systematic review and meta-analysis study was carried out following PRISMA guidelines. The following databases: Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Scopus, the Cochrane Library, Google Scholar, and CINAHL were used to search potentially interesting articles published from database inception until January 2022. Inclusion criteria for articles were: (1) retrospective comparative studies; (2) patients who had undergone a total knee arthroplasty; (3) publications evaluating the long-term survival of cruciate-retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilizing (PS) at a minimum 10 years' follow-up; (4) publications evaluating complications of cruciate-retaining (CR) versus posterior stabilizing (PS) at a minimum 10 years' follow-up; and (5) publications reporting sufficient data regarding the outcomes. We used a fixed-effects design in the case of I² < 50% and P > 0.05; if not, we adopted a random-effects design [4]. We also performed subgroups and sensitivity analysis in order to assess the possible source of heterogeneity.

RESULTS

Database searching identified 597 studies to be screened, of which 291 abstracts were revealed as potentially eligible and finally 7 articles were included. The forest plot showed that CR had significantly better survival than PS (OR = 2.17; 95% CI: 1.69-2.80) after 10 years. However, complication rate was not significantly different between CR and PS groups (OR = 0.86; 95% CI: 0.52-1.44; P = 0.57). Subgroup analysis showed that only the period of publication constituted a source of heterogeneity in survivorship outcome. Sensitivity analysis revealed that outcomes did not differ markedly, which indicates that the meta-analysis had strong reliability.

CONCLUSION

The results of this meta-analysis showed that cruciate retaining prosthesis may be preferred over the posterior stabilized design in view of longer survivorship it offers However, further randomized controlled trials are recommended to confirm this finding.

Coronal Laxity at Flexion is Larger After Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Than With Cruciate-Retaining Procedures

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether coronal stability differs between cruciate-retaining (CR) and posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty (TKA). The purpose of this study was to compare coronal laxity, radiological, and clinical outcomes between CR-TKA and PS-TKA.

METHODS

Seventy five CR-TKAs and 72 PS-TKAs with a minimum 2-year follow-up were retrospectively evaluated. Coronal laxity was assessed at knee extension and 80° of flexion on varus and valgus stress radiographs. Radiological evaluation included femoral-tibial angle, hip-knee-ankle angle, and positions of femoral and tibial components. Clinical evaluation included the modified Hospital for Special Surgery score, the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index, and range of motion.

RESULTS

PS-TKA resulted in significantly larger varus, valgus, and total laxities at 80° flexion (P = .034, .031, and 0.001, respectively) compared with CR-TKA, while no significant difference was found at extension (P = .513, .964, and .658, respectively). No statistical difference was found in radiological and clinical outcomes between CR-TKA and PS-TKA, but the functional scores were slightly better in CR-TKA. There were adverse correlations between varus laxity at flexion and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis index, the modified Hospital for Special Surgery score, and range of motion (r = 0.933, -0.229, -0.472, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Coronal laxity at 80° of flexion was larger after PS-TKA than CR-TKA. In addition, clinical outcomes were adversely affected by the larger varus laxity at flexion. Care should be taken to maintain the coronal stability, especially at flexion, during surgery to obtain better patient-reported outcomes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Clinical usefulness and safety in the early phase after a newly designed rotating-platform total knee arthroplasty: A prospective multicentre cohort study with a 2-year follow up

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to assess the clinical results and safety of a newly designed rotating-platform posterior-stabilised total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the early postoperative phase, within 2 years of follow up.

METHODS

This prospective, multicentre cohort study included 100 consecutive patients who underwent rotating-platform posterior-stabilised (PS) TKA (Vanguard PSRP). After excluding dropouts, 93 patients were analysed. The objective Knee Society Score (KSS)-2011, subjective KSS-2011, knee range of motion, EuroQol 5 Dimension index, complications, and survival rates were assessed before TKA and at 6 months, 1 year, and 2 years postoperatively. The scores at each time-point were compared, and the survival rate was assessed with revision as the endpoint. To demonstrate non-inferiority, the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent rotating-platform PS TKA were compared with those collected retrospectively from 50 patients who underwent fixed-PS TKA (Vanguard PS), defined as the control group.

RESULTS

All clinical outcomes at the final follow up significantly improved compared with their preoperative values (P < 0.001). The objective KSS-2011 was 90.0 ± 8.2 points, subjective KSS-2011 satisfaction was 30.7 ± 8.6 points, expectation was 10.4 ± 2.1 points, and functional activity was 74.0 ± 18.5 points at 2 years postoperatively. Complications included knee dislocation in one patient and surgical site infection in one patient. The survival rate was 99% at 2 years postoperatively. Clinical outcomes, complications, and survival rates of newly designed TKA were not statistically different compared with the control group.

CONCLUSION

The newly designed rotating-platform PS TKA showed good clinical results and suitable safety during the early postoperative phase in this prospective multicentre cohort study.

Trends in Polyethylene Design and Manufacturing Characteristics for Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Analysis From the American Joint Replacement Registry

BACKGROUND

Advances in polyethylene bearing characteristics have led to various options for total knee arthroplasty. We examine trends in use of polyethylene in the United States.

METHODS

An analysis of American Joint Replacement Registry data from 2012 to 2019 for primary total knee arthroplasty procedures was conducted. Design and manufacturing characteristics were obtained and validated in the American Joint Replacement Registry dataset. Polyethylene bearing design and manufacturing use characteristics were compared by year, gender, age group, and geographic region of the procedure. Descriptive analysis was performed.

RESULTS

We identified 993,292 cases over the study period. In total, 791,233 (80%) cases had complete device data available and were included in analysis. In addition, 366,280 (49.4%) cases utilized minimally stabilized bearings compared to 374,809 (50.6%) for posterior-stabilized bearings. Posterior-stabilized use was stable over the study period and highest in the Northeast (64.5%; P < .0001). Cruciate-retaining use decreased from 29.7% to 20.2% and anterior-stabilized use increased from 17.4% to 25.2%. Conventional polyethylene use decreased from 42.8% to 21.9%, and was highest in the 81+ age group (37.8%; P < .0001) and Northeast (43.0%; P < .0001). Highly cross-linked polyethylene (HXLPE) with antioxidant use increased from 9.08% to 31.8%, while HXLPE without antioxidant use remained constant.

CONCLUSION

There was an increase in use of anterior-stabilized and pivot bearings and an increase in use of HXLPE with antioxidant. Additionally, there were noted age group and regional differences in the use of various bearings. Further study should evaluate if these changing utilization trends are related to clinical outcomes, or due to regional training, preferences, or manufacturer pressures.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III, retrospective.

Total knee arthroplasty in the past three decades: Trends in patient characteristics and implant survivorship

OBJECTIVE

To explore the trends in patient characteristics and implant survivorship (IS) for primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) over the past three decades.

METHODS

This retrospective study enrolled a total of 635 knees who underwent TKA from 1985 to 2014. They were divided into three groups: group A, 125 knees in 1985-1994; group B, 203 knees in 1995-2004; and group C, 307 knees A in 2005-2014. The patient characteristics and IS were compared.

RESULTS

The mean age of patients undergoing TKA was getting older: 65.3 ± 9.7, 69.1 ± 10.0, and 74.6 ± 8.4 years, in groups A, B, and C, respectively (p = .001). The proportion of patients <60 years old with RA decreased (p < .001), whereas that of patients ≥ 80 years old with OA increased dramatically, it was 7.0%, 14.5%, and 32.0% in groups A, B, and C, respectively (p < .001). The IS free from infection was over 98% in all groups. Alternatively, the IS free from aseptic loosening become better, it was 83.7%, 95.2%, and 98.2% in groups A, B, and C, respectively (p = .014).

CONCLUSIONS

From these trends, we can estimate that the number of patients undergoing TKA will further increase in the future in an aging society.

No difference in PROMs between robotic-assisted CR versus PS total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary study

The purpose of this study was to determine if significant clinical differences exist in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) between PS and CR TKAs implanted using robotic-assisted technology. This was an IRB-approved retrospective study from an institutional database evaluating 214 knees in 190 patients. Inclusion criteria included: primary RA-TKA, age 22-89 at the time of surgery, preoperative coronal limb deformity within 15º of neutral alignment, and minimum 1-year follow-up. The PS cohort consisted of 103 patients with 107 RA-TKAs, whereas the CR cohort consisted of 87 patients with 107 RA-TKAs. Cohorts were compared on the basis of demographics and PROMs (KSS knee, KSS function, FJS-12, KOOS-JR, WOMAC, and 5-point satisfaction Likert scale) collected preoperatively and at 1-year follow-up. Statistical analyses comparing measures were conducted via Student's t tests for continuous data and Chi-squared analyses for categorical data. There were no significant differences identified in short-term PROMs at 1-year follow-up between cohorts (all p values > 0.05). 93.1% of patients with CR knees and 94.7% of patients with PS knees reported a satisfaction level of "very satisfied" or "satisfied". Revision arthroplasty occurred in six knees (2.8%, 3 knees in CR cohort, 3 knees in PS cohort) with no differences in overall complications between groups. The use of RA-TKA technology promoted high patient satisfaction scores within this study, independent of CR or PS implant type with no significant differences in PROMs, satisfaction, revisions, or complications between the two groups.

Relative Clinical Outcomes Comparing Manual and Robotic-Assisted Total Knee Arthroplasty at Minimum 1-Year Follow-up

Background: Total knee arthroplasty (TKA) demonstrates excellent durability using jig-based manual techniques (manual TKA [mTKA]), but significant rates of dissatisfaction remain. Modifications of mTKA techniques and TKA implant designs to improve outcomes have had minimal success. Studies comparing relative outcomes of mTKA and robotic-assisted TKA (raTKA) are limited. Purpose: This study sought to compare outcomes of mTKA and raTKA in patients at a single institution. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed all primary TKAs performed by 1 surgeon from 2015 to 2017. In all, 139 consecutive mTKAs (2015-2016) and 148 consecutive raTKAs (2016-2017) were included. No cases were excluded. Patient demographics, complications, readmission rates, and clinical and patient-reported outcomes were compared at a minimum of 1-year follow-up. A post hoc student t test and Pearson χ² test were used for continuous and categorical data. Results: We found that mTKA patients compared with raTKA patients required significantly longer length of stay (LOS) (1.73 vs 1.18 days, respectively), greater morphine milligram equivalents consumption (89.6 vs 65.2, respectively), and increased physical therapy (PT) visits (13.0 vs 11.0, respectively) with increased 30-day readmission rates (4.3 vs 0.7%, respectively) that approached significance. Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score for Joint Replacement and the University of California at Los Angeles activity score did not differ significantly comparing raTKA with mTKA patients at 1 year. There were no differences in complication rates. Conclusion: Significant early clinical benefits were noted with raTKA, including lower opioid requirements, shorter LOS, and fewer PT visits when compared with mTKA. A reduction in 30-day readmission rates was noted with raTKA that was not significant. Excellent clinical results with similar patient-reported outcomes were noted in both groups at 1-year follow-up. Further prospective investigations at longer follow-up intervals comparing these techniques are warranted.

Short-Term Outcomes of Synovectomy and Total Knee Replacement in Patients with Diffuse-Type Pigmented Villonodular Synovitis

Diffuse-type pigmented villonodular synovitis is a rare benign disease that causes disorders of the knee, including erosion of subchondral bone and cyst formation, with eventual osteoarthritis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the short-term outcomes of synovectomy and total knee replacement in patients with the diffuse type of pigmented villonodular synovitis. From November 2011 to May 2015, we performed synovectomy and total knee replacement in 28 patients with diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis diagnosed on the basis of histopathology of biopsy specimens. Clinical data were collected perioperatively and during follow-up for evaluation of surgical efficacy. No intraoperative complications were encountered. Mean operative duration was 73.4 minutes (range: 47-115 minutes); mean estimated blood loss was 223.9 mL (range: 50-600 mL). The mean duration of follow-up was 58.7 months (range: 36-84 months). Mean range of motion improved from 86.1 ± 11.3 degrees (range: 60-100 degrees) to 107 ± 11.4 degrees (range: 90-130 degrees). Average Knee Society clinical scores improved from 38.9 ± 9.5 (range: 17-54) to 84.4 ± 6.1 (range: 75-98); functional scores improved from 48.9 ± 13.1 (range: 25-80) to 84.6 ± 6.1 (range: 75-95; p < 0.05 for both). Postoperative radiographs showed no signs of prosthesis loosening, periprosthetic fractures, or dislocation. The short-term efficacy of synovectomy and total knee replacement in treating patients with diffuse pigmented villonodular synovitis was satisfactory.

Minimally invasive surgery total knee arthroplasty is less popular, but the prosthesis designed specifically for MIS provides good survival and PROMs with a minimum follow-up of 10 years

BACKGROUND

The concept of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) was introduced in total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in the late 1990s. The number of MIS TKAs has clearly decreased in recent years. An implant designed specifically for MIS TKA has been used all over the world, but there are no reports of long-term postoperative results. The purpose of this study was to characterize long-term clinical results with a minimum follow-up of 10 years.

METHODS

This retrospective study included 109 consecutive patients with 143 NexGen CR-Flex prostheses, which are MIS tibial component prostheses designed specifically for MIS TKA. Twelve-year survival analysis was performed using Kaplan-Meier method. Revision surgery for any reason was the endpoint. Long-term clinical and radiographic results of 74 knees (55%) in 60 patients with more than 10 years of follow-up were analyzed.

RESULTS

The cumulative survival rate of the single-radius posterior-stabilized TKA of 74 knees was 94.7% (95% confidence interval, 90-99%) at 12 years after surgery. Seven knees (9%) required additional surgery during the 10-year follow-up because of periprosthetic infections. Mean postoperative Knee Society knee score and functional score were 91 and 74 points, respectively. There were no cases of prosthesis breakage, polyethylene wear, or aseptic loosening of the prosthesis.

CONCLUSION

The prosthesis designed specifically for MIS TKA is associated with good survival and clinical results with a minimum follow-up of 10 years, even though MIS TKA has become less popular.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The effect of patellar facet angle on patellofemoral alignment and arthritis progression in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty without patellar resurfacing

Background

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effect of patellar facet angle on pre- and postoperative patellofemoral alignment and the progress of arthritis of the patellofemoral joint in posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty (PS TKA) without patellar resurfacing.

Methods

Patients who had a PS TKA for a varus osteoarthritic knee who were followed up for more than 2 years were included in this study. The radiologic and clinical outcomes were compared between 72 knees (group A) whose patellar facet angle was greater than 126° (> 126°) and 32 knees (group B) whose patellar facet angle was smaller than or equal to 126° (≤ 126°). For the radiologic assessment, the Kellgren-Lawrence grade, mechanical femorotibial angle, Insall-Salvati ratio, patellar tilt angle, patellar displacement and the osteosclerosis of the patellar ridge were evaluated. The range of motion (ROM) and patient-reported outcomes (the Knee Society knee score, the Knee Society function score, the Feller patellar score, and the Kujala patellofemoral score) were used for the clinical assessment.

Results

The preoperative patellar tilt angle was 9.8° (standard deviation [SD] 5.5) and 14.6° (SD 4.1) in group A and group B, respectively, a significant difference (p < 0.001). Other preoperative radiologic parameters and preoperative patient-reported outcomes and ROM showed no significant difference between the two groups (all parameters (p > 0.05). At the last-follow-up, 22 knees (30.6%) showed progression of osteosclerosis of the patellar ridge in group A and 13 knees (40.6%) showed progression of osteosclerosis in group B (p = 0.371). The postoperative radiologic and clinical outcomes showed no significant difference between the two groups (all parameters, p > 0.05).

Conclusions

Although a narrow patellar facet angle was related to an increase of lateral tilting of the patella, it showed no impact on the preoperative clinical assessment. The radiologic and clinical outcomes evaluated after the PS TKA showed no statistical difference according to the patellar shape. Although the patellar shape evaluated by the patellar facet angle can partially affect the preoperative patellofemoral alignment, this study result indicated insignificant clinical relevance of the patellar shape in the PS TKA.

Increased Intercondylar Femoral Box Cut-to-Femur Size Ratio During Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Increases Risk for Intraoperative Fracture

Background

Iatrogenic intraoperative fractures are preventable complications in total knee arthroplasty. As press-fit fixation becomes more popular, further investigation into risk factors is needed. Some authors have suggested that smaller femurs may be at higher risk in posterior-stabilized constructs owing to industry designs trending toward larger, constant box sizes that increase the amount of bone resection relative to bone stock.

Methods

Finite element analysis (FEA) was used to investigate the effect of insertion of posterior-stabilized femoral components on stress distributions in small femurs and whether common bony preparation techniques could further affect risk for intraoperative fracture. The FEA results were validated with mechanical testing by loading to failure with varying resection depths of the distal femur and varying lateralization of the box cut.

Results

With a standard distal resection depth and neutral box position, a decrease in femur size led to an increase in maximal von Mises stresses by 43.6% medially and 44.3% laterally. Box lateralization and increased distal resection depth had minimal changes on the maximal stresses (3.3% medially and −0.4% laterally) on average-sized femurs while having a much larger effect on the stress distribution in small femurs (118.3% medially and 6.7% laterally).

Conclusions

A subset of intraoperative femur fractures is potentially preventable. Small femur sizes, especially ones that would require increased distal resection or change in implant positioning, may benefit from an alternative design without the need for a cam/post mechanism.

Total Knee Arthroplasty Kinematics

Knee kinematics is an analysis of motion pattern that is utilized to assess a comparative, biomechanical performance of healthy nonimplanted knees, injured nonimplanted knees, and various prosthetic knee designs. Unfortunately, a consensus between implanted knee kinematics and outcomes has not been reached. One might hypothesize that the kinematic variances between the nonimplanted and implanted knee might play a role in patient dissatisfaction following TKA. There is a wide range of TKA designs available today. With such variety, it is important for surgeons and engineers to understand the various geometries and kinematic profiles of available prostheses. The purpose of this review is to provide readers with the pertinent information related to TKA kinematics.

The Effect of Sacrificing the Posterior Cruciate Ligament in Total Knee Arthroplasties That Use a Highly Congruent Polyethylene Component

BACKGROUND

There is continued debate regarding retention versus sacrificing of the posterior cruciate ligament (PCL) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We sought to determine if there was a difference in range of motion (ROM) after TKA between patients with PCL sacrifice versus PCL retention when using a highly congruent polyethylene insert.

METHODS

We conducted an Institutional Review Board approved retrospective study of consecutive patients receiving TKA using the same implant with a highly congruent polyethylene component implanted by one surgeon from November 2013 to January 2016. Patients were placed in 2 groups based on whether the PCL was intact or released at the time of surgery. Patient charts were reviewed for age, body mass index, PCL status at surgery (incompetent, kept intact, or released), and preoperative/postoperative knee ROM.

RESULTS

Both groups were similar in average age (60.5 vs 60.6, respectively) and body mass index (33.3 vs 32.6, respectively). Postoperative tibial slope (5.5° PCL release, 6.6° PCL retained, P = .028) was the only alignment variable reaching significance; all other alignment and motion variables were similar.

CONCLUSION

Results indicate that the PCL can be successfully retained with the use of a congruent bearing design, with no evident limitation in postoperative ROM or loss of stability due to the bearing in comparison to patients who undergo PCL release.

How prosthetic design influences knee kinematics: a narrative review of tibiofemoral kinematics of healthy and joint-replaced knees

INTRODUCTION

To improve the total knee arthroplasty (TKA) prosthesis design, it is essential to study the kinematics of the tibiofemoral joint. Many studies have been conducted in this area; however, conflicting results and incomparable testing methods make it difficult to draw definitive conclusions or compare research from studies. The goal of this article is to introduce what is known about both healthy and prosthetic tibiofemoral joint kinematics.

AREAS COVERED

Healthy tibiofemoral joint kinematics are reviewed in vivo by different activities, and the kinematics of existing knee prosthetic design features are considered separately. These features include but are not limited to cruciate retaining, posterior cruciate substituting, mobile-bearing, and high flexion.

EXPERT COMMENTARY

The type of activity that is being performed has a great influence on the kinematics of healthy knees, and the influences of different TKA prosthetic design features on the kinematics are complex and varied. Moreover, the TKA postoperative functional performance is influenced by many factors, and prosthetic design is among them, but not the only one that defines the performance.