Rules of Engagement Using Large Databases: Read the Fine Print

Patients With Previous COVID-19 Infection Can Safely Undergo Primary Total Joint Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

The COVID-19 virus is believed to increase the risk of diffusing intravascular coagulation. Total joint arthroplasty (TJA) is one of the most common elective surgeries and is also associated with a temporarily increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, the influence of a history of COVID-19 infection on perioperative outcomes following TJA remains unknown. Therefore, this study sought to determine what effect a history of COVID-19 infection had on outcomes following primary TJA.

METHODS

A retrospective case-control study using the national database was performed to identify all patients who had a history of COVID-19 and had undergone TJA, between 2019 and 2020. Patients who had a history of both were 1:1 matched to those who did not have a history of COVID-19, and 90-day outcomes were compared. A total of 661 TKA and 635 THA patients who had a history of COVID-19 were 1:1 matched to controls. There were no differences in demographics and comorbidities between the propensity-matched pairs in both TKAs and THAs studied. Previous COVID-19 diagnosis was noted in 28.3% of patients 5 days within TJA and in 78.6%, 90 days before TJA.

RESULTS

Patients who had a previous diagnosis of COVID-19 had a higher risk of pneumonia during the postoperative period for both THA and TKA (6.9% versus 3.5%, P < .001 and 2.27% versus 1.21%, P = .04, respectively). Mean lengths of stay were also greater for those with a previous COVID-19 infection in both cohorts (TKA: 3.12 versus 2.57, P = .027, THA: 4.52 versus 3.62, P < .001). Other postoperative outcomes were similar between the 2 groups.

CONCLUSION

COVID-19 infection history does not appear to increase the risk of VTE following primary TJA, but appears to increase the risk of pneumonia in addition to lengths of stay postoperatively. Individual risk factors should be discussed with patients, to set reasonable expectations regarding perioperative outcomes.

Bacteremia in Patients Undergoing Debridement, Antibiotics, and Implant Retention Leads to Increased Reinfections and Costs

Background

Debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) is a common treatment for acute prosthetic joint infection (PJI). The effects of concurrent bacteremia at the time of DAIR are poorly understood. This study sought to determine whether patients with bacteremia at the time of DAIR have higher reinfection rates.

Material and methods

A retrospective review of a national database was performed. Patients treated with DAIR (hip or knee arthroplasty) after a diagnosis of PJI were identified. DAIR patients who also had a diagnosis of bacteremia were matched to patients without bacteremia by comorbidities and Charlson Comorbidity Index score. The primary outcome was reinfection or continued infection at 90 days and 6, 12, and 24 months after DAIR. Ninety-day Medicare charges were compared between groups. Survival probabilities were used for survival comparisons.

Results

A total of 9945 patients underwent DAIR after a diagnosis of PJI. Seven hundred seven patients underwent DAIR with an associated diagnosis of bacteremia. Three hundred thirty-four DAIR patients with bacteremia were successfully matched to patients without bacteremia by age, gender, and comorbidities. DAIR survivorship was significantly worse in those with bacteremia at 90 days (51.5% vs 65.9%) and 6 (43.1% vs 60.5%), 12 (36.5% vs 56.0%), and 24 months (32.6% vs 53.3%) after DAIR. The 90-day costs of DAIR were significantly greater in PJI patients with bacteremia (mean: $14,722 standard deviation: $4086 vs mean: $8,052, standard deviation: $4,153, P < .01).

Conclusions

Patients undergoing DAIR with bacteremia are at an increased risk of reinfection or continued infection. Ninety-day costs are significantly increased (over 50%) in patients with bacteremia vs those without bacteremia.

[Quality criteria in arthroplasty]

The discipline of orthopedics and trauma surgery strives for constant improvement of the quality of results in arthroplasty; however, in order to enable targeted alterations to the establish standard operating procedures, dedicated documentation of the current quality of results is necessary. This can be achieved by so-called external quality assurance, evaluation of routine data of healthcare providers, analysis of clinical studies and the consultation of registry data. To achieve further improvement of the quality of results, legislature has been passed setting requirements for minimum quantities and by the specialist society (German Society for Orthopedics and Orthopedic Surgery, DGOOC) the adherence to certain process and structural guidelines within the framework of the certification system EndoCert®. A valid score for risk adjustment for assessment of the level of difficulty of orthopedic surgical interventions is so far lacking. As a future direction, the application of risk stratification concerning patient-specific anatomy should be developed. Through the combination of dedicated certification systems, the recording and evaluation of external inpatient quality assurance data, further quality assurance through routinely collected data and the development of adequate minimum quantity regulations, sustainable improvement of the quality of results can be achieved.

Complications and Costs Are Not Increased After Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients With a History of Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

Prostate cancer (PCa) is a largely prevalent disease in the United States. Moreover, it is unclear whether the thromboembolic burden of disease remains present after the cancer has been treated and whether such state impacts the short-term outcomes of orthopedic procedures. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to assess 90-day postoperative complications and costs after total hip arthroplasty (THA) for osteoarthritis in patients with a history of PCa.

METHODS

Two groups of patients who underwent THA for osteoarthritis in the Medicare Standard Analytical Files were identified through the PearlDiver server. Both groups were matched based on age, diabetes, smoking status, chronic kidney disease, alcohol abuse, chronic liver disease, and obesity in order to create a case-control study comparison. The 90-day complication rates after THA were compared using univariate regressions (odds ratio). We hypothesized that patients with a history of PCa would develop increased rates of thromboembolic complications based on a prolonged procoagulative state.

RESULTS

After matching, each group was comprised of 62,571 patients. Our findings identified greater 90-day pneumonia rates for those without a history of PCa (3.26% vs 2.68%; odds ratio, 0.82). All other complications including thromboembolic diseases were clinically comparable in both groups during the 90-day postoperative period. The charges and reimbursements for the 90-day period were also comparable.

CONCLUSION

In our large case-control study of 125,142 patients, we found that patients with a history of PCa do not have increased risk of short-term complications after THA and that the mean 90-day reimbursements were similar for both groups at $14,153 for PCa patients and $14,033 for those without (P = .114).