Highly Porous Tantalum Acetabular Components Without Ancillary Screws Have Similar Migration to Porous Titanium Acetabular Components With Screws at 2 Years: A Randomized Controlled Trial

No Difference in Survivorship Following Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty Using Ultraporous Acetabular Cups and Cross-Linked Polyethylene With and Without Acetabular Screws in a Large United States Health Care System

BACKGROUND

Modern cementless acetabular cups for total hip arthroplasty (THA) typically have screw options. Historically, screws were thought to improve stability, but came at the cost of pathways for osteolysis. Modern cups and liners may have made both concerns obsolete, and the utility of screws are now contested. We sought to determine modern implant survivorship relative to screw use.

METHODS

We conducted a cohort study. A US health care system's Total Joint Replacement Registry was used to identify patients ≥ 18 years who underwent uncomplicated primary THA for osteoarthritis (2010 to 2021) with an ultraporous cup and cross-linked polyethylene liner, with or without one to two acetabular screws. The primary outcome was acetabular revision for aseptic loosening. Secondary outcomes were aseptic revision for acetabular fracture and any revision for acetabular/femoral loosening and periprosthetic fracture. Multiple Cox proportional hazard regression was used to evaluate revision risk. There were 46,785 THAs identified. Screw use declined from 65.3 to 49.9%.

RESULTS

No difference was observed in 10-year revision risk for acetabular loosening (0.2 versus 0.1%, hazard ratio 1.97, 95% confidence interval = 0.84 to 4.59, P = 0.119). There was one revision for acetabular fracture with and three revisions without screws. There was no difference in risk of overall acetabular or femoral revision, loosening, or periprosthetic fracture. There remained no difference in acetabular-sided loosening between routine screw users and nonusers (0.15 versus 0.06%, hazard ratio 1.26, 95% confidence interval 0.42 to 3.75, P = 0.683).

CONCLUSIONS

In this study of survivorship following routine uncomplicated primary THA with modern cups and liners, screw usage patterns were associated with neither an advantage nor disadvantage - neither screw usage nor avoidance was associated with differences in acetabular loosening revision risk. Screw use was not associated with harm but remains debatable if there is an added benefit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level III.

Progress in the Application of Porous Tantalum Metal in Hip Joint Surgery

Porous tantalum metal is a new orthopedic implant material made of tantalum metal that has been processed by porous treatment. This material has various advantages, including high hardness, good ductility, good biocompatibility, and strong bone integration ability. Porous tantalum metal has performed well in clinical application, demonstrating excellent medium- to long-term curative effects. The use of implant products made of porous tantalum metal, such as porous tantalum rods, porous tantalum hip prostheses, and porous tantalum augments (MAs), is gradually increasing in the clinical application of hip surgery, and these products have achieved excellent therapeutic effects in the middle and late stages of various hip diseases. In recent years, the combined application of porous tantalum metal and three-dimenional (3D) printing technology to create personalized 3D-printed porous tantalum metal has led to new development directions for the treatment of complex hip joint surgical diseases. This review presents a summary of the application of porous tantalum metal in hip surgery in recent years, including clinical treatment effects and existing problems. In addition, the prospect of progress in this field is promoted.

Biomimetic Porous Ti6Al4V Implants: A Novel Interbody Fusion Cage via Gel-Casting Technique to Promote Spine Fusion

An interbody fusion cage (Cage) is crucial in spinal decompression and fusion procedures for restoring normal vertebral curvature and rebuilding spinal stability. Currently, these Cages suffer from issues related to mismatched elastic modulus and insufficient bone integration capability. Therefore, a gel-casting technique is utilized to fabricate a biomimetic porous titanium alloy material from Ti6Al4V powder. The biomimetic porous Ti6Al4V is compared with polyetheretherketone (PEEK) and 3D-printed Ti6Al4V materials and their respective Cages. Systematic validation is performed through mechanical testing, in vitro cell, in vivo rabbit bone defect implantation, and ovine anterior cervical discectomy and fusion experiments to evaluate the mechanical and biological performance of the materials. Although all three materials demonstrate good biocompatibility and osseointegration properties, the biomimetic porous Ti6Al4V, with its excellent mechanical properties and a structure closely resembling bone trabecular tissue, exhibited superior bone ingrowth and osseointegration performance. Compared to the PEEK and 3D-printed Ti6Al4V Cages, the biomimetic porous Ti6Al4V Cage outperforms in terms of intervertebral fusion performance, achieving excellent intervertebral fusion without the need for bone grafting, thereby enhancing cervical vertebra stability. This biomimetic porous Ti6Al4V Cage offers cost-effectiveness, presenting significant potential for clinical applications in spinal surgery.

Corroboration of coupled musculoskeletal model and finite element predictions with in vivo RSA migration of an uncemented acetabular component

While finite element (FE) models have been used extensively in orthopedic studies, validation of their outcome metrics has been limited to comparison against ex vivo testing. The aim of this study was to validate FE model predictions of the initial cup mechanical environment against patient-matched in vivo measurements of acetabular cup migration using radiostereometric analysis (RSA). Tailored musculoskeletal and FE models were developed using a combination of three-dimensional (3D) motion capture data and clinical computerized tomography (CT) scans for a cohort of eight individuals who underwent primary total hip replacement and were prospectively enrolled in an RSA study. FE models were developed to calculate the mean modulus of cancellous bone, composite peak micromotion (CPM), composite peak strain (CPS) and percentage area of bone ingrowth. The RSA cup migration at 3 months was used to corroborate the FE output metrics. Qualitatively, all FE-predicted metrics followed a similar rank order as the in vivo RSA 3D migration data. The two cases with the lowest predicted CPM (<20 µm), lowest CPS (<0.0041), and high bone modulus (>917 MPa) were confirmed to have the lowest in vivo RSA 3D migration (<0.14 mm). The two cases with the largest predicted CPM (>80 µm), larger CPS (>0.0119) and lowest bone modulus (<472 MPa) were confirmed to have the largest in vivo RSA 3D migration (>0.78 mm). This study enabled the first corroboration between tailored musculoskeletal and FE model predictions with in vivo RSA cup migration. Investigation of additional patient-matched CT, gait, and RSA examinations may allow further development and validation of FE models.

Migration patterns of acetabular cups: a systematic review and meta-analysis of RSA studies

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of RSA studies to investigate the early and long-term migration patterns of acetabular cups and the influence of implant factors on cup migration over time.

METHODS

We performed a systematic search of PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases to identify all RSA studies of cup migration following primary total hip replacement (THR). Proximal migration at 3 and 6 months, 1, 2, 5, and 10 years were considered for analysis. Implant factors investigated included fixation type, head size, bearing surface, uncemented coating design, and the decade of RSA introduction.

RESULTS

47 studies reported the proximal migration of 83 cohorts (2,328 cups). Besides 1 threaded cup design, no implant factor investigated was found to significantly influence proximal migration. The mean pooled 2-year proximal migration of cemented cups (0.14 mm, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.08-0.20) was not significantly different from uncemented cups (0.12 mm, CI 0.04-0.19). The mean pooled proximal migration at 6 months was 0.11 mm (CI 0.06-0.16) and there was no significant increase between 6 months and 2 years (0.015 mm, CI 0.000-0.030). 27 of 75 cohorts (36%) reported mean proximal migration greater than 0.2 mm at 2 years, which has previously been identified as a predictor of implants at risk of long-term loosening.

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the majority of cup migration occurs within the first 6 months. With one exception, no implant factors influenced the 2-year proximal migration of acetabular cups. 36% of studies with 2-year migration were considered at risk of long-term loosening. Further investigation and comparison against long-term survivorship data would validate 6-month and/or 1-year proximal migration measurements as an earlier predictor of long-term loosening than the current 2-year threshold.

Staged Revision Hip Arthroplasty With Femoral Impaction Bone Grafting for Prosthetic Joint Infections: Radiostereometric Analyses and Clinical Outcomes at Minimum 5-Year Follow-Up

BACKGROUND

There are ongoing concerns regarding the use of bone graft following prosthetic joint infection and subsequent implant subsidence. The aim of this study was to determine whether the use of a cemented stem combined with femoral impaction bone grafting (FIBG) at second stage revision for infection results in stable femoral stem fixation, determined by accurate methods, and good clinical results.

METHODS

A prospective cohort of 29 patients underwent staged revision total hip arthroplasty for infection using an interval prosthesis followed by FIBG at the final reconstruction. The mean follow-up was 89 months (range, 8 to 167 months). Femoral implant subsidence was measured with radiostereometric analysis. Clinical outcomes included the Harris Hip Score, Harris Pain score and Société Internationale de Chirurgie Orthopédique et de Traumatologie activity scores.

RESULTS

At 2-years follow-up the median stem subsidence relative to femur was -1.36 mm (range, -0.31 to -4.98), while the cement subsidence relative to femur was -0.05 mm (range, 0.36 to -0.73). At 5-years follow-up, the median stem subsidence relative to femur was -1.89 mm (range, -0.27 to -6.35), while the cement subsidence relative to femur was -0.06 mm (range, 0.44 to -0.55). There were 25 patients who were confirmed infection-free after the second stage revision with FIBG. The median Harris Hip Score improved from 51 pre-operatively to 79 at 5 years (P = .0130), and Harris Pain score from 20 to 40 (P = .0038).

CONCLUSIONS

Stable femoral component fixation can be achieved with FIBG when reconstructing the femur after revision for infection without compromising infection cure rates and patient-reported outcomes.

Efficacy and Safety of Acetabular Cup without Screw Fixation in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background and Objectives: Adequate initial fixation of the uncemented acetabular component in total hip arthroplasty is necessary to achieve long-term survival. Although screw fixation contributes to improved cup stability, there is currently no consensus on the use of this method. This study aimed to assess the existing randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on the efficacy and safety of cup fixation in total hip arthroplasty without screws. Materials and Methods: We searched the EMBASE, MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases to identify RCTs published before February 2022. Primary outcomes were reoperation, cup migration, and Harris Hip Score. Secondary outcomes were the presence of a radiolucent line in the acetabular region, translation and rotation movement, and polyethylene wear. We conducted meta-analyses using the random-effects models. The revised Cochrane risk-of-bias tool was used to assess the risk of bias for outcomes of interest; the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach was used to summarize the body of evidence. Results: We included six reports from four studies. Total hip arthroplasty without screw fixation to the acetabular cup had little to no effect on reoperation (pooled relative risk, 0.98; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-6.68; I2 = 0%), cup migration (pooled relative risk, 1.72; 95% confidence interval, 0.29-10.33; I2 = 1%), Harris Hip Score (mean difference, 1.19; 95% confidence interval, -1.31-3.70; I2 = 0%), radiolucent line (pooled relative risk, 5.91; 95% confidence interval, 0.32-109.35), translation and rotation of all axes, and polyethylene wear (mean difference, 0.01; 95% confidence interval, -0.01-0.04; I2 = 0%), with very low certainty of evidence on all measures. Conclusions: The efficacy of acetabular cups without screw fixation in total hip arthroplasty remains uncertain, suggesting the need for prudent clinical application. Further large-scale, well-designed studies with low risk of bias are required.

Are additional screws required for press-fit fixation of cementless acetabular cups? A systematic review and meta-analysis

Background

Press-fit cementless acetabular cup is widely used in total hip arthroplasty (THA). However, the use of additional screws for the acetabular cup has been extensively debated. The purpose of this review is to compare the stability, revision rate, wear rate, and clinical scores of cementless acetabular cups with and without screws in THA.

Materials and Methods

Comprehensive literature searches of the following databases were performed: Cochrane Library, Pubmed, Web of Science, OVID, Elsevier ClinicalKey, Clinicaltrials.gov, and EMBASE. We searched for trials that compared cementless acetabular cups with screws or without screws, and were published in the English language. We evaluated the stability of the prosthesis by osteolysis and migration. The clinical scores included Harris hip scores (HHS) and pain scores.

Results

Nineteen articles involving 4046 THAs met the inclusion criteria. Our analysis revealed that additional screws did not increase the stability of acetabular cups, and there was no statistical significance between the groups with and without screws in osteolysis and clinically relevant migration. Revision rates showed no significant difference between the groups with and without screws. There was no difference in wear between the two groups. Our analysis showed no difference in pain scores and HHS between groups.

Conclusion

Press-fit without screws could achieve sufficient acetabular cup stability. Acetabular cups without screws showed no difference from acetabular cups with screws in many outcomes. Additional screws are not required for cementless acetabular cups.

Level of evidence: Level III.