Knee Arthroscopy After Total Knee Arthroplasty: Not a Benign Procedure

Isolated lateral-sided knee pain in total knee arthroplasty. A review

Isolated lateral-sided knee pain is a unique problem following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). Reported causes include soft tissue impingement against extruded cement, an overhanging tibial tray, remnant osteophytes rubbing against the iliotibial band (ITB), popliteal tendon impingement, fabella syndrome, and synovial tissue impingement in the lateral gutter. In addition, iliotibial band traction syndrome secondary to guided motion Bi-cruciate stabilizing knee arthroplasty has been recognized as a new clinical entity. Initial work up should include ruling out the most common causes of painful TKA including infection, aseptic loosening, and instability. Radiographs and CT scan are utilized to identify potential source of pain. Ultrasound evaluation (with elicited probe tenderness) can increase diagnostic accuracy. Ultrasound guided local anesthetic injections can confirm the source of pain. Anti-inflammatory medications, physical therapy with ITB stretches, and therapeutic local steroid injections are initial treatment modalities. Satisfactory resolution of symptoms may require surgical intervention directed at the specific cause and may avoid the morbidity associated with revision TKA.

Knee Arthroscopy Following Total Knee Arthroplasty is Not Associated With an Elevated Risk of Infection

BACKGROUND

Recent literature has suggested that knee arthroscopy (KA) following ipsilateral primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) may be associated with an increased risk of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). However, prior studies on this subject have relied on insurance databases or have lacked control groups for comparison. This study aimed to evaluate the risk of PJI in patients undergoing ipsilateral KA after primary TKA at a single institution.

METHODS

Our total joint registry was queried to identify 167 patients (178 knees) who underwent ipsilateral KA for any indication other than infection following primary TKA (KA + TKA group). The average time from TKA to KA was 2.1 ± 2.3 years. The average follow-up from primary TKA and from KA was 8.4 ± 5.4 years and 6.3 ± 5.4 years, respectively. The mean patient age was 63 ± 11 years, the mean body mass index was 31 ± 5, and 64% were women. The most common indications for KA were patellar clunk or patellofemoral synovial hyperplasia (66%) and arthrofibrosis (16%). Patients in the KA + TKA group were matched to 523 patients who underwent TKA without subsequent KA (TKA group) based on age, sex, date of surgery, and body mass index. The primary outcome measure was survivorship free from PJI.

RESULTS

There was no statistical difference in the overall rate of PJI between the KA + TKA group (n = 2, 1.1%) compared to the TKA group (n = 3, 0.6%) (hazard ratio 2.0, 95% confidence interval 0.3 to 12.0, P = .4). At 5 and 10 years after TKA, there was no difference in survivorship free of PJI between the 2 groups (P = .8 and P = .3, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

A PJI is a rare complication of KA after TKA. The rate of PJI in patients undergoing KA following TKA is not significantly increased.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

The Cost of Stiffness After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Stiffness after primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is debilitating and poorly understood. A heterogenous approach to the treatment is often utilized, including both nonoperative and operative treatment modalities. The purpose of this study was to examine the prevalence of treatments used between stiff and non-stiff TKA groups and their financial impact.

METHODS

An observational cohort study was conducted using a large database. A total of 12,942 patients who underwent unilateral primary TKA from January 1, 2017, to December 31, 2017, were included. Stiffness after TKA was defined as manipulation under anesthesia and a diagnosis code of stiffness or ankylosis, and subsequent diagnosis and procedure codes were used to identify the prevalence and financial impact of multiple common treatment options.

RESULTS

The prevalence of stiffness after TKA was 6.1%. Stiff patients were more likely to undergo physical therapy, medication, bracing, alternative treatment, clinic visits, and reoperation. Revision surgery was the most common reoperation in the stiff TKA group (7.6%). The incidence of both arthroscopy and revision surgery were higher in the stiff TKA population. Dual component revisions were costlier for patients who had stiff TKAs ($65,771 versus $48,287; P < .05). On average, patients who had stiffness after TKA endured costs from 1.5 to 7.5 times higher than the cost of their non-stiff counterparts during the 2 years following index TKA.

CONCLUSION

Patients who have stiffness after primary TKA face significantly higher treatment costs for both operative and nonoperative treatments than patients who do not have stiffness.

High Complication Rate Associated With Arthroscopic Lysis of Adhesions Versus Manipulation Under Anesthesia for Arthrofibrosis After Total Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is often treated by arthroscopic lysis of adhesions (ALAs) or manipulation under anesthesia (MUA). This study compared the 2-year complication rates of ALA and MUA and range-of-motion (ROM) outcomes for ALA, early MUA (<3 months after TKA), and delayed MUA (>3 months after TKA).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included 425 patients undergoing ALA or MUA after primary TKA from 2001 to 2018. Demographics, clinical variables, and complication rates were collected from clinical records and compared using Student t -tests and Kaplan-Meier log-rank tests. Multivariable logistic regressions were used for adjusted analysis. ROM data were analyzed using fixed and mixed-effects models.

RESULTS

ALA patients were younger (55.2 versus 58.9 years, P < 0.001) and underwent surgery later from the index TKA (12 versus 1.9 months, P < 0.001). The Charlson Comorbidity Index was higher in the MUA group. Preoperative ROM was significantly worse in the MUA cohort, but did not differ between groups after the procedure (117°, P = 0.27) or at 2 years. Demographics and ROM outcomes were equivalent between early MUA and delayed MUA ( P = 0.75). The incidence of repeat arthrofibrosis (7.1%) and revision arthroplasty (2.4%) was similar between ALA and MUA cohorts while ALA patients had significantly more surgical site infections (3.8%) compared with MUA patients (0.47%, P = 0.017).

DISCUSSION

Equivalent ROM outcomes were seen between ALA, early MUA, and delayed MUA for the treatment of arthrofibrosis after TKA. However, this study demonstrated a markedly higher complication rate, particularly surgical site infection, after ALA, suggesting that MUA may be the preferred option for treating arthrofibrosis at both early and late time points.

The role of knee arthroscopy in managing common soft tissue complications after total knee arthroplasty: a retrospective case series study

Background

To investigate the feasibility, safety and therapeutic efficacy of arthroscopy in managing the 3 most common soft tissue complications, peripatellar impingement (PI), arthrofibrosis (AF) and generalized synovitis (GS), after total knee arthroplasty (TKA).

Methods

A retrospective review of patients undertaking arthroscopy for PI, AF and GS was conducted. Outcome measures included complications, postoperative range of motion (ROM), Knee Society Score (KSS) and rates of symptom recurrence, prosthesis revision. Intraoperative findings and surgical procedures were also recorded. Paired t test, Fisher’s exact test, Kruskal-Wallis test and post hoc analysis with Bonferroni correction were used for statistical evaluation.

Results

A total of 74 patients, including 35 patients with peripatellar impingement, 25 patients with arthrofibrosis and 14 patients with generalized synovitis, with a mean age of 66.1 ± 7.9 years, were analysed. The mean follow-up (FU) duration was 81.3 ± 40.6 months. All patients underwent arthroscopic surgery safely without intraoperative complications. However, there were 4 postoperative complications, including 1 acute myocardial infarction and 3 periprosthetic joint infections. Overall, patients acquired improvements in ROM from 81.7 ± 23.1° to 96.8 ± 20.5° (p < 0.05), in KSS knee score from 64.2 ± 9.6 to 78.7 ± 12.1 (p < 0.05) and in KSS function score from 61.1 ± 7.4 to 77.3 ± 12.2 (p < 0.05) postoperatively. Patients in all 3 groups had improvements in ROM (p < 0.05), KSS knee score (p < 0.05) and KSS function score (p < 0.05). The overall recurrence rate was 22.9% (95% confidence interval (CI) 15.1–34.9%), and the overall revision rate was 14.9% (95% CI 8.6–25.6%). There were significant differences in both the symptom recurrence and prosthesis revision rates among the groups (p < 0.05). The PI group had a significantly lower symptom recurrence rate (11.4%, 95% CI 4.5–28.7%) and revision rate (8.6%, 95% CI 2.9–25.3%) (p < 0.017), while the GS group had a significantly higher recurrence rate (42.9%, 95% CI 23.4–78.5%) and revision rate (35.7%, 95% CI 17.6–72.1%) (p < 0.017).

Conclusions

In the setting of symptomatic TKA, although carrying certain risks for PJI and other complications, arthroscopic intervention could be feasible and provide clinical improvement in most cases at an average of 81.3 months follow-up. Patients with PI had the best outcomes, while patients with GS had the worst outcomes.

Level of evidence

Level IV