TKA is More Durable Than UKA for Morbidly Obese Patients: A Two-Year Minimum Follow-Up Study

Research on the biomechanical characteristics of the tibiofemoral joint before and after kinematic alignment unicompartmental knee arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Kinematic alignment (KA) unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA), which has not been widely adopted in clinical practice, aims to implant a more personalized and physiologically compatible mobile-bearing UKA prosthesis for the treatment of advanced single compartment knee osteoarthritis. KA UKA is anticipated to enhance patient satisfaction and decrease the revision rate following UKA. However, its quantified biomechanical indicators remain unclear. The purpose of this study is to reveal the biomechanical characteristics of the tibiofemoral joint in normal and KA UKA knees, and to evaluate the biomechanical effect.

METHODS

In this study, six cadaveric knee joint specimens were utilized for biomechanical testing before (normal cadaveric knee joint specimen ) and after KA UKA. The knee joint specimens were subjected to an axial load of 1000 N, and the biomechanical parameters were assessed at flexion angles ranging from 0° to 120° in 10° increments.

RESULTS

The root mean square (RMS) values of the tibiofemoral contact area, mean contact pressure, and peak contact pressure during knee flexion were 529 mm², 1.8 MPa, and 4.5 MPa in normal knees, respectively. After KA UKA, these values changed to 449 mm², 2.0 MPa, and 9.8 MPa, respectively. Additionally, the RMS value of the external rotation of the femur relative to the tibia in the tibiofemoral joint was 9.9° in normal knees, while the posterior translations of the center of the femoral condyle, the medial femoral condyle, and the lateral femoral condyle were 18.4 mm, 11.5 mm, and 25.4 mm respectively. After KA UKA, these values changed to 8.6°, 19.3 mm, 12.9 mm, and 25.9 mm respectively.

CONCLUSION

At the same flexion angle, the increase in peak contact pressure in the medial compartment after KA UKA is the most significant compared with the normal knees. However, the kinematic characteristics do not change significantly after KA UKA. These findings are beneficial for understanding the possible postoperative complications and good functional effects of KA UKA.

Can ChatGPT make surgical decisions with confidence similar to experienced knee surgeons?

BACKGROUND

Unicompartmental knee replacements (UKRs) have become an increasingly attractive option for end-stage single-compartment knee osteoarthritis (OA). However, there remains controversy in patient selection. Natural language processing (NLP) is a form of artificial intelligence (AI). We aimed to determine whether general-purpose open-source natural language programs can make decisions regarding a patient's suitability for a total knee replacement (TKR) or a UKR and how confident AI NLP programs are in surgical decision making.

METHODS

We conducted a case-based cohort study using data from a separate study, where participants (73 surgeons and AI NLP programs) were presented with 32 fictitious clinical case scenarios that simulated patients with predominantly medial knee OA who would require surgery. Using the overall UKR/TKR judgments of the 73 experienced knee surgeons as the gold standard reference, we calculated the sensitivity, specificity, and positive predictive value of AI NLP programs to identify whether a patient should undergo UKR.

RESULTS

There was disagreement between the surgeons and ChatGPT in only five scenarios (15.6%). With the 73 surgeons' decision as the gold standard, the sensitivity of ChatGPT in determining whether a patient should undergo UKR was 0.91 (95% confidence interval (CI): 0.71 to 0.98). The positive predictive value for ChatGPT was 0.87 (95% CI: 0.72 to 0.94). ChatGPT was more confident in its UKR decision making (surgeon mean confidence = 1.7, ChatGPT mean confidence = 2.4).

CONCLUSIONS

It has been demonstrated that ChatGPT can make surgical decisions, and exceeded the confidence of experienced knee surgeons with substantial inter-rater agreement when deciding whether a patient was most appropriate for a UKR.

Predicting postoperative coronal alignment after fixed-bearing unicompartmental knee arthroplasty using a new morphological assessment method: the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle

PURPOSE

Only a few reports have been published so far on factors that predict postoperative coronal alignment after unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). The purpose of this study is to clarify the relationship between the arithmetic hip-knee-ankle angle (aHKA) and postoperative coronal alignment after medial fixed-bearing UKA.

METHODS

One hundred and one consecutive patients (125 knees) who underwent medial fixed-bearing UKA were assessed. Pre- and postoperative coronal HKA angles, lateral distal femoral angle (LDFA), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and the thickness of the tibial and femoral bone cut were measured. aHKA was calculated as 180° - LDFA + MPTA. Correlations between postoperative HKA angle and aHKA, LDFA, and MPTA were investigated by single regression analysis. After the patients were divided into three groups according to the postoperative HKA angle, i.e., HKA angle > 180°, 175° < HKA angle ≤ 180°, and HKA angle ≤ 175°, aHKA, LDFA, MPTA, preoperative HKA angle, and the thickness of the distal femoral as well as tibial bone cut were compared among the three groups.

RESULTS

aHKA and MPTA were positively correlated with postoperative HKA angle, while no correlation was found between postoperative HKA angle and LDFA. Among the three groups classified by postoperative HKA angle, significant differences were found in aHKA, MPTA, and preoperative HKA angle, while no significant difference was found in LDFA and the amount of distal femoral and tibial osteotomies.

CONCLUSIONS

aHKA was correlated with postoperative HKA angle after medial fixed-bearing UKA, which was probably due to the influence of MPTA.

Combination of a High Residual Varus and Joint-Line Lowering Strongly Increases the Risk of Early Implant Failure in Medial Unicompartmental Knee Arthroplasty

BACKGROUND

Outliers in implant positioning, malalignment, and joint line height change are risk factors for unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA) failure. However, their relationships and patterns in large datasets remain unexplored. This study assessed medial UKA survival in a large cohort and explored associated risk factors.

METHODS

This was a retrospective cohort study on medial UKA patients (2011 to 2019). Radiological outcomes included tibial implant positioning in the coronal plane, posterior tibial slope, residual knee deformity, and joint line restitution. Survival rate at last follow-up was recorded. Multinomial logistic regression analyzed risk factors, incorporating demographic and univariate analysis data.

RESULTS

Three hundred and sixty-six knees met inclusion criteria, with 10 lost to follow-up (2.7%). Mean follow-up was 61.3 months [24.1 to 135.1]. 5- and 10-year implant survival rates were 92% ± 1.6 and 88.4% ± 3.8, respectively. Multivariate analysis identified post-operative hip-knee-ankle angle (HKA) ≤ 175° (OR = 5.30 [1.64 to 17.13], P = .005) and joint line lowering ≥2 mm (OR = 8.86 [2.06 to 38.06]) as significant risk factors for tibial implant failure. Their combination carried a significantly high risk of failure (OR = 10.3 [3.1 to 34.3]). Post-operative HKA < 175° was common in knees with pre-operative HKA < 172°.

CONCLUSION

This study reports encouraging 5- and 10-year survival outcomes for medial UKA. Tibial loosening was the main reason for revision. Patients with joint line lowering ≥ 2 mm and post-operative HKA ≤ 175° were at high risk of tibial implant failure. Surgeons should carefully restore the joint line in cases of pre-operative HKA < 172°.